AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Wed 02/19/14


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:08 AM - Re: PCB Mfg board house (Eric M. Jones)
     2. 07:25 AM - Re: Re: PCB Mfg board house (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     3. 08:02 AM - Re: Re: PCB Mfg board house (Bill Watson)
     4. 08:18 AM - Re: Audio Amp input (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     5. 09:11 AM - Re: Audio Amp input (user9253)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:08:35 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: PCB Mfg board house
    From: "Eric M. Jones" <emjones@charter.net>
    My two cents: Eagle is a great program compared to many PCB design programs. It comes in several versions. It would be my first choice for boards that need autorouting. It's probably worth reviewing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EAGLE_(program) I use www.ExpressPCB.com exclusively now, since my PCBs are the size of postage stamps. Their great advantages are: 1) Lightning fast delivery. I can finish a design Tuesday am and get the PCBs Friday am. 2) Stunning easy to learn. The learning curve is a "One Cup of Coffee to Expert" experience. 3) Schematic Capture and Layout modules are FREE. And yes, they will send you the Gerbers for a reasonable charge after your first order (I think). -------- Eric M. Jones www.PerihelionDesign.com 113 Brentwood Drive Southbridge, MA 01550 (508) 764-2072 emjones(at)charter.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=418995#418995


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:25:20 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: PCB Mfg board house
    At 09:07 AM 2/19/2014, you wrote: > >My two cents: I use www.ExpressPCB.com exclusively now, since my PCBs are the size of postage stamps. Their great advantages are: 1) Lightning fast delivery. I can finish a design Tuesday am and get the PCBs Friday am. 2) Stunning easy to learn. The learning curve is a "One Cup of Coffee to Expert" experience. 3) Schematic Capture and Layout modules are FREE. I will echo Eric's sentiments. For the kinds of things I do, time is often of the essence. I submitted an order for proof of concept boards to Exp-PCB yesterday morning, will have boards tomorrow morning and assembled samples in my customer's hands Friday morning (or even late tomorrow night if they so wish) . . . even tho I live in cow-town KS . . . The software is stunningly easy to learn, custom components easily crafted, turn-around times difficult to better. Their software also spits out .dxf files of the board with holes and parts locations so that creating an assembly drawing in any dxf friendly cad program is greatly assisted. Had one customer voice some amazement that holes in the board I provided "lined up exactly" with CAD/CNC holes in his target assembly. Don't know where his previous disappointments came from but the transitions from Exp-PCB -> cad -> g-code -> aluminum are in solid lock-step with each other. When you're charging my exorbitant fees for $time$, the external costs for materials and services are relatively insignificant. Most customers are interested in shortest path to workable solutions. I think there may be some services on a par with Exp-PCB but I've used Exp-PCB for many years with no note-worthy incentives to change. Bob . . .


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:02:50 AM PST US
    From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver@nc.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: PCB Mfg board house
    On 2/19/2014 10:24 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote: > <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> > > At 09:07 AM 2/19/2014, you wrote: >> <emjones@charter.net> >> >> My two cents: > I use www.ExpressPCB.com exclusively now, since my PCBs are the size > of postage stamps. Their great advantages are: > > 2) Stunning easy to learn. The learning curve is a "One Cup of Coffee > to Expert" experience. > > The software is stunningly easy to learn, custom > components easily crafted, turn-around times difficult > to better. On a somewhat unrelated note, the ExpressSCH software (free) is an excellent tool for documenting aircraft electrical diagrams if one does not already have skills with an appropriate drawing tool. Though intended for use in designing custom circuit boards, it adapts well to the task of drawing electrical diagrams for your project. Since it 'knows' circuits, it works in a way that is compatible with generalized electrical diagram documentation. Not as good as Autocad/Turbocad but much easier to learn for this simple task. I can pick it up after 6 months to make a change and am able to use it without relearning anything. As Bob said above, "Stunning easy to learn". Great for 'one time use'. Thanks to whoever originally suggested this. Here's my Z-14 drawn using ExpressSCH Z-14 for RV10 <https://www.dropbox.com/s/3006csh1jkh84fa/PDF%20of%20Z-14.pdf> (ExpressSCH is one of the two components of the ExpressPCB package. You only need the ExpressSCH to draw diagrams for your aircraft.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:18:57 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Audio Amp input
    At 07:28 PM 2/18/2014, you wrote: Bob's audio amplifier http://www.aeroelectric.com/DIY/Audio_Iso_Amp_9009-700L.pdf has 10 microfarad capacitors connected to the LM386 input. Does the polarity matter in this circuit? If so, I assume that the curved part of the capacitor symbol is negative. Are the values of the input capacitors and resistors critical? I have seen similar circuits whose capacitors are 1 microfarad and whose resistors are 10K or even 100K. Thanks, Joe Those resistors were selected with two criteria in mind (1) the input impedance of the amplifier was crafted to be in the same ballpark as the aviation headsets 150-600 ohms. Hence the suggested first-choice values for resistors on the gain-selection sockets of 150 ohms. (2) the 'amplifier' didn't really need to have any gain . . . we're wanting to simply mix a combination of headset audio values together into an output on the same order. The LM386 chip as a minimum gain of 20 http://tinyurl.com/ps3zj69 so the downstream resistor wanted to offer some attenuation of the incoming signal. In this case, 10 ohm resistors offered a 15:1 attenuation ratio. The figures on Page 8 of the assembly manual show dipped tantalum capacitors in most of the slots, exceptions being 120, 121 and 127 which are monolythic ceramics. However, these three capacitors COULD also be tantalums which is why the parts locator drawing has polarity dots on the capacitor locations to denote the more positive terminal. Input coupling capacitor polarity is not critical . . . if any DC differences are expected between the amplifier and a signal source, it is supposed to be zero to very small . . . there is little potential for undesired performance should these capacitors be installed the other way. Most schematics will use the flat-plate/curved-plate symbol for all capacitors. About the only time you'll find flat/flat symbols is in the legacy literature. If the bill of materials calls out electrolytic for a particular capacitor, then the schematic will often included a + adjacent to the positive terminal but lacking specific instructions, the flat plate is supposed to always be +. http://tinyurl.com/ps3zj69 Flat/flat capacitor symbols didn't garner favor for very long. Some of the oldest Heathkit and ARRL publications went flat/curved for all variants of the capacitor Emacs! Bob . . .


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:11:14 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Audio Amp input
    From: "user9253" <fransew@gmail.com>
    Bob and all, thanks for the explanations. Using a capacitor symbol with a curved line avoids confusion with the symbol for relay contacts which has two straight lines. Joe -------- Joe Gores Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=419005#419005




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --