AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Tue 08/30/16


Total Messages Posted: 6



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:51 AM - Re: Under Sized Wire (user9253)
     2. 06:57 AM - Re: Wire Clamps (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     3. 11:10 AM - Re: Re: Under Sized Wire (Roger)
     4. 11:10 AM - Z13/8 with EarthX battery and dual electronic ignition (Mark and Kathleen Navratil)
     5. 02:06 PM - Re: Wire Clamps (Art Zemon)
     6. 08:12 PM - Re: Z13/8 with EarthX battery and dual electronic ignition (user9253)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:51:04 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Under Sized Wire
    From: "user9253" <fransew@gmail.com>
    In reference to my original question about 14 AWG wire melting at 60 amp, below are some links related to the subject. Calculate the dissipated watts: http://mustcalculate.com/electronics/wireproperties.php?mat=cu&l=1&area=2.08&areae=mm2&i=60&temp All About Circuits forum discussion: http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/how-to-calculate-heat-in-wires.108314/ WIRE AND CABLE MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE AND RISE IN AIR DESIGN NOTE November 1996, Updated September 2009 by Douglas P. Arduini - Consultant TABLE 3. MAXIMUM WIRE CURRENT FOR SINGLE COPPER WIRE IN FREE AIR https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7ZTG2VpCuDRR0VkRGpidG5DcTA 14 AWG at 43 amps = 125 degrees C temp rise 14 AWG at 47 amps =150 degrees C temp rise 14 AWG at 54 amps = 200 degrees C temp rise Conclusion: 14 AWG wire would not melt at 60 amps -------- Joe Gores Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=460028#460028


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:57:00 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Wire Clamps
    At 07:44 PM 8/29/2016, you wrote: >That's a very clever idea. Thank you, Kent. I'll keep that one in >mind. Given the way that the interior of the BD-4C is built, I am >more likely to rivet a little piece of scrap to a an aluminum angle >that is part of the frame than to use epoxy. But you have given me >food for thought. Adhesives in structural or semi-structural applications are worthy of thought . . . and testing. Adhesive science is as much art as it is physics. You can delve into the subject on the 'net where you will discover discussions on levels of energy inherent in the surfaces of the various materials. The ability of an adhesive to grip any given surface is a function of surface textures and energy levels diluted with the effects of shock, moisture, contamination, temperature, etc. etc. I would not discourage anyone from trying any combination of glued joints using materials from their past experiences but if joint failure in your airplane generates an uncomfortable level of risk . . . well . . . think it through and TEST. At Beech, we had folks in the materials lab who were dedicated to the study and application of the various uckum-yuckies that were offered up as the next great glue. They could tell you some pretty amazing stories . . . and as long as the studies were confined to the lab, some were funny too. A few years ago I produce this article for the 'Connection . . . http://tinyurl.com/j2gxbqy . . . and later, refined it for Kit Planes http://tinyurl.com/hxczu3r The article speaks to the use of glued-on mountings for low-risk structural applications. Securing wire bundles and small electro-whizzies to the airplane are generally low risk situations. About the time I was selling the bond studs, I researched a number of adhesives for their suitability to task. No doubt there are many but the material E6000 and "ShoGoo" proved to be useful. The stuff needs 24 hour cure but it's tenacious, robust, inexpensive and available about everywhere. Bob . . .


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:10:19 AM PST US
    From: Roger <rnjcurtis@charter.net>
    Subject: Re: Under Sized Wire
    WIRE AND CABLE MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE AND RISE IN AIR DESIGN NOTE November 1996, Updated September 2009 by Douglas P. Arduini - Consultant TABLE 3. MAXIMUM WIRE CURRENT FOR SINGLE COPPER WIRE IN FREE AIR https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7ZTG2VpCuDRR0VkRGpidG5DcTA 14 AWG at 43 amps = 125 degrees C temp rise 14 AWG at 47 amps =150 degrees C temp rise 14 AWG at 54 amps = 200 degrees C temp rise Conclusion: 14 AWG wire would not melt at 60 amps At 60 amps the temperature would be about 480 deg F!! I would say that you would see some flowing of the wire insulation and a bit of smoke. Not what I would call an ideal airborne situation! Roger


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:10:45 AM PST US
    From: Mark and Kathleen Navratil <czechsix@msn.com>
    Subject: Z13/8 with EarthX battery and dual electronic ignition
    Hi Bob, I'm building an RV-14A that will have a full glass IFR panel and dual elect ronic ignition (still undecided about which brand of ignition but for discu ssion purposes let's assume it's not P-mags). I'd also like to use the Ea rthX ETX680 battery for the significant weight savings. Would you be comfo rtable using Z13/8 for this mission? A few specific questions I have: 1) 1) Is the SD-8 with the parallel R/C circuit & PMR1C-14 regulator guaranteed to self-excite even if the alternator is brought online without a battery connected? One possible failure mode is the physical connection to the battery, but my real concern is the unknown failure modes of the Ear thX technology. It's more complex than a lead acid battery due to the BMS and newer chemistry and has a short track record thus far, so compared to a n Odyssey PC680 I feel there's a greater chance that the EarthX may simply shut itself off or fail in a manner that is equivalent to having the batter y completely disconnected. In this scenario I would assume the main altern ator will no longer function reliably so I need high confidence that the SD -8 will come online and produce 12-14 V, especially with both ignition syst ems depending on it. 2) 2) Operationally would you recommend having both alternators on al l the time for normal flying? Or would you normally have the SD-8 off and only switch it on if the main alternator fails? It seems one potential dow nside to having both alternators on all the time is if there's an overvolta ge condition it may trip the field breakers for both alternators. You woul dn't know which one failed and you'd have to reset one CB at a time to see which one works. Not a really big deal but it adds troubleshooting complex ity... 3) 3) Z13/8 shows both electronic ignition systems connected to the M ain Battery Bus. This seems ok for Pmags, but for ignition units without t heir own generating capability, I'm thinking it would make sense to move on e of them directly to the + battery terminal with a fusible link. 4) 4) Z13/8 shows the main battery lead, battery bus lead, and fuseli nk for the SD-8 all connected to the same terminal on the battery contactor . While I'm sure this is a pretty robust connection, it's still a potentia l single point failure that could result in loss of your battery and both a lternators (along with Main bus, E-bus, and Batt Bus) all at once. I'm thi nking about moving the SD-8 fuselink from the battery contactor over to the MAIN BATTERY BUS fuseblock stud. This would look the same to the electron s but eliminates the battery contactor stud as a single point failure for t he entire system. Thoughts? I know I could alleviate some of my concerns by going with an Odyssey PC680 and installing magnetos or Pmags, but the Odyssey battery is significantly heavier and the Pmags are still a concern for long-term reliability (I'm s keptical about how any electronic device can handle the heat exposure that is inherent in the Pmag design and have an MTBF of more than several hundre d hours). I could also add another smaller battery and have a full dual ba tt/dual alternator architecture, but this adds more weight, complexity, mai ntenance, expense, etc, so I prefer not to go that route unless necessary. Thanks, Mark Navratil Spring Hill, KS RV-8A N2D built/flew/sold RV-14A #140017 finishing wings


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:06:41 PM PST US
    From: Art Zemon <art@zemon.name>
    Subject: Re: Wire Clamps
    More good ideas. Thank you, Bob. Everybody: This is hugely helpful. I won't use all of these ideas but just seeing the photos is giving me ideas that I can build on. Some of the places that I want to secure wires would have been a PITA with cushion clamps. -- Art Z. On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III < nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote: > At 07:44 PM 8/29/2016, you wrote: > > That's a very clever idea. Thank you, Kent. I'll keep that one in mind. > Given the way that the interior of the BD-4C is built, I am more likely to > rivet a little piece of scrap to a an aluminum angle that is part of the > frame than to use epoxy. But you have given me food for thought. > > > Adhesives in structural or semi-structural > applications are worthy of thought . . . and > testing. > > Adhesive science is as much art as it is > physics. You can delve into the subject > on the 'net where you will discover discussions > on levels of energy inherent in the surfaces > of the various materials. The ability of an > adhesive to grip any given surface is a > function of surface textures and energy > levels diluted with the effects of shock, > moisture, contamination, temperature, etc. etc. > > I would not discourage anyone from trying > any combination of glued joints using > materials from their past experiences > but if joint failure in your airplane > generates an uncomfortable level of > risk . . . well . . . think it through > and TEST. > > At Beech, we had folks in the materials > lab who were dedicated to the study and > application of the various uckum-yuckies > that were offered up as the next great > glue. They could tell you some pretty > amazing stories . . . and as long as the > studies were confined to the lab, some were > funny too. > > A few years ago I produce this article > for the 'Connection . . . > > > http://tinyurl.com/j2gxbqy > > . . . and later, refined it for Kit Planes > > http://tinyurl.com/hxczu3r > > The article speaks to the use of glued-on > mountings for low-risk structural applications. > Securing wire bundles and small electro-whizzies > to the airplane are generally low risk > situations. > > About the time I was selling the bond studs, > I researched a number of adhesives for their > suitability to task. No doubt there are many > but the material E6000 and "ShoGoo" proved > to be useful. The stuff needs 24 hour cure > but it's tenacious, robust, inexpensive > and available about everywhere. > > > Bob . . . > -- http://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ <http://cheerfulcurmudgeon.com/> *"If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel*


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:12:55 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Z13/8 with EarthX battery and dual electronic ignition
    From: "user9253" <fransew@gmail.com>
    The Rotax 914 fuel injected engine has two alternators: the permanent magnet one and the larger electromagnet (wired field) one. The permanent magnet dynamo is completely separate from the aircraft electrical system and is dedicated to powering a fuel pump only. No matter how the aircraft electrical system fails, the fuel pump will keep working as long as the engine is running. The SD-8 could be wired similar to the Rotax dynamo. An AGM lead battery is unlikely to short out. Is it possible for the EarthX to short out and bring down the whole aircraft electrical system? -------- Joe Gores Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=460059#460059




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --