Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 04:44 AM - Re: Follow Up to Power Opti-Miser (icrashrc)
2. 06:21 AM - Re: Re: Follow Up to Power Opti-Miser (ROGER & JEAN CURTIS)
3. 06:21 AM - Re: Re: Follow Up to Power Opti-Miser (Lynn Riggs)
4. 12:51 PM - will LR3C work with the Z-13/8? (Lincoln Keill)
5. 03:26 PM - Re: Kind of off topic. Speed sensor needed. (David E. Nelson)
6. 07:45 PM - Re: will LR3C work with the Z-13/8? (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Follow Up to Power Opti-Miser |
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect wrote:
> At 07:56 PM 12/17/2009, you wrote:
>
> > Bob, thanks so much for replying to my post about my experience with
> > low power factor appliances. I see that I need to study some more
> > so I can understand this better. I've stubbed my toe on power
> > factor questions before, so I'm not surprised. You've asked good
> > questions that I'll address after I study up!
> >
> >
>
> My pleasure sir. I'd like to know more about
> your homepower experiences. At the least, an
> off-list conversation would be welcome . . .
> but I'm pretty certain that out of 1800
> subscribers, there's a significant interest
> in the practice and technology.
>
> Shucks, some of the folks might have remote
> hangars they'd like to "power up". What ever
> you're comfortable with is fine with me.
>
> Bob . . .
I vote for a public discussion so we all can learn a little.
--------
Scott
www.ill-EagleAviation.com
do not archive
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=278047#278047
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Follow Up to Power Opti-Miser |
>
> My pleasure sir. I'd like to know more about
> your homepower experiences. At the least, an
> off-list conversation would be welcome . . .
> but I'm pretty certain that out of 1800
> subscribers, there's a significant interest
> in the practice and technology.
>
> Shucks, some of the folks might have remote
> hangars they'd like to "power up". What ever
> you're comfortable with is fine with me.
>
> Bob . . .
I vote for a public discussion so we all can learn a little.
--------
Scott
I second that request!
Roger
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Follow Up to Power Opti-Miser |
I will second that vote.
Lynn A. Riggs
BH 656 Kit 22
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of icrashrc
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 6:42 AM
Subject: AeroElectric-List: Re: Follow Up to Power Opti-Miser
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect wrote:
> At 07:56 PM 12/17/2009, you wrote:
>
> > Bob, thanks so much for replying to my post about my experience with
> > low power factor appliances. I see that I need to study some more
> > so I can understand this better. I've stubbed my toe on power
> > factor questions before, so I'm not surprised. You've asked good
> > questions that I'll address after I study up!
> >
> >
>
> My pleasure sir. I'd like to know more about
> your homepower experiences. At the least, an
> off-list conversation would be welcome . . .
> but I'm pretty certain that out of 1800
> subscribers, there's a significant interest
> in the practice and technology.
>
> Shucks, some of the folks might have remote
> hangars they'd like to "power up". What ever
> you're comfortable with is fine with me.
>
> Bob . . .
I vote for a public discussion so we all can learn a little.
--------
Scott
www.ill-EagleAviation.com
do not archive
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=278047#278047
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | will LR3C work with the Z-13/8? |
I'm tallying up another order to B&C as I build the bones of Z-13/8 and cam
e up with this question: -Will the B&C LR3C controller (which functions a
s a all-in-one regulator, over-voltage protection and low-voltage warning)
work with Z-13/8? -I ask because the tech sheet says the LR3C only works
with "Type B" alternator systems, which I think means the regulator sits be
tween the bus and the alternator. -Looking at Z-13/8, it appears as if it
is designed for a "Type A" alternator whereby the alternator output (the B
lead) gets sent directly to the bus. -It may be that I'm mixed up and th
ey are referring to need to have the field line run from the bus, thru the
regulator and then to the alternator. -Anyone successfully using the LR3C
controller with Z-13/8? -Comments, corrections and suggestions encourage
d...
Lincoln KeillRV-7A
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Kind of off topic. Speed sensor needed. |
Hi Sam,
How about a Wii game console remote? These little remotes have a 3-axis
accelerometer, Bluetooth, and an IR camera all for the cost of about $40/ea.
They are durable and available at any Wal-Mart so replacements easy should they
ever get lost, damaged, etc.
There are several examples of interfacing these guys w/ PC's, also. In fact,
some scientific communities are using them instead of high dollar/special
purpose sensors:
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/12/wiimote-science/
Some more example usage and some Wii remote specs:
http://johnnylee.net/projects/wii/
More info on the remote can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wii_Remote
What I was thinking was:
1) With the accelerometer, they can be accurately aimed straight up thus
ensuring that the distance between the two points is accurate regardless of the
height of the aircraft.
2) Provide a good IR source pointing up.
3) Place some reflective tape on the bottom of the aircraft in such a manner
that it won't affect the surface.
4) Do this on both ends of the runway, throw in some WiFi (to allow
communications and to synchronize the time) , some WiFi and Bluetooth enabled
laptops (Bluetooth dongles cost $20/ea), some programming (there are C, C# and
python libraries available for free), and I'd think you'd have a fairly
inexpensive setup assuming that equipment could be donated, borrowed, and/or
purchased as used.
Some testing would have to be done if a target could even be detected at 100'
AGL in strong daylight. Given that, everything else is doable.
One could go so far as to build dedicated enclosures using micro-ATX
motherboards with all the included components for very reasonable prices.
If you know of anybody with a Wii remote and a Linux based PC, have them look
into the "CWiid" package. It comes with a 'wmgui' demo program so that you, or
anybody else, can get a feel for how things work.
Regards,
/\/elson
Austin, TX
~~ Lately my memory seems to be like a steel trap .... without any spring. ~~
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Sam Hoskins wrote:
> Aeroelectric listers,
>
> We're looking for a bright idea. Preferably an inexpensive one.
>
> The Sport Air Racing League, http://www.sportairrace.org/ is trying to develop an accurate and reliable way to time the speed of an aircraft zooming down a runway, at 50 feet or so. They are
> looking for some kind of trigger that will start the clock at one end, and stop
it at the far end.
>
> We don't really want to erect pylons to fly through to break a beam, that would
be unwieldy. Some of the guys have looked at airborne systems, such as GPS
tracking, but it's not accurate
> enough.
>
> The SARL group is having a hard time coming up with something. Anybody have
any thoughts how we might accomplish this?
>
> Thanks for any ideas.
>
> Sam Hoskins
> Race 22!
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: will LR3C work with the Z-13/8? |
At 02:48 PM 12/18/2009, you wrote:
>I'm tallying up another order to B&C as I build the bones of Z-13/8
>and came up with this question: Will the B&C LR3C controller (which
>functions as a all-in-one regulator, over-voltage protection and
>low-voltage warning) work with Z-13/8?
Sure
> I ask because the tech sheet says the LR3C only works with "Type
> B" alternator systems, which I think means the regulator sits
> between the bus and the alternator. Looking at Z-13/8, it appears
> as if it is designed for a "Type A" alternator whereby the
> alternator output (the B lead) gets sent directly to the bus. It
> may be that I'm mixed up and they are referring to need to have the
> field line run from the bus, thru the regulator and then to the
> alternator. Anyone successfully using the LR3C controller with Z-13/8?
LR3 series regulators are designed to work with
any, wound field, externally regulated alternator
wherein one field brush is permanently connected
to ground (type B). See:
http://aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Schematics/External_Regulator.jpg
Any B&C alternator other than permanent magnet
devices are type B. Virtually all alternators
on type certificated aircraft are type B.
Type A connection is found on INTERNALLY regulated
alternators and feature one field brush connected
to the alternator output or B-terminal are
conventionally called type A. See:
http://aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Schematics/Internal_Regulator.jpg
This is the most popular convention for the vast
majority of automotive alternators.
Bob . . .
////
(o o)
===========o00o=(_)=o00o========
< Go ahead, make my day . . . >
< show me where I'm wrong. >
================================
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|