Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:37 AM - Re: Comm Antennas ()
     2. 05:24 AM - Re: Flightcom 403 Aux inputs (Pete Howell)
     3. 06:12 AM - Re: Comm Antennas (Speedy11@aol.com)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re:  Comm Antennas | 
      
      --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: <gmcjetpilot@yahoo.com>
      
      Carlos:
         
        To answer you question, yes that would be fine, but.....
         
        Do you plan on using them at the same time. On near same freq 
      you could have an issue. Most dual panel mount radio setups 
      have an interconnect between dual COMs. It protects the 
      radio when the other one is transmitting.  
         
        Do you really need two radios? The handheld can just use 
      the attached portable antenna for say getting ATIS. If you 
      need to use it as the main radio in a pinch, like the ICOM dies,
      I have a suggestion below.
         
         
        Instead of two external antenna put just one bent whip antenna 
      on the belly forward of the main spare off to the pilot side. You 
      will have short coax run. ALSO if you need to, you can reach 
      down disconnect the coax from the antenna mounted in the floor
      under the pilots leg and attach the coax to the handheld in an 
      emergency. The coax is out of the way just forward of the spar, 
      but it is still accessible. You could put a coax break anywhere. 
         
        They make commercial antenna switches to attach a portable 
      to the same antenna.
         
        99% or the RV's put the antenna on the belly fwd of the spar. 
      Also most RV's use just one external COM antenna. Each 
      antenna is about 1/3 to 1/2 mph lost off of top speed. Also with 
      the long coax runs you will add extra weight. The area under 
      the belly is fine. You may worry about the gear leg blocking 
      the signal but this has prove to be a non issue.
         
        The tail cone is fine but ugly in my opinion.
         
        I assume you will have the audio out from the handheld going 
      into one of the ICOM aux inputs.
      
         
        Cheers George 
         
         
         
        --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        From: "Carlos Trigo" <trigo@mail.telepac.pt>
        
      I'm building an RV-9A and planning to install 2 comm antennas, 
      one for the panel radio (ICOM A-200) and the other for an handheld 
      backup radio. If I put both on the tail cone, one on the upper side 
      and the other on the bottom side of the fuselage, thus on the same 
      vertical plan and some 3 ft apart, are there any location associated 
      problems?
        Carlos 
         
      
      		
      ---------------------------------
      Blab-away for as little as 1/min. Make  PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger
      with Voice.
      
      
      
      
      
      
       
       
       
      
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Flightcom 403 Aux inputs | 
      
      --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Pete Howell" <pete.howell@gecko-group.com>
      
      
      After some experientation (and good advice from some EE buddies -
      thanks Vern) here is what worked pretty well.   Each of the inputs
      have a 1000 Ohm resistor and a 10uF cap in series with the input. 
      The exception to this is the EIS tone that just has a 150 Ohm and the
      10uF cap.  I tried without success to get the warning tone piped into
      pin 21 of the FC403 to make it unmuted.  In the end, I was happy with
      this as it allows me to silence the music and warnings with one flip
      of the isolate switch.    The EIS also has a warning light to alert
      me of engine issues.  This setup provides minimal Background noise
      and the radios, trafficscope, and EIS each have sufficient volume.
      
      Pete
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
       
       
       
      
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Comm Antennas | 
      
      --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Speedy11@aol.com
      
      Regarding Carlos' question below, it seems to me that his antennae could be 
      mounted close together IF only one antenna were used at a time.  Correct?
      Stan Sutterfield
      
      I'm building an RV-9A and planning to install 2 comm antennas, one for the 
      panel radio (ICOM A-200) and the other for an handheld backup radio.
      If I put both on the tail cone, one on the upper side and the other on the 
      bottom side of the fuselage, thus on the same vertical plan and some 3 ft 
      apart, are there any location associated problems?
      
      Carlos
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
       
       
       
      
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |