AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Sun 08/13/17


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 08:03 AM - Re: Alternators - To Fuse or not to fuse - That IS the question (kearney)
     2. 08:27 AM - Re: Re: Alternators - To Fuse or not to fuse - That IS the question (Jared Yates)
     3. 09:10 AM - Re: Re: Alternators - To Fuse or not to fuse - That IS the question (John Tipton)
     4. 02:23 PM - Grounding RV (Ron Burnett)
     5. 08:41 PM - Re: Re: Alternators - To Fuse or not to fuse - That IS the question (David Saylor)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:03:45 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Alternators - To Fuse or not to fuse - That IS
    the question
    From: "kearney" <kearney@shaw.ca>
    Charlie Your comment on the OV nuisance trip is interesting. How does one tell if the OV was a temporary, non-threatening excursion or if it is the result of something serious? Resetting the breaker seems risky. Dave's comment about being able to isolate the field field when ship's power is on without the engine makes sense. In that case I wounder if a switch and a fuse would be better. Pulling breakers seems a bit kludgy. Cheers Les Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=471817#471817


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:27:45 AM PST US
    From: Jared Yates <email@jaredyates.com>
    Subject: Re: Alternators - To Fuse or not to fuse - That
    IS the question You tell by resetting the breaker, once. On August 13, 2017 11:09:00 "kearney" <kearney@shaw.ca> wrote: > > Charlie > > Your comment on the OV nuisance trip is interesting. How does one tell if > the OV was a temporary, non-threatening excursion or if it is the result of > something serious? Resetting the breaker seems risky. > > Dave's comment about being able to isolate the field field when ship's > power is on without the engine makes sense. In that case I wounder if a > switch and a fuse would be better. Pulling breakers seems a bit kludgy. > > Cheers > > Les > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=471817#471817 > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:10:07 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Alternators - To Fuse or not to fuse - That
    IS the question
    From: John Tipton <jmtipton@btopenworld.com>
    And if the breaker was compromised during the initial indication !!! Sent from my iPad ----x--O--x---- > On 13 Aug 2017, at 04:24 pm, Jared Yates <email@jaredyates.com> wrote: > > > You tell by resetting the breaker, once. > > >> On August 13, 2017 11:09:00 "kearney" <kearney@shaw.ca> wrote: >> >> >> Charlie >> >> Your comment on the OV nuisance trip is interesting. How does one tell if the OV was a temporary, non-threatening excursion or if it is the result of something serious? Resetting the breaker seems risky. >> >> Dave's comment about being able to isolate the field field when ship's power is on without the engine makes sense. In that case I wounder if a switch and a fuse would be better. Pulling breakers seems a bit kludgy. >> >> Cheers >> >> Les >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=471817#471817 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:23:38 PM PST US
    From: Ron Burnett <ronburnett@charter.net>
    Subject: Grounding RV
    My RV-6A operated 2 plus years with a Subaru and my forest of tabs bolted to the stainless firewall with the two thru bolts and nuts inside. I have two grounds to the engine from the bolt head and one to each of dual oddessy bats. Had another ground on the panel side of the glove box attached with metal screws and a #8 wire ground from there to the firewall forest. Am now going to dual EFII on a Lycoming and it has been recommended to isolate the glove box ground, leave the 8 wire to firewall ground AND to isolate firewall ground and a #8 wire to inside post from battery to avoid any ground loops. Do both changes have merit, or just isolate the glove box ground? Also have wing lights grounded by lamps. Ron Burnett May you have the Lord's blessings today! Sent from my iPad


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:41:49 PM PST US
    From: David Saylor <saylor.dave@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Alternators - To Fuse or not to fuse - That
    IS the question Well, every just about every plane I've flown with an alternator switch has accidentally been flown with it off. By me. Somehow I manage to check "Breakers In" but "Alternator On" occasionally escapes me. And for as infrequently as I use the breaker as a switch, it works fine for me. FWIW, my field comes on with the master, through the field breaker. --Dave On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 8:00 AM, kearney <kearney@shaw.ca> wrote: > > Charlie > > Your comment on the OV nuisance trip is interesting. How does one tell if > the OV was a temporary, non-threatening excursion or if it is the result of > something serious? Resetting the breaker seems risky. > > Dave's comment about being able to isolate the field field when ship's > power is on without the engine makes sense. In that case I wounder if a > switch and a fuse would be better. Pulling breakers seems a bit kludgy. > > Cheers > > Les > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=471817#471817 > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --