---------------------------------------------------------- AeroElectric-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Thu 01/19/12: 3 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 06:07 AM - Re: Re: Electrical Gremlins (Robert L. Nuckolls, III) 2. 06:08 AM - Re: Re: Weak and Static on Transmission (Robert L. Nuckolls, III) 3. 06:12 AM - Re: Re: Weak and Static on Transmission (Robert L. Nuckolls, III) ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 06:07:09 AM PST US From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Re: Electrical Gremlins >I've got a few days to go before engine start so I can't address the >on-line alternator scenario. >Re 2 LVW's, I have two alternators. The stby alternator uses a >Ford-type regulator, hence the 9005 LVM. Understand. Check the calibration of your bench test setup for the LV Warning trip points. To have both an LR3 and ABMM module to be off by the same direction and magnitude is curious. Both are set by design at 13.0 volts although being .5 V higher wouldn't hurt their utility. Bob . . . ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ Time: 06:08:10 AM PST US From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Re: Weak and Static on Transmission At 11:30 AM 1/18/2012, you wrote: > >Just to make sure the obvious is not overlooked, are you sure that >the location of the antenna is surrounded by fiberglass and not >RF-opaque carbon fiber? >IIRC, the Legacy uses a lot of CF in the airframe. ???? Hmmm . . . didn't know that about the Legacy but I wondered when he made the reference to 'fiberglas'. I thought it curious that Lancair would use the carbon fiber in the IV and glass in the Legacy. Yeah, if the antenna is inside a carbon structure it's effectiveness is severely degraded. Bob . . . ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________ Time: 06:12:54 AM PST US From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Re: Weak and Static on Transmission At 10:18 PM 1/18/2012, you wrote: > >I'm surprised no one has brought up the obvious >of likely P-static. Does the aircraft have any static wicks? He didn't mention flying in precip and static wicks don't have anything to 'connect' to on a glass airplane. If it's a carbon fiber then wicks might be useful but my impression was that his poor signal reports were at low altitudes and probably slowed down for approach to landing and in clear weather. P-static wouldn't hurt a transmitted signal, only a received signal and he didn't mention not being able to hear . . . only be heard. This is why the differentiation between weak-signal static versus poor connection static is important. The presence of carbon would support the notion of it being the weak-signal variety. Bob . . . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Matronics Email List Services ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post A New Message aeroelectric-list@matronics.com UN/SUBSCRIBE http://www.matronics.com/subscription List FAQ http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm Web Forum Interface To Lists http://forums.matronics.com Matronics List Wiki http://wiki.matronics.com Full Archive Search Engine http://www.matronics.com/search 7-Day List Browse http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list Browse Digests http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list Browse Other Lists http://www.matronics.com/browse Live Online Chat! http://www.matronics.com/chat Archive Downloading http://www.matronics.com/archives Photo Share http://www.matronics.com/photoshare Other Email Lists http://www.matronics.com/emaillists Contributions http://www.matronics.com/contribution ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.