AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Sun 03/15/09


Total Messages Posted: 14



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:51 AM - Re: For Sell Apple . . . (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     2. 08:08 AM - Re: Little toot on your mag cover. (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     3. 08:10 AM - Revision 12 cover photo contest results (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     4. 09:06 AM - Re: For Sell Apple . . . (Walter Fellows)
     5. 10:31 AM - Re: For Sell Apple . . . (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     6. 10:37 AM - Re: Re: Polyfuses (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     7. 10:43 AM - Re: For Sell Apple . . . (Jeffery J. Morgan)
     8. 11:02 AM - Re: Polyfuses (bcondrey)
     9. 11:19 AM - Proper use of "Delete" function (Dale Alexander)
    10. 12:44 PM - Rotax w/ Perihelion OVM (Chris Stone)
    11. 01:20 PM - Re: Rotax w/ Perihelion OVM (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    12. 01:22 PM -  (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    13. 01:58 PM - Re: Proper use of "Delete" function (Ralph Finch)
    14. 06:55 PM - Re: Proper use of "Delete" function (N395V)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:51:38 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: For Sell Apple . . .
    At 07:27 PM 3/14/2009, you wrote: >I hope we can keep the forum to a forum and not an email sales site. > >On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:38 AM, mvilla121 ><<mailto:mobilevilla@rediff.com>mobilevilla@rediff.com> wrote: ><<mailto:mobilevilla@rediff.com>mobilevilla@rediff.com> Remain calm my friend. Matt's subscription system is highly automated so that labor needed to add or remove a user's email address is minimized. Obviously, this leaves an opening for persons of dishonorable intent to display their character for thousands of people to witness. I've never quite understood that human trait. Nevertheless, we've just witnessed a prime example. Know that these things are spotted and dealt with in a timely manner. To "increase" security for the purpose of controlling future intrusions will only adversely affect us all. Sorta like hiring tens of thousands of folks to frisk babies and little ol' ladies at the airport gates. So understand that the occasional ringer will surface and be dealt with appropriately. It unnecessary and unproductive to get tense or respond to these events in any manner. Sleep well tonight, your list administrators are awake. Bob . . . ----------------------------------------) ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) ( appearance of being right . . . ) ( ) ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) ----------------------------------------


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:08:05 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Little toot on your mag cover.
    At 06:36 PM 3/11/2009, you wrote: >We appreciate your use of my fathers Little Toot on the cover >of your magazine. > >As Bob Borger mentioned to you. We have larger Meg pictures if you >care to have them. > >I would be honored to see N61G on your cover soon. >Let me know what I could do to help. Sure would help the toot LSA Movement. > >Please consider my large library of Photo's of Little Toot. > >Your consideration is appreciated. > >If you would like to contact me. >Here is my Phone Number 817-269-9292 > >Tommy Meyer Tommy, The voting on covers for the next edition of my book clearly showed a preference for Little Toot. The shot that Bob sent me did require some "photo shopping" to get the "long side" vertical for an 8.5 x 11" cover. You mentioned a library of other shots. While I can use what I have, you may well have something that's better suited. Thank you for your interest and support! Bob . . .


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:10:42 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Revision 12 cover photo contest results
    I've closed the voting and tallied the responses: Cover #1 7 Cover #2 9 Cover #3 10 Cover #4 12 There was no overwhelming favorite which is a testament to the diversity of interests in this group. Since my vote added to any one of these would not change the outcome, I'll forego the ballot. Tom Meyer has offered access to a library of views for this aircraft. He may have something that doesn't require "photoshopping" to the extent that I had to work on the photo I have. But even this mildly hacked view (as many of you've noted) is well suited to the task. The paper copy of R12 will go to press soon. Thanks to all who participated! Bob . . . ----------------------------------------) ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) ( appearance of being right . . . ) ( ) ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) ----------------------------------------


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:06:31 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: For Sell Apple . . .
    From: Walter Fellows <walter.fellows@gmail.com>
    Thanks, this is the first time I have seen anything this blatant on this site. As for my vote, the plugs for the sites of active forum members and the occasional odd equipment sale of a builder seem reasonable. On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III < nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote: > At 07:27 PM 3/14/2009, you wrote: > > I hope we can keep the forum to a forum and not an email sales site. > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:38 AM, mvilla121 <mobilevilla@rediff.com > > wrote: > mobilevilla@rediff.com > > > > Remain calm my friend. Matt's subscription system is > highly automated so that labor needed to add > or remove a user's email address is minimized. Obviously, > this leaves an opening for persons of dishonorable intent > to display their character for thousands of people to > witness. I've never quite understood that human trait. > Nevertheless, we've just witnessed a prime example. > > Know that these things are spotted and dealt with in > a timely manner. To "increase" security for the purpose > of controlling future intrusions will only adversely > affect us all. Sorta like hiring tens of thousands of > folks to frisk babies and little ol' ladies at the airport > gates. So understand that the occasional ringer will > surface and be dealt with appropriately. It unnecessary > and unproductive to get tense or respond to these events > in any manner. > > Sleep well tonight, your list administrators are awake. > > > Bob . . . > > ----------------------------------------) > ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) > ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) > ( appearance of being right . . . ) > ( ) > ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) > ---------------------------------------- > > * > > * > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:31:24 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: For Sell Apple . . .
    At 11:04 AM 3/15/2009, you wrote: >Thanks, this is the first time I have seen anything this blatant on >this site. As for my vote, the plugs for the sites of active forum >members and the occasional odd equipment sale of a builder seem reasonable. Yes. Folks offering items of unique interest to the OBAM aviation enthusiast are encouraged to make the fact known here on the List. But massive, blind fishing exercises for other products and services is prohibited. There are mechanisms in place to control these irritating but rare occurrences. Bob . . . ----------------------------------------) ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) ( appearance of being right . . . ) ( ) ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) ----------------------------------------


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:37:44 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Polyfuses
    At 04:03 PM 3/13/2009, you wrote: <snip> > It's even more attractive given that I have some standard > product enclosures . . . > >http://aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Products/A09_Package.jpg > > . . . that reduce the cost of getting these little critters > boxed up and bolted to the airplane. After pondering this project for a few days, I've distilled the magnitude of the effort down considerably. The "magic" parts we're adapting to our design goals are really inexpensive. It just doesn't make sense to wrap a lot of materials and labor costs around their utilization. I've got some ideas for a do-it- yerself packaging scheme. I still need to do some temperature testing in the chamber to make sure we don't have thermal performance issues with either operation of the polyfuse or failure of the packaging technique. Bottom line is that if the present idea works, these will be really easy to use for the purposes identified in earlier postings to this thread. Bob . . . ----------------------------------------) ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) ( appearance of being right . . . ) ( ) ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) ----------------------------------------


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:43:21 AM PST US
    Subject: For Sell Apple . . .
    From: "Jeffery J. Morgan" <jmorgan@compnetconcepts.com>
    Don't assume that the name you see on the list as the sender actually sent that. It is no different than if you wrote someone else's address on the return address of an envelope. Spammers make millions of dollars faking out systems, and that almost always has nothing to do with the name you see as the sender on almost all of the messages. -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robert L. Nuckolls, III Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 12:30 PM Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: For Sell Apple . . . <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> At 11:04 AM 3/15/2009, you wrote: >Thanks, this is the first time I have seen anything this blatant on >this site. As for my vote, the plugs for the sites of active forum >members and the occasional odd equipment sale of a builder seem reasonable. Yes. Folks offering items of unique interest to the OBAM aviation enthusiast are encouraged to make the fact known here on the List. But massive, blind fishing exercises for other products and services is prohibited. There are mechanisms in place to control these irritating but rare occurrences. Bob . . . ----------------------------------------) ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) ( appearance of being right . . . ) ( ) ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) ----------------------------------------


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:02:04 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Polyfuses
    From: "bcondrey" <bob.condrey@baesystems.com>
    I reported this "feature" on this forum although there might also have been others. I got the information directly from Klaus at LSE via a telephone call. Another individual that I personally know called Klaus to advise him of this thread and behavior was confirmed to him. I think the polyfuse approach is a great solution and look forward to Bob N's testing. Assuming that all turns out well I'll be ordering also. Bob RV-10 N442PM (flying) >Is the crowbar feature for real? Somebody else mentioned that > they thought this was a mis-understanding of some variety. > You LSE customers should be curious/concerned about this . . . > which one is going to call/write LSE and find out? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=234708#234708


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:19:03 AM PST US
    From: "Dale Alexander" <dalexan48@dslextreme.com>
    Subject: Proper use of "Delete" function
    Well, because you folks don't bother to delete the bulk of the message, in this case his models offered for sale, he got to advertise 3X. Proper E-mail etiquette would provide to only reply with the relevant material and delete what is not necessary. Dale Alexander > ________________________________ Message 1 > _____________________________________ > > > Time: 10:40:56 AM PST US > Subject: AeroElectric-List: For Sell Apple iPhone 3G 16Gb $190usd,HTC > Touch HD > $250usd. > From: "mvilla121" <mobilevilla@rediff.com> > > > We Are Arrow Electronics,we sell brand new mobile phone, unlocked, > laptops,Plasma > T.V, with full accessories,and 1year international warranty from the > Manufacturer. > > *SPECIFICATIONS: > (europeans/usa-specifications) general network gsm 900/gsm 1800/gsm 1900 > platform > - tri band (gsm900 + 1800 + 1900 MHz: countries where manufactured: > Finland. >


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:44:56 PM PST US
    From: Chris Stone <rv8iator@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Rotax w/ Perihelion OVM
    --- MIME Errors - No Plain-Text Section Found --- A message with no text/plain MIME section was received. The entire body of the message was removed. Please resend the email using Plain Text formatting. HOTMAIL is notorious for only including an HTML section in their client's default configuration. If you're using HOTMAIL, please see your email application's settings and switch to a default mail option that uses "Plain Text". --- MIME Errors No Plain-Text Section Found ---


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:20:48 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Rotax w/ Perihelion OVM
    >I purchased this to provide over voltage protection for the >electrics powered by the built-in alternator on the Rotax. I am not >entirely clear on the operation of the Rotax alternator nor is the >Rotax manual. It contains only a schematic, no theory of >operation. It has what appear to be two B leads. Per Bob's >schematic breaking one B lead shuts down the alternator. Per Rotax >the output is 20A@5,000 RPM. Thus a 20A relay would be suitable if >each B lead produces 10A max. Since Rotax calls the voltage >regulator a rectifier/regulator I am assuming each B lead is single >phase AC but I am not clear as to how breaking one B lead would shut >down the alternator. You have two wires coming out of a wall socket to power some device, but the ON-OFF switch needs to open or close only one leg of the wall-power to control the device. Those are not "B" (battery) leads coming off the engine. They are as you've guessed, two leads with single phase, AC power on them. The B-leads are the "R" and "B+" wires that come off the rectifier/regulator. Breaking one of the green ac power input leads is the same as the single switch on your desk lamp. The PM alternator continues to develop voltage but it has no place to go. >A couple of questions: Why both a fusable link and 5A CB in series >on the master sw/OV disconnect relay? This is to accommodate some legacy design rules adopted from certified aircraft . . . since the power to operate the relay is so small, and since you've elimnated the need for a pilot accessible circuit breaker, I'll suggest you eliminate both the fusible link and the 5A breaker. Power your alternator control circuit directly from a 3A fuse on your main bus. > How does breaking one line from the 'dynamo' shut it down, or > does it? Per this schematic power is required from the battery to > close the OV disconnect relay and bring the 'dynamo' on-line. Thus > with a dead battery there is no way to bring the 'dynamo' on-line? Right. But given what we know about the internals of the rectifier regulator, it doesn't matter. It's not self-exciting. I suspect we could do a "band-aid" not unlike that which was developed for the SD-8 and shown in the latest z-figures . . . but the proof-of- concept study has not been accomplished for that product. If you have a dead battery, the prudent action is to recharge it from some ground based source before you start the engine to go flying. Except for elimination of the fusible link and CB, what you've proposed should work as advertised. Bob . . . ----------------------------------------) ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) ( appearance of being right . . . ) ( ) ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) ----------------------------------------


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:22:48 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject:
    Gilles, Some time back some fellows of your acquaintance were exploring the thermal deficiencies in the stock Rotax/Ducati rectifier regulator. Has that work evolved further than what's currently described on your website? Bob . . . ----------------------------------------) ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) ( appearance of being right . . . ) ( ) ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) ----------------------------------------


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:58:50 PM PST US
    From: "Ralph Finch" <rgf@dcn.davis.ca.us>
    Subject: Proper use of "Delete" function
    I would go further...because of all the replies and responses about this spam--which the OP will never see nor care about--the spam has thrust in my face much more than the occasional spam which appears in my mailbox. Why comment about spam at all? Delete the entire message and forget it. Matt is a capable list admin and deals with problems on this list. Proper etiquette with respect to spam is to quietly ignore it, not repost it time after time. -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dale Alexander Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 11:16 AM Subject: AeroElectric-List: Proper use of "Delete" function <dalexan48@dslextreme.com> Well, because you folks don't bother to delete the bulk of the message, in this case his models offered for sale, he got to advertise 3X. Proper E-mail etiquette would provide to only reply with the relevant material and delete what is not necessary. Dale Alexander


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:55:36 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Proper use of "Delete" function
    From: "N395V" <Bearcat@bearcataviation.com>
    It is also proper etiquette to add "do not archive " to useless posts. -------- Milt 2003 F1 Rocket 2006 Radial Rocket Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=234763#234763




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --