AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Thu 03/05/09


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:14 PM - Re: Polyfuses (marcausman)
     2. 12:46 PM - Re: Re: Polyfuses (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:14:23 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Polyfuses
    From: "marcausman" <marc@verticalpower.com>
    Technically there's nothing wrong with polyfuses. But I am not a fan of using them in an aviation application because you cannot control them directly like you can an electronic (solid state) circuit breaker or old-style circuit breaker. At least when a fuse blows the circuit stays off. -------- Marc Ausman http://www.verticalpower.com RV-7 IO-390 Flying Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=233378#233378


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:46:41 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Polyfuses
    At 02:12 PM 3/5/2009, you wrote: > >Technically there's nothing wrong with polyfuses. But I am not a fan >of using them in an aviation application because you cannot control >them directly like you can an electronic (solid state) circuit >breaker or old-style circuit breaker. At least when a fuse blows the >circuit stays off. Sure. We (the TC guys) never had an arugment with the ability of the polyfuse to perform as advertised. Our problem was delivering to traditional design goals of which you mentioned two, control and non-self re-setting. The other problem was that the parts are not bolt-in, wire up and play. You have to install them on some manufactured assembly that incorporates an etched circuit board for mounting the parts. Even if we popped for the custom assembly, the TOTAL cost of acquisition/ownership wasn't that much better than what we were already doing. The breaker as a mil-qualified bolt-in- and-play parts require no special attention to mix and match as needed. A customized assembly has to be designed, qualified and becomes very hard to change once approved for the airframe. Bob . . . ----------------------------------------) ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) ( appearance of being right . . . ) ( ) ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) ----------------------------------------




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --