AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Thu 08/24/17


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:54 AM - Re: Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch? (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     2. 11:37 AM - Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch? (jonlaury)
     3. 11:41 AM - Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch? (jonlaury)
     4. 02:45 PM - SDSFI redundant power wiring with Z-14 (jeff conner)
     5. 05:09 PM - Re: SDSFI redundant power wiring with Z-14 (user9253)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:54:01 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?
    At 11:14 AM 8/23/2017, you wrote: > >Joe and Charlie, > >The switch controls an electronic lamp ballast driving two 75W UVC >producing. I don't know if that is inductive or resistive load. >Steady state amperage is 800ma > >And found this white paper(excerpt) on electronic ballasts. : > >"Design Considerations for Electronic Ballasts > >Inrush currents at turn-on, produced from some electronic >ballasts can cause premature relay contact failures. >These inrush currents can be much higher than those >experienced with traditional tungsten or magnetic ballast >loads because many electronic ballasts employ large >energy storage capacitors. Such capacitors can charge up >to 400V for a 277V line voltage, and will briefly draw high >current from the line to achieve this voltage. >As mentioned above, these typically short inrush currents >can climb as high as 100 times the nominal operating >levels. ALL devices with metallic contacts have difficulties with capacitive loads. The majority of my experiences with premature contact failures involved capacitive loads. Consider adding inrush limiting to the switched pathway http://tinyurl.com/yacaagsp These are negative temperature coefficient resistors with substantial room temperature resistance that falls to insignificant resistance after being allowed to warm up under the steady state load. I've only had occasion to use these once on an airplane (P-180). The techs working the experimental airplane came to my desk complaining that the things kept 'blowing up'. Turns out they had mounted the device to adjacent lamp housing such that internal heating was transferred to the housing. The devices were not being allowed to warm up, internal dissipation remained high and they went into self destruction. So be sure to mount these such that free air is the only heat sink. It may take a bit of fiddling to get the optimum part . . . but this one seems a likely starting point for your quest. http://tinyurl.com/y92bs8ba Bob . . .


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:37:34 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?
    From: "jonlaury" <jonlaury@impulse.net>
    After further investigation, suspicion has grown about the inrush current to the power supply that I'm using. The ballast mfgr says any inrush to the ballast is not a problem for the garden-variety installation. The thing that is different about my install is the inclusion of a step-down power supply that specs 40A inrush current...8x the switch spec of 5A. Stay tuned John Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=472140#472140


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:41:46 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Non-aero app: 120/240 AC through 24vdc switch?
    From: "jonlaury" <jonlaury@impulse.net>
    Thanks Bob, Although suspicion has risen that my step-down power supply is the culprit (40a inrush), I appreciate learning about inrush current limiters for their small form and small price compared to clunky hi amperage/price relays, mechanical or solid state. John Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=472141#472141


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:45:36 PM PST US
    From: jeff conner <jconner2424@gmail.com>
    Subject: SDSFI redundant power wiring with Z-14
    Hello, Looking for input on the following. I am installing a SDSFI system on the 540 for my RV-10 project. The power schematic for the SDSFI system is attached. I will be using a dedicated fuse buss for this engine system. http://sdsefi.com/aircraft.html I am considering 2 different scenarios for redundant power to the system using rear mounted Odyssey P625 batteries.: 1. Running 2 - 10GA dedicated power feeds to the SDSFI engine buss with the aux feed only being switched and fused like shown in the attached schematic. 2. Running main buss power from the pass through firewall power lug that I plan to use with the 2 AWG power wire. Running 1 - 10 GA aux power feed from the rear aux battery. Questions: - What pros and cons do you see in the above compared scenarios? - What benefit is the crossfeed contactor usage covering battery contactor failure at each rear mounted battery? - Should I run the system with both aux battery contactors closed and the crossfeed contactor closed at all times? Thanks for your input / help! Jeff


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:09:02 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: SDSFI redundant power wiring with Z-14
    From: "user9253" <fransew@gmail.com>
    The aux battery needs to be automatically isolated during engine cranking to prevent blowing its 30 amp fuse. There is something wrong with the ECU selector switch circuit. It appears to select both ECUs at once. If a ground fault occurs on the master switch feeder, will the aux battery fuse blow? Your post mentions contactors and heavy wires, but they are not shown on the schematic. A picture is worth a thousands words. I would rather see a schematic than try to understand a description. -------- Joe Gores Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=472158#472158




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --