Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 07:39 AM - Re: Switch S700 2-11 (Mike M)
2. 07:53 AM - Re: Re: Switch S700 2-11 (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Switch S700 2-11 |
Thanks Bob! I made several failed attempts to figure out how to wire the S700
2-10 switch to perform desired function...but you drawing makes it obvious. So
I'll be using the 2-10.
Mike Marker
--------
Mike Marker
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=413201#413201
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Switch S700 2-11 |
At 09:37 AM 11/16/2013, you wrote:
>
>Thanks Bob! I made several failed attempts to figure out how to
>wire the S700 2-10 switch to perform desired function...but you
>drawing makes it obvious. So I'll be using the 2-10.
The 2-11 nomenclature is not carried over from
the mil-specs like the other dash numbers. I think
B&C added this callout to describe one of the
variants of the 2-10 . . . which are fundamentally
unnecessary since the 2-10 can be wired to accomplish
the same tasks.
Bob . . .
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|