AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Tue 05/02/06


Total Messages Posted: 3



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:37 AM - Re: Comm Antennas ()
     2. 05:24 AM - Re: Flightcom 403 Aux inputs (Pete Howell)
     3. 06:12 AM - Re: Comm Antennas (Speedy11@aol.com)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:37:32 AM PST US
    From: <gmcjetpilot@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Comm Antennas
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: <gmcjetpilot@yahoo.com> Carlos: To answer you question, yes that would be fine, but..... Do you plan on using them at the same time. On near same freq you could have an issue. Most dual panel mount radio setups have an interconnect between dual COMs. It protects the radio when the other one is transmitting. Do you really need two radios? The handheld can just use the attached portable antenna for say getting ATIS. If you need to use it as the main radio in a pinch, like the ICOM dies, I have a suggestion below. Instead of two external antenna put just one bent whip antenna on the belly forward of the main spare off to the pilot side. You will have short coax run. ALSO if you need to, you can reach down disconnect the coax from the antenna mounted in the floor under the pilots leg and attach the coax to the handheld in an emergency. The coax is out of the way just forward of the spar, but it is still accessible. You could put a coax break anywhere. They make commercial antenna switches to attach a portable to the same antenna. 99% or the RV's put the antenna on the belly fwd of the spar. Also most RV's use just one external COM antenna. Each antenna is about 1/3 to 1/2 mph lost off of top speed. Also with the long coax runs you will add extra weight. The area under the belly is fine. You may worry about the gear leg blocking the signal but this has prove to be a non issue. The tail cone is fine but ugly in my opinion. I assume you will have the audio out from the handheld going into one of the ICOM aux inputs. Cheers George -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Carlos Trigo" <trigo@mail.telepac.pt> I'm building an RV-9A and planning to install 2 comm antennas, one for the panel radio (ICOM A-200) and the other for an handheld backup radio. If I put both on the tail cone, one on the upper side and the other on the bottom side of the fuselage, thus on the same vertical plan and some 3 ft apart, are there any location associated problems? Carlos --------------------------------- Blab-away for as little as 1/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:24:52 AM PST US
    From: "Pete Howell" <pete.howell@gecko-group.com>
    Subject: Re: Flightcom 403 Aux inputs
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Pete Howell" <pete.howell@gecko-group.com> After some experientation (and good advice from some EE buddies - thanks Vern) here is what worked pretty well. Each of the inputs have a 1000 Ohm resistor and a 10uF cap in series with the input. The exception to this is the EIS tone that just has a 150 Ohm and the 10uF cap. I tried without success to get the warning tone piped into pin 21 of the FC403 to make it unmuted. In the end, I was happy with this as it allows me to silence the music and warnings with one flip of the isolate switch. The EIS also has a warning light to alert me of engine issues. This setup provides minimal Background noise and the radios, trafficscope, and EIS each have sufficient volume. Pete


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:12:33 AM PST US
    From: Speedy11@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Comm Antennas
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Speedy11@aol.com Regarding Carlos' question below, it seems to me that his antennae could be mounted close together IF only one antenna were used at a time. Correct? Stan Sutterfield I'm building an RV-9A and planning to install 2 comm antennas, one for the panel radio (ICOM A-200) and the other for an handheld backup radio. If I put both on the tail cone, one on the upper side and the other on the bottom side of the fuselage, thus on the same vertical plan and some 3 ft apart, are there any location associated problems? Carlos




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --