Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 05:48 AM - Re: AeroLed landing lights not working with wig wag relay (Helidesigner)
2. 08:11 AM - Re: Rotax 912ULS charging problem (Jan de Jong)
3. 10:26 AM - Re: Low Cost WigWag Alternatives (Brantel)
4. 10:35 AM - Re: Low Cost WigWag Alternatives (Brantel)
5. 11:22 AM - Re: Rotax 912ULS charging problem (Nati Niv)
6. 01:30 PM - Report on New Power Supply (Dennis Johnson)
7. 07:20 PM - Re: Rotax 912ULS charging problem (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
8. 08:10 PM - Re: Report on New Power Supply (Richard E. Tasker)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: AeroLed landing lights not working with wig wag |
relay
The Aeroled units with wig wag were an additional $100 each. It was a lot cheaper
to buy a simple flasher unit. I have a light in each wing tip. The wiring is
also easier with the flasher unit behind the panel. The Aeroled units need to
be connect by a few wires that would have to run tip to tip.
--------
Thanks
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352124#352124
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Rotax 912ULS charging problem |
Another schematic attached - also without correctness guarantee.
Jan de Jong
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Low Cost WigWag Alternatives |
The cheap NAPA relay will not work to wig-wag HID's even if you do heat them up
manually.
I use this solid state wig-wagger and it works great with em!
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352162#352162
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Low Cost WigWag Alternatives |
The cheap NAPA relay will not work to wig-wag HID's even if you do heat them up
manually.
I use this solid state wig-wagger and it works great with em!
.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352164#352164
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Rotax 912ULS charging problem |
Jan
Thanks so much, I think the diagram you provided is accurate, the
replacement part number for the SCR (2N6504) help verifying that these are
SCR'S. by looking at your diagram I was able to understand the principal of
operation of the charger. The two SCRs are used to connect to ground each
one of the G terminals during its negative part of the cycle making
it referenced to ground so the other G terminal can charge the battery thru
the in line diode. (the G leads coming from the engine are not referenced t
o
ground otherwise).
With regards to my charging problem, the way I read the diagram is the
charge light on/off control is related only to the existing of AC energy
between the two G terminals, not to anything else, it=92s a bit surprising.
My
understanding of the charge light logic did not help me at all to Identify
the source of the incorrect indication problem I am facing with.
Bob,
I suggest that you replace the diagram currently published on your web sit
e
with the one Jan has provided
Thanks and regards
Nati
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Jan de Jong <jan_de_jong@casema.nl> wrote
:
> Another schematic attached - also without correctness guarantee.
>
> Jan de Jong
>
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Report on New Power Supply |
A few weeks ago I reported that I had bought this 12 volt power supply:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250852141183
I wanted it to power my instrument panel while doing navigation data
updates, cycling the wing flaps, and other tasks that would otherwise
take power from the airplane's battery. I have one that appeared
similar to this one that works perfectly.
However, the new one seems pretty close to useless for my needs. If I
adjust the output voltage higher than about 12.4 volts DC, the power
supply goes into overload and makes a quiet snapping sound about once
per second and the output amps go to zero (while it's connected to my
airplane's battery).
The literature claims the output voltage is adjustable from 10.8 to 13.2
volts and that the input voltage is from 100 to 264 VAC. However, the
one I received is labeled 176 - 264 volts AC. My guess is that since my
input is 120 volts, the power supply cannot achieve the stated
performance.
I only paid $15 for it, including shipping, so I'm not all that unhappy.
I'm sure I'll find a use for it somewhere. I just wanted to pass along
that the power supply I received doesn't seem to be suitable for 12 volt
airplanes. I could complain to the seller, but when I emailed them to
ask how to connect it, since it came without instructions, my emails was
never answered and it's now worth my time to fight for $15.
I might look at battery maintainers at Wal Mart instead. Since I'm done
building, I don't ground test heavy loads (like raising and lowering the
landing gear) that often. A battery maintainer is probably all I need
anyway.
Dennis
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Rotax 912ULS charging problem |
>Bob,
>
>I suggest that you replace the diagram currently published on your
>web site with the one Jan has provided
>
>Thanks and regards
>
>Nati
>
Good idea sir. I'll do it right now.
Bob . . .
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Report on New Power Supply |
Interestingly, if you look closely at the photo on the eBay listing you can see
printed on the top of the supply "AC 176-264V". Not that anyone would notice
that when bidding...
You should at least give feedback to eBay about this. How many others will purchase
this supply just like you did and discover the same thing as you did?
Dick Tasker
Dennis Johnson wrote:
> A few weeks ago I reported that I had bought this 12 volt power supply:
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250852141183 <http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250852141183>
> I wanted it to power my instrument panel while doing navigation data updates,
cycling the wing flaps, and other tasks that would otherwise take power from
the airplane's battery. I have one that
> appeared similar to this one that works perfectly.
> However, the new one seems pretty close to useless for my needs. If I adjust
the output voltage higher than about 12.4 volts DC, the power supply goes into
overload and makes a quiet snapping sound
> about once per second and the output amps go to zero (while it's connected to
my airplane's battery).
> The literature claims the output voltage is adjustable from 10.8 to 13.2 volts
and that the input voltage is from 100 to 264 VAC. However, the one I received
is labeled 176 - 264 volts AC. My
> guess is that since my input is 120 volts, the power supply cannot achieve the
stated performance.
> I only paid $15 for it, including shipping, so I'm not all that unhappy. I'm
sure I'll find a use for it somewhere. I just wanted to pass along that the
power supply I received doesn't seem to be
> suitable for 12 volt airplanes. I could complain to the seller, but when I emailed
them to ask how to connect it, since it came without instructions, my emails
was never answered and it's now worth
> my time to fight for $15.
> I might look at battery maintainers at Wal Mart instead. Since I'm done building,
I don't ground test heavy loads (like raising and lowering the landing gear)
that often. A battery maintainer is
> probably all I need anyway.
> Dennis
> *
>
>
> *
--
Please Note:
No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message. We do concede, however,
that a significant number of electrons may have been temporarily inconvenienced.
--
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|