Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 04:24 AM - Re: Re: Inline connections needed? (with little space) (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
2. 06:53 AM - Re: AeroElectric-List Digest: 12 Msgs - 09/17/13 (Dennis Johnson)
3. 09:44 AM - Re: Electrical System Review (jonlaury)
4. 10:52 AM - Re: Re: Electrical System Review (Bob McCallum)
5. 12:45 PM - Re: Electrical System Review (user9253)
6. 02:19 PM - KX-125 to Garmin SL-30 Upgrade Mounting (Matt Dralle)
7. 03:39 PM - Re: KX-125 to Garmin SL-30 Upgrade Mounting (Bill Putney)
8. 03:56 PM - Re: KX-125 to Garmin SL-30 Upgrade Mounting (Earl Juno)
9. 05:20 PM - Re: KX-125 to Garmin SL-30 Upgrade Mounting (Kelly McMullen)
10. 05:41 PM - Re: Bad Crimp? (Bill Watson)
11. 06:07 PM - Re: Inline connections needed? (with little space) (donjohnston)
12. 08:50 PM - Re: Bad Crimp? (Dave Saylor)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Inline connections needed? (with little space) |
At 06:21 PM 9/17/2013, you wrote:
>
>
>rickofudall wrote:
> > Or you could use the machined pins for the DB 25 and mate them
> directly with some shrink tubing over them and go without using the
> body of the connector.
> >
> > Rick Girard
> >
>
>
>I have room for a DB-25 behind the switches.
>
What is controlled by these switches? Are the
'mags' legacy magnetos or p-mags? What is the
largest anticipated current to be controlled
by any one switch?
Bob . . .
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: AeroElectric-List Digest: 12 Msgs - 09/17/13 |
Weather is perfect. See you soon.
Dennis
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 17, 2013, at 11:59 PM, AeroElectric-List Digest Server <aeroelectric-list@matronics.com>
wrote:
> *
>
> =================================================
> Online Versions of Today's List Digest Archive
> =================================================
>
> Today's complete AeroElectric-List Digest can also be found in either of the
> two Web Links listed below. The .html file includes the Digest formatted
> in HTML for viewing with a web browser and features Hyperlinked Indexes
> and Message Navigation. The .txt file includes the plain ASCII version
> of the AeroElectric-List Digest and can be viewed with a generic text editor
> such as Notepad or with a web browser.
>
> HTML Version:
>
> http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=html&Chapter 13-09-17&Archive=AeroElectric
>
> Text Version:
>
> http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=txt&Chapter 13-09-17&Archive=AeroElectric
>
>
> ===============================================
> EMail Version of Today's List Digest Archive
> ===============================================
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> AeroElectric-List Digest Archive
> ---
> Total Messages Posted Tue 09/17/13: 12
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Today's Message Index:
> ----------------------
>
> 1. 06:22 AM - Re: Electrical System Review (user9253)
> 2. 07:16 AM - Inline connections needed? (with little space) (donjohnston)
> 3. 07:42 AM - Re: Inline connections needed? (with little space) (Bob McCallum)
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Electrical System Review |
Thank you Joe.
The OVM wiring makes perfect sense now in the schematic. I'm pretty sure that's
the way I wired it, but it's on my list of the next hangar visit.
I kind of get the reverse polarity protection, but I'd really appreciate a brief
description of what happens should the GPJ get a reverse polarity input.
Dennis, thanks for calling the battery symbol into question. It had never occurred
to me that there was a convention re which plate size was negative and which
was positive.
Googling images for "12v battery symbol", it turns out that the small plate is
negative and the large one positive, so my symbol on the schematic is correct
with the small plate connected to the ground bus. But I didn't know that.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=408788#408788
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Electrical System Review |
The battery symbol thing actually carries over into the physical manufactur
e of the battery. The larger post on a conventional automotive battery is p
ositive the smaller post negative just like the schematic symbol.
Think of negative as less (smaller) positive as more. (larger)
Bob McC
> Subject: AeroElectric-List: Re: Electrical System Review
> From: jonlaury@impulse.net
> Date: Wed=2C 18 Sep 2013 09:43:56 -0700
> To: aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
>
>
>
> Thank you Joe.
> The OVM wiring makes perfect sense now in the schematic. I'm pretty sure
that's the way I wired it=2C but it's on my list of the next hangar visit.
> I kind of get the reverse polarity protection=2C but I'd really appreciat
e a brief description of what happens should the GPJ get a reverse polarity
input.
>
> Dennis=2C thanks for calling the battery symbol into question. It had nev
er occurred to me that there was a convention re which plate size was negat
ive and which was positive.
> Googling images for "12v battery symbol"=2C it turns out that the small
plate is negative and the large one positive=2C so my symbol on the schemat
ic is correct with the small plate connected to the ground bus. But I didn'
t know that.
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=408788#408788
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
===========
===========
===========
===========
>
>
>
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Electrical System Review |
> I kind of get the reverse polarity protection, but I'd really appreciate a brief
description of what happens should the GPJ get a reverse polarity input.
If the ground power polarity is wrong, the lamp will not illuminate nor will
the ground power contactor coil be energized because the diode blocks current
in the reverse direction.
If the ground power polarity is correct when plugged in, current flows through
the lamp and the diode and 2 amp circuit breaker to ground and the lamp illuminates.
Then if the switch is closed, the contactor coil is energized by current
flowing from the ground power plug to the contactor, through the coil, and
switch, and diode, and 2 amp circuit breaker to ground.
Now that the contactor coil is energized, it will hold and stay energized even
if the ground power is unplugged. Current flows from the aircraft battery (unless
it is completely dead) through the already closed ground power contactor
contacts, through the coil and switch and diode and 2 amp circuit breaker to
ground. The ground power switch should be shut off whenever the ground power
is disconnected.
Joe
--------
Joe Gores
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=408797#408797
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | KX-125 to Garmin SL-30 Upgrade Mounting |
Dear Listers,
I've currently got a King KX125 nav/com in the RV-6. I was thinking of upgrading
to a Garmin SL-30. But, as luck would have it, the vertical heights are different.
The Garmin is about 2/3's the height of the KX-125. Does anyone know
of a sweet installation kit that I could use to mount the SL-30 in the same
hole that the KX-125 is currently in? Something that would look like it was suppose
to be that way and not a klugy deal?
Thanks!
Matt
-
Matt Dralle
RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen"
http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log
http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log
http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel
Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap...
RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer"
http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log
Status: 180+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode
Matt's Livermore Airport Live ATC Stream!
Check out the live ATC stream directly from my hangar at the Livermore
Airport. Includes both Tower and Ground transmissions. Archives too!
For entertainment purposes only. http://klvk.matronics.com
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: KX-125 to Garmin SL-30 Upgrade Mounting |
Matt,
What's above and below the current KX-125? If it's blank plates, you can
take up some of the space with rubber U grommets. You can find various
styles at ACS. If it's other radios, I've used black rubber tubing.
Squeeze it in after the SL30 is mounted.
Of course... If you've got very much upgrading or rearranging going on,
having a whole new panel made is the clean solution. Having one
professionally made, powder coated and silk screened is under $1K. Not
too much compared to all the other stuff you put in the panel and it
makes the airplane look more finished than patched.
Bill
On 9/18/13 2:18 PM, Matt Dralle wrote:
>
>
> Dear Listers,
>
> I've currently got a King KX125 nav/com in the RV-6. I was thinking of upgrading
to a Garmin SL-30. But, as luck would have it, the vertical heights are
different. The Garmin is about 2/3's the height of the KX-125. Does anyone know
of a sweet installation kit that I could use to mount the SL-30 in the same
hole that the KX-125 is currently in? Something that would look like it was
suppose to be that way and not a klugy deal?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matt
>
> -
> Matt Dralle
>
> RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen"
> http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log
> http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log
> http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel
> Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap...
>
> RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer"
> http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log
> Status: 180+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode
>
> Matt's Livermore Airport Live ATC Stream!
> Check out the live ATC stream directly from my hangar at the Livermore
> Airport. Includes both Tower and Ground transmissions. Archives too!
> For entertainment purposes only. http://klvk.matronics.com
>
>
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: KX-125 to Garmin SL-30 Upgrade Mounting |
Do not have info on a kit but might be interested in the KX 125? earl
On Sep 18, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Listers,
>
> I've currently got a King KX125 nav/com in the RV-6. I was thinking of upgrading
to a Garmin SL-30. But, as luck would have it, the vertical heights are
different. The Garmin is about 2/3's the height of the KX-125. Does anyone know
of a sweet installation kit that I could use to mount the SL-30 in the same
hole that the KX-125 is currently in? Something that would look like it was
suppose to be that way and not a klugy deal?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matt
>
> -
> Matt Dralle
>
> RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen"
> http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log
> http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log
> http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel
> Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap...
>
> RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer"
> http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log
> Status: 180+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode
>
> Matt's Livermore Airport Live ATC Stream!
> Check out the live ATC stream directly from my hangar at the Livermore
> Airport. Includes both Tower and Ground transmissions. Archives too!
> For entertainment purposes only. http://klvk.matronics.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: KX-125 to Garmin SL-30 Upgrade Mounting |
Depending on what is desired, or if the SL30 is already procured, the
new Garmin replacement for the SL30 is a little taller and has a few
more features/integration with their brand GPS units.
On 9/18/2013 3:38 PM, Bill Putney wrote:
>
> Matt,
>
> What's above and below the current KX-125? If it's blank plates, you
> can take up some of the space with rubber U grommets. You can find
> various styles at ACS. If it's other radios, I've used black rubber
> tubing. Squeeze it in after the SL30 is mounted.
>
> Of course... If you've got very much upgrading or rearranging going
> on, having a whole new panel made is the clean solution. Having one
> professionally made, powder coated and silk screened is under $1K. Not
> too much compared to all the other stuff you put in the panel and it
> makes the airplane look more finished than patched.
>
> Bill
>
> On 9/18/13 2:18 PM, Matt Dralle wrote:
>> <dralle@matronics.com>
>>
>>
>> Dear Listers,
>>
>> I've currently got a King KX125 nav/com in the RV-6. I was thinking
>> of upgrading to a Garmin SL-30. But, as luck would have it, the
>> vertical heights are different. The Garmin is about 2/3's the height
>> of the KX-125. Does anyone know of a sweet installation kit that I
>> could use to mount the SL-30 in the same hole that the KX-125 is
>> currently in? Something that would look like it was suppose to be
>> that way and not a klugy deal?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> -
>> Matt Dralle
>>
>> RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen"
>> http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log
>> http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log
>> http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel
>> Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap...
>>
>> RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer"
>> http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log
>> Status: 180+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full
>> Flyer Mode
>>
>> Matt's Livermore Airport Live ATC Stream!
>> Check out the live ATC stream directly from my hangar at the Livermore
>> Airport. Includes both Tower and Ground transmissions. Archives too!
>> For entertainment purposes only. http://klvk.matronics.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Good memory there Dave. I did replace the crimp and all seemed well
with the original installation.
However, during my problem determination and fell back on the good 'ol
swap the box solution. That is, I bought a new strobe unit to replace
the "Avi-Pak" unit from CreativAir. I picked up the "XPAK604X" unit
from Nova Electronics. It is a non-aviation unit but it mounts in the
same mount and looks like it is from the same manufacturer.
However, this unit keeps the switch out of the main power circuit. That
is, the XPAK604X has a power circuit that in the '10 can be run
directly from the rear mounted battery to the strobe power unit - a run
of less than 2 feet. Then the panel switch is wired on a separate
control circuit. Notably, the panel switch no longer is warm to the touch.
I've been running this for about a year and all is good.
Can't do it now but I can supply more information if needed.
Bill
On 9/13/2013 5:36 PM, Dave Saylor wrote:
> Bob,
>
> Can you tell from the photo if this is this a poor crimp? It was
> overheating on the back of a strobe switch. I recall Bill Watson had
> a crimp fail on a strobe switch recently as well. The strobes were
> occasionally intermittent but the wire near the terminal was always
> very hot to the touch. The insulation was discolored too.
>
> I changed the terminal and the last few inches of wire, and now all is
> well. Nice and cool.
>
> Any comments on the crimp would be much appreciated.
>
> Dave Saylor
> 831-750-0284 CL
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Inline connections needed? (with little space) |
[/quote]
What is controlled by these switches? Are the
'mags' legacy magnetos or p-mags? What is the
largest anticipated current to be controlled
by any one switch?
Bob . . .[/quote]
Master switch, mags, starter contactor, boost pump, alternator...
Stock magnetos on a Continental IO-550.
Highest current device is the boost pump drawing 4a @ 28v.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=408822#408822
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I did some tests with our crimper. As long as it's used correctly, it
still makes good crimps. Whew!
I made some poor crimps on purpose, and they looked like the the one that
failed. But I really had to abuse it. Musta had a bad day.
Bill, I like the idea of having the switch as a control. The strobe pack
powered by the failed crimp is the certified Whelen version with regular
strobes and LED nav lights. Personally, I have an automotive Whelen version
in my plane. I haven't looked at it lately but I recall it has a blade
fuse in the case, as you mentioned only a few inches from the master relay,
and it switches to ground. But I don't think the switch is a control as
you described since it's the only ground in the system.
Dave Saylor
831-750-0284 CL
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Bill Watson <Mauledriver@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> Good memory there Dave. I did replace the crimp and all seemed well
> with the original installation.
>
> However, during my problem determination and fell back on the good 'ol
> swap the box solution. That is, I bought a new strobe unit to replace the
> "Avi-Pak" unit from CreativAir. I picked up the "XPAK604X" unit from Nova
> Electronics. It is a non-aviation unit but it mounts in the same mount and
> looks like it is from the same manufacturer.
>
> However, this unit keeps the switch out of the main power circuit. That
> is, the XPAK604X has a power circuit that in the '10 can be run directly
> from the rear mounted battery to the strobe power unit - a run of less than
> 2 feet. Then the panel switch is wired on a separate control circuit.
> Notably, the panel switch no longer is warm to the touch.
>
> I've been running this for about a year and all is good.
>
> Can't do it now but I can supply more information if needed.
>
> Bill
>
> On 9/13/2013 5:36 PM, Dave Saylor wrote:
>
> Bob,
>
> Can you tell from the photo if this is this a poor crimp? It was
> overheating on the back of a strobe switch. I recall Bill Watson had a
> crimp fail on a strobe switch recently as well. The strobes were
> occasionally intermittent but the wire near the terminal was always very
> hot to the touch. The insulation was discolored too.
>
> I changed the terminal and the last few inches of wire, and now all is
> well. Nice and cool.
>
> Any comments on the crimp would be much appreciated.
>
> Dave Saylor
> 831-750-0284 CL
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> 09/18/13
>
>
> *
>
> *
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|