AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Wed 06/08/11


Total Messages Posted: 9



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:16 AM - Re: Re: Brass bus bar (Henador Titzoff)
     2. 05:35 AM - Re: Re: Brass bus bar (William Slaughter)
     3. 05:37 AM - Re: Re: Brass bus bar (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     4. 08:05 AM - Switch Position within the Circuit (stearman456)
     5. 08:52 AM - Re: Switch Position within the Circuit (Vern Little)
     6. 09:53 AM - Re: Switch Position within the Circuit (stearman456)
     7. 10:50 AM - Switch Position within the Circuit (BobsV35B@aol.com)
     8. 11:24 AM - Re: Switch Position within the Circuit (stearman456)
     9. 07:28 PM - Re: Re: Brass bus bar (Kent Orr)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:16:49 AM PST US
    From: Henador Titzoff <henador_titzoff@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Brass bus bar
    Wow,=0A=0AIf you cannot find copper bus bar at your location and you do NOT want to have it shipped in, then your obvious solution is to use Roger/Jea n Curtis' solution. -He/she said that they flattened 3/8" soft copper tub ing in a vise, and it works great!=0A=0AProblem solved.=0A-=0AHenador Tit zoff=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: B Tomm <fvalarm@ra pidnet.net>=0ATo: aeroelectric-list@matronics.com=0ASent: Wednesday, June 8 , 2011 1:07 AM=0ASubject: RE: AeroElectric-List: Re: Brass bus bar=0A=0A--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "B Tomm" <fvalarm@rapidnet.net>=0A=0A Wow,=0A=0AI had no idea what a lively discussion my original question would initiate.=0AI have learned much but not the answer to the original questio n. Maybe it is=0Aless important than the sum of all the new knowledge in my old noggin.=0A=0AOK, I understand that my electrician friend's advice abou t using stainless=0Abar stock with the stainless terminals is not ideal for aircraft.- I still=0Ahave not found 1/8" copper bar stock locally and re ally don't want to ship=0Ait.=0A=0AWhat about using some 1/2" copper plumbi ng pipe, hammer flatten each end of=0Ait's 3" length, drill mounting holes as required and bolt it in?=0A=0ABy the way, the current going through this bar stock connector will max out=0Aat about 55amp under max (everything on ) load and is protected by the 60 amp=0AANL fuse, to which it is connected. =0A=0ABevan=0A=0A-----Original Message-----=0AFrom: owner-aeroelectric-list -server@matronics.com=0A[mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.co m] On Behalf Of Robert L.=0ANuckolls, III=0ASent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 9: 06 AM=0ATo: aeroelectric-list@matronics.com=0ASubject: Re: AeroElectric-Lis L. Nuckolls, III" =0A--> <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>=0A=0A=0A>I really recommend configuring wiring so as to not need a bus bar.=0A=0A- - Not sure what this means. In the classic sense, a=0A- - bus bar is a solid conductor distribution point from=0A- - which multiple branch feeds are taken. The strip of=0A- - conductor behind rows of breakers on the pan el is=0A- - a "bus". The strip of conductor down the center of=0A- - a multiple slot fuse holder is a "bus".=0A=0A- - But when you want to connect two closely spaced=0A- - studs together, like on a pair of c ontactors with=0A- - bar stock, that's a rectangular wire. I can deduce =0A- - no value in designing "not to need a bus bar."=0A- - They ar e used wherever they present the elegant=0A- - solution for minimizing parts count.=0A=0A>Factoids: Gold is good for low corrosion and its resulti ng low =0A>resistance. But it only makes sense for very low voltages/curren ts.=0A=0A- - The only time gold has a 'voltage/current' significance =0A- - is in the use of gold for switching. The very best=0A- - s witches and relays for switching tiny signal=0A- - levels feature gold plated contacts. But gold=0A- - is easily eroded away if the wattage levels=0A- - in the switch circuit get very high. We generally=0A- - limit the use gold switches and relays in the tens=0A- - of milli amps and tens of volts range. See:=0A=0Ahttp://www.aeroelectric.com/Referen ce_Docs/Microswitch/=0A=0A>- You might think gold might would be a great conductor, but it isn't.=0A=0A- - But it's not "bad" either. The conduc tivity=0A- - of gold is relatively insignificant because=0A- - nobo dy makes either wire or bus bars out of gold.=0A- - They do PLATE certa in conductors with gold for=0A- - the purpose of minimizing surface cor rosion=0A- - . . . the layers are so thin as to add no=0A- - signif icant resistance to the joint.=0A=0A=0A>Factoid: Copper and other metals wo rks even if oxidized=0A=0A- - ??? Don't know what "works" means. Every material=0A- - and the manner in which joints are made with other=0A- - materials will drive system performance. If the=0A- - materials ar e particularly reactive with each other=0A- - and with oxygen in the pr esence of moisture, performance=0A- - levels will degrade with time.=0A =0A- - It's true that the observable surfaces of conductors=0A- - c an be severely corroded without observable=0A- - performance issues . . . this happens because=0A- - the metal-to-metal interface between comp onents=0A- - is sealed from the environment . . . i.e. GAS=0A- - TI GHT.=0A=0A- - So whether your "rectangular wires" of choice=0A- - a re copper, aluminum or brass, both initial=0A- - and future performance is dependent upon maintaining=0A- - gas-tightness of the joint either by exemplary=0A- - craftsmanship on assembly, periodic maintenance=0A - - later or both.=0A=0A>- so keep those connections clean and tight. =================


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:35:48 AM PST US
    From: "William Slaughter" <william_slaughter@att.net>
    Subject: Re: Brass bus bar
    I used a sheet of copper stock and cut the strips I needed from it. Available at hardware stores and hobby shops. Google K&S to find info. Storm Copper has everything you can imagine if you decide that you can order it in after all. William -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of B Tomm Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 12:08 AM Subject: RE: AeroElectric-List: Re: Brass bus bar Wow, I had no idea what a lively discussion my original question would initiate. I have learned much but not the answer to the original question. Maybe it is less important than the sum of all the new knowledge in my old noggin. OK, I understand that my electrician friend's advice about using stainless bar stock with the stainless terminals is not ideal for aircraft. I still have not found 1/8" copper bar stock locally and really don't want to ship it. What about using some 1/2" copper plumbing pipe, hammer flatten each end of it's 3" length, drill mounting holes as required and bolt it in? By the way, the current going through this bar stock connector will max out at about 55amp under max (everything on) load and is protected by the 60 amp ANL fuse, to which it is connected. Bevan -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robert L. Nuckolls, III Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 9:06 AM Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Re: Brass bus bar --> <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> >I really recommend configuring wiring so as to not need a bus bar. Not sure what this means. In the classic sense, a bus bar is a solid conductor distribution point from which multiple branch feeds are taken. The strip of conductor behind rows of breakers on the panel is a "bus". The strip of conductor down the center of a multiple slot fuse holder is a "bus". But when you want to connect two closely spaced studs together, like on a pair of contactors with bar stock, that's a rectangular wire. I can deduce no value in designing "not to need a bus bar." They are used wherever they present the elegant solution for minimizing parts count. >Factoids: Gold is good for low corrosion and its resulting low >resistance. But it only makes sense for very low voltages/currents. The only time gold has a 'voltage/current' significance is in the use of gold for switching. The very best switches and relays for switching tiny signal levels feature gold plated contacts. But gold is easily eroded away if the wattage levels in the switch circuit get very high. We generally limit the use gold switches and relays in the tens of milliamps and tens of volts range. See: http://www.aeroelectric.com/Reference_Docs/Microswitch/ > You might think gold might would be a great conductor, but it isn't. But it's not "bad" either. The conductivity of gold is relatively insignificant because nobody makes either wire or bus bars out of gold. They do PLATE certain conductors with gold for the purpose of minimizing surface corrosion . . . the layers are so thin as to add no significant resistance to the joint. >Factoid: Copper and other metals works even if oxidized ??? Don't know what "works" means. Every material and the manner in which joints are made with other materials will drive system performance. If the materials are particularly reactive with each other and with oxygen in the presence of moisture, performance levels will degrade with time. It's true that the observable surfaces of conductors can be severely corroded without observable performance issues . . . this happens because the metal-to-metal interface between components is sealed from the environment . . . i.e. GAS TIGHT. So whether your "rectangular wires" of choice are copper, aluminum or brass, both initial and future performance is dependent upon maintaining gas-tightness of the joint either by exemplary craftsmanship on assembly, periodic maintenance later or both. > so keep those connections clean and tight. Hear, HEAR!!!! Bob . . .


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:37:10 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Brass bus bar
    OK, I understand that my electrician friend's advice about using stainless bar stock with the stainless terminals is not ideal for aircraft. I still have not found 1/8" copper bar stock locally and really don't want to ship it. 1/8" is 'hefty' to your task What about using some 1/2" copper plumbing pipe, hammer flatten each end of it's 3" length, drill mounting holes as required and bolt it in? That would work too but kind'a . . . well . . . not very graceful. That piece of pipe would be good for hundreds of amps . . . By the way, the current going through this bar stock connector will max out at about 55amp under max (everything on) load and is protected by the 60 amp ANL fuse, to which it is connected. For that connection consider using aluminum. .062", or so, 3/4" wide. Brighten up the interfacing surfaces before installation. Maybe use some dielectric grease on those same surfaces (Permatx 67VR or equal at hardware or automotive parts stores). Torque the fasteners well. Bob . . .


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:05:44 AM PST US
    Subject: Switch Position within the Circuit
    From: "stearman456" <warbirds@shaw.ca>
    On a 12 volt DC system, does it make any difference if the toggle switch is located between the device and ground vs the device and the + bus bar? Wiring my aircraft it's going to be more convenient to make the runs from the ground bus to the cockpit and then to the device and then the the + bus. (There is no grounding via the airframe - it's a dual wire installation with a ground block on the firewall.) Dan warbirds@shaw.ca Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=342406#342406


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:52:22 AM PST US
    From: "Vern Little" <sprocket@vx-aviation.com>
    Subject: Re: Switch Position within the Circuit
    The short answer is yes, it does matter. In the event of an electrical short circuit (or even when you are servicing), you want to be able to switch off the circuit. If your unswitched wire is always hot (+12) and you have a short to ground, which is the most likely scenario, then you can't do this. If you need to do ground switching, you can wire in a relay in series with the +12V feed, with one side of the coil connected to +12V as well. Then, you can switch the other coil connection to ground to control the circuit. Vern -----Original Message----- From: stearman456 Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 8:01 AM Subject: AeroElectric-List: Switch Position within the Circuit On a 12 volt DC system, does it make any difference if the toggle switch is located between the device and ground vs the device and the + bus bar? Wiring my aircraft it's going to be more convenient to make the runs from the ground bus to the cockpit and then to the device and then the the + bus. (There is no grounding via the airframe - it's a dual wire installation with a ground block on the firewall.) Dan warbirds@shaw.ca Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=342406#342406 ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:53:49 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Switch Position within the Circuit
    From: "stearman456" <warbirds@shaw.ca>
    Of course! All it would take is a chafed wire. Man, I can be dumb. Thanks for the help - back to the drawing board! Dan Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=342416#342416


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:50:39 AM PST US
    From: BobsV35B@aol.com
    Subject: Switch Position within the Circuit
    Good Afternoon Dan, As another thought, if putting the switch in the "ground" side is more convenient, go ahead and do it. Just make sure the circuit breaker is properly located as close as practical to the primary power source and that it is properly sized to protect the wire used. Happy Skies, Old Bob AKA Bob Siegfried Stearman N3977A LL22 In a message dated 6/8/2011 11:55:36 A.M. Central Daylight Time, warbirds@shaw.ca writes: --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "stearman456" <warbirds@shaw.ca> Of course! All it would take is a chafed wire. Man, I can be dumb. Thanks for the help - back to the drawing board! Dan Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=342416#342416


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:24:37 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Switch Position within the Circuit
    From: "stearman456" <warbirds@shaw.ca>
    Hi Bob, It's not a big deal, just a little less direct routing of the main bundle from the junction box on the backside of the firewall, but not by much. Mine is also a Stearman, so there's lots of room for it. Dan Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=342424#342424


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:28:59 PM PST US
    From: "Kent Orr" <kcorr@charter.net>
    Subject: Re: Brass bus bar
    Bevan, You might try going to an electrical contractor or electrical supply house and see if they have any scrap electrical panels. A 200A or 400A panel should have 1/8" thick copper bus bars in it. Good Luck Kent -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of B Tomm Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 12:08 AM Subject: RE: AeroElectric-List: Re: Brass bus bar Wow, I had no idea what a lively discussion my original question would initiate. I have learned much but not the answer to the original question. Maybe it is less important than the sum of all the new knowledge in my old noggin. OK, I understand that my electrician friend's advice about using stainless bar stock with the stainless terminals is not ideal for aircraft. I still have not found 1/8" copper bar stock locally and really don't want to ship it. What about using some 1/2" copper plumbing pipe, hammer flatten each end of it's 3" length, drill mounting holes as required and bolt it in? By the way, the current going through this bar stock connector will max out at about 55amp under max (everything on) load and is protected by the 60 amp ANL fuse, to which it is connected. Bevan -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robert L. Nuckolls, III Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 9:06 AM Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Re: Brass bus bar --> <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> >I really recommend configuring wiring so as to not need a bus bar. Not sure what this means. In the classic sense, a bus bar is a solid conductor distribution point from which multiple branch feeds are taken. The strip of conductor behind rows of breakers on the panel is a "bus". The strip of conductor down the center of a multiple slot fuse holder is a "bus". But when you want to connect two closely spaced studs together, like on a pair of contactors with bar stock, that's a rectangular wire. I can deduce no value in designing "not to need a bus bar." They are used wherever they present the elegant solution for minimizing parts count. >Factoids: Gold is good for low corrosion and its resulting low >resistance. But it only makes sense for very low voltages/currents. The only time gold has a 'voltage/current' significance is in the use of gold for switching. The very best switches and relays for switching tiny signal levels feature gold plated contacts. But gold is easily eroded away if the wattage levels in the switch circuit get very high. We generally limit the use gold switches and relays in the tens of milliamps and tens of volts range. See: http://www.aeroelectric.com/Reference_Docs/Microswitch/ > You might think gold might would be a great conductor, but it isn't. But it's not "bad" either. The conductivity of gold is relatively insignificant because nobody makes either wire or bus bars out of gold. They do PLATE certain conductors with gold for the purpose of minimizing surface corrosion . . . the layers are so thin as to add no significant resistance to the joint. >Factoid: Copper and other metals works even if oxidized ??? Don't know what "works" means. Every material and the manner in which joints are made with other materials will drive system performance. If the materials are particularly reactive with each other and with oxygen in the presence of moisture, performance levels will degrade with time. It's true that the observable surfaces of conductors can be severely corroded without observable performance issues . . . this happens because the metal-to-metal interface between components is sealed from the environment . . . i.e. GAS TIGHT. So whether your "rectangular wires" of choice are copper, aluminum or brass, both initial and future performance is dependent upon maintaining gas-tightness of the joint either by exemplary craftsmanship on assembly, periodic maintenance later or both. > so keep those connections clean and tight. Hear, HEAR!!!! Bob . . .




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --