AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Sat 12/22/07


Total Messages Posted: 8



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:38 AM - Re: Alternator whine in audio (William Gill)
     2. 07:36 AM - Ultralast AA - Fry's (Dennis Golden)
     3. 07:39 AM - alternator/audio noise (Fergus Kyle)
     4. 09:07 AM - Re: Alternator whine in audio (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     5. 09:07 AM - Re: Ultralast AA - Fry's (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     6. 09:53 AM - Re: alternator/audio noise (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     7. 01:36 PM - Re: Alternator whine in audio (Ken)
     8. 04:05 PM - Re: Firewall Placement Of Electrical Components (DaveG601XL)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:38:53 AM PST US
    From: "William Gill" <wgill10@comcast.net>
    Subject: Alternator whine in audio
    Thanks for the information Bob. With minimal load on the alternator, I see an output of 14.3 volts during cruise flight. As I apply loads one by one (radios, landing lights, strobes, pitot heat, etc.), the noise gets stronger and the bus voltage drops to 14.0 volts. The loads total about 15 amps and I would not expect to see the bus voltage drop -- does this seem normal? I am going to return the 60-amp alternator to PlanePower for inspection. I didn't notice this noise during the first 15 or 20 hours of flight testing, so maybe I did lose an alternator phase as PlanePower identified as a possible culprit. Yes, I can hear the whine in flight. I have to turn the headset volume down to its lowest level and crank the radio volume up max to obtain an acceptable audio output (minimal noise). Merry Christmas, Bill -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robert L. Nuckolls, III Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 9:27 AM Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Alternator whine in audio <nuckolls.bob@cox.net> At 04:20 PM 12/20/2007 +0000, you wrote: >Hello All,<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = >"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> > > I have a PlanePower alternator and have noticed a whine noise in the > David Clark headset audio. It is really noisy if the headset volume is > high; however, if I turn the headset volume down low and turn the comm > radio volume up to compensate, the whine is barely detectable. Can anyone > explain this and/or provide possible solutions? Yes. The alternator is the noisiest device in the airplane and there is no practical way to 'filter' its worst noise component - AC 'ripple' voltage left over after the 3-phase AC output of the stator windings is rectified into DC. The simple-ideas that support this assertion are illustrated in an excerpted figure from the chapter on noise in the 'Connection which you can see here: http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Misc/Figure_16p3.pdf A rectified 3-phase AC voltage has a predictable 10% pk-pk ripple. I.e., your 14V alternator has about 1.4 volts pk-pk AC signal at an audio rate (you can hear it) riding on top of the DC power output. Worse yet, the ENERGY in this 'noise' is HUGE . . . let's say .5v RMS X alternator output of up to say 60A makes this a 30 WATT potential noise source. The notion of adding a practical filter for this condition is polluted by the knowledge that many of the more useful filters for radio noise are fairly easy pills to swallow (.5 lb, 10 square inches footprint and perhaps 30 cubic inches in volume). However, these are designed to work at Megahertz frequencies and energy levels perhaps 1 millionth as strong. A filter capable of cleaning up the output of an alternator is going to be more weight, volume and loss of power than you're going to want to put in your airplane. This is why the graybeards in this technology have provided guidance to designers in the form of Mil-Std-704 and similar tomes that say, "Son, that's one nasty noise generator out there on the engine with no practical way to silence it. Suggest you learn to live with it." Indeed, DC power generation per Mil-Std-704 tells us to expect 3 volts pk-pk on 28v systems as described in http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Curves/MSTD704_28V_Noise.jpg over the range of 1000 to 5000 Hz (you can HEAR it) and tapering in intensity on either side. Cut that value in half for a 14v system. Here's a noise trace taken from my automobile's bus: http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Curves/Safari_Bus_Noise_1.gif >I called PlanePower to inquire about filter and they informed me that >their product has internal noise filtering and that I must have an audio >ground problem. But they didn't tell you everything. The only kind of filter that can be physically installed in their alternator goes to conducted RADIO FREQUENCY noise from 150 KHz to 30 MHz in the form of a reasonably sized capacitor. This filter cannot speak to the AUDIO FREQUENCY noise described in the Mil-Std-704 excerpt cited above. Their hypothesis about audio ground noise is a strong one. The vast majority of audio system noise problems I've encountered in the past had root cause in poor ground architecture. This is why we spend so much time exploring the potential for grounding problems in chapter 16 and crafted the ground architecture drawings in Figure Z-15. > When the alternator is switched off-line, the audio is crystal clear. If > there was an > audio grounding issue I would expect to hear ignition noise too, but > that's not > the case. A faulty supposition. The propagation modes for these two antagonists are entirely different from each other. The presence of one does not automatically include or exclude the presence of both. >Can additional filtering be installed external to the alternator? No. > Suggestions please. Suggest you first make sure that your headset and microphone jacks DO NOT ground locally to the airframe where they are mounted. This common installation error probably accounts for 1/2 of all the light aircraft alternator noise problems. Understand too that you MIGHT have a propagation mode that is difficult to find and/or fix. With the advent of high quality, noise cancelling headsets noises that used to be well below the nuisance threshold for signal to noise are now deemed undesirable. I'm not suggesting that your problem is not fixable . . . just that the cost in $time$ to fix it may not be very rewarding. Is the noise you're hearing on the ground perceptible and objectionable in flight? I've had MANY situations where folks have chased over an airplane looking for root cause and fix for noises that nobody can hear while in flight. If the mic/headset jacks ARE properly grounded back at the intercom, then try running the noise isolation traps described in Chapter 16. The noise MIGHT be coming in through the +14v power leads where its practical to add a filter like: http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles/filter/RS_Noise_Filters.pdf http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles/filter/filter.pdf Unfortunately, all the components featured in these two pieces are no longer offered by Radio Shack since they got out of the automotive audio products business. However, other companies are very much IN that business. If your studies determine that the noise IS coming in through the +14v supply, perhaps a device like . . . http://tinyurl.com/ynn7at would do the job. There's no automatic recipe for success here because the variables that set levels of perception for the noise have a huge range of cause/effect. Noise problems of this nature are always plagued with a certain amount of cut and try. I've copied my friend Steven Klodd at Plane-Power on this note. Steve, should you find it useful, feel free to copy any or all of this stuff and assemble it into a document for sharing with your customers. A poor understanding of these simple- ideas has cause our brothers to spend a lot of $time$ chasing the elusive double-ugly, yellow- beaked noise snipe! Bob . . .


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:36:57 AM PST US
    From: Dennis Golden <dgolden@golden-consulting.com>
    Subject: Ultralast AA - Fry's
    Has anyone tried the Ultralast Alkaline batteries from Fry's? This weekends add lists $13.99 for a pack of 100. Dennis -- Dennis Golden Golden Consulting Services, Inc.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:39:33 AM PST US
    From: "Fergus Kyle" <VE3LVO@rac.ca>
    Subject: alternator/audio noise
    Cheers, In my dotage, I have this insatiable urge to expound my attitude to the subject. I invite the stalwarts to reject it, but it has helped me through several score years of trouble-shooting and might help those less schooled in electronics (a phase I'm approaching at a measureable rate). Earphone communications equipment is usually assailed by audio freqs from the alternator - because it wants to. Thus designers (lusting for success) often attempt to include circuitry in their magic boxes which thwart the influx of these noises. These attempts are undone by adding another 'ground' outside the box. Like the doc asks, "does it hurt when you do that?" and you say "yes", he replies, "Then don't do that" - make every effort to let the 'box' solve the noise and ensure no other connection is made to ground. As Bob (I think) says, much of the trouble comes from inadvertent grounding outside the box. Read this, unless the more educated of us shoots me down. Have at me. Cheers for the season, Ferg


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:07:15 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@cox.net>
    Subject: Alternator whine in audio
    At 04:36 AM 12/22/2007 -0600, you wrote: > >Thanks for the information Bob. > >With minimal load on the alternator, I see an output of 14.3 volts >during cruise flight. As I apply loads one by one (radios, landing >lights, strobes, pitot heat, etc.), the noise gets stronger and the bus >voltage drops to 14.0 volts. The loads total about 15 amps and I would >not expect to see the bus voltage drop -- does this seem normal? I am >going to return the 60-amp alternator to PlanePower for inspection. I >didn't notice this noise during the first 15 or 20 hours of flight >testing, so maybe I did lose an alternator phase as PlanePower >identified as a possible culprit. Internally regulated alternators can only sense alternator output voltage at the alternator's b-lead terminal. One of several advantages of external regulators is their local or remote sense inputs that are closer to the bus. What you may be experiencing is simple voltage drop along your b-lead wiring. Make a temporary connection to the alternator b-lead terminal and check for loss of regulation under load. It may be that what you're observing is predictable drop in ship's wiring and the alternator is holding the b-lead terminal at regulator setpoint. >Yes, I can hear the whine in flight. I have to turn the headset volume >down to its lowest level and crank the radio volume up max to obtain an >acceptable audio output (minimal noise). Okay, if this voltage drop thing and the whine thing are NEW, then you may well have one of the three phases missing in the alternator's output. loss of one winding often manifests itself as poor regulation combined with quantum jump in noise. Take your alternator to an alternator overhaul shop before sending it all the way to Texas. They should be able to run it on a 5+ HP drive stand that will verify/deny the open phase hypothesis. Automotive parts stores have table- top alternator test stands but they may or may not be able to spot the missing phase . . . and probably can't run it under full load either. Bob . . .


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:07:15 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Ultralast AA - Fry's
    At 09:25 AM 12/22/2007 -0600, you wrote: ><dgolden@golden-consulting.com> > >Has anyone tried the Ultralast Alkaline batteries from Fry's? This >weekends add lists $13.99 for a pack of 100. They are probably good value . . . i.e. good ratio of energy contained versus dollars spent. Buy a pack and send me two for "draining". Bob . . . ----------------------------------------) ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) ( appearance of being right . . . ) ( ) ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) ----------------------------------------


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:53:03 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: alternator/audio noise
    At 10:38 AM 12/22/2007 -0500, you wrote: > >Cheers, > In my dotage, I have this insatiable urge to expound my attitude to >the subject. >I invite the stalwarts to reject it, but it has helped me through several >score years of trouble-shooting and might help those less schooled in >electronics (a phase I'm approaching at a measureable rate). > Earphone communications equipment is usually assailed by audio freqs >from the alternator - because it wants to. Thus designers (lusting for >success) often attempt to include circuitry in their magic boxes which >thwart the influx of these noises. These attempts are undone by adding >another 'ground' outside the box. Like the doc asks, "does it hurt when you >do that?" and you say "yes", he replies, "Then don't do that" - make every >effort to let the 'box' solve the noise and ensure no other connection is >made to ground. As Bob (I think) says, much of the trouble comes from >inadvertent grounding outside the box. > Read this, unless the more educated of us shoots me down. Have at >me. An astute observation given credence by your now keen powers of observation and deduction that only come with interest, dedication and the ability to sort the puzzle of simple-ideas for ways they fit together in useful inventions. >Cheers for the season, . . . and to you also my friend. Bob, K0DYH (for over 50 years) ----------------------------------------) ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) ( appearance of being right . . . ) ( ) ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) ----------------------------------------


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:36:13 PM PST US
    From: Ken <klehman@albedo.net>
    Subject: Re: Alternator whine in audio
    Even easier might be to find someone with an oscilloscope. It should be obvious from looking at the AC ripple almost anywhere in the planes electrical distribution. Every third peak will be missing. That economical Owon scope that Bob mentioned a year or so ago runs very well off a little inverter plugged into my cigarette lighter. Ken >snip > Take your alternator to an alternator overhaul shop before > sending it all the way to Texas. They should be able to > run it on a 5+ HP drive stand that will verify/deny the > open phase hypothesis. Automotive parts stores have table- > top alternator test stands but they may or may not be able > to spot the missing phase . . . and probably can't run > it under full load either. > > Bob . . .


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:05:55 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Firewall Placement Of Electrical Components
    From: "DaveG601XL" <david.m.gallagher@ge.com>
    Bob, Thanks for the answer. Sometimes I just need a little positive reinforcement to keep me moving forward. Happy holidays to all, -------- David Gallagher 601 XL, tail and wings completed, fueslage almost done. Working engine and electrical systems. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=153730#153730




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --