Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 08:25 AM - Re: Re: VHF antenna in the tail (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
2. 08:30 AM - The morning smile . .. (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
3. 08:47 AM - Re: The morning smile . .. (Rene)
4. 11:43 AM - Re: Electronic Ignition spark advance signal boost (Eric Page)
5. 04:24 PM - Re: Re: VHF antenna in the tail (GTH)
6. 05:29 PM - VHF Antenna in tail (Graeme Coates & Sharon Beaman)
7. 06:05 PM - Re: Electronic Ignition spark advance signal boost (Airdog77)
8. 08:03 PM - Re: Electronic Ignition spark advance signal boost (Eric Page)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: VHF antenna in the tail |
At 12:14 AM 12/21/2017, you wrote:
>As I recall, the characteristic impedance of a folded dipole is 200
>ohms, so you would probably need a 1:4 balun to feed it from 50 ohm coax?
>
>Bill
Actually, closer to 300 ohms. WAAaaayyy back when television
Yagis featuring folded driven elements were a close match
to 300-ohm twin-lead.
Antennas and airplanes just don't really play nicely
together . . . the most elegant solution is almost
always a compromise . . . a departure from that which
can be achieved in terrestrial environs.
Fortunately, VHF communications is (1) mostly short
range and (2) line of sight. Hence, a few watts of
transmitter and a wet string for an antenna will
generally put you in contact with the other station.
For the build in question, the goal is to get as
much of a 1/4 wave, vertically oriented radiator
supported on the leading edge of a composite vertical
fin . . . which MUST be glass/epoxy structure to
minimize RF attenuation.
Then, it would be NICE if we could put an 1/4 wave
radius ground plane around the base.
Emacs!
Hmmmm . . . that would make for a funny looking airplane . . .
even the first level compromise of crafting a ground
plane from multiple radials is out of question.
Okay, compromise #3, a SINGLE 1/4 wave element that
extends back along the feedline toward the radio. Here's
one of dozens of examples in the DIY antenna crowd.
https://goo.gl/HXCBzh
This article is pretty close. The author stubs his
toe in assuming that the velocity factor of the 'bazooka'
section is the same as the velocity factor of the
coax used to fabricate the feedline and antenna.
In fact, velocity factor is a function of dielectric
characteristics between two conductors, in this case
center conductor and the surrounding shield. For
coax, the dielectric is some material designed
to hold the center conductor alignment while minimizing
losses.
It's true that the outer braid of the bazooka
does form a coaxial section over the
outer braid of the feed line . . . but with a
DIFFERENT dielectric which is not low
loss center conductor support but a robust outer
jacket of the coax that has nothing in common
with the RF characteristics of the inner
insulation. Hence the velocity factor of the
feed line has no relationship to the design
of the de-coupling sleeve.
This antenna can be installed in a glass/epoxy
airplane with the radiating element firmly
built into the vertical fin structure. The
feed line can be fitted with a de-coupling
'bazooka' . . . and essentially treated as
any other feed line.
I've got the test equipment necessary to tune
the de-coupling sleeve to accommodate the new
dielectric/conductor combination . . . but it
will probably be after the first of the year
before I'll be able to get to it.
Bob . . .
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | The morning smile . .. |
Emacs!
Bob . . .
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | The morning smile . .. |
My wife would be much more impressed by the C-97.
Rene'
801-721-6080
From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robert L.
Nuckolls, III
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 9:30 AM
Subject: AeroElectric-List: The morning smile . ..
Bob . . .
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Electronic Ignition spark advance signal boost |
Wade, here's a small (1.46" x 0.56") PCB to carry Bob's suggested circuit plus
a voltage regulator...
https://oshpark.com/shared_projects/xwyh5mon
...and here's a Digi-Key shopping cart with the necessary parts...
http://www.digikey.com/short/qqfnwm
Connect 'IN+' to the Electroair ignition module advance signal and 'IN-' to the
Electroair local ground. Connect 'BUS' and 'GND' to 12V and ground, and 'OUT'
to the desired EIS input.
If you'd like, I'm happy to put this together and send it along with the other
stuff. It will be about $22.50 with the shipping and tax from Digi-Key. I can
just add this to the PayPal invoice for the voltage slump eliminator.
Eric
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476673#476673
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: VHF antenna in the tail |
Hi all,
Thanks to all who responded.
Indeed the dipole is out of the question and we'll have to go the 1/4
wave route.
/Le 21/12/2017 17:24, Robert L. Nuckolls, III a crit :
/
> /
> Okay, compromise #3, a SINGLE 1/4 wave element that
> extends back along the feedline toward the radio. Here's
> one of dozens of examples in the DIY antenna crowd.
>
> / /https://goo.gl/HXCBzh/
Most interesting.
Maybe this as something in common with the Becker 1A005 ?
http://www.beckerusa.com/Products/1a005-2/
Which we find too expensive at ~100 .
>
>
> /
> I've got the test equipment necessary to tune
> the de-coupling sleeve to accommodate the new
> dielectric/conductor combination . . . but it
> will probably be after the first of the year
> before I'll be able to get to it. /
I'd be most interested in your findings in order to craft a bazooka for
an acceptable VHF antenna in the tail fin.
Thanks again,
--
Best regards,
Gilles
http://contrails.free.fr
http://lapierre.skunkworks.free.fr
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | VHF Antenna in tail |
Hi
Jim Weir designed a copper tape antenna years ago. See sport Aviation
Jan 1981 (attached)
and
http://www.rst-engr.com/rst/products/plasticplaneantenna/plasticplaneantenna_files/2802%20Manual-s.pdf
Very simple and cheap.
> Time: 07:05:33 AM PST US
> Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: VHF antenna in the tail
> From: GTH <gilles.thesee@free.fr>
>
> /Le 20/12/2017 02:41, GTH a crit :
> /
>> /
>> On the attached picture of the rear half-fuselage, the glass fin can
>> be seen, with the carbon fiber tail cone at the base. A small number
>> of foam ribs will be added.
>>
>> Question 1 : What would be the lightest and most inexpensive way to
>> construct an efficient VHF antenna housed in the tail fin ?
>> Question 2 : Will it be necessary to build a glass fiber rudder, or
>> will carbon fiber be acceptable (weight concern) ?
>> /
>>
> Hi all,
>
> Thank you everyone who responded.
> The project is a small airplane with the fin about 800 mm high (~950 mm
> leading edge), so space seems a bit limited for a dipole antenna.
> Still looking into any solution.
> The idea is to design something mostly DIY for cost reasons, so this
> seems to rule out off-the-shelf antennas.
> Any ideas ?
>
> BTW, what is the influence of the radiating element width/diameter vs
> selectivity or else ?
> Any hard facts on the subject ?
>
> Thanks for any input,
>
>
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Electronic Ignition spark advance signal boost |
Eric,
If you're sure you don't mind, that would be a huge help...
Thanks a million! (And to all the others collaborating on this).
Warm regards and Merry Christmas,
Wade
--------
Airdog
Wade Parton
Building Long-EZ N916WP
www.longezpush.com
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476681#476681
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Electronic Ignition spark advance signal boost |
No problem. Lately I've been a little low on things to do in my "off" time, so
I'd be glad to build it.
Parts and boards are ordered.
Eric
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476682#476682
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|