Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 10:07 PM - Flightcom 403 Aux inputs (Pete Howell)
2. 11:18 PM - Re: Re: AeroElectric-List Digest: 13 Msgs - 04/27/06 (Nancy Ghertner)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Flightcom 403 Aux inputs |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Pete Howell" <pete.howell@gecko-group.com>
I am wiring the aux inputs to my FC 403 intercom (stereo) I have garmin 396
(st), Trafficscope VRX (st), ipod(st), GRT EIS 4000(Mono). I have them each
isolated with a 150 Ohm R and a 10 uF cap. 396 and ipod will not be used at
the same time. It all works pretty well except when the Trafficscope is
hooked up, I get a low level tone - not really the classic ground loop hum.
The voices are clear when the traffic alerts kick in, but the low level tone
is always there. My next step is the iso amp, but I thought I would try to
make this passive network work first.
One other question - could an unused mic input be used for the mono EIS
warning tone.
Thanks,
Pete
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: AeroElectric-List Digest: 13 Msgs - 04/27/06 |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Nancy Ghertner <nghertner@verizon.net>
On 4/28/06 7:25 AM, "Terry Lamp" <tlamp@genesishcs.org> wrote:
> --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Terry Lamp <tlamp@genesishcs.org>
>
>
>
> Joe here is a picture of my install.
>
> http://home.columbus.rr.com/tlamp/mvc-398f.jpg
>
> and my entire construction page of the Long EZ at:
>
> http://home.columbus.rr.com/tlamp/planpics.htm
>
> I'm sure you have seen this type before, it has the typical microswitch
> located behind the latch.
>
> I think it would be better if I also had a magnetic switch inline to also
> verify that the canopy is shut, as the latch can be locked and the canopy
> not captured. It is pretty obvious if that happens, but it would be a safer
> installation.
>
> Terry Lamp
> Long EZ N977JT
> Ohio
>
> ________________________________ Message 5
> _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 09:24:26 AM PST US
> From: Joe Dubner <jdubner@yahoo.com>
> Subject: AeroElectric-List: Canopy Latched Sensor
>
> --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Joe Dubner <jdubner@yahoo.com>
>
> I'm looking for a better way to implement the canopy unlatched warning
> system on a Long-EZ. The standard method is to use a small microswitch
> that responds to "canopy latched". (This is not the same as "canopy
> closed", which would be easy enough to implement but I want a "latched"
> indication.)
>
> Here's an illustration of the standard system:
> http://users.lewiston.com/hth/jd/CanopyLockMicroswitch.jpg
>
> When the canopy locking handle is pushed forward (left in the image) far
> enough to latch the canopy locking mechanism, the head of the screw on
> the handle (at the right in the image) fits in the hole on the latch and
> actives the microswitch through its (specially bent) lever.
>
> I'm not happy with the microswitch as it doesn't hold up well under use
> and wonder if any Aeroelectric Connection readers can come up with a
> better idea. I've searched for optical interrupters but can't find one
> with a gap large enough for the head of the relatively large #10 screw.
> I'm not familiar with any specific reflective-type optical sensors but
> I'm guessing that would be the way to go.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
> Long-EZ 821RP
> Lewiston, ID
>
>
> *************************************************************************
> *****************Confidentiality Notice:******************************
> *************************************************************************
> The information contained in this e-mail message, including any
> attachments, is intended only for use of the individual or entity
> named above (addressee). This e-mail may contain information
> that is privileged, confidential and/or otherwise exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is
> not the intended recipient, any disclosure, dissemination,
> distribution, copying or other use of the communication or its
> substance is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
> please reply to this e-mail indicating you are not the intended
> recipient and immediately destroy all copies of this e-mail. Receipt
> by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of any
> privileged information.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Marya,
We are going to the opening, flying down , coming home on Thursday.
She is not there everyday, but would of course meet you.
Love, Nancy
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|