AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Sat 05/24/14


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 10:02 AM - alternate batteries (GLEN MATEJCEK)
     2. 10:22 AM - Re: alternate batteries (Charlie England)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:02:41 AM PST US
    Subject: alternate batteries
    From: GLEN MATEJCEK <fly4grins@gmail.com>
    > > I happened to be exploring some alternate battery battery options on the > 'net just yesterday, when something interesting popped out at me. Only one > referenced being a replacement for portable jump start units, and was > marketed under the Schumacher label. Does anyone know if there is some > difference in these batteries that might make them more appropriate for > engine cranking service, or is it all just advertising?


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:22:32 AM PST US
    From: Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: alternate batteries
    On 5/24/2014 12:01 PM, GLEN MATEJCEK wrote: > > I happened to be exploring some alternate battery battery options > on the 'net just yesterday, when something interesting popped out > at me. Only one referenced being a replacement for portable jump > start units, and was marketed under the Schumacher label. Does > anyone know if there is some difference in these batteries that > might make them more appropriate for engine cranking service, or > is it all just advertising? > > Look at internal impedance/resistance numbers. Easy to find for PC680; sometimes harder to find for brand x. Comparing batteries with the same ampere-hour ratings, batteries intended for relatively low current, long term discharge will have higher internal impedance than batteries intended for starting. Bob alluded to this in a recent post about a new battery he tested, that would last almost 'forever' running avionics, but couldn't supply enough power to start an engine. With the typical brand x SLA batteries I've seen over the last few years, up-sizing the AH rating by a few points (18 AH to 22AH, for example) gets the internal resistance low enough to match the higher priced PC680's starting ability. Going from 18 to 22 AH doesn't typically increase the size, at least not enough to matter. A lot of the brand x 18AH batteries are slightly smaller than a PC680. FWIW, Charlie




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --