AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Fri 09/04/09


Total Messages Posted: 4



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:24 AM - Re: 505-1 PM/OV filter and OV protection kit from B&C (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     2. 06:40 AM - Re: 505-1 PM/OV filter and OV protection kit from B&C (lwinger)
     3. 12:55 PM - Re: Battery charge voltage (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     4. 06:16 PM - Re: Battery charge voltage (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:24:26 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: 505-1 PM/OV filter and OV protection kit from
    B&C At 10:28 PM 9/3/2009, you wrote: > >I have an extra, brand-new 505-1 PM/OV filter and OV protection kit >from B&C. They sell for $65, but the first person with $45 (plus >shipping) can have it. Please contact me off-list at larrywinger@gmail.com. Larry, are you sure you want to do this? The only item in that kit that is not useful to you in the Z-9 configuration is the OVM-14 crowbar module. Since B&C no longer offers that as a separate piece of merchandise, it shouldn't be hard to sell it. But you'll need the capacitor, relay and you can use the indicator lamp if it fits into your panel decor. Bob . . . --------------------------------------- ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) ( appearance of being right . . . ) ( ) ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) ---------------------------------------


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:40:00 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: 505-1 PM/OV filter and OV protection kit from B&C
    From: "lwinger" <larrywinger@gmail.com>
    Thanks, Bob. That fills in a gap in my understanding of the relationship between the present and future products. I guess that means that James is still looking for an OVM-14, I may be able to help. -------- Larry Winger Tustin, CA Plans building 601XL/650 with Corvair Fuselage on gear Canopy nearly complete www.mykitlog.com/lwinger Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=261398#261398


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:55:16 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Battery charge voltage
    My RV7A is not flying yet but after much reading here over the years I decided I was confident to make my own battery solution for my Yamaha personal watercraft. Since I only use the boat for one week of the year, it doesn't make sense for me to keep a "manufacturer's recommended battery" in it all year due to the cost. It seemed to need a new one every couple years even though I kept it on a maintainer during the other 51 weeks. Background: Original OEM battery was 12V Champion 16CL-B flooded lead/acid motorcycle battery This is probably the worst battery you can choose for operational "fragility" . . . Engine is 155HP 2-cycle Yamaha Battery was always left in the boat and on a batt maintainer during off season, What brand/model of maintainer? This year I bought a no-name RGB 17AH battery and it cranked/started the engine just fine. I made a voltage measurement with the engine running a various RPM and found that the charging voltage (with battery connected) ranged from 13.0 to 13.4 volts. Pretty low. I'm pretty sure this engine would have a pm alternator. Does the rectifier/regulator have and adjustment screw on it? Am I correct to conclude that with this arrangement, while good enough to start the engine, it will never get fully charged up? I would expect to see 14+ volts to charge the OEM flooded battery. . . . or ANY lead-acid technology . . . Could this be why that OEM battery never seemed to last more than a couple years even though it was on a charger 95% of the time. Flooded batteries suck for air while on storage. . . . but it could be a combination of flooded technology and/or the operating features of the maintainer. Not all maintainers are cut from the same engineering expertise. If you plug the maintainer in while the vehicle is parked, it SHOULD get fully charged between uses . . . so the low bus voltage shouldn't be a service life factor. What, if any, difference is there between the recommended charge voltage for these two batteries? None . . . This is relevant to my future RV because it too will likely be put away for long periods during the off season. I don't know yet whether I will use a flooded or RGB battery. . . . why recombinant gas of course. No battery box. No spills. Very good self life. Better cranking performance for the weight and volume. Much better low temperature performance. Flooded batteries should be relegated to the museums of electro-whizzies that have suffered the inevitable effects of planned obsolescence characteristic of an evolving technology. But even then, don't get sucked into complacent apathy because it's the newest and best we know how to do. If you're going to depend on this battery for support of a minimum list of equipment during alternator-out conditions, it needs to be treated like a house plant. Keep an eye on it's CAPACITY and replace it when design goals for alternator-out endurance are no longer met. It's exceedingly unlikely that you'll keep the battery on board for more than 3-4 years under the best of circumstances . . . and it will still be cranking the engine just fine when you take it out. Batteries that fail to crank an engine have been useless as sources of back-up power for some period of time. Bob . . . --------------------------------------- ( . . . a long habit of not thinking ) ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial ) ( appearance of being right . . . ) ( ) ( -Thomas Paine 1776- ) ---------------------------------------


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:16:50 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Battery charge voltage
    At 08:06 PM 9/3/2009, you wrote: > >Bevan, > >My own personal findings are that a "maintainer" set to about 13.1 >to 13.2 is about right to handle new and old flooded batteries. If >you push it higher, the older batt's with a little bit of sulphation >and other cranky aging, may gas too much when taking in more than >13.2. A new batt. with no internal deteration handles tad bit more >voltage without gassing. > >In the normal use airplane world, we use our birds too little. This >is hard on lead/acid batts. Usual life is about 2-3 years. I have >have had as much as 7 years life when keeping on a tuned up >maintainer. Even after 7 years I replace the batt. just to keep the >worry factor at bay. Worry factor? Did you have any protocols in place for verifying the battery's capacity? If one is depending on a battery for KNOWN levels of performance in alternator-out situations, then the prudent aviator will usually replace the battery long before it quits cranking the engine. >What I mean by a "tuned up" unit. I have found that more than 50% >of the maintainers are not set correctly during manuf. To many are >set to higher voltage. Most of them have 1 or 2 pots inside the >case that can be tuned to the best float voltage. Many are a pain >to take apart in their potted cases. Keep in mind that there are a lot of folks selling "battery maintenance products." We've evaluated a number of devices here in our shop. While the widely acclaimed devices from Battery Minder, Battery Tender and Schumacher do deliver true "maintainer like" performance, some do not (including a few devices from Harbor Freight). >Be sure to check the float voltage on any maintainer about 24 hrs. >after connection to the batt. with an accurate digital DVM or >similar. Again, my personal high setting is 13.2 v. That's a good target value for any maintainer for lead-acid batteries. This is determined by the chemistry's open circuit voltage at rest. All of our batteries here in the shop read 12.9 to 13.0 volts after being off the charger for a few days. The goal of a maintainer is to simply support those loads INTERNAL to the battery that tend to discharge it over time. Hence the maintenence voltage need not be much if any higher than that. Bob . . .




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --