AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Thu 10/23/08


Total Messages Posted: 6



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:00 AM - Interpreting battery test results (Sam Hoskins)
     2. 06:08 AM - Re: Interpreting battery test results (George, Neal E Capt USAF ACC 605 TES/TBM)
     3. 06:35 AM - Re: Interpreting battery test results (Robert Borger)
     4. 07:21 AM - Re: Interpreting battery test results (ROGER & JEAN CURTIS)
     5. 07:43 AM - Re: Grounding ()
     6. 08:09 PM - Re: Interpreting battery test results (Sam Hoskins)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:00:37 AM PST US
    From: "Sam Hoskins" <sam.hoskins@gmail.com>
    Subject: Interpreting battery test results
    I just got hold of a new Oddessey PC310 battery, to use as an endurance backup. I need to product 12 amps for something like 30-45 minutes. It is rated at 8Ah and here is the product information: http://www.odysseybatteries.com/battery/pc310.htm Wanting to see what it really had in it, I hooked up the West Mountain tester. In the test parameters, I called it and 8Ah battery and tried to have it run at 12 amps. However, the program didn't like that, so I stepped the current draw down to 7 amps. I set the cutoff voltage at 9 volts. I was surprised the test lasted only 24 minutes, but even more surprised that the resultant Tested Capacity was only 2.82 Ah. You can see the test results here: http://www.mistakeproofing.net/transfer/PC310_10-22-08.pdf So, why the difference? Shouldn't the Tested Capacity be near 8Ah? Am I misinterpreting the test results? Is there something wrong with this brand-new battery? Was my test set-up flawed? Sam Hoskins Murphysboro, IL www.samhoskins.blogspot.com


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:08:33 AM PST US
    Subject: Interpreting battery test results
    From: "George, Neal E Capt USAF ACC 605 TES/TBM" <Neal.George@hurlburt.af.mil>
    Well...sorta. You performed a valid test and got roughly the results we'd expect. The battery you tested is likely rated for 8-ah at a current that would discharge it in about 20-hours. Closer to 400mA - not 12 amps. neal ________________________________ From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of Sam Hoskins Sent: Thu 10/23/2008 6:58 AM Subject: AeroElectric-List: Interpreting battery test results I just got hold of a new Oddessey PC310 battery, to use as an endurance backup. I need to product 12 amps for something like 30-45 minutes. It is rated at 8Ah and here is the product information: http://www.odysseybatteries.com/battery/pc310.htm Wanting to see what it really had in it, I hooked up the West Mountain tester. In the test parameters, I called it and 8Ah battery and tried to have it run at 12 amps. However, the program didn't like that, so I stepped the current draw down to 7 amps. I set the cutoff voltage at 9 volts. I was surprised the test lasted only 24 minutes, but even more surprised that the resultant Tested Capacity was only 2.82 Ah. You can see the test results here: http://www.mistakeproofing.net/transfer/PC310_10-22-08.pdf So, why the difference? Shouldn't the Tested Capacity be near 8Ah? Am I misinterpreting the test results? Is there something wrong with this brand-new battery? Was my test set-up flawed? Sam Hoskins Murphysboro, IL www.samhoskins.blogspot.com <http://www.samhoskins.blogspot.com/>


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:35:48 AM PST US
    From: Robert Borger <rlborger@mac.com>
    Subject: Re: Interpreting battery test results
    Sam, Check that Odyssey web site document again. It shows that the battery will provide 25 amps for 9 minutes. That means that it will only provide 12 amps for 18 minutes at best. If you want 12 amps for 30-45 minutes you need a bigger battery. Probably something on the order of a 12 amp-hour battery at a minimum. Bob Borger Europa XS, short wings, intercooled Rotax 914, Airmaster C/S prop. 99.999% complete. Only some extended testing to do. On Thursday, October 23, 2008, at 06:58AM, "Sam Hoskins" <sam.hoskins@gmail.com> wrote: >I just got hold of a new Oddessey PC310 battery, to use as an endurance >backup. I need to product 12 amps for something like 30-45 minutes. It is >rated at 8Ah and here is the product information: >http://www.odysseybatteries.com/battery/pc310.htm > >Wanting to see what it really had in it, I hooked up the West Mountain >tester. In the test parameters, I called it and 8Ah battery and tried to >have it run at 12 amps. However, the program didn't like that, so I stepped >the current draw down to 7 amps. I set the cutoff voltage at 9 volts. > >I was surprised the test lasted only 24 minutes, but even more surprised >that the resultant Tested Capacity was only 2.82 Ah. >You can see the test results here: >http://www.mistakeproofing.net/transfer/PC310_10-22-08.pdf > >So, why the difference? Shouldn't the Tested Capacity be near 8Ah? Am I >misinterpreting the test results? Is there something wrong with this >brand-new battery? Was my test set-up flawed? > >Sam Hoskins >Murphysboro, IL >www.samhoskins.blogspot.com >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:21:06 AM PST US
    From: "ROGER & JEAN CURTIS" <mrspudandcompany@verizon.net>
    Subject: Interpreting battery test results
    Sam, The 8AH capacity of this battery is based on a discharge current rate of 0.4A over a 20 hr period. The chart shows a decrease capacity to 7AH if you increase the output current to 0.7A. As you increase the output current the internal resistance increases resulting in large internal losses at high current. You can normally get a higher output current with less loss from a larger capacity battery, simply due to the increased plate area, translating to lower internal resistance at a given output current. Look at Duration of discharge vs. discharge current at Bob's site: http://www.aeroelectric.com/Reference_Docs/Battery/Panasonic/LC-LA1233P.p df At a 1.65A discharge rate for 20 hrs capacity is 33AH. At 105.5A rate for 0.7hr.the capacity drops to 12.3AH. This is a Panasonic battery of a different size, but the characteristics are similar across the lead acid battery spectrum. Roger -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Sam Hoskins Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 7:58 AM Subject: AeroElectric-List: Interpreting battery test results I just got hold of a new Oddessey PC310 battery, to use as an endurance backup. I need to product 12 amps for something like 30-45 minutes. It is rated at 8Ah and here is the product information: http://www.odysseybatteries.com/battery/pc310.htm Wanting to see what it really had in it, I hooked up the West Mountain tester. In the test parameters, I called it and 8Ah battery and tried to have it run at 12 amps. However, the program didn't like that, so I stepped the current draw down to 7 amps. I set the cutoff voltage at 9 volts. I was surprised the test lasted only 24 minutes, but even more surprised that the resultant Tested Capacity was only 2.82 Ah. You can see the test results here: http://www.mistakeproofing.net/transfer/PC310_10-22-08.pdf So, why the difference? Shouldn't the Tested Capacity be near 8Ah? Am I misinterpreting the test results? Is there something wrong with this brand-new battery? Was my test set-up flawed? Sam Hoskins Murphysboro, IL www.samhoskins.blogspot.com


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:43:42 AM PST US
    Subject: Grounding
    From: <longg@pjm.com>
    Very nice, I'll buy two. -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robert L. Nuckolls, III Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:04 PM Subject: RE: AeroElectric-List: Grounding <nuckolls.bob@cox.net> At 02:05 PM 10/21/2008 -0400, you wrote: > >Myself as well as many other builders in my area have simply used the B >& C grounding block. It's a thing of beauty. 48 inside and 24 on the >firewall. If that doesn't cut it, better to chat with Boeing on that >SFAR88 thingy. > >Kudos to B & C for coming up with a simple but elegant solution to >grounding. That's a product we developed here and sold for a time before turning it over to B&C. We're going to be offering a panel-ground concentrator block in the near future. It will look like this: http://aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Grounding/AVG_RA.jpg We're looking at a more compact version of the forest- of-ground-tabs too, but that one is not a done deal yet.


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:09:17 PM PST US
    From: "Sam Hoskins" <sam.hoskins@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Interpreting battery test results
    Thanks t all who replied. I now get the picture. Fortunately, I am friends with the owner of the battery shop and we'll make an adjustment. Sam On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:48 AM, ROGER & JEAN CURTIS < mrspudandcompany@verizon.net> wrote: > Sam, > > > The 8AH capacity of this battery is based on a discharge current rate of > 0.4A over a 20 hr period. The chart shows a decrease capacity to 7AH if > you increase the output current to 0.7A. > > > As you increase the output current the internal resistance increases > resulting in large internal losses at high current. You can normally get a > higher output current with less loss from a larger capacity battery, simply > due to the increased plate area, translating to lower internal resistance at > a given output current. > > > Look at Duration of discharge vs. discharge current at Bob's site: > > > http://www.aeroelectric.com/Reference_Docs/Battery/Panasonic/LC-LA1233P.pdf > > > At a 1.65A discharge rate for 20 hrs capacity is *33AH*. At 105.5A rate > for 0.7hr.the capacity drops to *12.3AH*. > > > This is a Panasonic battery of a different size, but the characteristics > are similar across the lead acid battery spectrum. > > > Roger > > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto: > owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Sam Hoskins > *Sent:* Thursday, October 23, 2008 7:58 AM > *To:* Aerolectric List > *Subject:* AeroElectric-List: Interpreting battery test results > > > I just got hold of a new Oddessey PC310 battery, to use as an endurance > backup. I need to product 12 amps for something like 30-45 minutes. It is > rated at 8Ah and here is the product information: > http://www.odysseybatteries.com/battery/pc310.htm > > Wanting to see what it really had in it, I hooked up the West Mountain > tester. In the test parameters, I called it and 8Ah battery and tried to > have it run at 12 amps. However, the program didn't like that, so I stepped > the current draw down to 7 amps. I set the cutoff voltage at 9 volts. > > I was surprised the test lasted only 24 minutes, but even more surprised > that the resultant Tested Capacity was only 2.82 Ah. > You can see the test results here: > http://www.mistakeproofing.net/transfer/PC310_10-22-08.pdf > > So, why the difference? Shouldn't the Tested Capacity be near 8Ah? Am I > misinterpreting the test results? Is there something wrong with this > brand-new battery? Was my test set-up flawed? > > Sam Hoskins > Murphysboro, IL > www.samhoskins.blogspot.com > > > * * > > * * > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > *http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List* > > ** > > ** > > ** > > *http://forums.matronics.com* > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > *http://www.matronics.com/contribution* > > ** > > * * > > * > > * > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --