AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Sat 08/25/18


Total Messages Posted: 1



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:02 PM - Re: Jabiru 3300 voltage regulator (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:02:43 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Jabiru 3300 voltage regulator
    At 12:43 PM 8/24/2018, you wrote: >I am helping a friend install a Jabiru 2200 on an Excalibur light >sport airplane that has a much simpler electrical system than you >are building. I checked the Jabiru manual and found that they are >using a permanent magnet alternator with single phase AC >output. The regulator that Jabiru supplied with the engine is the >type that puts a full load on the alternator at all times then >rectifies the output and regulates it down to 14 volts. This 'shunt regulation' philosophy for small engine PM alternators was indeed popular and practical when mini-bike builders wanted to add batteries and headlights to their products. Total system energy requirements were on the order of 10 watts or less . . . not unlike that produced by those little generators we used to put on our bicycles. The had to be designed to tolerate continuous short circuit loading. I.e. wound with smaller, high resistance wire and well heat-sinked to dissipate the energy developed when a battery became fully charged and the shunting device, usually an SCR, was triggering early in every half cycle of the dynamo's output. Simple and sorta worked purddy gud . . . Emacs! Then came snowmobiles, ski-doos, etc, etc and the batteries got bigger, lights more powerful, starters were added, etc. etc. But the common vernacular for the ac dynamo on the engine was a 'lighting coil'. But as the system energy requirements went up, output demands from the dynamo and its companion regulator did too. A fundamental concern for any solid state power management is what to do with and about wasted heat. You can do it with a combination of two techniques: (1) reduce the heat dissipated in the circuit components and (2) add heat sinking which may included fins to dissipate energy into convection or forced air. (1) is where you start from. Emacs! The legacy, gated full wave rectifier shown above is typical of most if not ALL rectifier regulators of 20 or so years ago. Some people have mistakenly called this a 'shunt' regulator because of the totem-pole of rectifier- SCR strings across the alternator winding. It may LOOK like some kind of 'shunt' circuit but in fact, those four devices in the bridge are only turned ON in pairs and in series connection with the alternator winding. The 'transistors' you see above are in fact 4-layer, triacs or scrs. They are the major heat dissipating devices in the circuit. Some manufacturer's have eliminated the 4-layer devices in favor of MOSFET transistors which typically have perhaps 5% of the dissipation of the SCR. These modern R/R's run much cooler and are more efficient. Once you've refined your circuit components, you then PACKAGE the thing to manage heat that 20A+ components invariably throw off. But these are still gated, SERIES, full wave bridge rectifiers. Nobody would build a true SHUNT style regulator reminiscent of your daddy's moped. It's inefficient, wasteful, difficult to manage thermally and best yet . . . completely unnecessary. If someone claims to HAVE a shunt style rectifier/regulator, ask them to put a snap-on ammeter on one of the alternator leads while system loads are minimized and the battery is charged. If it's a shunt style regulator, current flowing in that loop with minimized alternator loads would be high. I'll offer to give $100 to anyone who can send me a SHUNT style R/R rated at 10A or more to test on my stand along with identification of where it came from and on what vehicle it is used. I'll test here, write a report and return the R/R to the owner with or without the $100 as dictated by test results. I'll bet the Jabiru 3300 R/R is no different electronically than the Ducatti regulators supplied with Rotax engines all these years. Bob . . .




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --