AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Thu 01/13/11


Total Messages Posted: 3



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:52 AM - Re: Request review of Electrical Load Analysis - using Z13/8 ar (plevyakh)
     2. 06:30 AM - Re: Re: Request review of Electrical Load Analysis - using Z13/8 ar (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     3. 06:33 AM - Re: Open squelch (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:52:20 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Request review of Electrical Load Analysis - using
    Z13/8 ar
    From: "plevyakh" <hplevyak@mac.com>
    Jeff, Thanks I'll add those items. I'm going to go without the cooling fan initially and see how the avionics fare. I might have to add later. For those planning IFR w/ similar equipment....it looks like the LC-60 amp alternator is a must due to the high current consumption of the pitot heat, navigation, strobe, and landing lights. For anyone who has not yet purchased equipment you'll want to buy LED style, and maybe the Gretz Aero pitot heat system to keep the amps down. I'm going to switch to the B&C LC-60 amp alternator and plan for a max continuous electrical load of 80-85% or 48 to 51 amps. Howard -------- Howard Plevyak GlaStar North Bend, Ohio hplevyak@mac.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=326839#326839


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:30:42 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Request review of Electrical Load Analysis
    - using Z13/8 ar At 06:48 AM 1/13/2011, you wrote: > >Jeff, >Thanks I'll add those items. I'm going to go without the cooling >fan initially and see how the avionics fare. I might have to add later. > >For those planning IFR w/ similar equipment....it looks like the >LC-60 amp alternator is a must due to the high current consumption >of the pitot heat, navigation, strobe, and landing lights. > >For anyone who has not yet purchased equipment you'll want to buy >LED style, and maybe the Gretz Aero pitot heat system to keep the amps down. > >I'm going to switch to the B&C LC-60 amp alternator and plan for a >max continuous electrical load of 80-85% or 48 to 51 amps. Really that high? Do you run all those things all the time for any flight condition? Here's an exemplar load-analysis form I've used for many years. http://www.aeroelectric.com/PPS/Load_Analysis/Blank_Form.pdf It set's up a series of flight conditions that comport with suggestions offered by FAR23.1351(a)(1)(i) that says:i) "For normal, utility, and acrobatic category airplanes, by an electrical load analysis or by electrical measurements that account for the electrical loads applied to the electrical system in probable combinations and for probable durations" The operative words are "combinations" and "duration". Not all things are turned on at any time. The last detail load analysis I did on a small airplane some years ago showed a max CONTINUOUS demand of 27 amps for the worst case flight condition (IFR, pitot heat ON). This left 10A plus for battery maintenance with only a 40A alternator. The rule of thumb for alternator sizing is to reserve 25% of total capacity for battery charging so if you're planning a 60A alternator, you want to establish operating conditions that do not demand more than 45A continuous. Bob . . . >Howard > >-------- >Howard Plevyak >GlaStar >North Bend, Ohio >hplevyak@mac.com > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=326839#326839 > > >----- >No virus found in this message. >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Bob . . .


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:33:42 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Open squelch
    Thanks Bob; When the antenna is disconnected the radio goes silent. I spoke with both Icom and GRT today. At this point I'm going to leave it as is until I still have a problem after the panel is installed in the aircraft. If so GRT indicated they can install some filters on the video display that may help. Interesting. I didn't mention it in my earlier post . . . but the LCD color display panels have cropped up a number of times before as potentially serious radiation antagonists. Sounds like GRT might not fare well in the DO160 qualifications tests. Bob . . .




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --