AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Sat 05/25/13


Total Messages Posted: 3



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 01:10 PM - Re: Re: Fuselink Link 14/10 AWG connection (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     2. 07:18 PM - Icon 210 wiring (Charles Plumery)
     3. 08:45 PM - Re: Icon 210 wiring (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:10:45 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Fuselink Link 14/10 AWG connection
    At 05:03 PM 5/24/2013, you wrote: > >Bob, > >Did you ever pick up some of these and/or check the manufacturer's >data? Wondering if they really are the "right stuff". > >Eric S. Man . . . that's been awhile. I had to stop in several NAPA stores before I found any butt splices and then they were similar but a different part number. I think they were okay in performance. It's been so long ago I don't recall. There's a bunch of PIDG alternatives out there, many are adequate to the task. It would be difficult to evaluate a bunch of PIDG wannabe parts and attempt to sprinkle any sort of holy-water on them. That could crank up a never ending task! I think it's pretty clear what we expect of our non-insulated and pre-insulated terminals for performance. We've discussed the fact that a useful study mates wires, terminals and tools. There's some illustrated discussions on the website. I think the best general rule of thumb I can offer is to do your own tear-down of the as-applied terminal and see how the two metals come together and how well the insulation is gripped without 'squashing' it. I use a Dremel tool cut-off wheel to section the wire grip. Polish the cut-line with 800 wet-or- dry paper. I have a 40X binocular inspection 'scope through which I can evaluate the work- product and take pictures. There are dozens of really reasonable illuminated, pocket microscopes on ebay . . . http://tinyurl.com/py6x8uq that would be quite adequate for getting up close and personal with the 'mash'. With a few simple tools and a lot of curiosity, you can easily deduce suitability to task for a variety of wire/terminal/tool combinations. Bob . . .


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:18:30 PM PST US
    Subject: Icon 210 wiring
    From: Charles Plumery <barber_seville@msn.com>
    Hello, I am a complete beginner in electronics but having Internet access and your b ook I have come to the conclusion that I have wired the moles connector on m y Icom 210 incorrectly because I did not use shielded wire for the connectio ns with a circle around the conductor to ground. Can you confirm that I need to retire the moles using shielded wiring Sent from my iPad, Chuck =9CA nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cann ot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, fo r he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst t hose within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alley s, heard in the very halls of government itself. MT Cicero


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:45:09 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Icon 210 wiring
    At 09:15 PM 5/25/2013, you wrote: >Hello, >I am a complete beginner in electronics but having Internet access >and your book I have come to the conclusion that I have wired the >moles connector on my Icom 210 incorrectly because I did not use >shielded wire for the connections with a circle around the conductor >to ground. Can you confirm that I need to retire the moles using >shielded wiring\ It's probably not serious. However, SOME of the wires may show shield connections at BOTH ends . . . in which case you need to add a wire to take care of the signals that flowed on the shields. It's a rare installation that suffers because the wires are not shielded. Bob . . .




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --