AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Thu 01/17/08


Total Messages Posted: 19



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:03 AM - Re: IFR GPS requirements (glen matejcek)
     2. 06:03 AM - Re: Note #24 in appendix Z part number ? (Jeffrey W. Skiba)
     3. 06:26 AM - Blue Mountain EFIS (James H Nelson)
     4. 06:41 AM - Controlling defrost fans (Ralph E. Capen)
     5. 07:20 AM - Re: Controlling defrost fans (Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis))
     6. 07:56 AM - Re: Controlling defrost fans (jtortho@aol.com)
     7. 09:07 AM - Re: OT-- Solar panel overvoltage (vozzen)
     8. 09:25 AM - Re: Blue Mountain EFIS (Chuck Jensen)
     9. 11:05 AM - IFR GPS requirements ()
    10. 01:40 PM - Z-11 Main Battery Bus (AlRice)
    11. 01:40 PM - IFR GPS requirements (James H Nelson)
    12. 02:05 PM - Re: IFR GPS requirements (Bryan)
    13. 03:14 PM - Re: IFR GPS requirements (BobsV35B@aol.com)
    14. 05:08 PM - Re: IFR GPS requirements (Henry Trzeciakowski)
    15. 07:12 PM - Re: Z-11 Main Battery Bus (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    16. 07:44 PM - Re: Z-11 Main Battery Bus (BobsV35B@aol.com)
    17. 07:48 PM - Re: Z-11 Main Battery Bus (Matt Prather)
    18. 08:57 PM - Re: Z-11 Main Battery Bus (AlRice)
    19. 09:19 PM - IFR (GPS) requirements (Emrath)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:03:55 AM PST US
    From: "glen matejcek" <aerobubba@earthlink.net>
    Subject: RE: IFR GPS requirements
    Hi Bill et al- Re: >Hello Bill, Avoid that poor soul -- he has not been around long enough or >cared enough to learn that type certificated aircraft and amateur built >experimental aircraft are treated very differently in the FAA's paperwork >system. While I greatly appreciate and highly regard and respect the source of that comment, I couldn't disagree more. If this inspector has run 50 unnecessary 337's through the system, he has cost a lot of people a lot of money, spread misinformation across the system, and will no doubt cause other improperly educated or motivated inspectors to take the 'conservative' (ignorant) route at our collective expense. In other words, there has been a gross misuse of governmental power. These kinds of topics have gone to DC and back via OSH, and we have the tools to correct the problem you are facing. My personal experience with an amateur built rule hose-up was to be very (politely) clear with the person involved about the nature and basis for our disconnect, and then call OSH with the details. Within 24 hours they had achieved understanding with the head of the directorate involved, and within another 24 the fed involved had been re-educated. That ended the problem for me, and, presumably, everyone who came along after. Also, the feds now have a program to handle customer service issues in house. As I understand it, it's the equivalent of 'let me speak to your supervisor', although I don't recall the precise terminology. Mike, can you fill us in? While I don't advocate getting into hostile conflicts with The Man, I strongly urge you (and anyone else having bogus reg interpretation issues) to fight the good fight with the resources we have developed and paid for through our EAA dues and those gate fees at OSH we are all unhappy about. Heck, Brian got a law in Jacksonville repealed with a little help from his friends. What's one confused inspector? glen matejcek aerobubba@earthlink.net


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:03:56 AM PST US
    From: "Jeffrey W. Skiba" <jskiba@icosa.net>
    Subject: Note #24 in appendix Z part number ?
    Bob, Thanks for the quick reply about the heat sink, so that does mean that I found the correct part for this function at digikey ? Info shows: Technical/Catalog Information GBPC3502A-ND <http://rocky.digikey.com/scripts/ProductInfo.dll?Site=US&V=698&M=GBPC3502A> Standard Package <http://dkc1.digikey.com/US/EN/help/help14.html> 100 Category Discrete Semiconductor Products Family Bridge Rectifiers Vendor Vishay IR <http://www.digikey.com/scripts/Redirect/Redirect.dll?R=9&V=698> Diode/Rectifier Type Single Phase Voltage - Rated 200V Current Rating 35A Package / Case GBPC-A Packaging Bulk Speed Standard Recovery > 200mA Reverse Recovery Time (trr) - Lead Free Status Lead free RoHS Status RoHS compliant Other Names *GBPC3502A GBPC3502A GBPC3502A-ND -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robert L. Nuckolls, III Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 11:39 PM Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Note #24 in appendix Z part number ? <nuckolls.bob@cox.net> At 11:00 PM 1/16/2008 -0600, you wrote: <jskiba@icosa.net> > >Hello List > >I am getting ready to order some parts for my OBAM aircraft electrical >system and would like to verify I have found the correct Diode Bridge per >note #24 in appendix Z. > >I found this at digi key >Is it the correct part? >http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail?name=GBPC3502A- N >D > >My next question is how big of a heat sink do I need for it if the device >getting power from it draws about 6 amps? Mount it to any metal surface and it will be fine. Bob . . .


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:26:35 AM PST US
    Subject: Blue Mountain EFIS
    From: James H Nelson <rv9jim@juno.com>
    Hi Stan, His reference must be of the "civilian" world. I run a small business and with all the customer interface, I can verify the 85 / 15 do'ers and riders. I think he is overly optimistic on the 85 /15, I think it is really 90 / 10. Jim Nelson Retired: US Army (aviation) do not archive


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:41:41 AM PST US
    From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Controlling defrost fans
    I have a pair of 1.5"x1.5" fans (Radio Shack 273-240) mounted forward of the instrument panel on my 6A slider - think about the intersection of the support bulkhead parallel and forward of the instrument panel and the ribs that point aft that support the top of the instrument panel in three places. I am wondering if a straight on-off switch is sufficient or should I put in a rheostat to control the fan speed? KISS would dictate that a simple on-off switch would work - but has anyone out there wished for a half-speed? Here on the DelMarVa peninsula - I'm certain that I'll need it on a regular basis Thanks, Ralph


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:20:36 AM PST US
    From: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com>
    Subject: Controlling defrost fans
    I doubt it...Just give it full blast to de-mist then shut them off...Once your flying I doubt you'll ever turn 'em back on. I wish I had installed a fan now too on my tip up in Western oregon Frank -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ralph E. Capen Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 6:36 AM Subject: AeroElectric-List: Controlling defrost fans --> <recapen@earthlink.net> I have a pair of 1.5"x1.5" fans (Radio Shack 273-240) mounted forward of the instrument panel on my 6A slider - think about the intersection of the support bulkhead parallel and forward of the instrument panel and the ribs that point aft that support the top of the instrument panel in three places. I am wondering if a straight on-off switch is sufficient or should I put in a rheostat to control the fan speed? KISS would dictate that a simple on-off switch would work - but has anyone out there wished for a half-speed? Here on the DelMarVa peninsula - I'm certain that I'll need it on a regular basis Thanks, Ralph


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:56:34 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Controlling defrost fans
    From: jtortho@aol.com
    I just put a 5 ohm resistor across a SPDT switch to give a? high-off-low option. Works great in the garage, but not flying yet. Jim Timoney -----Original Message----- From: Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis) <frank.hinde@hp.com> Sent: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:15 am Subject: RE: AeroElectric-List: Controlling defrost fans <frank.hinde@hp.com> I doubt it...Just give it full blast to de-mist then shut them off...Once your flying I doubt you'll ever turn 'em back on. I wish I had installed a fan now too on my tip up in Western oregon Frank -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ralph E. Capen Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 6:36 AM Subject: AeroElectric-List: Controlling defrost fans --> <recapen@earthlink.net> I have a pair of 1.5"x1.5" fans (Radio Shack 273-240) mounted forward of the instrument panel on my 6A slider - think about the intersection of the support bulkhead parallel and forward of the instrument panel and the ribs that point aft that support the top of the instrument panel in three places. I am wondering if a straight on-off switch is sufficient or should I put in a rheostat to control the fan speed? KISS would dictate that a simple on-off switch would work - but has anyone out there wished for a half-speed? Here on the DelMarVa peninsula - I'm certain that I'll need it on a regular basis Thanks, Ralph ________________________________________________________________________


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:07:28 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: OT-- Solar panel overvoltage
    From: "vozzen" <vozzen@yahoo.com>
    > Suggest you team the solar panels with a regulating charger, the largest battery Yep, those are the charge controllers I'd looked at, and I understand the role of the battery. I had tested a direct-driven 12v. boat bilge pump (1.5A) in a water-garden-fish-pond, but found the 16-18v roasted the pump (it did work for a whole summer). Other thought was for an attic exhaust fan-- but without controller, will have same problem. Will head down to local H.F. Chinese outlet store, get a controller, and go from there. Thanks, Bob, and others, for suggestions. --RJV Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=158804#158804


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:25:23 AM PST US
    Subject: Blue Mountain EFIS
    From: "Chuck Jensen" <cjensen@dts9000.com>
    Jim, The 90:10 ratio of spear carriers to spear throwers is about right. Chuck Jensen Do Not Archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of James H Nelson Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:22 AM Subject: AeroElectric-List: Blue Mountain EFIS Hi Stan, His reference must be of the "civilian" world. I run a small business and with all the customer interface, I can verify the 85 / 15 do'ers and riders. I think he is overly optimistic on the 85 /15, I think it is really 90 / 10. Jim Nelson Retired: US Army (aviation) do not archive


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:05:14 AM PST US
    From: <bakerocb@cox.net>
    Subject: IFR GPS requirements
    1/17/2008 Hello Rick, Thanks for your input and interest in this subject. You wrote: 1) "It depends on what the inspector wrote into you ops limits." The FAA Inspector or DAR is directed by FAA Order 8130.2_ (edition F, with change 3 incorporated is the current version) what to write into the Operating Limitations when issuing the Special Airworthiness Certificate for an amateur built experimental aircraft. His prerogative to ad lib in this specific area (IFR GPS requirements) is extremely limited to non existent. 2) "If he referenced 91.205 as a requirement for IFR flight, then you must get the system tested by an FAA certified shop." and "If not you can proceed as you wish." These two statements are misleading / incorrect. 2A) First off, There is no "if" about it. He most certainly will reference 91.205 as a requirement for IFR flight. He will do this by incorporating this statement into the Operating Limitations: "After completion of phase 1 testing, unless appropriately equipped for night and/or instrument flight in accordance with 91.205, this aircraft is to be operated VFR day only." See paragraph 1 above. 2B) Second, Other than the normal regulatory requirements for periodic inspections of the altitude encoder, the altimeter, and the transponder (these inspection requirements also apply to type certificated aircraft) there is no requirement to "get the system tested by an FAA certified shop." 2C) Third, It is not clear what you mean when you write the word "system". I have prepared a table that serves as a quick reference on this subject: MINIMUM INSTRUMENT AND EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR POWERED AMATEUR BUILT EXPERIMENTAL AIRCRAFT. I will email a copy of this table to any reader requesting it. 'OC' Says: "The best investment we can make is the effort to gather and understand knowledge." ------------------------------------------------------- Time: 06:50:54 AM PST US From: "Richard Girard" <jindoguy@gmail.com> Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: IFR GPS requirements Peter, et al, It depends on what the inspector wrote into you ops limits. If he referenced 91.205 as a requirement for IFR flight, then you must get the system tested by an FAA certified shop. If not you can proceed as you wish. In the Ops Limits I received yesterday, Item 11: "After completion of phase 1 testing, unless appropriately equipped for night and/or instrument flight in accordance with 91.205, this aircraft is to be operated VFR day only." Rick Girard


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:40:06 PM PST US
    Subject: Z-11 Main Battery Bus
    From: "AlRice" <Allen@AllenRice.net>
    Bob: On diagrams Z-11 and Z-13 I notice that you have the Hobbs meter powered off the main battery bus which is on all the time. Shouldn't the Hobbs come off the main power bus instead? -------- Al Rice Skybolt 260 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=158861#158861


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:40:06 PM PST US
    Subject: IFR GPS requirements
    From: James H Nelson <rv9jim@juno.com>
    Hi Bob, Could you send me a copy of the list? I am setting up for lite IFR but having the right stuff is important also. Jim Nelson N15JN RV9-A


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:05:31 PM PST US
    From: "Bryan" <bhcishere@ca.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: IFR GPS requirements
    Bob, I could sure use a copy of your table. Thank You, Bryan > > I have prepared a table that serves as a quick reference on this subject: > > MINIMUM INSTRUMENT AND EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR POWERED AMATEUR BUILT > EXPERIMENTAL AIRCRAFT. > > I will email a copy of this table to any reader requesting it. > > 'OC' Says: "The best investment we can make is the effort to gather and > understand knowledge." >


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:14:36 PM PST US
    From: BobsV35B@aol.com
    Subject: Re: IFR GPS requirements
    Good Afternoon OC, I would appreciate a copy of your listing! _BobsV35B@aol.com_ (mailto:BobsV35B@aol.com) Happy Skies, Old Bob AKA Bob Siegfried Ancient Aviator 628 West 86th Street Downers Grove, IL 60516 630 985-8502 Stearman N3977A Brookeridge Air Park LL22 In a message dated 1/17/2008 1:07:41 P.M. Central Standard Time, bakerocb@cox.net writes: MINIMUM INSTRUMENT AND EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR POWERED AMATEUR BUILT EXPERIMENTAL AIRCRAFT. I will email a copy of this table to any reader requesting it. 'OC' Says: "The best investment we can make is the effort to gather and understand knowledge." **************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:08:03 PM PST US
    From: "Henry Trzeciakowski" <hammer408@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: IFR GPS requirements
    Good evening OC: I also would appreciate a copy. Thanks hammer408@comcast.net Henry ----- Original Message ----- From: BobsV35B@aol.com To: aeroelectric-list@matronics.com Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 3:11 PM Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: IFR GPS requirements Good Afternoon OC, I would appreciate a copy of your listing! BobsV35B@aol.com Happy Skies, Old Bob AKA Bob Siegfried Ancient Aviator 628 West 86th Street Downers Grove, IL 60516 630 985-8502 Stearman N3977A Brookeridge Air Park LL22 In a message dated 1/17/2008 1:07:41 P.M. Central Standard Time, bakerocb@cox.net writes: MINIMUM INSTRUMENT AND EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR POWERED AMATEUR BUILT EXPERIMENTAL AIRCRAFT. I will email a copy of this table to any reader requesting it. 'OC' Says: "The best investment we can make is the effort to gather and understand knowledge." ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year.


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:12:04 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Z-11 Main Battery Bus
    At 01:36 PM 1/17/2008 -0800, you wrote: > >Bob: >On diagrams Z-11 and Z-13 I notice that you have the Hobbs meter powered >off the main battery bus which is on all the time. Shouldn't the Hobbs >come off the main power bus instead? A Hobbs may be POWERED by the battery bus (as it is in virtually ALL Cessna single engine aircraft) it is CONTROLLED by an oil pressure switch so that it records engine run time, not bus hot time. See: http://www.aeroelectric.com/PPS/Engine/Oil_Pressure/Oil_P_Warn.pdf Bob . . . >-------- >Al Rice >Skybolt 260 > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=158861#158861 > > >-- >9:01 AM > > >incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG. Bob . . . ----------------------------------------) ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) ( appearance of being right . . . ) ( ) ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) ----------------------------------------


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:44:09 PM PST US
    From: BobsV35B@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Z-11 Main Battery Bus
    Good Evening Al Rice, For What It Is Worth! It is done that way to make it more difficult for the thieves who would turn the Master Switch off in an effort to cheat the FBO! Happy Skies, Old Bob AKA Bob Siegfried Ancient Aviator 628 West 86th Street Downers Grove, IL 60516 630 985-8502 Stearman N3977A Brookeridge Air Park LL22 In a message dated 1/17/2008 9:14:15 P.M. Central Standard Time, nuckolls.bob@cox.net writes: A Hobbs may be POWERED by the battery bus (as it is in virtually ALL Cessna single engine aircraft) it is CONTROLLED by an oil pressure switch so that it records engine run time, not bus hot time. See: http://www.aeroelectric.com/PPS/Engine/Oil_Pressure/Oil_P_Warn.pdf Bob . . . **************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:48:57 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Z-11 Main Battery Bus
    From: "Matt Prather" <mprather@spro.net>
    Keeps the FBO's renting out airplanes in business... :) Matt- > <nuckolls.bob@cox.net> > > At 01:36 PM 1/17/2008 -0800, you wrote: > >> >>Bob: >>On diagrams Z-11 and Z-13 I notice that you have the Hobbs meter powered >>off the main battery bus which is on all the time. Shouldn't the Hobbs >>come off the main power bus instead? > > A Hobbs may be POWERED by the battery bus (as it is > in virtually ALL Cessna single engine aircraft) it is > CONTROLLED by an oil pressure switch so that it records > engine run time, not bus hot time. > > See: > > http://www.aeroelectric.com/PPS/Engine/Oil_Pressure/Oil_P_Warn.pdf > > > Bob . . . > > >>-------- >>Al Rice >>Skybolt 260 >> >> >> >> >>Read this topic online here: >> >>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=158861#158861 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-- >>9:01 AM >> >> >>incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >>Checked by AVG. > > > Bob . . . > > ----------------------------------------) > ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) > ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) > ( appearance of being right . . . ) > ( ) > ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) > ---------------------------------------- > >


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:57:11 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Z-11 Main Battery Bus
    From: "AlRice" <Allen@AllenRice.net>
    I didn't know that. Thanks for the clarification. -------- Al Rice Skybolt 260 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=158963#158963


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:19:51 PM PST US
    From: "Emrath" <emrath@comcast.net>
    Subject: IFR (GPS) requirements
    Please clarify the statements make by Old Bob and Rumen. What entries are to be made to the logs showing the the required IFR equipment is installed? Or are we just saying the installation has been tested and proven/observed to be satisfactory? Can you give us the wording for the papers, I assume in the aircraft log, not the engine or prop logs. Marty in Brentwood TN Time: 11:04:15 AM PST US From: rd2@evenlink.com Subject: AeroElectric-List: IFR (GPS) requirements Right on! Hello (Old) Bob, Rick, Night or IFR for OBAM or production aircraft is a function of how equipped (per FAA requirements for night or IFR equipment) and whether such equipment has been checked as required (e.g. 24 months for pitot-static, X-ponder, 30 days VOR check, currency of GPS data bases as required by the manufacturer, etc.) rather than pre-approval by the FAA in the ops specs. It can be gained (or lost) by the owner/operator at any time after airworthiness is obtained. No need for FAA involvement. If I filed IFR and an inspector meets me after landing for a ramp check, I'd have to show the required IFR equipment (also as logged entries) and that the required checks have been complied with. Some production aircraft are "certified" for "Night flight" from the factory, which nothing more than meaning the required equipment for night flight was installed, checked, and properly placarded. If e.g. my nav light became inoperative, I am no longer "night" "certified". Rumen do not archive _____________________Original message __________________________ (received from BobsV35B@aol.com; Date: 10:04 AM 1/16/2008 EST) ________________________________________________________________ Good Morning Rick, That is exactly the way it should read! The next step is to equip it in accordance with the specifications of 14 CFR Part 91, section 91.205 for the type of flight you wish to conduct and make an entry into the ship's papers stating that you have done so. No need to change anything on your ops spec and no need to contact any Fed. Just install the equipment and test it in accordance with the manufacturers directions. As long as you have the proper equipment, just hop in the machine and go fly IFR and/or night Happy Skies, Old Bob AKA Bob Siegfried Ancient Aviator 628 West 86th Street Downers Grove, IL 60516 630 985-8502 Stearman N3977A Brookeridge Air Park LL22 In a message dated 1/16/2008 8:53:03 A.M. Central Standard Time, jindoguy@gmail.com writes: In the Ops Limits I received yesterday, Item 11: "After completion of phase 1 testing, unless appropriately equipped for night and/or instrument flight in accordance with 91.205, this aircraft is to be operated VFR day only." Rick Girard Marty




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --