AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Mon 12/21/15


Total Messages Posted: 6



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:55 AM - Re: Oscilloscope for Android Phone (rampil)
     2. 10:13 AM - JPI vs. Insight (GLEN MATEJCEK)
     3. 10:58 AM - Re: JPI vs. Insight (Bambas)
     4. 11:22 AM - Re: JPI vs. Insight (Charlie England)
     5. 03:12 PM - Re: JPI vs. Insight (rampil)
     6. 05:26 PM - Re: JPI vs. Insight (James Quinn)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:55:12 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Oscilloscope for Android Phone
    From: "rampil" <ira.rampil@gmail.com>
    Hi All, Im not sure what signals Sam is looking for with his desire for an oscilloscope. There is no description of the interference with his EFIS and autopilot. Without some detailed sort of characterization of the symptoms you can't even guess what bandwidth you might need in a scope to track down the noise. Is it audio range, power inverter range, RF, etc? The android apps mentioned by Jetboy seen to be spectrum analyzers for audio range only, so far as I can tell, not oscilloscope apps. Sam: what wires are you planning to look at with a scope? Power? Digital I/O lines, analog I/O? If you are thinking about splicing a headset cord on to a avionics power line, remember that 12 V will smoke an Android. Real scopes generally have voltage divider probes and and are usually tolerant of much wider voltage ranges to start with. -------- Ira N224XS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=451285#451285


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:13:04 AM PST US
    Subject: JPI vs. Insight
    From: GLEN MATEJCEK <fly4grins@gmail.com>
    HI All- I've a friend interested in updating his 182's panel with a graphic engine analyzer, and has narrowed his search to either a JPI 730 or 830, or an Insight G2 or G3. I haven't followed that market in many years, and was wondering if any of you folks in the field had any commentary. Thanks in advane for your thoughts-


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:58:11 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: JPI vs. Insight
    From: Bambas <karl@bambas.com>
    I've had a JPI 830 in a Globe Swift (6 cyl Cont O-300) for four years an it has worked flawlessly. I fly by it's %power and EGT indications. The fuel totalizer is usually within tenths of a gallon on predicting gallons required when topping off. Karl > On Dec 21, 2015, at 1:09 PM, GLEN MATEJCEK <fly4grins@gmail.com> wrote: > > HI All- > > I've a friend interested in updating his 182's panel with a graphic engine analyzer, and has narrowed his search to either a JPI 730 or 830, or an Insight G2 or G3. I haven't followed that market in many years, and was wondering if any of you folks in the field had any commentary. > > Thanks in advane for your thoughts-


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:22:33 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: JPI vs. Insight
    From: Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com>
    On 12/21/2015 12:09 PM, GLEN MATEJCEK wrote: > HI All- > > I've a friend interested in updating his 182's panel with a graphic > engine analyzer, and has narrowed his search to either a JPI 730 or > 830, or an Insight G2 or G3. I haven't followed that market in many > years, and was wondering if any of you folks in the field had any > commentary. > > Thanks in advane for your thoughts- I'd never buy anything from JPI, because of their legal action against the host of these lists. They basically stole the name of a product that Matt created (Fuelscan), then used the overwhelming weight of their corporate lawyers to force his brand name off his product. I've read of others having support issues (read that 'abandonment') with a different brand that the company bought out. I'm a firm believer in keeping my money away from unscrupulous & unethical operators. Charlie


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:12:38 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: JPI vs. Insight
    From: "rampil" <ira.rampil@gmail.com>
    Then there is this, from Matt, about JPI: http://www.matronics.com/jpi.html -------- Ira N224XS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=451308#451308


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:26:50 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: JPI vs. Insight
    From: James Quinn <jquinn3@gmail.com>
    You might also consider the Electronics International (EI) range of products. They also have an excellent reputation for customer support. On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com> wrote: > ceengland7@gmail.com> > > On 12/21/2015 12:09 PM, GLEN MATEJCEK wrote: > >> HI All- >> >> I've a friend interested in updating his 182's panel with a graphic >> engine analyzer, and has narrowed his search to either a JPI 730 or 830, or >> an Insight G2 or G3. I haven't followed that market in many years, and was >> wondering if any of you folks in the field had any commentary. >> >> Thanks in advane for your thoughts- >> > I'd never buy anything from JPI, because of their legal action against the > host of these lists. They basically stole the name of a product that Matt > created (Fuelscan), then used the overwhelming weight of their corporate > lawyers to force his brand name off his product. I've read of others having > support issues (read that 'abandonment') with a different brand that the > company bought out. > > I'm a firm believer in keeping my money away from unscrupulous & unethical > operators. > > Charlie > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --