AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Sun 11/07/10


Total Messages Posted: 7



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     0. 12:21 AM - Please Make A Contribution To Support Your Lists (Matt Dralle)
     1. 07:57 AM - Re: Re: Battery contactor versus circuit breaker (Noel Loveys)
     2. 10:41 AM - Re: Covering up the contactors (James Kilford)
     3. 04:57 PM - Re: instrument ground loops? (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     4. 05:02 PM - Re: Covering up the contactors (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     5. 09:09 PM - Re:battery location change (James Robinson)
     6. 10:25 PM - Re: Re:battery location change (Peter Harris)
 
 
 


Message 0


  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:21:03 AM PST US
    From: Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com>
    Subject: Please Make A Contribution To Support Your Lists
    Dear Listers, There is no advertising income to support the Matronics Email Lists and Forums. The operation is supported 100% by your personal Contributions during the November Fund Raiser. Please make your Contribution today to support the continued operation and upgrade of these services. You can pick up a really nice gift for making your Contribution too! You may use a Credit Card or Paypal at the Matronics Contribution Site here: http://www.matronics.com/contribution or, you can send a personal check to the following address: Matronics / Matt Dralle 581 Jeannie Way Livermore, CA 94550 Thank you in advance for your generous support! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List and Forum Administrator


    Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:57:15 AM PST US
    From: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: Re: Battery contactor versus circuit breaker
    To begin with regardless of the protective device protection is downstream from the battery after the protection. So in fact the safest thing to do would be to have the protection actually built into the battery. That not being available the next best thing is to put the protection device next to the battery. Cessna for one actually puts the protection right on the outside of the battery box on the C-180, C-185. The advantage of using a relay is that if you see a hard landing coming your way you can with the flick of a switch (on the panel) you can isolate a remote installed battery. With a circuit breaker in the same location it would require a short to cause the breaker to open... That could be the spark you really wouldn't want. I've always seen the main cable for the starter come directly off the battery to a very close solenoid ( another relay) then from the solenoid to the starter. As Bob mentioned last week this doesn't give you any protection from the solenoid jamming closed which aside leaving the heavy cable to the starter energized but it would also cause the starter to run continuously to destruction with no method of shut down. I have seen bendix units with integral solenoids jam in cars but never the remote solenoid but it's worth considering what bob mentioned and if you have a master relay that can handle the current of the starter it would be a good idea to wire the starter through it as an additional method of stopping the starter if the starter solenoid jams closed. So in short you are reading Bob correctly. BTW you should also have a breaker or at least a switch between the generator and the panel. In the event of an impending accident battery isolation is a great thing to have. Noel -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of mmayfield Sent: November 4, 2010 7:34 AM Subject: AeroElectric-List: Re: Battery contactor versus circuit breaker <mmayfield@ozemail.com.au> Noel, on a couple of photos I've seen of what I believe is a similar setup (and on this same plane type), the batt c/b was located right next to the battery where one might otherwise find a battery contactor on other types, thus it would seem to offer supply wire protection. The schematic is exceedingly simple: Batt, to batt c/b, to master switch, to bus. All in a straight line. I guess I'm enquiring as to the relative wisdom of this type of main supply-wire protection versus using a contactor. Bear in mind that it's a very simple electrical system in either case. If I'm reading what Bob wrote correctly, he is saying that a contactor allows virtual complete isolation of the battery in an emergency and consequent reduction of hazard/risk, and thus might be preferable to a non-accessible battery circuit breaker in even such a simple system with a low power alternator as this. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=318106#318106


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:41:38 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Covering up the contactors
    From: James Kilford <james@etravel.org>
    Thanks for that Bob. Even after a couple of years on the firewall in the hangar, the contactors are already quite dull. They're not corroded, as I put some Vaseline (petroleum grease) on them and the various connections. That Bonanza certainly looks pristine! Is there a trick to keeping everything so sparkling? James On 6 November 2010 05:04, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote: > <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> > > At 08:01 PM 11/5/2010, you wrote: >> >> >> Gents, >> >> I have three contactors mounted on the engine side of the firewall, >> along with a battery. Everything else (regulator, busses, etc.) is >> inside the cabin. Is there any value in covering up my contactors, or >> are they alright as they are? > > Here's the firewall of an A36 Bonanza. > > http://aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Wiring_Technique/A36_Firewall_A.jpg > > http://aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Wiring_Technique/A36_Firewall_B.jpg > > with contactors, fuseblocks, current limiters, etc > hung out in behind Continental and everybody. > I think your electro-whizzies will be fine without > extra-ordinary cover. > > > Bob . . . > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:57:23 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: instrument ground loops?
    At 11:53 PM 11/6/2010, you wrote: > >Bob, > >Sort of related... > >My LR3C voltage regulator has surprisingly large mounting holes. 5/16 IIRC. >Is this because there should be an isolation washer to prevent the bolts and >case from touching the metal mounting surface? I don't have any bolts with >such a large diameter and so short of grip length. I was considering >drilling for #8 screws in between the factory holes until I saw this thread. Good question . . . The footprint for the LR series regulators was cloned from a series of production regulators and I don't even remember now who's devices . . . They were commonly mounted on nut plates but with #8 hardware and flat washers. I don't know why they would choose to do this other than to have a lot of tolerance for hole locations on the mounting plate. You can drill new holes or put washers under the heads of smaller screws. In about 25 years and thousands of sold units, you're the first I can recall that noticed and asked the question. I think it was a Lamar footprint and we simply cloned it with the idea of making it a drop-in replacement. Bob . . . //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o======== < Go ahead, make my day . . . > < show me where I'm wrong. > ================================


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:02:32 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Covering up the contactors
    At 12:37 PM 11/7/2010, you wrote: Thanks for that Bob. Even after a couple of years on the firewall in the hangar, the contactors are already quite dull. They're not corroded, as I put some Vaseline (petroleum grease) on them and the various connections. That Bonanza certainly looks pristine! Is there a trick to keeping everything so sparkling? I took that on the production line . . . so it's a sure bet that the 'shine' goes away after a few years. But shine doesn't help the electrons get from point-A to point-B. The gas tight joint and designing switching devices to meet service life in the proposed application side steps the lack of luster. Bob . . . //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o======== < Go ahead, make my day . . . > < show me where I'm wrong. > ================================


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:09:25 PM PST US
    From: James Robinson <jbr79r@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re:battery location change
    Good Evening Bob I have the 2 alternator , 2 batteries, setup in my Glasair. this has been a problem free system since it's inception. I am needing to change the location of the batteries for weitht and balance and interference problems. Currently the batteries and the all the control solenoids are on the engine side of the firewall with 2 power and 1 gnd thru the firewall connections. Do I need to add 2 more thru the firewall connections to get the power back out to the solenoids from the repositioned batteries or is there a more efficient way to reconfigure the system. I am not at home so I can't consult the original diagram. Thanks as always for your expert help in these matters. Jim James Robinson Glasairlll N79R Spanish Fork UT U77


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:25:10 PM PST US
    From: "Peter Harris" <peterjfharris@netspace.net.au>
    Subject: Re:battery location change
    Hi Bob, Do you have a protection circuit to protect against regulator-rectifier failure for the PM alternator as used on the Jabiru 3300? I have installed the OV crowbar circuit but does this stop voltage excess say 15-20V? I am getting interference affecting the ECU as I have fuel injected the engine. I will test the Vreg output in a couple of days but need to be sure I have this protection if possible anyway. Thanks Peter Quickie Q-200Jabiru




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --