AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Fri 10/24/08


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:37 PM - Continuous Lacing (Dave VanLanen)
     2. 11:08 PM - Re: review electric drawing for Jabiru 3300 powered (Tim Midgley)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:37:34 PM PST US
    From: "Dave VanLanen" <davevanlanen@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Continuous Lacing
    I was planning to use the continuous lacing technique suggested in The AeroElectric Connection, rather than tie wraps, to bundle wires between support points, (for example the wires I am routing through my wings for lighting), for the beneficial reasons that Bob provided. However, I just came across a paragraph in AC 43.13-1B, Section 8 - Wiring Installation Inspection Requirements - paragraph i., which states "Continuous lacing (spaced 6 inches apart) is not used, except in panels and junction boxes where this practice is optional". This seems to conflict with the continuous lacing suggestion. Can anyone clarify for me? Thanks, Dave Van Lanen


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:08:02 PM PST US
    From: "Tim Midgley" <tmidge@ozemail.com.au>
    Subject: Re: review electric drawing for Jabiru 3300 powered
    >Tim. What you've drawn will function as advertised but I'm curious as to why you did not adopt a version of Z-16 . . . HYPERLINK "http://www.aeroelectric.com/PPS/Adobe_Architecture_Pdfs/Z16M.pdf"http:// www .aeroelectric.com/PPS/Adobe_Architecture_Pdfs/Z16M.pdf . . . your proposed system has no control over the alternator, no ov protection. I presume that your EIS has some form of low voltage warning but if not, that should be a component of your design goals as well. The choice of ignition/starter controls doesn't impact functionality. Z-16 with the e-bus removed seems more suited to service in the small airplane. Bob . . . Bob, Thanks for your suggestions, my circuit is still a =93work in progress=94 and I think I will adopt a version of Z-16. Tim. Checked by AVG. 18/10/2008 6:01 PM




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --