AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Tue 01/29/08


Total Messages Posted: 18



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:29 AM - Re: Note 8 in App_ ZR11 M  (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     2. 04:32 AM - Re: Alternator Problems (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     3. 04:45 AM - Re: Firewall penetration (Ken)
     4. 06:37 AM - Re: Firewall penetration (RV10 4JF)
     5. 07:37 AM - Re: Podunk Int'l (Speedy11@aol.com)
     6. 08:14 AM - Re: Firewall penetration (David E. Nelson)
     7. 08:31 AM - Z Diagram Questions (Jay Brinkmeyer)
     8. 09:30 AM - Re: Firewall penetration (rvtach)
     9. 09:47 AM - B&C alternator 30Amps (kakydanou)
    10. 10:53 AM - Re: B&C alternator 30Amps (Greg Scott)
    11. 12:28 PM - Re: B&C alternator 30Amps (Matt Prather)
    12. 02:58 PM - Re: B&C alternator 30Amp (Sam Hoskins)
    13. 06:50 PM - Re: Re: Podunk Int'l (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    14. 06:54 PM - Internal Batterys for Dynon and VM1000 (DEAN PSIROPOULOS)
    15. 07:03 PM - Re: Z Diagram Questions (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    16. 07:47 PM - Re: Note 8 in App_ ZR11 M (Emrath)
    17. 10:11 PM - Z Diagram Questions (Jay Brinkmeyer)
    18. 11:00 PM - Bridged Amps, miss match impedance (was: Dumb questions) ()
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:29:30 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Note 8 in App_ ZR11 M
    At 08:30 PM 1/28/2008 -0600, you wrote: > >Bob, >Instead of running the test lead from the alternator, can one run the lead >from terminal #4 of the LR3C-14? Sure . . . you're looking for a voltage measurement on that lead. The only advantage of moving out on the lead is to include an ability to sense broken circuits further downstream. Bob . . .


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:32:14 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Alternator Problems
    At 08:18 AM 1/28/2008 -0800, you wrote: > >I have a B&C 60 Amp alternator and a B&C Voltage regulator. Lately on 3 >occasions, while out flying, after about 20 minutes, my alternator stops >putting out( Amps go to zero, and volts start dropping). Upon landing and >charging battery(to Make it home). All works well. Also notice that the >volts, while cruising, while the alternator is on line, vary from 13.5to >14.9 . I have checked all the wiring and it SEEMS fine. Do I have a >voltage regulator problem??? Note 8 in Appendix Z describes a troubleshooting technique that will help you isolate the problem to wiring, alternator or regulator. You want to know exactly where the problem is before you remove anything from the airplane. Bob . . .


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:45:13 AM PST US
    From: Ken <klehman@albedo.net>
    Subject: Re: Firewall penetration
    It is not difficult to make a stainless guillotine valve right on the firewall. A pull cable pulls a plate over the firewall hole to block it and control the heat. In case things distort in a fire, I have it set to pull closed. It is on the cabin side of the FW. Perhaps not as good a solution for those who have to dump excess manifold heat but excellant for water heat and for fire blocking. Ken snip > My personal opinion is that there's much more risk from the heater > penetration, even with stainless parts, than with any penetration > carrying solid wires or steel cables. If you look at the air gap around > the flapper valve on the heater penetration, the total area of the gap > is effectively a gaping hole, compared to a wire penetration filled with > wire & fire suppressing caulk. > > Charlie >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:37:42 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Firewall penetration
    From: "RV10 4JF" <ETskypilot@aol.com>
    I found the article that I mentioned on the EAA builders site. http://members.eaa.org/home/homebuilders/building/firewall/How%20to%20Make%20Firewall%20Grommet%20Shields.html#TopOfPage Check this out and see if it will work for you. JF Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=161057#161057


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:37:01 AM PST US
    From: Speedy11@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Podunk Int'l
    Bob, Cool airport! Is that your mansion at the SE corner with its own golf course? Stan Sutterfield Do not archive Interestingly enough, after his airplane was moved to our Podunk International Airport **************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:14:16 AM PST US
    From: "David E. Nelson" <david.nelson@pobox.com>
    Subject: Re: Firewall penetration
    Hi Jim, Clever idea. I presume it's brass so it's corrosion resistant even though you drilled out the threads. I saw a clever use of EMT tubing set screw connectors (ie steel electrical conduit tubing). You can see a picture here (search for 'set-screw'): http://www.alliedtube.com/electrical-raceways/conduit/emt-connectors-couplings.asp The builder had notched out the set screw. Personally, I think I'd leave the set screw hole (and toss the set screw) and make sure the inside of coupling was free of any burrs, etc. The set screw hole is slightly raised thus providing a little bit of a "barb" to keep any clamps and fire sleeve from backing out. The connectors are available in a variety of nominal sizes from 1/2", 3/4", 1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", all the way up to 4". Any hardware store (at least in the US) would have the smaller sizes. I would also think about using some .032 sheet behind the locking nut rather than have the nut gouge the firewall. Regards, /\/elson Austin, TX RV-7A - Canopy frame ~~ Lately my memory seems to be like a steel trap .... without any spring. ~~ On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, rvtach wrote: > > Hi- > > Working on making firewall penetrations and making them fireproof. I'm using steel eyeballs for engine control cables and a stainless heater valve. I'm expecting to have a single penetration for electrical wiring and for engine sensors etc near the battery box. > > I like Bob's modified grab handle method for a fireproof penetration but it's larger and bulkier than I need. And it's probably not a good use of my $time$ to try to come up with a less expensive alternative to the SafeAir 1 stainless fire wall pass through system; it's only $50. But it's $50! I came across a plumbing fitting in the "swamp cooler" section of my local plumbing supply today and it just might be a $3.50 alternative. I have posted some photos at http://picasaweb.google.com/rvtach/FirewallPassthrough that show the hardware. > > It comes threaded internally for 1/2" NPT. I removed the threads by running a 7/8" drill through it. The whole thing fits snugly through a 1" hole and is secured by a threaded nut which would need to be secured with some thread locker. I would use firesleeve and hose clamps like Bob's grab handle or the SafeAir 1 product. There's just over 1/2" to clamp the sleeve to which is a little short but should be adequate. > > So, can any of you guys think of any problems with this method? Maybe I shouldn't use brass hardware against the s/s firewall? Brass melts to easily? Anything? Appreciate any help at all here. > > -------- > Jim McChesney > Tucson, AZ > RV-7A Finishing Kit > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=160931#160931 > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:31:06 AM PST US
    From: Jay Brinkmeyer <jaybrinkmeyer@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Z Diagram Questions
    Hello, I'm an RV10 builder with a bunch of questions regarding the Z diagrams. Sidebar: I really appreciate the obvious amount of work required to put these together. I'd hate to think how much time and $$ would be wasted rolling my own electrical system without leveraging this resource. Cheers, Jay * I have in mind using two 17AH batteries to be mounted in the battery mount back behind the baggage compartment. What's connected from here is up for grabs. * The current plan is to use one electronic ignition and one traditional mag with glass panel (and a few steam gauge backups). Others have done this successfully, so this shouldn't be breaking too much new ground. I believe my choices are pointing to using either Z-14 (Dual Battery/Alternator/Split Bus) or Z-19RB (Dual Battery/Single Alt/Rear Batt). * Z-14 is obviously way more expensive, has more moving parts and appears to be overkill. However, the Z-19RB (5/4/07) has shows 5 engine/dc power switches as compared to 3 required for Z-14. In addition, Z-19RB appears to use an obsolete/unavailable part (ack!) AEC9005-101 low voltage module. I found another Z-19 cousin while pawing around called FOLDOUT4.DWG. This one uses the LR-3 and appears to be a bit more simple compared to the Z-19RB. Is Z-19RB "dated"? Q1: Z-14 diagram (rev 5/9/06) strangeness... Both AUX & Main contactors are shown with 4AWG in and out of the primary terminals. Strangely, the Crossfeed contactor has 2AWG out (to Main Batt Contactor) which then uses 4AWG going forward to the Starter contactor. 2AWG is shown from Starter contactor to Starter. >>> It seems like 2AWG should be used consistently (without mixing 4AWG in series) to carry high current loads forward? The REAR Battery contactors are close to batteries, but the Crossfeed contactor is ~15 feet away on the engine side of the firewall close to the Starter contactor. Was Z-14 orginally created assuming forward battery placement? Q2: General ALT fuse question: What's the rationale behind how to size ANL fuses (maybe max amps - 10 or something)? The fuse protects the wire, right? So are we assuming the purpose of ANL is to protect against possible runaway ALT operation? Under what conditions might this scenario occur? Are ANL slow blow fuses? If so, why would one use those in general? Note 10 didn't go into enough detail for inquiring minds. Q3: Some Z diagrams show the LR-3 ALT Controller "Volts Warn" light with a push-to-test switch. I would think the lamp would light whenever batt power is applied to the LR-3, but the ALT is not yet running. Is PTT really necessary (it's yet another switch)? Q4: A number of Z diagrams show an inline current sensing resistor (w/ voltage output). Are builders exposing voltmeters on their panel, plumbing volts to EFIS display or something else? I haven't seen lots of panels with voltmeters hanging off them except in spam cans... Knowing current state is obviously a great indicator of ALT health. Q5: What's your opinion on solid state (i.e. MOSFET) contactors? Are they ready for prime time? Aircraft Spruce lists one on their website, but no pricing is shown (I smell problems). How long should steam guage contactors last under normal operation? http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/elpages/superSwitch.php Q6: Why do B&C alternators all use external regulators? Are there safety and/or MTBF factors to consider as opposed to internally regulated units? The external LR-3 really add to the total $$. Looking for last minute shopping deals?


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:30:07 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Firewall penetration
    From: "rvtach" <rvtach@msn.com>
    david.nelson(at)pobox.com wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Clever idea. I presume it's brass so it's corrosion resistant even though > you drilled out the threads. > > [/quote] Yup. It is solid brass. Any opinions if brass is adequate fire protection in this application? > Be aware of possible impact on engine sensor data if sensor leads are too > close to high current (fat) wires. > Dale Ensing > Hadn't thought of this. I had planned on running my main bus and e-bus feed lines through this pass through (along with all engine sensors). No really fat wires (like starter or B-lead) but would there be enough current here for me to need to make a separate penetration to keep these wires separate? Really appreciate all the input so far. If I actually do need to make 2 more penetrations then maybe this is worthwhile ($7 vs $100). Thanks, -------- Jim McChesney Tucson, AZ RV-7A Finishing Kit Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=161114#161114


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:47:15 AM PST US
    Subject: B&C alternator 30Amps
    From: "kakydanou" <daniel.gallaz@hotmail.com>
    Hello, I've ordered a B&C alternator 433H 30amps for my engine, a C90-14F. They just keep pushing the shipping date month after month and I'm getting tired of waiting. 1 Does someone already have installed this unit? If yes, is it worth the wait? 2 what other alternative do I have? Needed output is around 30amps max? Thank you for your help, Daniel Zurich, Switzerland Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=161117#161117


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:53:24 AM PST US
    From: "Greg Scott" <gregory.scott1@virgin.net>
    Subject: Re: B&C alternator 30Amps
    Daniel, Try a Nippon Denso 35amp auto alternator. You will need an external regulator and best if you have over voltage protection. B and C do a reg/over volt combination, I think it is an LR3 C but check their site. Greg Scott U.K. PS Have such an alternator on my RV4 for 500 plus hours, good as gold. Bought mine from Van's Aircraft but you could get one from an auto dealer. ----- Original Message ----- From: "kakydanou" <daniel.gallaz@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 5:44 PM Subject: AeroElectric-List: B&C alternator 30Amps > <daniel.gallaz@hotmail.com> > > Hello, > > I've ordered a B&C alternator 433H 30amps for my engine, a C90-14F. They > just keep pushing the shipping date month after month and I'm getting > tired of waiting. > 1 Does someone already have installed this unit? If yes, is it worth the > wait? > 2 what other alternative do I have? Needed output is around 30amps max? > Thank you for your help, > > Daniel > Zurich, Switzerland > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=161117#161117 > > >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:28:43 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: B&C alternator 30Amps
    From: "Matt Prather" <mprather@spro.net>
    433H doesn't look like one of the B&C part numbers. Maybe a reseller's number? I don't see a 30A alternator for a Continental on there. They have a 12A unit listed here: http://www.bandc.biz/cgi-bin/ez-catalog/cat_display.cgi?17X358218 One complication about using an automotive alternator (ND) on a Continental is that many (all?) of their small engines don't have a belt driven alternator; they're mostly gear driven. One could design a belt drive for one of these engines (making it like the accessory case driven big bore Continentals). Or one could add a pulley to the crank end - I've seen that on some engines. Regards, Matt- > <gregory.scott1@virgin.net> > > Daniel, > Try a Nippon Denso 35amp auto alternator. You will need an external > regulator and best if you have over voltage protection. B and C do a > reg/over volt combination, I think it is an LR3 C but check their site. > Greg Scott > U.K. > PS > Have such an alternator on my RV4 for 500 plus hours, good as gold. > Bought > mine from Van's Aircraft but you could get one from an auto dealer. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "kakydanou" <daniel.gallaz@hotmail.com> > To: <aeroelectric-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 5:44 PM > Subject: AeroElectric-List: B&C alternator 30Amps > > >> <daniel.gallaz@hotmail.com> >> >> Hello, >> >> I've ordered a B&C alternator 433H 30amps for my engine, a C90-14F. They >> just keep pushing the shipping date month after month and I'm getting >> tired of waiting. >> 1 Does someone already have installed this unit? If yes, is it worth >> the >> wait? >> 2 what other alternative do I have? Needed output is around 30amps >> max? >> Thank you for your help, >> >> Daniel >> Zurich, Switzerland >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=161117#161117 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:58:34 PM PST US
    From: "Sam Hoskins" <shoskins@MCHSI.COM>
    Subject: Re: B&C alternator 30Amp
    Are you sure you need 30 amps? I would think most day VFR C-90s could get by fine with the B&C 200G. That's what I used for the last 20 years in my Q-200. Sam Murphysboro, IL On Jan 29, 2008 11:44 AM, kakydanou <daniel.gallaz@hotmail.com> wrote: > daniel.gallaz@hotmail.com> > > Hello, > > I've ordered a B&C alternator 433H 30amps for my engine, a C90-14F. They > just keep pushing the shipping date month after month and I'm getting tir ed > of waiting. > 1=B0 Does someone already have installed this unit? If yes, is it worth t he > wait? > 2=B0 what other alternative do I have? Needed output is around 30amps max ? > Thank you for your help, > > Daniel > Zurich, Switzerland > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=161117#161117 > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > >


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:50:28 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Podunk Int'l
    At 10:30 AM 1/29/2008 -0500, you wrote: >Bob, >Cool airport! >Is that your mansion at the SE corner with its own golf course? >Stan Sutterfield >Do not archive No. While we were operating the airport, we lived in a rather old and leaky mobile home that you can't see under the trees. The big hangar just south of the trees is the one where Burt Lancaster set up his changing facilities while filming segments of "Gypsy Moths" on 1K1. The small roof peeking through the trees is the airport office with the white concrete fueling ramp out front to the west. The Mobile home was right behind the office to the east. Now we live in Wichita a couple of miles from Jabara Airport. http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Misc/Rock_Throw_to_Jabara.jpg Bob . . .


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:54:30 PM PST US
    From: "DEAN PSIROPOULOS" <dean.psiropoulos@verizon.net>
    Subject: Internal Batterys for Dynon and VM1000
    Anyone know what battery Dynon uses for (internal)backup power? Make model size etc? If you get one from the factory they cost an arm and a leg ($125.00) and I know they must be available from my local battery mart for a LOT less. Same question on the internal battery for a legacy (monochrome LCD screen) VM-1000 DPU? I haven't opened the DPU but since all the battery in there does is hold up the memory I suspect it's a button cell like those in a PC. Since this model of VM-1000 is now orphaned it would be nice to find alternate source for the internal battery. Thanks. Dean RV-6A N197DM


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:03:20 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Z Diagram Questions
    At 08:24 AM 1/29/2008 -0800, you wrote: >Hello, > >I'm an RV10 builder with a bunch of questions regarding the Z diagrams. >Sidebar: I really appreciate the obvious amount of work required to put >these together. I'd hate to think how much time and $$ would be wasted >rolling my own electrical system without leveraging this resource. > >Cheers, >Jay > >* I have in mind using two 17AH batteries to be mounted in the battery >mount back behind the baggage compartment. What's connected from here is >up for grabs. Why two? >* The current plan is to use one electronic ignition and one traditional >mag with glass panel (and a few steam gauge backups). Others have done >this successfully, so this shouldn't be breaking too much new ground. I >believe my choices are pointing to using either Z-14 (Dual >Battery/Alternator/Split Bus) or Z-19RB (Dual Battery/Single Alt/Rear Batt). > >* Z-14 is obviously way more expensive, has more moving parts and appears >to be overkill. However, the Z-19RB (5/4/07) has shows 5 engine/dc power >switches as compared to 3 required for Z-14. In addition, Z-19RB appears >to use an obsolete/unavailable part (ack!) AEC9005-101 low voltage module. >I found another Z-19 cousin while pawing around called FOLDOUT4.DWG. This >one uses the LR-3 and appears to be a bit more simple compared to the >Z-19RB. Is Z-19RB "dated"? First, consider Z-13/8 with one battery and tell us how it falls short of a perceived requirement. If you're planning any form of non-traditional aircraft ignition, consider a p-mag. >Q1: Z-14 diagram (rev 5/9/06) strangeness... Both AUX & Main contactors >are shown with 4AWG in and out of the primary terminals. Strangely, the >Crossfeed contactor has 2AWG out (to Main Batt Contactor) which then uses >4AWG going forward to the Starter contactor. 2AWG is shown from Starter >contactor to Starter. Z-14 is not appropriate for 99% of the OBAM projects under construction . . . >Q2: General ALT fuse question: What's the rationale behind how to size ANL >fuses (maybe max amps - 10 or something)? The fuse protects the wire, >right? So are we assuming the purpose of ANL is to protect against >possible runaway ALT operation? Under what conditions might this scenario >occur? Are ANL slow blow fuses? If so, why would one use those in general? >Note 10 didn't go into enough detail for inquiring minds. Fuses protect wires only and have no value in mitigating a runaway alternator condition. A runaway alternator is generally incapable of opening the b-lead protection under any conditions. >Q3: Some Z diagrams show the LR-3 ALT Controller "Volts Warn" light with a >push-to-test switch. I would think the lamp would light whenever batt >power is applied to the LR-3, but the ALT is not yet running. Is PTT >really necessary (it's yet another switch)? > >Q4: A number of Z diagrams show an inline current sensing resistor (w/ >voltage output). Are builders exposing voltmeters on their panel, plumbing >volts to EFIS display or something else? I haven't seen lots of panels >with voltmeters hanging off them except in spam cans... Knowing current >state is obviously a great indicator of ALT health. Only if you know how to interpret what it displays. See chapter on instrumentation. >Q5: What's your opinion on solid state (i.e. MOSFET) contactors? Are they >ready for prime time? Aircraft Spruce lists one on their website, but no >pricing is shown (I smell problems). How long should steam guage >contactors last under normal operation? ><http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/elpages/superSwitch.php>http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/elpages/superSwitch.php > Don't know how to answer this. I've ssen them last 20 years with no problems and I have some rental airplanes that got replacements in less than 5 years. The best answer is that return on investment for these devices is good. A failure tolerant architecture makes contactor failure a cost of ownership issue and not a flight safety issue. That's what I would use if I were building. There are no mosfet contactors suited for both loading and charging a battery . . . mosfet devices are decidedly one-way streets. >Q6: Why do B&C alternators all use external regulators? Are there safety >and/or MTBF factors to consider as opposed to internally regulated units? >The external LR-3 really add to the total $$. This is discussed at length in the archives, on the website articles and chapters in the 'Connection. At present, there is no practical way to make an internally regulated alternator function in the same manner as externally regulated machines have and still to perform in aircraft. I'm working on it but my 20-hour a week consulting task has morphed into another career! See: http://aeroelectric.com/articles/Adapting_IR_Alternators_to_Aircraft.pdf Bob . . .


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:47:07 PM PST US
    From: "Emrath" <emrath@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: Note 8 in App_ ZR11 M
    Bob, Thanks for the vote of confidence. I'll just have to remember to check continuity of the field wire from the regulator to the alternator first, but this means one less wire attached to that big shaky thing to break too. Marty . . . Subject: Re: Note 8 in App_ ZR11 M From: Robert L. Nuckolls, III (nuckolls.bob@cox.net) At 08:30 PM 1/28/2008 -0600, you wrote: > >Bob, >Instead of running the test lead from the alternator, can one run the lead >from terminal #4 of the LR3C-14? Sure . . . you're looking for a voltage measurement on that lead. The only advantage of moving out on the lead is to include an ability to sense broken circuits further downstream. Bob . . .


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:11:48 PM PST US
    From: Jay Brinkmeyer <jaybrinkmeyer@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Z Diagram Questions
    * I have in mind using two 17AH batteries to be mounted in the battery mount back behind the baggage compartment. What's connected from here is up for grabs. Why two? >>> Assumming dead alternator... The goal is for battery (or batteries) to provide adequate power to avionics & ignition system to safely complete flight. Hopefully, the total available amp-hour capacity exceeds available fuel supply. The notion is that two batteries provide redundancy if one proves incapable of providing adequate performance. Rotating one out at each annual reduces dud factor. <snip> * Z-14 is obviously way more expensive, has more moving parts and appears to be overkill. However, the Z-19RB (5/4/07) has shows 5 engine/dc power switches as compared to 3 required for Z-14. In addition, Z-19RB appears to use an obsolete/unavailable part (ack!) AEC9005-101 low voltage module. I found another Z-19 cousin while pawing around called FOLDOUT4.DWG. This one uses the LR-3 and appears to be a bit more simple compared to the Z-19RB. Is Z-19RB "dated"? First, consider Z-13/8 with one battery and tell us how it falls short of a perceived requirement. If you're planning any form of non-traditional aircraft ignition, consider a p-mag. >>> Z-13 is an attractive setup. However, my understanding is that p-mag devices aren't available for 6 cylinder (e.g. Lycoming 540) engines. I thought they were only used on 4 cylinder ones. Therefore, I have not considered Z-13 as a viable option. Z19RB still seems to fit. Q1: Z-14 diagram (rev 5/9/06) strangeness... Both AUX & Main contactors are shown with 4AWG in and out of the primary terminals. Strangely, the Crossfeed contactor has 2AWG out (to Main Batt Contactor) which then uses 4AWG going forward to the Starter contactor. 2AWG is shown from Starter contactor to Starter. Z-14 is not appropriate for 99% of the OBAM projects under construction . . . >>> It is overkill. What are the characteristics of the 1% that Z-14 would be good for? Dual electronic ignition w/ EFIS-only avionics seems a likely candidate. Q2: General ALT fuse question: What's the rationale behind how to size ANL fuses (maybe max amps - 10 or something)? <snip> Fuses protect wires only and have no value in mitigating a runaway alternator condition. A runaway alternator is generally incapable of opening the b-lead protection under any conditions. >>> Okay, but what size ANL is appropriate for 60A alternator? Something less than 60A ANL? I can't imagine ever pulling anywhere close to 60A total. Dumb question - Does a 60A alternator put out 60A continuously or does its output vary depending upon other factors? Looking for last minute shopping deals?


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:00:08 PM PST US
    From: <gmcjetpilot@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Bridged Amps, miss match impedance (was: Dumb questions)
    >From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@cox.net> >Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Dumb questions >What Rick is referring to is the differential balanced PAIR >of wires that goes to each speaker. This is a technique > that allows TWO amplifiers to drive both wires of a > speaker out To add to Bob's comments, "bridged amps", each speaker wire, Pos and Neg are powered by amps, so don't ground the speaker's Neg to gnd or airframe gnd. It might be best to use the pre-amp output of the radio to drive your intercom. When you connect a car's "bridge amp" to an intercom, with on single common gnd you have an ISSUE? Most just use the Pos from L & R & don't connect the Neg speaker wires at all. It works, but some amps detect an imbalance & may not work, shutting down, protecting itself. Use a 10uF capacitor in line with the Pos speaker output, tricking it. For the ground connection on the intercom? Leave it disconnected or ground to the airframe (I'm talking about the ground on the intercom's AUX audio input, not the receiver/CD player.) I wouldn't use the hi-pwr speaker outputs at all. Most quality radios today have preamp outputs. Using the speaker output to drive your little mill-watt intercom is over driving to the extreme. I guess you can hook-up some speakers to the high pwr speaker drivers, and "rock-out" at the air show? Impedance The other issue is impedance. The impedance from car receiver speaker output's is typ 8 ohm. Even little portable players have 16-31 ohm head-phone outputs typically. The INPUT to the intercom is typically 600-1000 ohms. This miss-match will reduce the volume or gain. It might work, it might not. The best way to handle this is a matching transformer. A cars pre-amp output is typically of 2v to 5v, so the mismatch may not be a big issue, since it has pwr to overcome the inefficiency. Battery powered iPods on the other hand have low pwr output and are affected by miss-match more, so volume levels can be unacceptably low. You can buy a solution from these guys. ($35?) http://www.cirruslog.com/products/imp_adp/garmin_296.htm (don't use this with a bridged amp, for low power no bridge) You can make your own. Radio Shack to the rescue. http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2103254 You need two for stereo. Model: EI-19 Catalog #: 273-1380 Wire diagram: http://www.cirruslog.com/products/imp_adp/garmin11.gif EI-19 may not be the perfect transformers; if you have a better suggestion or source let us all know. *** Stereo to Mono Quandary: If you want to go from stereo to mono (with a portable low power device) don't tie the L & R together to make mono directly. You may damage your iPod. Regardless, it's just poor form. A resistor/capacitor pair is sometimes used on each L & R channel, isolating them, before connecting them together to make mono. However with the miss-match mentioned above, the efficiency is already pretty low; combined w/ the resistor/capacitor and small amp, of a portable device, you might not have much volume. Some will use a resistor/capacitor in line with each speaker output (L&R) before tying them together. Another way, use the matching/isolation transformer above (EI-19) and wire like this. http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/856/matchingtransformerfz7.jpg (The radio shack audio transformer has a center tap on the 1000 ohm side. Again not for high powered bridge amps, just little low drive MP3, pocket AM/FM radios.) The third way to handle low volume of portable devices is this isolation / pre-amp. Here is a home made design you build from your own parts (not a kit). http://www.minidisc.org/headbanger.html Enjoy George ATP/CFI - RV7 --------------------------------- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --