Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 02:05 AM - Re: Fw: CNBTR connector (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
2. 02:05 AM - Re: Fw: CNBTR connector (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
3. 02:06 AM - Re: Re: Red/Blue PIDG tool (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
4. 06:48 AM - Re: ADS-B Misinformation ()
5. 07:00 AM - Re: Fw: CNBTR connector (DANIEL PELLETIER)
6. 07:57 AM - Re: ADS-B Misinformation (Gerry Van Dyk)
7. 09:12 AM - Re: Flap control suggestions (GTH)
8. 07:37 PM - Re: Fw: CNBTR connector (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Fwd: CNBTR connector |
At 05:36 PM 2/14/2017, you wrote:
><pelletie1959@me.com>
>
>
> >
> > Somebody knows this kind on connector and how to open the female
> one, to be able to solder my wires.
>
>
>https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01DIY1Z12/ref=s9_acsd_hps_bw_c_x_1_w
>
> >
> > Daniel Pelletier
I've not encountered that particular product
before. It APPEARS to be a plastic clone of
the Mil-C-5015 connectors with roots dating
back to WWII. If so, check as follows:
Emacs!
See if there is a threaded joint under
the shaded area. Unscrew the back-shell
from the connector body. The Threaded
ring that engages the mating connector
simply floats on the housing held in
place by the back-shell.
mating
Bob . . .
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Fwd: CNBTR connector |
At 05:36 PM 2/14/2017, you wrote:
><pelletie1959@me.com>
>
>
> >
> > Somebody knows this kind on connector and how to open the female
> one, to be able to solder my wires.
>
>
>https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01DIY1Z12/ref=s9_acsd_hps_bw_c_x_1_w
>
> >
> > Daniel Pelletier
I've not encountered that particular product
before. It APPEARS to be a plastic clone of
the Mil-C-5015 connectors with roots dating
back to WWII. If so, check as follows:
Emacs!
See if there is a threaded joint under
the shaded area. Unscrew the back-shell
from the connector body. The Threaded
ring that engages the mating connector
simply floats on the housing held in
place by the back-shell.
mating
-I STAND CORRECTED -
Found a whole line of products from CNBTR that
includes some solder-cup, emulations (if not
exact clones) of a Mil-spec connector line.
I've ordered one in to take a peek
http://tinyurl.com/jdgnmtt
These are an interesting product with an
attractive price. I'm looking forward
to a closer look.
Bob . . .
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Red/Blue PIDG tool |
>
>
>Now I remember reading your document about PIDG crimpers a few years
>ago. Great write up! Is that a typo where it says red is 18-22 gage?
>Should it be 16-22?
>
>--------
>John Bright, RV-6A, at Finish Kit
>Continental Titan IOX-360, 8.5:1, vertical sump, SDSEFI EM-5,
>injectors in heads.
>Aeroelectric Z-12.
Yes. Good eye. I've fixed it.
Bob . . .
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | ADS-B Misinformation |
>>>> If you remain within the US borders, and never fly above
>>>> 18,000 feet, 978UAT is "good enough".
>> The US borders mention is a bit of red herring. You can fly
>> your UAT *outside* US borders as well. Canada has no
>> requirement for ADS-B. There is an optional use area in an
>> obscure corner of the country, above 27,000'. Most of us
>> aren't going there, and of course, could opt out of the
>> optional use even if we did.
>> No other western hemisphere country currently has an
>> ADS-B requirement... so just where outside of US borders
>> are we concerned?!
I'm not personally concerned about it at all, as I don't plan to fly to
Canada, Mexico, or anywhere else outside the US. But I DO have friends
who fly their planes to Europe, and others who fly to South America, and
it may well affect them. (Note the use of the word "may" in that
sentence.)
I believe I mentioned in one of my posts that Mexico is discussing
legislation that follows the US model, quite possibly even to the point
of including approval for 978 UAT, but that is purely speculative, as
nothing has been enacted yet, and it appears that their relationship
with the US is a bit "strained" at the moment... Previously, their
rules tended to parallel US rules, but nowadays, who knows? Until their
legislation is finalized, we're all just speculating.
Canada generally follows ICAO (as do the rest of the countries further
south), and ICAO has been pretty clear that they are going to require
1090ES, and that 978 UAT will NOT be considered or approved. That
doesn't mean that you need 1090ES to go to Canada today, nor on January
1st, 2020. But if/when Canada does join the ADS-B mandate, it is
probably going to require 1090ES, following the ICAO rules. (Again, note
the use of the word "probably" in that sentence.)
So, yes, if you're trying to decide HOW to meet the 2020 ADS-B OUT
mandate, and you plan to fly OUTSIDE the US, it might be a good idea to
at least CONSIDER equipping with 1090ES, rather than 978 UAT. AOPA and
others have published data showing that about 75-80% of current ADS-B
aircraft are 1090ES. I suspect a lot of them are going that route not
because they will fly above 18000 ft, nor fly outside the US, but
because they would rather ditch their ancient Transponder now, as part
of the upgrade to ADS-B, rather than supplement it with a 978 UAT
device. I know that's my current thinking, since my transponder seems
to have been original equipment back in 1965...
Or, you can just follow the time-honored aviation principle of "wait
until not having ADS-B OUT prevents me from doing something I want to
do, and worry about it then..." But judging by the backlog at my local
avionics shops, people who do this may be in for a considerable wait
before they can get it done... Free country, so make your choice and
live with it. Since I live just inside a Mode-C veil, I don't have much
of a choice, other than deciding between 1090ES and 978UAT. Unless I
want to just park my plane, and that's not a viable option for me.
Jim Parker
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Fwd: CNBTR connector |
Thank you Bob,
You're right for the threaded joint under the shaded area. To unscrew the b
ack-shell from the connector body, we must let the male part in place in the
female part. You place the male part in a vise and use a vise grip to unscr
ew the back-shell. A particularity you unscrew counter clockwise.
Daniel
> Le 15 f=C3=A9vr. 2017 =C3- 05:02, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob@
aeroelectric.com> a =C3=A9crit :
>
> At 05:36 PM 2/14/2017, you wrote:
e.com>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Somebody knows this kind on connector and how to open the female one, t
o be able to solder my wires.
>>
>>
>> https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01DIY1Z12/ref=s9_acsd_hps_bw_c_x_1_w
>>
>> >
>> > Daniel Pelletier
>
> I've not encountered that particular product
> before. It APPEARS to be a plastic clone of
> the Mil-C-5015 connectors with roots dating
> back to WWII. If so, check as follows:
>
> <26db80.jpg>
>
> See if there is a threaded joint under
> the shaded area. Unscrew the back-shell
> from the connector body. The Threaded
> ring that engages the mating connector
> simply floats on the housing held in
> place by the back-shell.
> mating
>
> -I STAND CORRECTED -
>
> Found a whole line of products from CNBTR that
> includes some solder-cup, emulations (if not
> exact clones) of a Mil-spec connector line.
>
> I've ordered one in to take a peek
>
> http://tinyurl.com/jdgnmtt
>
> These are an interesting product with an
> attractive price. I'm looking forward
> to a closer look.
>
>
>
> Bob . . .
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | ADS-B Misinformation |
Nav Canada has been using ADS-B for years, but ONLY on the overseas routes over
the north Atlantic and Hudson's Bay. To the best of my knowledge there is no
discussion about implementing any form of ADS-B for Canadian domestic operations.
Mode C is all that's required in any controlled airspace in Canada.
http://www.navcanada.ca/en/products-and-services/pages/on-board-operational-initiatives-ads-b.aspx
Gerry van Dyk
Wetaskiwin, Alberta
On 02/15/17 07:52 AM, jim@PoogieBearRanch.com wrote:
>
> Canada generally follows ICAO (as do the rest of the countries further
> south), and ICAO has been pretty clear that they are going to require
> 1090ES, and that 978 UAT will NOT be considered or approved. That
> doesn't mean that you need 1090ES to go to Canada today, nor on January
> 1st, 2020. But if/when Canada does join the ADS-B mandate, it is
> probably going to require 1090ES, following the ICAO rules. (Again, note
> the use of the word "probably" in that sentence.)
>
>
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Flap control suggestions |
/Le 11/02/2017 21:08, Bill Watson a crit :
/
> //
> /I've been using TCW's Intellignet Flap Controller
> <http://www.tcwtech.com/Installation%20instructions%20model%20IFC-10_rev1.1.pdf>
> and have been happy with it. I use it with a switch where the up
> position takes it all the way to reflex and each momentary touch of
> the downs switch takes it from reflex to zero to first position down
> to full down.
> /
Thank you everyone for your suggestions.
I've passed them on to my partners.
--
Best regards,
Gilles
http://contrails.free.fr
http://lapierre.skunkworks.free.fr
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Fwd: CNBTR connector |
At 08:58 AM 2/15/2017, you wrote:
>Thank you Bob,
>
>You're right for the threaded joint under the shaded area. To
>unscrew the back-shell from the connector body, we must let the male
>part in place in the female part. You place the male part in a vise
>and use a vise grip to unscrew the back-shell. A particularity you
>unscrew counter clockwise.
Yeah, these appear to be a near-if-not-exact clone
of a legacy mil-spec connector. I'll know more about
them when the sample I ordered gets here. The
prices are certainly right . . .
Bob . . .
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|