AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Mon 06/19/17


Total Messages Posted: 8



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:57 AM - Re: G4 stick grip wiring (Werner Schneider)
     2. 03:32 AM - Re: G4 stick grip wiring (GTH)
     3. 10:10 AM - Re: Onex antenna location (user9253)
     4. 10:36 AM - Re: com dual PWR/GND on two fuses? (Robert McCallum)
     5. 11:20 AM - Re: Re: Onex antenna location (Tom Chapman)
     6. 12:13 PM - Re: Re: Onex antenna location (Rene)
     7. 02:41 PM - Re: com dual PWR/GND on two fuses? (Carlos Trigo)
     8. 04:02 PM - Re: com dual PWR/GND on two fuses? (Kelly McMullen)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:57:38 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: G4 stick grip wiring
    From: Werner Schneider <glastar@gmx.net>
    Hi Gilles, aircraftspruce most of the time has documentation to what they sell: http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/pdf/G207instruct.pdf I know not before the weekend bust I was abstinent on emails :) Cheers Werner On 17.06.2017 15:28, GTH wrote: > > Hi all, > > A group of buddies asked me to devise the wiring of a pair of Ray Allen > G 405 stick grips, but they can't remember whether they came with any > documentation, and no wiring information is available on Ray Allen's > website.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:32:51 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: G4 stick grip wiring
    From: GTH <gilles.thesee@free.fr>
    /Le 19/06/2017 09:56, Werner Schneider a crit : / > / > Hi Gilles, > aircraftspruce most of the time has documentation to what they sell: > > http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/pdf/G207instruct.pdf > / Hi Werner, Thanks for responding. Unfortunately the Series 4 stick grip document remains unpublished to date. Thanks to the great guys on the 'List, I got the documentation within hours, and was able to deliver the schematics on time ! Thank you everyone ! -- Best regards, Gilles http://contrails.free.fr http://lapierre.skunkworks.free.fr


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:10:36 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Onex antenna location
    From: "user9253" <fransew@gmail.com>
    The gear legs will affect the radio transmissions and reception. Exactly how much can only be determined by testing. You can install the antenna then go fly and try it out. You might be satisfied with it. Or maybe not. An option is to mount the com antenna on top of the airplane. Theoretically the airplane will block the signal from reaching the ground. But in practice, top mounted antennas work fine. The same might be true for an antenna mounted between the gear legs. -------- Joe Gores Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=470234#470234


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:36:01 AM PST US
    From: Robert McCallum <robert.mccallum2@sympatico.ca>
    Subject: Re: com dual PWR/GND on two fuses?
    Always bear in mind that the fuses are sized to protect the wire and what is connected at the other end (in this case your radio) has no influence on the fuse size used. As long as the wires are adequate for the 10 Amps then 10 Amp fuses are fine and certainly if the existing wiring will supply the new device's requirements then they may be reused/re-purposed. Bob McC > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: Werner Schneider <glastar@gmx.net> > Date: June 16, 2017 at 5:20 PM > > > <glastar@gmx.net> > > Hello, > > most avionics do have PWR and GND on two pins. My SL30 had even one used > for the NAV part (3A fused) and one for the COM part (5A fused). > > I have to replace it with a new 8.33, but just going for a COM right > now, that one has as well 2 pins each tied together, PWR onto a 10A fuse > (8W COM). > > Is there any disadvantage, if I use the existing cabling with the 2x > GND/PWR on extra fuses? Should I use 2x10A fuses (for a 8W com I found > the 10A a bit high). > > Thanks for your advice > > Cheers Werner > > > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:20:01 AM PST US
    From: Tom Chapman <tomrv4@me.com>
    Subject: Re: Onex antenna location
    I have a bent whip on my RV4 between the gear legs just aft of the firewall. I haven't had any problem communicating once airborne, but on the ground at certain airports I have a heck of a time getting hold of the tower. I'm building a full IFR RV-7A, and plan to put one antennae on the bottom of the plane, and the secondary radio antennae on the top in order to switch to whichever radio works best per the situation... Tom -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of user9253 Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 12:10 PM Subject: AeroElectric-List: Re: Onex antenna location The gear legs will affect the radio transmissions and reception. Exactly how much can only be determined by testing. You can install the antenna then go fly and try it out. You might be satisfied with it. Or maybe not. An option is to mount the com antenna on top of the airplane. Theoretically the airplane will block the signal from reaching the ground. But in practice, top mounted antennas work fine. The same might be true for an antenna mounted between the gear legs. -------- Joe Gores Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=470234#470234


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:13:38 PM PST US
    From: "Rene" <rene@felker.com>
    Subject: Re: Onex antenna location
    I had the same problem on my RV-10. I moved one antenna to the top, problem solved. Rene' 801-721-6080 -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom Chapman Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 12:19 PM Subject: RE: AeroElectric-List: Re: Onex antenna location I have a bent whip on my RV4 between the gear legs just aft of the firewall. I haven't had any problem communicating once airborne, but on the ground at certain airports I have a heck of a time getting hold of the tower. I'm building a full IFR RV-7A, and plan to put one antennae on the bottom of the plane, and the secondary radio antennae on the top in order to switch to whichever radio works best per the situation... Tom -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of user9253 Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 12:10 PM Subject: AeroElectric-List: Re: Onex antenna location The gear legs will affect the radio transmissions and reception. Exactly how much can only be determined by testing. You can install the antenna then go fly and try it out. You might be satisfied with it. Or maybe not. An option is to mount the com antenna on top of the airplane. Theoretically the airplane will block the signal from reaching the ground. But in practice, top mounted antennas work fine. The same might be true for an antenna mounted between the gear legs. -------- Joe Gores Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=470234#470234


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:41:32 PM PST US
    From: "Carlos Trigo" <trigo@mail.telepac.pt>
    Subject: com dual PWR/GND on two fuses?
    Hi Bob You are right that the fuse is there to protect the wire, but the size (in A) of the fuse is a function of the current which is drawn by what is connected at the other end of the wire, isn=99t it? Otherwise you could put a 1A fuse to protect a #24 wire with a pitot heater at the end, and you would never see that heater working when you wanted it. With due respect Carlos De: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] Em nome de Robert McCallum Enviada: Monday, June 19, 2017 6:35 PM Para: aeroelectric-list <aeroelectric-list@matronics.com> Assunto: Re: AeroElectric-List: com dual PWR/GND on two fuses? Always bear in mind that the fuses are sized to protect the wire and what is connected at the other end (in this case your radio) has no influence on the fuse size used. As long as the wires are adequate for the 10 Amps then 10 Amp fuses are fine and certainly if the existing wiring will supply the new device's requirements then they may be reused/re-purposed. Bob McC ---------- Original Message ---------- From: Werner Schneider <glastar@gmx.net <mailto:glastar@gmx.net> > <glastar@gmx.net <mailto:glastar@gmx.net> > Hello, most avionics do have PWR and GND on two pins. My SL30 had even one used for the NAV part (3A fused) and one for the COM part (5A fused). I have to replace it with a new 8.33, but just going for a COM right now, that one has as well 2 pins each tied together, PWR onto a 10A fuse (8W COM). Is there any disadvantage, if I use the existing cabling with the 2x GND/PWR on extra fuses? Should I use 2x10A fuses (for a 8W com I found the 10A a bit high). Thanks for your advice Cheers W-======================== ========= >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:02:21 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: com dual PWR/GND on two fuses?
    From: Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com>
    Not Bob, However, the wire has to be sized at a minimum to carry the anticipated load, so you would not have the situation you describe. On the other hand, it is common that relatively small loads, say 1 amp are carried on 18-22 gauge wire, and would be fused for what the wire can carry, usually more than what the load is. Another common occurrence is that wires for lighting on a plane were sized for an incandescent load, but the lamps have all been replaced with LEDs that draw 1/5th the amount. The circuit breakers would not change, because the wiring did not change. On 6/19/2017 2:38 PM, Carlos Trigo wrote: > Hi Bob > > You are right that the fuse is there to protect the wire, but the size > (in A) of the fuse is a function of the current which is drawn by what > is connected at the other end of the wire, isnt it? > > Otherwise you could put a 1A fuse to protect a #24 wire with a pitot > heater at the end, and you would never see that heater working when you > wanted it. > > With due respect > > Carlos > > *De:*owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] *Em nome de > *Robert McCallum > *Enviada:* Monday, June 19, 2017 6:35 PM > *Para:* aeroelectric-list <aeroelectric-list@matronics.com> > *Assunto:* Re: AeroElectric-List: com dual PWR/GND on two fuses? > > Always bear in mind that the fuses are sized to protect the wire and > what is connected at the other end (in this case your radio) has no > influence on the fuse size used. > > As long as the wires are adequate for the 10 Amps then 10 Amp fuses are > fine and certainly if the existing wiring will supply the new device's > requirements then they may be reused/re-purposed. > > Bob McC > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: Werner Schneider <glastar@gmx.net <mailto:glastar@gmx.net>> > Date: June 16, 2017 at 5:20 PM > > > <glastar@gmx.net <mailto:glastar@gmx.net>> > > Hello, > > most avionics do have PWR and GND on two pins. My SL30 had even one > used > for the NAV part (3A fused) and one for the COM part (5A fused). > > I have to replace it with a new 8.33, but just going for a COM right > now, that one has as well 2 pins each tied together, PWR onto a 10A > fuse > (8W COM). > > Is there any disadvantage, if I use the existing cabling with the 2x > GND/PWR on extra fuses? Should I use 2x10A fuses (for a 8W com I found > the 10A a bit high). > > Thanks for your advice > > Cheers W-================================= > > > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --