Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 07:08 AM - Re: Now writing for Kitplanes (Ralph Finch)
2. 07:14 AM - Re: Best practices for multi-destination connections (Rob Henderson)
3. 08:08 AM - Re: Now writing for Kitplanes (Bill)
4. 08:10 AM - Re: Best practices for multi-destination connections (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
5. 09:03 AM - Re: Now writing for Kitplanes (eschlanser)
6. 10:04 AM - Re: Re: Now writing for Kitplanes (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
7. 11:14 AM - Re: Best practices for multi-destination connections (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
8. 11:38 AM - Re: Now writing for Kitplanes (Ralph Finch)
9. 12:12 PM - Re: Now writing for Kitplanes (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
10. 02:10 PM - Re: Now writing for Kitplanes (DeWitt Whittington)
11. 02:18 PM - Re: Now writing for Kitplanes (DeWitt Whittington)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Now writing for Kitplanes |
Excellent. In the past I've written a couple of emails to Kitplanes
suggesting this very thing. Looks like the new editor is more responsive
and alert than the previous one.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Jeff Luckey <jluckey@pacbell.net> wrote:
> That's great Bob - looking forward to it. Can't think of a better man for
> the job!
>
> -Jeff
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
> *To:* aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 20, 2013 5:05 PM
> *Subject:* AeroElectric-List: Now writing for Kitplanes
>
> nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
>
> The next issue of Kitplanes will contain an article
> by yours truly on DIY bond studs. After some conversation
> with Paul Dye, I've agreed to offer a continuous flow of
> material for the magazine's pages. Some of you may remember
> Paul from his offering of this technique for crafting
> an annunciator panel
>
> http://tinyurl.com/mrockg7
>
> I have written a dozen or so articles for S.A. and did
> some critical review for articles proposed by others . . .
>
> But after they published these two bombs
>
> http://tinyurl.com/ke3bq9d
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5hug5
>
> and then failed to remit promised payment for an
> article cranked out at a dead-run to fill a gap
> generated by another author, I decided to part ways
> with S.A.
>
> I'm looking forward to a much more pleasant and
> productive association with Kitplanes.
>
>
> Bob . . . **
>
>
> *
>
> *
>
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Best practices for multi-destination connections |
Bob
What do you recommend for removable connections for larger single wires, say
16 or 14 gauge?
Would a "B" crimp male and female with heat shrink be ok?
-Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robert L.
Nuckolls, III
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Best practices for multi-destination
connections
--> <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
At 05:00 PM 6/19/2013, you wrote:
Machined pins by themselves, without a DB housing, make handy, very small,
removable butt connectors. A piece of tight heat shrink will hold the
whole thing together. Good or bad, the entire connection disappears in a
wire bundle, it's so slim.
Yes! I've illustrated the technique at:
http://tinyurl.com/c5v2xvm
Also, I recently did an install that needed power to 5 or 6 engine sensors.
The sensors are all very low current and fed from a single wire out of the
engine monitor, so I used Bob's DB ground block philosophy in reverse: I
soldered the wire from the engine monitor to the back terminals of the DB
sockets, then distributed that power to the various sensors through the
other half of the DB connector. I used the plastic body of the connector
to insulate the whole thing.
The d-sub can be pretty versatile.
The technique Dave is talking about here
is illustrated at:
http://tinyurl.com/kpy5acn
http://tinyurl.com/jwwta9t
Bob . . .
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Now writing for Kitplanes |
Congratulations Sensei -
I'm real pleased to hear this. For years your offerings have been shared
extensively by word-of-mouth in the OBAM community. This praiseworthy
development is long overdue. Kitplanes is the most respected publication
IMO, for the quality of information you present.
Bill
SF bay area
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <
nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote:
> nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com**>
>
> The next issue of Kitplanes will contain an article
> by yours truly on DIY bond studs. After some conversation
> with Paul Dye, I've agreed to offer a continuous flow of
> material for the magazine's pages. Some of you may remember
> Paul from his offering of this technique for crafting
> an annunciator panel
>
> http://tinyurl.com/mrockg7
>
> I have written a dozen or so articles for S.A. and did
> some critical review for articles proposed by others . . .
>
> But after they published these two bombs
>
> http://tinyurl.com/ke3bq9d
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5hug5
>
> and then failed to remit promised payment for an
> article cranked out at a dead-run to fill a gap
> generated by another author, I decided to part ways
> with S.A.
>
> I'm looking forward to a much more pleasant and
> productive association with Kitplanes.
>
>
> Bob . . .
>
>
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Best practices for multi-destination connections |
At 09:13 AM 6/21/2013, you wrote:
><robnrobinh@comcast.net>
>
>Bob
>What do you recommend for removable connections for larger single wires, say
>16 or 14 gauge?
>Would a "B" crimp male and female with heat shrink be ok?
If it were my airplane, I'd go with the PIDG knife splice
http://tinyurl.com/kp6ptl2
Bob . . .
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Now writing for Kitplanes |
Bob,
That's good news for us Kitplanes subscribers!
Here's some inspiration for writing technical articles for the average OBAM reader. http://tinyurl.com/nb628a4
Good luck on your new job.
Eric
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403101#403101
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Now writing for Kitplanes |
At 11:03 AM 6/21/2013, you wrote:
>
>Bob,
>
>That's good news for us Kitplanes subscribers!
>
>Here's some inspiration for writing technical articles for the
>average OBAM reader. http://tinyurl.com/nb628a4
Interesting article. Vocabulary and meaning
are critical to the useful sharing of ideas.
Many years ago in my own career, I remember
being presented with a list of words that had
identical, similar or easily mis-understood
meaning. We were encouraged to tailor our
writing to favor use the top word on each list,
I.e. probably the one with the most common usage.
In later years, we've see the rise of Technical
Standard English' as a communications tool for
maximizing the sharing of understanding. I think
there was a mil-spec of common technical terms too. To
be sure, our own culture is becoming less dependent
upon comprehending the written word as the cost
of producing visual/aural documents goes down.
Concise use of words becomes more important not
only for many of our fellow citizens but for
the spread of ideas amongst our brothers for
whom English is not a first language. I've
toyed with an idea for another book that would
compile and distill some 20 years of Q&A work
with the OBAM community into a kind FAQ. This
book would be an ideal vehicle for defining
terms as well.
Dr. Dee is helping me get the present state
of the 'Connection into a single application
for a completely fresh look at the editing with
a goal of doing our first issue totally generated
in a desk-top publisher. I'll then be able to
screen the document cover to cover for certain
words and phrases with the idea of bringing them
into greater common alignment.
Bob . . .
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Best practices for multi-destination connections |
At 10:09 AM 6/21/2013, you wrote:
><nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
>
>At 09:13 AM 6/21/2013, you wrote:
>><robnrobinh@comcast.net>
>>
>>Bob
>>What do you recommend for removable connections for larger single wires, say
>>16 or 14 gauge?
>>Would a "B" crimp male and female with heat shrink be ok?
>
> If it were my airplane, I'd go with the PIDG knife splice
>
> http://tinyurl.com/kp6ptl2
There's a less expensive version at:
http://tinyurl.com/mgfrn8h
Bob . . .
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Now writing for Kitplanes |
Your Paul Harvey-like "Rest of the Story" analyses are wonderful. Hope you
can keep doing them.
Ralph Finch
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <
nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote:
> nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com**>
>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/ke3bq9d
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5hug5
>
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Now writing for Kitplanes |
At 01:37 PM 6/21/2013, you wrote:
>Your Paul Harvey-like "Rest of the Story" analyses are wonderful.
>Hope you can keep doing them.
Thank you.
After a career centered on selling new products
and fixing old products that didn't, it's hard
not to hold an extra appreciation for the value
of what I've called simple-ideas. Fundamental,
unchanging truths that become ingredients that
go into recipes for success.
Individuals with the most rudimentary reading
and measuring skills can follow a recipe for
about any work product. It's been institutionalized
as the ISO9000 way. Certainly Ford and McDondald's
demonstrated the utility of the work-instruction
for a century.
But the first time the outcome is not-as-expected
or the machine breaks, the short path to resurrection
and perhaps the prophylactic against future failure
will be guided by an understanding of those simple-
ideas . . . and what caused them not to 'fit'.
I've adopted the philosophy for my readers that
is no different than for customers or supervisors
of years past. Laying out the whole story down to
the list of simple-ideas builds confidence and
reduces risk. It makes us better customers, better
suppliers, and more competent users of systems
which are a mystery to the vast majority of
the inhabitants of this planet.
I don't get to fly nearly as often as I would like
but you folks are my alter-egos. If I can help
you exploit your enjoyment of the sport with as
much pleasure and confidence as I have experienced,
then not having a machine with wings on it parked at
my airport is not a serious void in my life.
Bob . . .
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Now writing for Kitplanes |
Johan, thanks so much for the suggestion. Could you tell me from whom you
are going to buy this muffler? I did a quick look on the web and see a
number of sources. One we've dealt with before is Summit Racing, but the
three versions I see there don't match the one you are speaking of. Is
there a particular reason you are going with 2.50" diameter pipes?
Also, are you going to run the left and right pipes together and have a
single muffler, or two pipes. The header pipe we have from Jan is 1 3/4"
diameter. I do see Magnaflow muffler of a straight through design (inlet
offset to outlet) in 1 3/4" diameter. but with the case of the muffler 14"
long, 20" inches long overall.
Dee
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <
nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote:
> nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com**>
>
> At 01:37 PM 6/21/2013, you wrote:
>
>> Your Paul Harvey-like "Rest of the Story" analyses are wonderful. Hope
>> you can keep doing them.
>>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> After a career centered on selling new products
> and fixing old products that didn't, it's hard
> not to hold an extra appreciation for the value
> of what I've called simple-ideas. Fundamental,
> unchanging truths that become ingredients that
> go into recipes for success.
>
> Individuals with the most rudimentary reading
> and measuring skills can follow a recipe for
> about any work product. It's been institutionalized
> as the ISO9000 way. Certainly Ford and McDondald's
> demonstrated the utility of the work-instruction
> for a century.
>
> But the first time the outcome is not-as-expected
> or the machine breaks, the short path to resurrection
> and perhaps the prophylactic against future failure
> will be guided by an understanding of those simple-
> ideas . . . and what caused them not to 'fit'.
>
> I've adopted the philosophy for my readers that
> is no different than for customers or supervisors
> of years past. Laying out the whole story down to
> the list of simple-ideas builds confidence and
> reduces risk. It makes us better customers, better
> suppliers, and more competent users of systems
> which are a mystery to the vast majority of
> the inhabitants of this planet.
>
> I don't get to fly nearly as often as I would like
> but you folks are my alter-egos. If I can help
> you exploit your enjoyment of the sport with as
> much pleasure and confidence as I have experienced,
> then not having a machine with wings on it parked at
> my airport is not a serious void in my life.
>
>
> Bob . . .
>
>
--
DeWitt (Dee) Whittington
804-677-4849 iPhone
804-358-4333 Home
www.VirginiaFlyIn.org
Building Glasair Sportsman with 3 partners
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Now writing for Kitplanes |
Ooops, sorry, Bob. Obviously my recent post was in error.
Dee
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <
nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote:
> nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com**>
>
> At 01:37 PM 6/21/2013, you wrote:
>
>> Your Paul Harvey-like "Rest of the Story" analyses are wonderful. Hope
>> you can keep doing them.
>>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> After a career centered on selling new products
> and fixing old products that didn't, it's hard
> not to hold an extra appreciation for the value
> of what I've called simple-ideas. Fundamental,
> unchanging truths that become ingredients that
> go into recipes for success.
>
> Individuals with the most rudimentary reading
> and measuring skills can follow a recipe for
> about any work product. It's been institutionalized
> as the ISO9000 way. Certainly Ford and McDondald's
> demonstrated the utility of the work-instruction
> for a century.
>
> But the first time the outcome is not-as-expected
> or the machine breaks, the short path to resurrection
> and perhaps the prophylactic against future failure
> will be guided by an understanding of those simple-
> ideas . . . and what caused them not to 'fit'.
>
> I've adopted the philosophy for my readers that
> is no different than for customers or supervisors
> of years past. Laying out the whole story down to
> the list of simple-ideas builds confidence and
> reduces risk. It makes us better customers, better
> suppliers, and more competent users of systems
> which are a mystery to the vast majority of
> the inhabitants of this planet.
>
> I don't get to fly nearly as often as I would like
> but you folks are my alter-egos. If I can help
> you exploit your enjoyment of the sport with as
> much pleasure and confidence as I have experienced,
> then not having a machine with wings on it parked at
> my airport is not a serious void in my life.
>
>
> Bob . . .
>
>
--
DeWitt (Dee) Whittington
804-677-4849 iPhone
804-358-4333 Home
www.VirginiaFlyIn.org
Building Glasair Sportsman with 3 partners
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|