AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Sat 04/28/18


Total Messages Posted: 30



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:43 AM - Cables (Bobby Paulk)
     2. 06:37 AM - Re: Re: Z-13/8 Question (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     3. 06:38 AM - Re: Re: Z-13/8 Question (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     4. 07:37 AM - PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Art Zemon)
     5. 07:48 AM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Alec Myers)
     6. 08:04 AM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Sebastien)
     7. 08:27 AM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Bob Verwey)
     8. 08:33 AM - Re: Re: Z-13/8 Question (Ken Ryan)
     9. 09:02 AM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Ron Springer)
    10. 09:44 AM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    11. 09:53 AM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    12. 09:58 AM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Art Zemon)
    13. 10:06 AM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Ron Springer)
    14. 10:08 AM - Re: Re: Z-13/8 Question (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    15. 10:09 AM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    16. 10:24 AM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Bernie Willis)
    17. 10:29 AM - Re: Re: Z-13/8 Question (Ken Ryan)
    18. 10:39 AM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Alec Myers)
    19. 12:40 PM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    20. 12:44 PM - Re: Re: Z-13/8 Question (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    21. 01:34 PM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    22. 02:50 PM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Art Zemon)
    23. 02:57 PM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Alec Myers)
    24. 05:07 PM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (FLYaDIVE)
    25. 06:06 PM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Charlie England)
    26. 07:49 PM - Re: Cables (FLYaDIVE)
    27. 08:45 PM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    28. 09:10 PM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    29. 09:16 PM - Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    30. 09:26 PM - Evolution of Wire (Correction) (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:43:24 AM PST US
    From: Bobby Paulk <bobbypaulk@comcast.net>
    Subject: Cables
    Barry My rudder and elevator parts are all aluminum - no iron or steel. Also I do not have auto pilot, strobes or any electronic whizzes mounted back there. I really think someone ( not me ) stored the cables on the DC welding machine while it was being used causing them to become highly magnetized. As an aside I had to change most of our Air National Guard rudder cables on the F-106 way back when. The old cables would become magnetized by the electronics mounted near them. The full timers would save the dirty or labor intense jobs for the part timers ( me ). We had to replace the cables with a finer stainless alloy that would not become magnetized. I think the cables were about 3/8" in diameter and the airplane was very long. Not an easy job. Bobby


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:37:59 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Z-13/8 Question
    At 11:48 PM 4/27/2018, you wrote: >For me, it would be availability (I don't keep 24 awg on hand) and >physical strength of the link. 22 is pretty tough; 24 is marginal. > >No doubt it will work, though, if you want to use it. This bigger-but-not-fat wire is a 'bus feeder' to a distribution point of one. You could use 18/22 or even put a maxifuse of, say 30-40A at the fuse-link location. The fuse link seems a bit more 'elegant' tied into the wire bundles as opposed to sticking out like a sore thumb. Bob . . .


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:38:05 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Z-13/8 Question
    At 11:48 PM 4/27/2018, you wrote: >For me, it would be availability (I don't keep 24 awg on hand) and >physical strength of the link. 22 is pretty tough; 24 is marginal. > >No doubt it will work, though, if you want to use it. This bigger-but-not-fat wire is a 'bus feeder' to a distribution point of one. You could use 18/22 or even put a maxifuse of, say 30-40A at the fuse-link location. The fuse link seems a bit more 'elegant' tied into the wire bundles as opposed to sticking out like a sore thumb. Bob . . .


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:37:42 AM PST US
    From: Art Zemon <art@zemon.name>
    Subject: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    Folks, I am out of nylon butt connectors. I know that I am not supposed to use PVC connectors in an airplane but... I need connectors for the landing light wires, out in the wings. I can grab a few PVC butt connectors in the aviation aisle of Home Depot. Help me figure this out, please. There are a whole lot of PVC connectors in cars. Lifetime on the order of 10-20 years, maybe more. Shouldn't I see similar lifetime inside a wing? Probably more since it will be exposed to cold but not as much heat (as a car regularly cooking in the sun in a parking lot)? This seems acceptable to me. What do you think? -- Art Z. -- https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ *"If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel*


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:48:16 AM PST US
    From: Alec Myers <alec@alecmyers.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    My Cessna has lots of (as far as I know) original PVC insulated crimps. > On Apr 28, 2018, at 10:36, Art Zemon <art@zemon.name> wrote: > > Folks, > > I am out of nylon butt connectors. I know that I am not supposed to use PV C connectors in an airplane but... I need connectors for the landing light w ires, out in the wings. I can grab a few PVC butt connectors in the aviation aisle of Home Depot. > > Help me figure this out, please. There are a whole lot of PVC connectors i n cars. Lifetime on the order of 10-20 years, maybe more. Shouldn't I see si milar lifetime inside a wing? Probably more since it will be exposed to cold but not as much heat (as a car regularly cooking in the sun in a parking lo t)? > > This seems acceptable to me. What do you think? > > -- Art Z. > > -- > https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ > > "If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what a m I? And if not now, when?" Hillel


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:04:36 AM PST US
    From: Sebastien <cluros@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    Good timing Art! In this week's Hint for Homebuilders on the EAA newsletter, Dick Koehler specifically mentions that while the nylon ones are better, the FAA says both are acceptable. http://www.eaavideo.org/detail/video/5776799595001/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWWpob E9UQTJObVk1TTJabSIsInQiOiJpeGVMOU9DWWg1Vks0Z0QwbFlLQjdvcjZiSCtEVkJpdW1Fd2ps YU9hL1Z4dVREUTJYa3FmUEdBMjVoRWNzWnBkZ2JNQTBPYVVQYXVwVjZsOGZ3UjhKcWl3UGJaNWJ 3ZXEvc3FnVnA2N0V1Y21NL2tjV21kUTV6bURmVWorZ0pUdCJ9 My aircraft is completely full of PVC connectors. I replace them with nylon whenever I install or repair anything but 30 years later the PVC ones are still problem free. On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Art Zemon <art@zemon.name> wrote: > Folks, > > I am out of nylon butt connectors. I know that I am not supposed to use > PVC connectors in an airplane but... I need connectors for the landing > light wires, out in the wings. I can grab a few PVC butt connectors in th e > aviation aisle of Home Depot. > > Help me figure this out, please. There are a whole lot of PVC connectors > in cars. Lifetime on the order of 10-20 years, maybe more. Shouldn't I se e > similar lifetime inside a wing? Probably more since it will be exposed to > cold but not as much heat (as a car regularly cooking in the sun in a > parking lot)? > > This seems acceptable to me. What do you think? > > -- Art Z. > > -- > https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ > > *"If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, wha t > am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel* >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:27:55 AM PST US
    From: Bob Verwey <bob.verwey@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    My understanding is that the nylon is good in the engine compartment...the PVC not so much On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, 4:52 PM Alec Myers <alec@alecmyers.com> wrote: > My Cessna has lots of (as far as I know) original PVC insulated crimps. > > On Apr 28, 2018, at 10:36, Art Zemon <art@zemon.name> wrote: > > Folks, > > I am out of nylon butt connectors. I know that I am not supposed to use > PVC connectors in an airplane but... I need connectors for the landing > light wires, out in the wings. I can grab a few PVC butt connectors in the > aviation aisle of Home Depot. > > Help me figure this out, please. There are a whole lot of PVC connectors > in cars. Lifetime on the order of 10-20 years, maybe more. Shouldn't I see > similar lifetime inside a wing? Probably more since it will be exposed to > cold but not as much heat (as a car regularly cooking in the sun in a > parking lot)? > > This seems acceptable to me. What do you think? > > -- Art Z. > > -- > https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ > > *"If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what > am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel* > >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:33:16 AM PST US
    From: Ken Ryan <keninalaska@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Z-13/8 Question
    Bob, I don't follow your language "this bigger but not fat wire is a 'bus feeder' to a distribution point of one." Specifically, why use the 18/22 when the rest of the run is 20. Why not just use 20/24? Ken On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III < nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote: > At 11:48 PM 4/27/2018, you wrote: > > For me, it would be availability (I don't keep 24 awg on hand) and > physical strength of the link. 22 is pretty tough; 24 is marginal. > > No doubt it will work, though, if you want to use it. > > > This bigger-but-not-fat wire is a 'bus feeder' > to a distribution point of one. You could > use 18/22 or even put a maxifuse of, say > 30-40A at the fuse-link location. > > The fuse link seems a bit more 'elegant' > tied into the wire bundles as opposed to > sticking out like a sore thumb. > > > Bob . . . >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:02:57 AM PST US
    From: Ron Springer <ron228rj@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    My Home Depot actually has some Tyco Electronics nylon connectors, which I have used on my plane. But, I am not sure if they have them for butt connectors. They definitely have nylon disconnects. Ron On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 10:42 AM Art Zemon <art@zemon.name> wrote: > Folks, > > I am out of nylon butt connectors. I know that I am not supposed to use > PVC connectors in an airplane but... I need connectors for the landing > light wires, out in the wings. I can grab a few PVC butt connectors in the > aviation aisle of Home Depot. > > Help me figure this out, please. There are a whole lot of PVC connectors > in cars. Lifetime on the order of 10-20 years, maybe more. Shouldn't I see > similar lifetime inside a wing? Probably more since it will be exposed to > cold but not as much heat (as a car regularly cooking in the sun in a > parking lot)? > > This seems acceptable to me. What do you think? > > -- Art Z. > > -- > https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ > > *"If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what > am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel* >


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:44:36 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    > > >On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Art Zemon ><<mailto:art@zemon.name>art@zemon.name> wrote: >Folks, > >I am out of nylon butt connectors. I know that I >am not supposed to use PVC connectors in an >airplane but... I need connectors for the >landing light wires, out in the wings. I can >grab a few PVC butt connectors in the aviation aisle of Home Depot.=C2 > >Help me figure this out, please. There are a >whole lot of PVC connectors in cars. Lifetime on >the order of 10-20 years, maybe more. Shouldn't >I see similar lifetime inside a wing? Probably >more since it will be exposed to cold but not as >much heat (as a car regularly cooking in the sun in a parking lot)? > >This seems acceptable to me. What do you think? I would invite the readers to review this article I posted a few years back that reviews the legacy design goals and properties of materials for what was then, a "mil spec'd" style of solderless wire termination: https://goo.gl/Fq95MU Major features in the PIDG style connectors are the terminal body (part that grips strands of wire), insulator (provides some protection of the assembly and helps identify the terminal by its color) and a thin, metallic sleeve inside the insulator that is formed down against the termnial barrel -AND- insulation of the mated wire to provide insulation support for resistance to breakage under vibration. Here's the TE_Connectivity/AMP drawing for a PIDG https://goo.gl/66QGz4 here's the same size terminal in Plasti-Grip https://goo.gl/ZQaKRV Without insulation support, the strands are at-risk for vibration fatigue and separation. Here'a an interesting work-around. Emacs! This Electronic Ignition, dual feed, diode isolated distribution bus has multiple connections just waiting to fail. Emacs! This view shows four, plasti-grip terminals that were either (1) improperly applied or (2) had already regained their as-manufactured shape due to temperature cycling. This was a 'hands off' inspection of the wreckage so I was unable examine more closely. Emacs! Here's an example of lapses in craftsmanship for a breaker/bus-bar assembly salvaged from a vintage Piper. We cannot know the time-in- service for the variety of terminations seen here, but the PIDG terminals demonstrate a decided advantage over the Plasti-Grip. Emacs! At 09:54 AM 4/28/2018, you wrote: Good timing Art! In this week's Hint for Homebuilders on the EAA newsletter, Dick Koehler specifically mentions that while the nylon ones are better, the FAA says both are acceptable. <http://www.eaavideo.org/detail/video/5776799595001/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWWpob E9UQTJObVk1TTJabSIsInQiOiJpeGVMOU9DWWg1Vks0Z0QwbFlLQjdvcjZiSCtEVkJpdW1Fd2psY U9hL1Z4dVREUTJYa3FmUEdBMjVoRWNzWnBkZ2JNQTBPYVVQYXVwVjZsOGZ3UjhKcWl3UGJaNWJ3Z XEvc3FnVnA2N0V1Y21NL2tjV21kUTV6bURmVWorZ0pUdCJ9>http://www.eaavideo.org/deta il/video/5776799595001/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWWpobE9UQTJObVk1TTJabSIsInQiOiJpeG VMOU9DWWg1Vks0Z0QwbFlLQjdvcjZiSCtEVkJpdW1Fd2psYU9hL1Z4dVREUTJYa3FmUEdBMjVoRW NzWnBkZ2JNQTBPYVVQYXVwVjZsOGZ3UjhKcWl3UGJaNWJ3ZXEvc3FnVnA2N0V1Y21NL2tjV21kUT V6bURmVWorZ0pUdCJ9 My aircraft is completely full of PVC connectors. I replace them with nylon whenever I install or repair anything but 30 years later the PVC ones are still problem free. I was unable to get the video to load. I would really like to see the document on FAA paper that suggests interchangeability for the PIDG vs Plasti-Grip. I would be surprised that any movement across technologies recommended/mandated by the FAA would translate 'downward'. Butt splices in runs of wire tied to wire bundles can be spliced with much less expense (and physical bulk to the bundle) with this technique: https://goo.gl/FMCY9K Having offered all the above, I will close with the notion that a Plasti-Grip splice tied into a wire bundle is at VERY LOW RISK for lost of conductors due to vibration because of the support offered by OTHER wires in the bundle. But be wary of non-PIDG terminations for wires taken to studs and tabe. Bob . . .


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:53:31 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    At 11:01 AM 4/28/2018, you wrote: >My Home Depot actually has some Tyco Electronics nylon connectors, >which I have used on my plane. But, I am not sure if they have them >for butt connectors. They definitely have nylon disconnects. Nylon vs. PVC is not the magic difference . . . do the any of their offerings feature metallic insulation grips under the plastic? Bob . . .


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:58:03 AM PST US
    From: Art Zemon <art@zemon.name>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    Here too. Thanks for saying something. I'm all set now. -- Art Z. Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity and bizarre typos. On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:17 AM Ron Springer <ron228rj@gmail.com> wrote: > My Home Depot actually has some Tyco Electronics nylon connectors, which I > have used on my plane. But, I am not sure if they have them for butt > connectors. They definitely have nylon disconnects. > > Ron > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 10:42 AM Art Zemon <art@zemon.name> wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> I am out of nylon butt connectors. I know that I am not supposed to use >> PVC connectors in an airplane but... I need connectors for the landing >> light wires, out in the wings. I can grab a few PVC butt connectors in the >> aviation aisle of Home Depot. >> >> Help me figure this out, please. There are a whole lot of PVC connectors >> in cars. Lifetime on the order of 10-20 years, maybe more. Shouldn't I see >> similar lifetime inside a wing? Probably more since it will be exposed to >> cold but not as much heat (as a car regularly cooking in the sun in a >> parking lot)? >> >> This seems acceptable to me. What do you think? >> >> -- Art Z. >> >> -- >> https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ >> >> *"If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, >> what am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel* >> >


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:06:05 AM PST US
    From: Ron Springer <ron228rj@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    Nope! On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 12:57 PM Robert L. Nuckolls, III < nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote: > At 11:01 AM 4/28/2018, you wrote: > > My Home Depot actually has some Tyco Electronics nylon connectors, which I > have used on my plane. But, I am not sure if they have them for butt > connectors. They definitely have nylon disconnects. > > > Nylon vs. PVC is not the magic difference . . . do the > any of their offerings feature metallic insulation grips > under the plastic? > > > Bob . . . >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:08:13 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Z-13/8 Question
    At 10:24 AM 4/28/2018, you wrote: >Bob, I don't follow your language "this bigger but not fat wire is a >'bus feeder' to a distribution point of one." Specifically, why use >the 18/22 when the rest of the run is 20. Why not just use 20/24? Forgive me. "FAT wires" refers to feeders that carry major battery/starter currents and generally require no fault protection. If one is using a fuse block as opposed to breaker panel, then we would like to have the crowbar ov protection breaker crew accessible. This requires runing an extension of the power distribution on something less than a fat-wire to the single breaker on the panel. As a practical matter, one could make that total run from the fuse block to regulator with 20AWG wire and no other consideration bit it fusible link or other CPD (circuit protective device). The fusible link suggestion simply honored the legacy rule-of-thumb allowing small, short wires to attach unprotected to a fat-wire fed bus. The notion was that a hard fault on such wires would terminate quickly and not generate much smoke. We're sifting the really fine sands of risk here. 99.99% of all circuit breakers/fuses installed on all manner of vehicle goes to the salvage yard never being called upon to do its job to protect vehicle and occupants from smoke/fire. If we were boarding your airplane for a $100 hamburger trip and you confessed to me that the feeder to the crowbar ov breaker was 'unprotected' . . . my response is most likely to be, "Where are we going? Ponca City or Hutch?" Bob . . .


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:09:51 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    At 12:04 PM 4/28/2018, you wrote: >Nope! Well then . . . there you go . . . Bob . . .


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:24:03 AM PST US
    From: Bernie Willis <arcticarrow@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    This electrical connection subject is very interesting to me because over the years I=99ve seen several failures on my work as well as that of others. My son got me onto crimp connectors with heat shrink insulation. I=99ve been using them for about 5 years now without any failures on all kinds of installations, cars, boats and aircraft. The insulation once shrunk provides support for the wire and besides insulation seals against moisture getting into the crimp. They=99re available at Polar Wire in Anchorage, AK and probably many other places. Bernie > On Apr 28, 2018, at 6:54 AM, Sebastien <cluros@gmail.com> wrote: > > Good timing Art! > > In this week's Hint for Homebuilders on the EAA newsletter, Dick Koehler specifically mentions that while the nylon ones are better, the FAA says both are acceptable. > > http://www.eaavideo.org/detail/video/5776799595001/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWWpo bE9UQTJObVk1TTJabSIsInQiOiJpeGVMOU9DWWg1Vks0Z0QwbFlLQjdvcjZiSCtEVkJpdW1Fd2 psYU9hL1Z4dVREUTJYa3FmUEdBMjVoRWNzWnBkZ2JNQTBPYVVQYXVwVjZsOGZ3UjhKcWl3UGJa NWJ3ZXEvc3FnVnA2N0V1Y21NL2tjV21kUTV6bURmVWorZ0pUdCJ9 <http://www.eaavideo.org/detail/video/5776799595001/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWWp obE9UQTJObVk1TTJabSIsInQiOiJpeGVMOU9DWWg1Vks0Z0QwbFlLQjdvcjZiSCtEVkJpdW1Fd 2psYU9hL1Z4dVREUTJYa3FmUEdBMjVoRWNzWnBkZ2JNQTBPYVVQYXVwVjZsOGZ3UjhKcWl3UGJ aNWJ3ZXEvc3FnVnA2N0V1Y21NL2tjV21kUTV6bURmVWorZ0pUdCJ9> > > My aircraft is completely full of PVC connectors. I replace them with nylon whenever I install or repair anything but 30 years later the PVC ones are still problem free. > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Art Zemon <art@zemon.name <mailto:art@zemon.name>> wrote: > Folks, > > I am out of nylon butt connectors. I know that I am not supposed to use PVC connectors in an airplane but... I need connectors for the landing light wires, out in the wings. I can grab a few PVC butt connectors in the aviation aisle of Home Depot. > > Help me figure this out, please. There are a whole lot of PVC connectors in cars. Lifetime on the order of 10-20 years, maybe more. Shouldn't I see similar lifetime inside a wing? Probably more since it will be exposed to cold but not as much heat (as a car regularly cooking in the sun in a parking lot)? > > This seems acceptable to me. What do you think? > > -- Art Z. > > -- > https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ <https://cheerfulcurmudgeon.com/> > > "If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:29:07 AM PST US
    From: Ken Ryan <keninalaska@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Z-13/8 Question
    Thanks Bob. That clears some things up for me. You have not commented on using 20AWG with a 24AWG fuselink. I'm sure at some point the mechanical properties of the wire become an issue. Is 24AWG too small to be messing with for a fuselink? Ken On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III < nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote: > At 10:24 AM 4/28/2018, you wrote: > > Bob, I don't follow your language "this bigger but not fat wire is a 'bus > feeder' to a distribution point of one." Specifically, why use the 18/22 > when the rest of the run is 20. Why not just use 20/24? > > > Forgive me. "FAT wires" refers to feeders that > carry major battery/starter currents and generally > require no fault protection. If one is using > a fuse block as opposed to breaker panel, then > we would like to have the crowbar ov protection > breaker crew accessible. This requires runing an > extension of the power distribution on something > less than a fat-wire to the single breaker on the > panel. > > As a practical matter, one could make that total > run from the fuse block to regulator with 20AWG > wire and no other consideration bit it fusible > link or other CPD (circuit protective device). > > The fusible link suggestion simply honored the > legacy rule-of-thumb allowing small, short wires > to attach unprotected to a fat-wire fed bus. The > notion was that a hard fault on such wires would > terminate quickly and not generate much smoke. > > We're sifting the really fine sands of risk here. > 99.99% of all circuit breakers/fuses installed > on all manner of vehicle goes to the salvage yard > never being called upon to do its job to protect > vehicle and occupants from smoke/fire. > > If we were boarding your airplane for a $100 hamburger > trip and you confessed to me that the feeder to the > crowbar ov breaker was 'unprotected' . . . my response > is most likely to be, "Where are we going? Ponca City > or Hutch?" > > Bob . . . >


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:39:04 AM PST US
    From: Alec Myers <alec@alecmyers.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    Bob, That second picture looks like the crimps were improperly applied, with no i nsulation crimp at all. Even the most highbrow PIDG terminal won=99t h elp if you don=99t put it on properly. On Apr 28, 2018, at 13:22, Bernie Willis <arcticarrow@gmail.com> wrote: This electrical connection subject is very interesting to me because over th e years I=99ve seen several failures on my work as well as that of oth ers. My son got me onto crimp connectors with heat shrink insulation. I =99ve been using them for about 5 years now without any failures on all k inds of installations, cars, boats and aircraft. The insulation once shrunk p rovides support for the wire and besides insulation seals against moisture g etting into the crimp. They=99re available at Polar Wire in Anchorage , AK and probably many other places. Bernie > On Apr 28, 2018, at 6:54 AM, Sebastien <cluros@gmail.com> wrote: > > Good timing Art! > > In this week's Hint for Homebuilders on the EAA newsletter, Dick Koehler s pecifically mentions that while the nylon ones are better, the FAA says both are acceptable. > > http://www.eaavideo.org/detail/video/5776799595001/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWWpo bE9UQTJObVk1TTJabSIsInQiOiJpeGVMOU9DWWg1Vks0Z0QwbFlLQjdvcjZiSCtEVkJpdW1Fd2ps YU9hL1Z4dVREUTJYa3FmUEdBMjVoRWNzWnBkZ2JNQTBPYVVQYXVwVjZsOGZ3UjhKcWl3UGJaNWJ3 ZXEvc3FnVnA2N0V1Y21NL2tjV21kUTV6bURmVWorZ0pUdCJ9 > > My aircraft is completely full of PVC connectors. I replace them with nylo n whenever I install or repair anything but 30 years later the PVC ones are s till problem free. > >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Art Zemon <art@zemon.name> wrote: >> Folks, >> >> I am out of nylon butt connectors. I know that I am not supposed to use P VC connectors in an airplane but... I need connectors for the landing light w ires, out in the wings. I can grab a few PVC butt connectors in the aviation aisle of Home Depot. >> >> Help me figure this out, please. There are a whole lot of PVC connectors i n cars. Lifetime on the order of 10-20 years, maybe more. Shouldn't I see si milar lifetime inside a wing? Probably more since it will be exposed to cold but not as much heat (as a car regularly cooking in the sun in a parking lo t)? >> >> This seems acceptable to me. What do you think? >> >> -- Art Z. >> >> -- >> https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ >> >> "If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel >


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:40:01 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    At 12:37 PM 4/28/2018, you wrote: >Bob, > >That second picture looks like the crimps were >improperly applied, with no insulation crimp at >all. Even the most highbrow PIDG terminal >won=99t help if you don=99t put it on properly. You may be correct . . . on both counts. I didn't have the time or charter to investigate this airplane's condition in all respects. I was to focus on the chain of events that killed the engine. Anecdotal observations of lapses in craftsmanship were numerous. Bob . . .


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:44:09 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Z-13/8 Question
    At 12:26 PM 4/28/2018, you wrote: >Thanks Bob. That clears some things up for me. You have not >commented on using 20AWG with a 24AWG fuselink. I'm sure at some >point the mechanical properties of the wire become an issue. Is >24AWG too small to be messing with for a fuselink? Actually, no . . . We used a lot of 24AWG in the airframe wiring on Premier . . . lots of grumbling at the outset but I think if proved to be pretty much a non issue. When crimping 24AWG into the red pidg terminals, I do double the strip length and fold the strands back to double the copper in the crimp . . . and i'm not sure that offers demonstrable benefit. Play around with it on the bench and see what YOU think . . . Bob . . .


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:34:10 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    At 12:22 PM 4/28/2018, you wrote: >This electrical connection subject is very >interesting to me because over the years I=99ve >seen several failures on my work as well as that >of others. My son got me onto crimp connectors >with heat shrink insulation. I=99ve been using >them for about 5 years now without any failures >on all kinds of installations, cars, boats and >aircraft. The insulation once shrunk provides >support for the wire and besides insulation >seals against moisture getting into the >crimp. They=99re available at Polar Wire in >Anchorage, AK and probably many other places. Yes, the heat-shrink, pre-insulated butt splices are a special breed of cat. I've messed with 'em here and been impressed of their value . . . with reservations. Emacs! None of my rachet-handled tools produced adequate crimps on 22AWG wire for a RED splice. Doubling the stranding back helps a lot. I ultimately settled on my legacy, hardware-store crimp too . . . put as much 'mash' on it as you can with your bare hands. Play with them a bit . . . do a pull test on a sample installation. You should find it difficult to part the splice with your bare hands . . . and it's always good if the wire 'breaks' as opposed to "pulls out" at the grip. Of course you only crimp the wire-grip. The plastic jacket will look pretty beat up after the crimps . . . but smooth nicely at the time of shrinking . . . as see above. The jacket become quite rigid . . . and the products I tested also featured dual wall shrink . . . in internal layer of melting sealant. Bob . . .


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:50:45 PM PST US
    From: Art Zemon <art@zemon.name>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III < nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote: > At 11:01 AM 4/28/2018, you wrote: > > My Home Depot actually has some Tyco Electronics nylon connectors, which I > have used on my plane. But, I am not sure if they have them for butt > connectors. They definitely have nylon disconnects. > > > Nylon vs. PVC is not the magic difference . . . do the > any of their offerings feature metallic insulation grips > under the plastic? > =8B=8B =8BBob, The Tyco connectors that I found have a metal sleeve, an adhesive layer, and a plastic insulating layer. Crimp then heat to melt the adhesive and shrink the insulation. The size is just right for the pigtails on my landing lights and the wires in the harnesses that i built for the wings =8B. I think that these connectors will be a good solution for this particular application. =8B Cheers, -- Art Z.=8B -- https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ *"If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel*


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:57:14 PM PST US
    From: Alec Myers <alec@alecmyers.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    There is a smaller size of insulated crimp than the red ones, they=99r e yellow, and for 22-26 gauge wire. I=99ve never seen them in the fles h, and tooling appears to be scarce and pensive, but I believe they exist. Then there are the =9Cenvironmental butt splices=9D with the uni nsulste copper core and the slide over heat-shrink sleeves, from $Raychem$. On Apr 28, 2018, at 16:33, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectri c.com> wrote: At 12:22 PM 4/28/2018, you wrote: > This electrical connection subject is very interesting to me because over t he years I=99ve seen several failures on my work as well as that of ot hers. My son got me onto crimp connectors with heat shrink insulation. I =99ve been using them for about 5 years now without any failures on all k inds of installations, cars, boats and aircraft. The insulation once shrunk p rovides support for the wire and besides insulation seals against moisture g etting into the crimp. They=99re available at Polar Wire in Anchorage , AK and probably many other places. Yes, the heat-shrink, pre-insulated butt splices are a special breed of cat. I've messed with 'em here and been impressed of their value . . . with reservations. None of my rachet-handled tools produced adequate crimps on 22AWG wire for a RED splice. Doubling the stranding back helps a lot. I ultimately settled on my legacy, hardware-store crimp too . . . put as much 'mash' on it as you can with your bare hands. Play with them a bit . . . do a pull test on a sample installation. You should find it difficult to part the splice with your bare hands . . . and it's always good if the wire 'breaks' as opposed to "pulls out" at the grip. Of course you only crimp the wire-grip. The plastic jacket will look pretty beat up after the crimps . . . but smooth nicely at the time of shrinking . . . as see above. The jacket become quite rigid . . . and the products I tested also featured dual wall shrink . . . in internal layer of melting sealant. Bob . . .


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:07:47 PM PST US
    From: FLYaDIVE <flyadive@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    Hi Art: The reason why PVC is not used - - - supposedly not used, . . . Goes back to PVC jacketed wire. You are not supposed to use PVC jacketed wire either, in planes. I almost said that PVC is NEVER used in aircraft but, I have seen crazy things done like a PRT! Not that a PRT is crazy just that they used PVC. So, the reason why NOT is: Very Caustic Fumes are produced when the PVC Burns. The answer to that is: Don't crash! Barry On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Art Zemon <art@zemon.name> wrote: > Folks, > > I am out of nylon butt connectors. I know that I am not supposed to use > PVC connectors in an airplane but... I need connectors for the landing > light wires, out in the wings. I can grab a few PVC butt connectors in the > aviation aisle of Home Depot. > > Help me figure this out, please. There are a whole lot of PVC connectors > in cars. Lifetime on the order of 10-20 years, maybe more. Shouldn't I see > similar lifetime inside a wing? Probably more since it will be exposed to > cold but not as much heat (as a car regularly cooking in the sun in a > parking lot)? > > This seems acceptable to me. What do you think? > > -- Art Z. > > -- > https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ > > *"If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what > am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel* >


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:06:52 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    From: Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com>
    Barry, A randomly selected list for your perusal: http://www.nationalwire.com/pdf/cat01_elect_hookup_wire.pdf On the subject of Very Caustic Fumes: Close yourself up in a closet & burn some Tefzel insulation. Report back (if able). Charlie ;-) On 4/28/2018 7:06 PM, FLYaDIVE wrote: > Hi Art: > > The reason why PVC is not used - - - supposedly not used, . . . Goes > back to PVC jacketed wire. > You are not supposed to use PVC jacketed wire either, in planes. > I almost said that PVC is NEVER used in aircraft but, I have seen > crazy things done like a PRT! > Not that a PRT is crazy just that they used PVC. > So, the reason why NOT is: Very Caustic Fumes are produced when the > PVC Burns. > > The answer to that is: Don't crash! > > > Barry > > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Art Zemon <art@zemon.name > <mailto:art@zemon.name>> wrote: > > Folks, > > I am out of nylon butt connectors. I know that I am not supposed > to use PVC connectors in an airplane but... I need connectors for > the landing light wires, out in the wings. I can grab a few PVC > butt connectors in the aviation aisle of Home Depot. > > Help me figure this out, please. There are a whole lot of PVC > connectors in cars. Lifetime on the order of 10-20 years, maybe > more. Shouldn't I see similar lifetime inside a wing? Probably > more since it will be exposed to cold but not as much heat (as a > car regularly cooking in the sun in a parking lot)? > > This seems acceptable to me. What do you think? > > -- Art Z. > > -- > https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ <https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/> > > /"If I am not for myself, who is for me? And if I am only for > myself, what am I? And if not now, when?" Hillel/ > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:49:13 PM PST US
    From: FLYaDIVE <flyadive@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Cables
    Bobby: Even the Rudder Horns on your RV10 are aluminum? I has been a while since I worked on an RV 6, but I think I recall their horns to be steel??? I was thinking the RV 10 would have a similar design. Barry On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 8:41 AM, Bobby Paulk <bobbypaulk@comcast.net> wrote: > Barry > > My rudder and elevator parts are all aluminum - no iron or steel. Also I > do not have auto pilot, strobes or any electronic whizzes mounted back > there. I really think someone ( not me ) stored the cables on the DC > welding machine while it was being used causing them to become highly > magnetized. > > As an aside I had to change most of our Air National Guard rudder cables > on the F-106 way back when. The old cables would become magnetized by the > electronics mounted near them. The full timers would save the dirty or > labor intense jobs for the part timers ( me ). We had to replace the cables > with a finer stainless alloy that would not become magnetized. I think the > cables were about 3/8" in diameter and the airplane was very long. Not an > easy job. > > > Bobby >


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:45:17 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    At 04:55 PM 4/28/2018, you wrote: >There is a smaller size of insulated crimp than >the red ones, they=99re yellow, and for 22-26 >gauge wire. I=99ve never seen them in the flesh, >and tooling appears to be scarce and pensive, but I believe they exist. Yes they do, here's one example. https://goo.gl/bEKHco Even have a t-head tool that I'd make someone a really good deal on. Needed it for one task about 15 years ago. Bob . . .


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:10:23 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    The reason why PVC is not used - - - supposedly not used, . . . Goes back to PVC jacketed wire. You are not supposed to use PVC jacketed wire either, in planes. I almost said that PVC is NEVER used in aircraft but, I have seen crazy things done like a PRT! Not that a PRT is crazy just that they used PVC. So, the reason why NOT is: Very Caustic Fumes are produced when the PVC Burns. All the times I worked in Cessna factories (62- 69) the single and twin lines were wired with Mil-W-16878 type BN wire. Nylon jacket over PVC. The wire is still made and can be used to repair said airplanes as it is the same material as called out on the airplane's type certificate. This was the first step up from varnish over cotton over rubber that wired the first electrical systems in the C140, C170, et. als. The spec number escapes me at the moment but that wire too is still made and can be used to repair an airplane that calls it out on the drawings. Tefzel (and some close cousins like Raychem's Spec 55) were just starting to be pitched in Wichita about 1982 . . . I recall discussions at Lear concerning upgrading to these new, higher temperature, more chemically resistant insulations. The 22759 wire was export controlled so we were leaning toward Spec 55 when Lear negotiated the export license and Teflon became the insulation of choice. I don't know where that PVC toxicity meme originated. I don't recall discussing it at Lear . . . the big whoop for Tefzel was the wider operating temperature range and lighter weight. To be sure, Tefzel smoke is not from Marlboro Country! Our major concern from the airframe perspective was flame characteristics. Would it self extinguish and was it free of tendencies to drop flaming balls of molten plastic. Tefzel was really good in that regard, PVC not so much . . . Nonetheless, nylon over PVC was the wire of choice in tens of thousands of Wichita airframes and I suspect as many more elsewhere. Bob . . .


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:16:13 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: PVC vs Nylon Connectors
    At 08:05 PM 4/28/2018, you wrote: >Barry, > >A randomly selected list for your perusal: ><http://www.nationalwire.com/pdf/cat01_elect_hookup_wire.pdf>http://www.nationalwire.com/pdf/cat01_elect_hookup_wire.pdf > >On the subject of Very Caustic Fumes: Close yourself up in a closet >& burn some Tefzel insulation. Report back (if able). Emacs! Yup, that's the stuff! Bob . . .


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:26:16 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Evolution of Wire (Correction)
    > . . . . . . . . . . . . . The 22759 wire > was export controlled so we were leaning toward > Spec 55 when Lear negotiated the export license > and Teflon became the insulation of choice. Correction. TEFZEL. We looked at Teflon but not very hard. Excellent temperature ratings but very expensive. Teflon extruded onto the strands at such high temperatures that you had to have silver plated strands. Further, Teflon was softer and would cold-flow under the pressure a too tight a cable tie. Bob . . .




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --