AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Thu 09/17/15


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 10:28 AM - Re: Pitot Heat Ground (DougW)
     2. 02:28 PM - Re: Pitot Heat Ground (DougW)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:28:38 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Pitot Heat Ground
    From: "DougW" <N1deltawhiskey@comcast.net>
    Bob, This has been a rather lengthy thread. Being somewhat confused by various elements of the discussion, and as a recent acquirer of the Dynon heated pitot, I decided to look at the latest installation instructions. On page 3-1, it states to keep wires to the controller and between the controller and pitot away from any magnetometer/ADHRS, as well as audio devices. On page 3-2, it states "Do not connect the Black (Ground) wire to the airframe as a Ground connection." On page 3-4, the figure shows the black wire going "To permanent connection to aircraft ground" I could not find anywhere where it indicated that the metal case of the controller was and electrical ground for the controller. As a longtime follower of your comments and advice, I have avoided using the airframe as a ground except at one point on the firewall where it is grounded to the electrical system ground. For my installation, I will be generally following this comment of yours even though my magnetometer is in the tail cone, well away from the pitot heat wiring path: Were I designing such a beast, all power wiring between tube and box . . . and from box to ship's power would be on twisted pairs with the box providing EMC grounding only . . . power would float (this is the way the BIG guys do it). However, given the state of the conversation, I am wondering it a resistance measurement has been made between the proposed installation site and a common electrical ground point. Also, as the current must flow through the single +12v wire to power the controller/pitot provide the electromagnetic interference that the originator of this thread is trying to avoid? Regards, Doug Windhorn Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=447162#447162


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:28:10 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Pitot Heat Ground
    From: "DougW" <N1deltawhiskey@comcast.net>
    Bob, This has been a rather lengthy thread. Being somewhat confused by various elements of the discussion, and as a recent acquirer of the Dynon heated pitot, I decided to look at the latest installation instructions. On page 3-1, it states to keep wires to the controller and between the controller and pitot away from any magnetometer/ADHRS, as well as audio devices. On page 3-2, it states "Do not connect the Black (Ground) wire to the airframe as a Ground connection." On page 3-4, the figure shows the black wire going "To permanent connection to aircraft ground" I could not find anywhere where it indicated that the metal case of the controller was and electrical ground for the controller. As a longtime follower of your comments and advice, I have avoided using the airframe as a ground except at one point on the firewall where it is grounded to the electrical system ground. For my installation, I will be generally following this comment of yours even though my magnetometer is in the tail cone, well away from the pitot heat wiring path: Were I designing such a beast, all power wiring between tube and box . . . and from box to ship's power would be on twisted pairs with the box providing EMC grounding only . . . power would float (this is the way the BIG guys do it). However, given the state of the conversation, I am wondering if a resistance measurement has been made between the proposed installation site and a common electrical ground point. I don't trust my airframe to conduct low resistance currents as it has been corrosion proofed internally. As the current for the heated pitot also must flow through the single +12v wire to power the controller/pitot, would this not provide the electromagnetic interference that the originator of this thread is attempting to avoid? Regards, Doug Windhorn Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=447172#447172




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --