AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Wed 12/01/10


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 10:54 AM - Re: Headphone impedance (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     2. 11:24 AM - Re: Headphone impedance (Ron Quillin)
     3. 07:33 PM - Re: Headphone impedance (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     4. 11:36 PM - Next generation connectors (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     5. 11:47 PM - Re: Headphone impedance (Ron Quillin)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:54:15 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Headphone impedance
    So the question is, how are these speakers that I am about to stick into my helmet going to react when the radio output is fed to them? If their impedance is low I'm guessing that will impact the volume, so I imagine I will have to turn the radio volume up? It a noisy airplane and is already up fairly high. Can I add some resistors to help out? Do I connect both speakers to the tels output (doesn't that cut the already low impedance in half?) They're going to be fine . . . in fact, perhaps TOO fine. 1 mW of audio into an efficient headphone is quite audible. The power delivered to the popular ear-buds is on the order of hundreds of microwatts. Check the chapter on audio systems for the significance of "output impedance" as a listed characteristic of an accessory. You'll have PLENTY of output capability from the speaker connections for this radio. In face, you'll probably want to add some resistance in series with the headset leads such that a comfortable listening level is achieved at 1/3 to 1/2 of volume control travel. Another reader suggested that use of the radio's speaker output would probalby kill the sidetone feature for being able to monitor your transmitted signal. You COULD use an audio isolation amplifier like: http://www.aeroelectric.com/Catalog/AEC/9009/ Using such a device between your radio's headset output and the low impedance headphones keeps the sidetone feature working and takes care of any integration problems that might be encountered by direct connection. Are all electret mics the same? The microphones are all built on the same technology. The ELECTRONICS that converts a delta-charge into some value of delta-voltage is super simple. Bias the microphone element up through a resistor and take the audio off the junction between microphone element and resistor. Aircraft radios are unique amongst voice communications technologies. WAAaayyy back when, the first radio-telephone transmitters were fitted with the most popular microphone technology of the time that was shared with the telephone. Like the electret mic, the carbon mike needs to be powered by it's associated circuitry. The carbon microphone is a relatively low impedance, variable resistance, high output device VERY suited to the telephone which takes operating power from the wires that come into the back of building. The electret is a high impedance, variable voltage, low output device. It also needs to be powered. But to emulate the legacy carbon microphone, it needs some electronics. An exemplar circuit is shown below. Emacs! Bob . . .


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:24:13 AM PST US
    From: Ron Quillin <rjquillin@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Headphone impedance
    Bob, From the original post I interpreted, perhaps incorrectly, that these would be connected to the HP output. >Do I connect both speakers to the tels output and based my reply on that assumption. And as assumptions are fraught with issues, asked: > From your post, it is unclear if you plan on connecting your helmet > speakers to the speaker output, or the headphone output? to clarify the issue. So, lacking knowledge of the Becker output topology, I'll still stand by my comments. Connecting a four, or eight ohm, load to a 600 ohm source could be problematic. Additionally, if the drivers he is proposing to use are four ohm, and connected in parallel, they would present a two ohm load to the output circuit... At 10:45 12/1/2010, you wrote: >From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> > >So the question is, how are these speakers that I am about to stick >into my helmet going to react when the radio output is fed to them? >If their impedance is low I'm guessing that will impact the volume, >so I imagine I will have to turn the radio volume up? It a noisy >airplane and is already up fairly high. Can I add some resistors to >help out? Do I connect both speakers to the tels output (doesn't >that cut the already low impedance in half?) > > They're going to be fine . . . in fact, perhaps TOO fine. > 1 mW of audio into an efficient headphone is quite audible. > The power delivered to the popular ear-buds is on the order > of hundreds of microwatts. > > Check the chapter on audio systems for the significance > of "output impedance" as a listed characteristic of an > accessory. You'll have PLENTY of output capability from > the speaker connections for this radio. In face, you'll > probably want to add some resistance in series with the > headset leads such that a comfortable listening level > is achieved at 1/3 to 1/2 of volume control travel. > > Another reader suggested that use of the radio's speaker > output would probalby kill the sidetone feature for > being able to monitor your transmitted signal.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:33:57 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Headphone impedance
    At 01:20 PM 12/1/2010, you wrote: >Bob, > >So, lacking knowledge of the Becker output topology, I'll still >stand by my comments. >Connecting a four, or eight ohm, load to a 600 ohm source could be >problematic. >Additionally, if the drivers he is proposing to use are four ohm, >and connected in parallel, they would present a two ohm load to the >output circuit... It's certainly problematic. At the same time I don't think it represents a hazard to system components. I think all the specialty chips designed to drive audio loads (line, spkr, phones, etc) are inherently overload protected. It's unfortunate that the folks who write black box specifications don't seem to have a grasp of the notion of "output impedance". What most installation manuals need to say is something like . . . Headphones Output: 1 V rms minimum into 100 ohms. Now, I pulled those numbers out of the air but the intent is to illustrated the radio's ability to drive perhaps as many as 6 pairs of headsets in parallel and still offer an output voltage equal to or greater than ear-spltting levels with poor efficiency headphones. Nobody's output impedance is really 600 ohms. See the first 3 pages of chapter 18. But it's also true that the radio's headset audio output device might go into a self- preserving current limit when presented with the low impedance loads of the proposed helmet speakers. So it takes a bit more current to drive these speakers masquerading as headphones. This COULD come from the radio's own speaker output or by using a device like an isolation amplifier. The headphone/speakers are probably 8 ohm or greater. I've run across small speakers with impedances of 20 to 30 ohms. Wiring them in series would offer at least a 16 ohm load. It's entirely possible that the headset output RATED to deliver energy to a 600 ohm load will work okay with the new configuration. I think the risks to hardware are low. A simple experiment will determine the facts. Peter, have you looked at these speakers with an ohmmeter? Bob . . .


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:36:02 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Next generation connectors
    > >Comments/Questions: What is your opinion of sealed connectors verses >standard Molex? I work in the automotive industry (Honda)and these >connectors seem to be much more durable and less subject to >vibration and corrosion. I am building The RV-8 and Would like your thoughts. The Amp Mate-n-Lock nylon connectors were first integrated onto single-engine Cessna models about 1968. My relatively short tenure in the electronics and aviation arts suggested that airplanes were somehow worthy of technologies having extra-ordinary quality and robustness. I was understandably skeptical of the cheap, white plastic connectors. This was decades before I came to understand failure tolerant design. I was also relatively ignorant of the causes/effects in the history of aviation failures. 40 years later we observe that the Mate-n-Lock connector has probably exceeded anyone's expectations. Of course any connector is located such that there is risk for drip or splash gives us pause to consider special circumstances. But for the most part, the the perceived quality or robustness of any given connector has little influence on risks and only a small influence on cost of ownership. Some of the modern automotive under-the-hood connectors for are pretty impressive. I wouldn't discourage anyone from considering them if they have access to tools and a source of products. Bob . . .


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:47:14 PM PST US
    From: Ron Quillin <rjquillin@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Headphone impedance
    Some worthy observations you've made Bob. I did some digging, and have attached an IM for the unit. Of interest in section "C" and "D" on pdf page 21: C. Speaker connection A 4 to 8 Ohm speaker can be connected to audio output P1- 1AF-asym. CAUTION : The magnetic field of a speaker influences the magnetic compass. When choosing the mounting point, a minimum distance of 1.3 m must be maintained between the speaker and the magnetic compass. D. Headphone connection Up to two headphones with an impedance of 600 Ohm can be connected to the audio output P1 - 2,3 AF-HI/LO. At 19:29 12/1/2010, you wrote: ><nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> > >At 01:20 PM 12/1/2010, you wrote: >>Bob, >> >>So, lacking knowledge of the Becker output topology, I'll still >>stand by my comments. >>Connecting a four, or eight ohm, load to a 600 ohm source could be >>problematic. >>Additionally, if the drivers he is proposing to use are four ohm, >>and connected in parallel, they would present a two ohm load to the >>output circuit... > > It's certainly problematic. At the same time > I don't think it represents a hazard to > system components. I think all the specialty > chips designed to drive audio loads (line, > spkr, phones, etc) are inherently overload > protected. > > It's unfortunate that the folks who write > black box specifications don't seem to have > a grasp of the notion of "output impedance". > > What most installation manuals need to say > is something like . . . > > Headphones Output: 1 V rms minimum into > 100 ohms. Now, I pulled those numbers out > of the air but the intent is to illustrated > the radio's ability to drive perhaps as many > as 6 pairs of headsets in parallel and still > offer an output voltage equal to or greater > than ear-spltting levels with poor efficiency > headphones. Nobody's output impedance is really > 600 ohms. See the first 3 pages of chapter 18. > > But it's also true that the radio's headset > audio output device might go into a self- > preserving current limit when presented with the low > impedance loads of the proposed helmet speakers. > > So it takes a bit more current to drive these > speakers masquerading as headphones. This COULD > come from the radio's own speaker output or > by using a device like an isolation amplifier. > > The headphone/speakers are probably 8 ohm or > greater. I've run across small speakers with > impedances of 20 to 30 ohms. Wiring them in > series would offer at least a 16 ohm load. > It's entirely possible that the headset output > RATED to deliver energy to a 600 ohm load will > work okay with the new configuration. > > I think the risks to hardware are low. A > simple experiment will determine the facts. > > Peter, have you looked at these speakers > with an ohmmeter? > > > Bob . . . > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --