AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Tue 11/12/13


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 01:44 AM - Re: Re: Minimizing audio interference (Jay Hyde)
     2. 06:02 AM - Ground Wire Routing; Compass Issues (Mark Meredith)
     3. 07:29 AM - Re: Re: Minimizing audio interference (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     4. 10:53 AM - Re: Replacement Crimpers (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     5. 02:20 PM - Re: wiring assistance (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:44:26 AM PST US
    From: "Jay Hyde" <jay@horriblehyde.com>
    Subject: Re: Minimizing audio interference
    I believe that is an Op Amp - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operational_amplifier Jay From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Verwey Sent: 12 November 2013 09:43 AM Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Re: Minimizing audio interference Bob N, for us neophytes, please enlighten us on the triangular device in your sketch. Best... Bob Verwey IO 470 A35 Bonanza ZU-DLW On 11 November 2013 21:05, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote: At 08:30 AM 11/11/2013, you wrote: I like it that Z15-3.1 shows not only the right way, but also the wrong way to ground devices. I understand that earphones and microphones should not be grounded locally, but should only be grounded at the panel end (intercom or radio). I am a little confused with the engine sensors. Grounding might be different for different types of sensors and their display (EMS or steam gauge). Some sensors are grounded automatically by nature of their construction and mounting. Yes. Many oil pressure, oil temperature, CHT, EGT sensors are guilty of 'local grounding' . . . and for the manner in which they were originally intended to be used . . . it didnt' matter. But for sensors that have isolated ground, I assume that the ground wire should terminate at the EMS or display device and not at the engine case. Of course always follow the manufactures installation instructions. Oh, absolutely. But absent a end-to-end design goal, one has to play the DIY integration game. One useful way to deal with a locally grounded signal source looks like this: Emacs! There are low cost integrated circuits that do the task of making remote voltage measurements across hostile environments. Alternatively, one can take all grounds for the instrument to the crankcase. The same game is played in audio systems. I did the specification for design of an intercom system on the Lears that coupled all stations together by way of a transformer coupled, twisted pair . . . Intercoms scattered about the airplane could be grounded locally for power and control without the worry of noises on the ground- differences finding their way into the audio. Bob . . .


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:02:00 AM PST US
    From: "Mark Meredith" <msmeredith@comcast.net>
    Subject: Ground Wire Routing; Compass Issues
    Bob and Listers, Here's a question for the group from a new guy. It's prompted by the recent discussion (and couple of weeks ago) about minimizing radio noise and compass deviation. What is the best routing for the ground wire from my instrument panel forest of tabs to the firewall single point ground? Airplane is a modified open cockpit 1951 DeHavilland Super Chipmunk (IO-540) rebuilt over the past 4 years. For the configuration think Pitts S-2C: radio stack between the rear seat pilot's knees, VFR round gages with a handful of electric instruments and a (planned) mini-iPad portable mounted on the sidewall. Firewall forward is pure Pitts clone. The new electrical system is pretty much finished (I hope!) except for neatening up and securing the wire bundles. System was tested incrementally and everything worked first try except an issue with the electric compass noted below. I stuck exactly to the Z-11 architecture and have followed the Connection and discussion among this group for a couple of years. Pretty much every component is B&C (with lots of great installation guidance from TJ). Wire routing: I put the main and e-bus fuse blocks under the radio/xponder with a big wire bundle running vertically up to the panel then fanning out to instruments and switches via 18-22 AWG wires. Battery, contactors, regulator and single point ground are at the firewall about 6 feet forward of the rear instrument panel and radio stack/fuse blocks. Component location and wire bundle routing (either left, right or centerline) from the firewall to the rear cockpit were aimed to keep everything shortest from point A to point B. Radio and transponder antenna coax run aft centerline from the radio stack under the control stick and pilot's seat, bundled with the power wires for the lights, strobes, fuel pump and a remote compass detector. The lights, strobes and fuel pump are the only devices grounded locally; everything else grounds at the firewall. My main question is about the 6 AWG panel ground wire: it runs from the forest of tabs behind the right side of the panel, up the right sidewall then under the floor to the firewall ground. It's WIDELY separated from the 6 AWG main power wire that runs straight down the middle from the battery contactor to the fuse blocks between the pilot's knees. Was that routing a bad decision? A possible rerouting to ensure a clean radio and minimal compass deviation (I may not always have the portable GPS): collocate/twist together the 6 AWG ground fat wire with the 6 AWG main power wire running fuselage center. To do so, I'd need to run a new and longer ground wire from the right side of the panel via the bundle of small power and ground wires to centerline, then down to the radio stack/fuse blocks where it can join up with the 6 AWG main power wire, then forward under the centerline floor to the firewall. Question is prompted by this helpful info from Sacha a couple of weeks back: ". if they're kept very close together (eg by twisting) then as long as you are at a distance D away from the pair, where D is much greater than d, then the magnetic field becomes very small. Typically d is of the order of a few millimeters so if you're eg a meter away, then D is hundreds of times greater than d and the magnetic field is for all intents and purposes zero." "D" for my routing of panel wires is about 3 inches behind the wet compass and remote compass indicator. There are lots of small ground wires mixed in with power wires in this bundle; some wires go to the switches and instruments and some to the ground forest of tabs. Would it help to just wrap the wet compass and remote detector with shielding and leave wire routing as is? The electric compass indicator is fed from a remote detector (flux valve? don't know) behind the pilot's head far from anything else electrical. It's not a gyro, just an indicator. It had negligible deviation and worked fine before the rebuild. Have not tested deviation now because the airplane is still on blocks in a steel hangar. But when powered up the indicator has a steady oscillation left and right about 10 degrees, about once per second..if it doesn't settle out when I get the airplane out in the open then I have another problem. Unfortunately for the compass I installed a steel rollover bar behind the pilot's head close to the remote detector, knowing I was likely introducing a compass problem but scored the rollbar as priority. Well, now it's time to think about the compasses. Perhaps I can move the remote detector farther away from the rollbar but it's old, big (5-6 inch diameter cylinder) and heavy so space and balance are issues. Perhaps I could buy a new and lightweight remote compass system but would rather keep the current functioning system. I have one more unrelated question but I'll save that for another email. I've appreciated the expertise of the group over the past couple of years of reading the conversations, and thank you in advance for your suggestions! Mark Meredith Super Chipmunk N7DW (Google "Super Chipmunk Restoration" for pics/story of the rebuild and airplane's interesting history)


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:29:57 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Minimizing audio interference
    At 03:43 AM 11/12/2013, you wrote: >I believe that is an Op Amp ' see >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operational_amplifier > >Jay > >http://www.matni.com/Arabic/Elec-Info/LM741%20DETAILS/philk2w.j > Jay is correct. The "operational amplifier" has a rich history in the evolution of electronics. Check out the articles on Wikipedia about George Philbrick, Bob Widlar, Jim Williams, and Bob Pease just to name a few of the colorful pioneers of the electronic arts and sciences. The op-amp comes in many flavors and sizes tailored to a constellation of tasks. I cut my op-amp teeth about 1962 on this vacuum tube version that sold for a couple hundred dollars in 2013 money . . . Emacs! http://www.matni.com/Arabic/Elec-Info/LM741%20DETAILS/philk2w.j I doubt that there were more than a few dozen products available. The last op-amp I stuck to a board looked like a little brick of plastic about the size of a match head . . . Emacs! . . . and costs about $2. The Digikey site offers over 30,000 variations on the theme. We've come a long way baby . . . Bob . . .


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:53:35 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Replacement Crimpers
    At 08:46 PM 11/11/2013, you wrote: > >Bob, >I need to replace my long serving Paladin >crimpers, not due to wear, rather someone else >decided they needed them more than I do. One of >my criteria for the replacement is the use of >field swappable dies. Having read your writings >on crimpers for use with the common wire >terminals Id like your opinion on the >following dies the first one the Sargent 4100-40 is the leader in my opinion I'm not really in a position to offer useful information on the various products. I've evaluated a few tools and compared with the performance of my $high$ Amp crimpers . . . and found most to be satisfactory alternatives. I started to look at exchangeable die-sets a few years back but the cost of serviceable complete tools was so low that the idea of making one handle do lots of jobs wasn't very attractive. Further, the costs of loose die-sets is driven by volume of sales . . . seems that die-sets could easily approach the cost of a complete tool! Sorry I can't be more helpful . . . Bob . . .


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:20:58 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: wiring assistance
    At 02:48 PM 11/12/2013, you wrote: Bob, know this a long shot but i need assistance to finish wiring my Glasair. i am hoping you know someone over this way that i could contact. i was told that Greg Richter has done this sort of thing but i have been unable to contact him. had a guy who was supposed to assist me but he is too busy now. according to him i am only about 6 working hours away from being finished but i can't get him back. i am located in the middle of South Carolina. basically what needs to b done to finish the install is 6 circuit breakers and connect, finish the transponder harness (it's 90% done), finish the audio panel harness (it's 85% done), wire the new electric tach, rehookup the old engine instruments, and calibrate the new GRT Hxr w/autopilot. the airplane has now been down 5 months which is absolutely ridiculous. any direction and guidance would be most appreciated. thanks. Wince Holliday N745CW Wince, I am not personally aware of anyone in your neighborhood who might be helpful . . . I've posted your query to the aeroelectric-list. Perhaps someone on the list can help or knows somebody who can. Bob . . .




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --