AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Thu 06/02/16


Total Messages Posted: 11



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:18 AM - Official AeroElectric-List Usage Guidelines (Matt Dralle)
     2. 07:03 AM - Saggy bus voltage on Cessna 182 (Alec Myers)
     3. 08:08 AM - ADS-B SDR (was Re: Some low-cost EMC tools . . .) (Rick Beebe)
     4. 09:25 AM - Re: Saggy bus voltage on Cessna 182 (Charlie England)
     5. 09:37 AM - Re: Saggy bus voltage on Cessna 182 (Craig Reding)
     6. 09:56 AM - Re: Saggy bus voltage on Cessna 182 (Art Zemon)
     7. 10:42 AM - Re: Saggy bus voltage on Cessna 182 (Kent or Jackie Ashton)
     8. 12:01 PM - Re: Saggy bus voltage on Cessna 182 (user9253)
     9. 12:45 PM - Re: Saggy bus voltage on Cessna 182 (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    10. 01:42 PM - Re: Some low-cost EMC tools . . . (merlewagner2)
    11. 03:40 PM - Re: Re: Some low-cost EMC tools . . . (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:18:30 AM PST US
    From: Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com>
    Subject: Official AeroElectric-List Usage Guidelines
    Dear Listers, Please read over the AeroElectric-List Usage Guidelines below. The complete AeroElectric-List FAQ including these Usage Guidelines can be found at the following URL: http://www.matronics.com/FAQs/AeroElectric-List.FAQ.html Thank you, Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ****************************************************************************** AeroElectric-List Usage Guidelines ****************************************************************************** The following details the official Usage Guidelines for the AeroElectric-List. You are encouraged to read it carefully, and to abide by the rules therein. Failure to use the AeroElectric-List in the manner described below may result in the removal of the subscribers from the List. AeroElectric-List Policy Statement The purpose of the AeroElectric-List is to provide a forum of discussion for things related to this particular discussion group. The List's goals are to serve as an information resource to its members; to deliver high-quality content; to provide moral support; to foster camaraderie among its members; and to support safe operation. Reaching these goals requires the participation and cooperation of each and every member of the List. To this end, the following guidelines have been established: - Please keep all posts related to the List at some level. Do not submit posts concerning computer viruses, urban legends, random humor, long lost buddies' phone numbers, etc. etc. - THINK carefully before you write. Ask yourself if your post will be relevant to everyone. If you have to wonder about that, DON'T send it. - Remember that your post will be included for posterity in an archive that is growing in size at an extraordinary rate. Try to be concise and terse in your posts. Avoid overly wordy and lengthy posts and responses. - Keep your signature brief. Please include your name, email address, aircraft type/tail number, and geographic location. A short line about where you are in the building process is also nice. Avoid bulky signatures with character graphics; they consume unnecessary space in the archive. - DON'T post requests to the List for information when that info is easily obtainable from other widely available sources. Consult the web page or FAQ first. - If you want to respond to a post, DO keep the "Subject:" line of your response the same as that of the original post. This makes it easy to find threads in the archive. - When responding, NEVER quote the *entire* original post in your response. DO use lines from the original post to help "tune in" the reader to the topic at hand, but be selective. The impact that quoting the entire original post has on the size of the archive can not be overstated! - When the poster asks you to respond to him/her personally, DO NOT then go ahead and reply to the List. Be aware that clicking the "reply" button on your mail package does not necessarily send your response to the original poster. You might have to actively address your response with the original poster's email address. - DO NOT use the List to respond to a post unless you have something to add that is relevant and has a broad appeal. "Way to go!", "I agree", and "Congratulations" are all responses that are better sent to the original poster directly, rather than to the List at large. - When responding to others' posts, avoid the feeling that you need to comment on every last point in their posts, unless you can truly contribute something valuable. - Feel free to disagree with other viewpoints, BUT keep your tone polite and respectful. Don't make snide comments, personally attack other listers, or take the moral high ground on an obviously controversial issue. This will only cause a pointless debate that will hurt feelings, waste bandwidth and resolve nothing. - Occasional posts by vendors or individuals who are regularly subscribed to a given List are considered acceptable. Posts by List members promoting their respective products or items for sale should be of a friendly, informal nature, and should not resemble a typical SPAM message. The List isn't about commercialism, but is about sharing information and knowledge. This applies to everyone, including those who provide products to the entire community. Informal presentation and moderation should be the operatives with respect to advertising on the Lists. ------- [This is an automated posting.] do not archive


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:03:56 AM PST US
    From: Alec Myers <alec@alecmyers.com>
    Subject: Saggy bus voltage on Cessna 182
    Hello all, I wonder if I could get some ideas on fixing an electrical issue with my 1975 Cessna 182. The issue is that the bus voltage sags under load. With the engine running and no electrical load the voltage is approximately 13.8V, dropping to 13.2V with daytime load (beacon, avionics, engine monitor, electrical TC, autopilot) and with night time lighting (add strobes, position lights, LED landing and taxi lights, instrument lights) it drops to 12.8V. During flight the battery isn't fully charging and the engine start for the next flight I would describe as "reluctant". If I top off the battery from a line voltage charger for a few hours the next engine start is "enthusiastic". I have had the alternator serviced, and I have replaced the regulator. I have put a 'scope on the bus with the engine running and I see steady dc with about 50mV pp of ripple. I have a photograph of the scope trace, not sure how best to make it visible to list readers, but the ripple looks like a rectified AC waveform with no gaps (gaps I think would indicate a failed diode). Can anyone suggest where I could look next? Thanks for any suggestions Alec


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:08:53 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Some low-cost EMC tools . . .)
    From: Rick Beebe <rick@beebe.org>
    The Open Flight Solutions system is a commercialized version of the Stratux project at http://stratux.me. I've built several of those for myself and friends. That said, for my own system I replaced the crappy 3D printed enclosure I had been using for the one from Open Flight Solutions and it is a seriously nice box. And for about $50 more than sourcing all the parts yourself you can get a complete kit from him which is what I'm now recommending to my friends. At it's core, Stratux is a Raspberry Pi with one or two SDRs running software written by Chris Young to decode the ADS-B transmission and to send the results over wifi to a tablet or smart phone. --Rick On 6/1/2016 9:22 PM, Joe wrote: > Instead of waiting on an incompatible European ADS-B box. Check out > this one: https://www.openflightsolutions.com/flightbox/ > > Have a friend who just installed one in his C182 and is really pleased > with how well it works. > > Joe Parchesky > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Maxwell <wrmaxwell@bigpond.com> > To: aeroelectric-list <aeroelectric-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Wed, Jun 1, 2016 7:54 pm > Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Some low-cost EMC tools . . . > > For anybody interested in the PilotAware application and hardware, and > it is very noteworthy in that it not only receives and displays ADSB > traffic on your navigation application but also generates its own signal > for display if your aircraft is not ADSB equipped, the local radio > transceiver used is only good for Europe. It uses a frequency of 868 > MHz, or thereabouts from memory, which is not available in the US, > Canada, Australia or much of the rest of the world. Hopefully the team > will develop a hardware version which can be used at say 921 MHz so that > we can all benefit from it. > Bill > > On 2/06/2016 6:01 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote: > > At 01:05 AM 6/1/2016, you wrote: > > <jmtipton@btopenworld.com> > > Hi Bob > > I'm not sure what you have written here, but the last sentence > certainly rang a bell, and wondered if this is what you are > talking about > > http://www.pilotaware.com <http://www.pilotaware.com/> > > > The only connection I've made with respect to > ADSB intercepts is what was demonstrated on > the linked video. > > Most certainly, this capability is deeply dependent > on some detailed knowledge of ADSB along with the > talents to write software. No doubt, there are > software packages with amazing capability . . . > for a price. > > At the same time, there exists a boatload of open > source packages that are free. > > For the moment, my interest is focused on using > the SDR as a noise-source identification and > qualification tool. I'll leave it up to you guys > to explore broader interests to our brothers > on the List . . . > > > Bob . . . > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:25:18 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Saggy bus voltage on Cessna 182
    From: Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com>
    On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Alec Myers <alec@alecmyers.com> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > I wonder if I could get some ideas on fixing an electrical issue with my > 1975 Cessna 182. > > The issue is that the bus voltage sags under load. With the engine running > and no electrical load the voltage is approximately 13.8V, dropping to > 13.2V with daytime load (beacon, avionics, engine monitor, electrical TC, > autopilot) and with night time lighting (add strobes, position lights, LED > landing and taxi lights, instrument lights) it drops to 12.8V. > > During flight the battery isn't fully charging and the engine start for > the next flight I would describe as "reluctant". If I top off the battery > from a line voltage charger for a few hours the next engine start is > "enthusiastic". > > I have had the alternator serviced, and I have replaced the regulator. I > have put a 'scope on the bus with the engine running and I see steady dc > with about 50mV pp of ripple. I have a photograph of the scope trace, not > sure how best to make it visible to list readers, but the ripple looks like > a rectified AC waveform with no gaps (gaps I think would indicate a failed > diode). > > Can anyone suggest where I could look next? > > Thanks for any suggestions > > Alec > > Can you get voltmeter probes *directly on* the alternator B lead post & case? Not on the bolts, clamps etc, but directly on the post. Measure voltage there with the engine running & loads off, then on. Sounds like the alternator is supplying ~the right voltage (possibly just a bit low). But if you have high resistance connections anywhere between the alternator and the loads (on the B+ side *or* the ground side paths), the loads may not be seeing the full alternator voltage. If you have an issue with high resistance connections, the voltage from alternator B terminal to case will still be at 13.8 but your bus (and battery) voltage will be lower, due to voltage drops in the high resistance connections. Secondary possibility would be the same issue, but in the field circuit from regulator to field terminal on the alt. Charlie


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:37:29 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Saggy bus voltage on Cessna 182
    From: Craig Reding <clr@redingaviation.com>
    Im not an expert but I would look for corrosion around grounds. Make sure all of your grounds are good. Craig > On Jun 2, 2016, at 9:08 AM, Alec Myers <alec@alecmyers.com> wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > I wonder if I could get some ideas on fixing an electrical issue with my 1975 Cessna 182. > > The issue is that the bus voltage sags under load. With the engine running and no electrical load the voltage is approximately 13.8V, dropping to 13.2V with daytime load (beacon, avionics, engine monitor, electrical TC, autopilot) and with night time lighting (add strobes, position lights, LED landing and taxi lights, instrument lights) it drops to 12.8V. > > During flight the battery isn't fully charging and the engine start for the next flight I would describe as "reluctant". If I top off the battery from a line voltage charger for a few hours the next engine start is "enthusiastic". > > I have had the alternator serviced, and I have replaced the regulator. I have put a 'scope on the bus with the engine running and I see steady dc with about 50mV pp of ripple. I have a photograph of the scope trace, not sure how best to make it visible to list readers, but the ripple looks like a rectified AC waveform with no gaps (gaps I think would indicate a failed diode). > > Can anyone suggest where I could look next? > > Thanks for any suggestions > > Alec > > > > > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:56:49 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Saggy bus voltage on Cessna 182
    From: Art Zemon <art@zemon.name>
    I hate it when that happens. It's bad enough when old pilots sag but we should be able to depend on our airplanes staying __. =F0=9F=98=8B -- Art Z. Sent from my phone so please excuse typos and brevity.


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:42:21 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Saggy bus voltage on Cessna 182
    From: Kent or Jackie Ashton <kjashton@vnet.net>
    To add to what Charlie said, It sounds like a battery load-test is in order. A place like Batteries Plus can do one for you. Also Skytec has a good explanation of how to check for a high resistance that results in voltage drop. http://www.skytecair.com/troubleshooting.htm -Kent > On Jun 2, 2016, at 11:37 AM, Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Alec Myers <alec@alecmyers.com> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > I wonder if I could get some ideas on fixing an electrical issue with my 1975 Cessna 182. > > The issue is that the bus voltage sags under load. With the engine running and no electrical load the voltage is approximately 13.8V, dropping to 13.2V with daytime load (beacon, avionics, engine monitor, electrical TC, autopilot) and with night time lighting (add strobes, position lights, LED landing and taxi lights, instrument lights) it drops to 12.8V. > > During flight the battery isn't fully charging and the engine start for the next flight I would describe as "reluctant". If I top off the battery from a line voltage charger for a few hours the next engine start is "enthusiastic". > > I have had the alternator serviced, and I have replaced the regulator. I have put a 'scope on the bus with the engine running and I see steady dc with about 50mV pp of ripple. I have a photograph of the scope trace, not sure how best to make it visible to list readers, but the ripple looks like a rectified AC waveform with no gaps (gaps I think would indicate a failed diode). > > Can anyone suggest where I could look next? > > Thanks for any suggestions > > Alec > > Can you get voltmeter probes *directly on* the alternator B lead post & case? Not on the bolts, clamps etc, but directly on the post. Measure voltage there with the engine running & loads off, then on. > > Sounds like the alternator is supplying ~the right voltage (possibly just a bit low). But if you have high resistance connections anywhere between the alternator and the loads (on the B+ side *or* the ground side paths), the loads may not be seeing the full alternator voltage. If you have an issue with high resistance connections, the voltage from alternator B terminal to case will still be at 13.8 but your bus (and battery) voltage will be lower, due to voltage drops in the high resistance connections. > > Secondary possibility would be the same issue, but in the field circuit from regulator to field terminal on the alt. > > Charlie >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:01:31 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Saggy bus voltage on Cessna 182
    From: "user9253" <fransew@gmail.com>
    If the regulator has I A S F terminals, measure the voltage between terminal S and the regulator case with the engine running. If 14 to 14.5 volts, the regulator and alternator are working OK. With engine running and all electrical loads turned on, measure the voltage between the positive battery terminal and the alternator "B" terminal. The voltage drop should be less than a few tenths of a volt. If more, then check all connections between alternator B terminal and battery positive. Also check all ground connections, especially regulator ground, engine ground strap and battery ground. -------- Joe Gores Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456782#456782


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:45:03 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Saggy bus voltage on Cessna 182
    At 10:37 AM 6/2/2016, you wrote: >On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Alec Myers ><<mailto:alec@alecmyers.com>alec@alecmyers.com> wrote: ><<mailto:alec@alecmyers.com>alec@alecmyers.com> > > >Hello all, > >I wonder if I could get some ideas on fixing an electrical issue >with my 1975 Cessna 182. > >The issue is that the bus voltage sags under load. With the engine >running and no electrical load the voltage is approximately 13.8V, >dropping to 13.2V with daytime load (beacon, avionics, engine >monitor, electrical TC, autopilot) and with night time lighting (add >strobes, position lights, LED landing and taxi lights, instrument >lights) it drops to 12.8V The factory spec set point for those regulators is 14.2 +/- 0.2 volts . . . After engine start and before turning on any additional loads, the BUS voltage should be within those limits. >. > >During flight the battery isn't fully charging and the engine start >for the next flight I would describe as "reluctant". If I top off >the battery from a line voltage charger for a few hours the next >engine start is "enthusiastic". This observation rules out soggy battery. Given the voltages you've reported, battery performance sans external supports is understandable. A battery will not accept significant energy at bus voltages below 13.8 . . . and even at 13.8 it would take HOURS to top it off. This is why the slightly excessive set-point is the legacy value of 14.2 was selected for flooded lead-acid batteries . . . 'slight' overcharge that quickly tops off battery without serious 'damage'. The sealed vented lead-acid (SLVA) likes to be charged more aggressively . . . excerpts from the Hawker data says: Emacs! This fact drives the B&C policy decision to factory set their regulators to 14.6 volts. >I have had the alternator serviced, and I have replaced the >regulator. I have put a 'scope on the bus with the engine running >and I see steady dc with about 50mV pp of ripple. I have a >photograph of the scope trace, not sure how best to make it visible >to list readers, but the ripple looks like a rectified AC waveform >with no gaps (gaps I think would indicate a failed diode). > >Can anyone suggest where I could look next? Yes . . . and it is simple . . . just not easy. You need to get a voltmeter reading at the "S" and "F" terminals of your regulator with the engine running. "VS" should be the 14.2 +/- 0.2 volt value (or what ever is presently presented on the regulator's name-plate) and "VF" should be substantially larger than zero but NOT pegged against the bus . . . if it is pegged, then increase RPM to see if the voltage comes off the peg. I have had the alternator serviced, and I have replaced the regulator. I have put a 'scope on the bus with the engine running and I see steady dc with about 50mV pp of ripple. I have a photograph of the scope trace, not sure how best to make it visible to list readers, but the ripple looks like a rectified AC waveform with no gaps (gaps I think would indicate a failed diode). This reading is WAAaayyy low. It should be on the order of 1.5 volts pk-pk. 3 phase rectified DC is predicted to have an RMS ripple voltage on the order of 4% of the DC output. Hence 14 X 0.04 = 560 mVrms and approx 3x that pk-pk. If the bus voltage is that 'clean' then I think you're going to find that the field voltage is essentially zero. Depending on what you fine for "VS", there's probably a wiring disconnect somewhere along the path from Bus through the alternator switch to the OV sensor, out to the regulator and on to the alternator "F" terminal. Having the voltage measurements I suggested will 'divide' the enemy in the battle toward submission. Finally, once the stock regulator is working, you may want to consider a more modern ADJUSTABLE device that can be set to accommodate the special needs of SVLA batteries. Bob . . .


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:42:51 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Some low-cost EMC tools . . .
    From: "merlewagner2" <wagnermerle@gmail.com>
    Bob, Checkout rfexplorer.com. They have a neat setup for RF analysis using the RF Explorer. If I wasn't building a spectrum analyzer then this would be my next purchase. Merle Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456787#456787


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:40:27 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Some low-cost EMC tools . . .
    At 03:41 PM 6/2/2016, you wrote: ><wagnermerle@gmail.com> > >Bob, > >Checkout rfexplorer.com. They have a neat setup for RF analysis >using the RF Explorer. Yes, I've seen those. There are numerous hardware configurations on eBay . . . and a variety of open source software support programs as well. These are simply a more 'self contained' version of the SDR modules. They certainly have an advantage of offering hand-held utility. I will probably have one of broad-band versions at some time in the future. Bob . . .




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --