AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Wed 10/22/08


Total Messages Posted: 6



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:10 PM - metal compatibility (Dennis Jones)
     2. 02:32 PM - Re: metal compatibility (Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis))
     3. 04:21 PM - Re: metal compatibility (jaybannist@cs.com)
     4. 04:52 PM - Re: metal compatibility (Jim Baker)
     5. 07:27 PM - Re: Head Set Jack shoring out (Emrath)
     6. 08:40 PM - Re: Wing-to-Fuselage electrical connections (marcausman)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:10:47 PM PST US
    From: "Dennis Jones" <djones@northboone.net>
    Subject: metal compatibility
    What issues would one face with the compatibility of brass and stainless steel. Brass fittings, bolts and such through the firewall. Thanks Jonsey


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:32:27 PM PST US
    From: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com>
    Subject: metal compatibility
    None, they are both inert enough not to cause problems from corrosion. Frank ________________________________ From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectr ic-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dennis Jones Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 2:07 PM Subject: AeroElectric-List: metal compatibility What issues would one face with the compatibility of brass and stainless st eel. Brass fittings, bolts and such through the firewall. Thanks Jonsey


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:21:58 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: metal compatibility
    From: jaybannist@cs.com
    Inert or not (which has nothing to do with galvanic activity) brass and stainless steel a pretty far apart on the chart of galvanic activity.? In the presence of moisture, they will corrode. Jay in Dallas -----Original Message----- From: Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis) <frank.hinde@hp.com> Sent: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 4:26 pm Subject: RE: AeroElectric-List: metal compatibility None, they are both inert enough not to cause problems from corrosion. ? Frank From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dennis Jones Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 2:07 PM aeroelectric-list@matronics.com Subject: AeroElectric-List: metal compatibility What issues would one face with the compatibility of brass and stainless steel. Brass fittings, bolts and such through the firewall. ? Thanks Jonsey ist">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List ics.com .matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________ Email message sent from CompuServe - visit us today at http://www.cs.com


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:52:45 PM PST US
    From: "Jim Baker" <jlbaker@msbit.net>
    Subject: Re: metal compatibility
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) X-SpamReason %%SpamReason%%: > What issues would one face with the compatibility of brass and stainless steel. Brass fittings, bolts and such through the firewall. http://www.eaa1000.av.org/technicl/corrosion/galvanic.htm The info is there to find..... Jim Baker 580.788.2779 Elmore City, OK


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:27:06 PM PST US
    From: "Emrath" <emrath@comcast.net>
    Subject: RE: Head Set Jack shoring out
    Bob, I spoke to the electric man at our airport about this issue. He claims that the jacks have a 28v tip to accommodate BOSE head sets in the plane. It seems that the shorting occurs when the jack in plugged in which shorts out the audio panel's modulation side of panel. Does this make any sense? Marty Time: 08:19:34 PM PST US From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@cox.net> Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Head Set Jack shoring out At 06:49 PM 10/20/2008 -0500, you wrote: > >Bob, > >I received this message from a FBO where I rent planes. Any idea why >this is even possible? > >"When flying Diamond aircraft at Wings of Eagles, headsets MUST be >plugged in BEFORE turning the radios on. If this procedure is not >followed, it could result in the headset jack shorting out, which >renders the jack inoperative & obviously not being able to communicate >effectively. Your adherence to this practice will result in a more >pleasant flight experience and less aircraft down time due to >maintenance. Thank you in advance for your cooperation" I am unaware of the physics that might justify such a protocol. It is true that for stereo headphones and depending on the design of the jack, right and left channels can be momentarily shorted together but I'm betting these are not stereo headset installations . . . and even so, momentary shorts between channels shouldn't be big deal. I've never encountered a microphone or headset installation where engaging or disengaging the connector while the radios are ON presents any kind of risk to the equipment. It would be interesting to talk to the technicians who are making repairs alleged to have been precipitated by ungraceful mating of headset connectors. Bob. . . M


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:40:03 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Wing-to-Fuselage electrical connections
    From: "marcausman" <marc@verticalpower.com>
    Here's a link with pictures and part numbers for AMP CPC connectors, which work well for power (not coax) wires. http://www.verticalpower.com/forums/showthread.php?t=634 -------- Marc Ausman http://www.verticalpower.com RV-7 IO-390 Flying Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 9953#209953




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --