AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Tue 07/09/19


Total Messages Posted: 13



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:30 AM - Re: WIFI Repeater/Booster Options For My Remote Steel Hangar??? (LecrameMark)
     2. 07:10 AM - Re: Limiting Current to a Battery (Ernest Christley)
     3. 07:14 AM - Re: Re: Limiting Current to a Battery (Ernest Christley)
     4. 07:48 AM - Re: Re: Limiting Current to a Battery (Dick Tasker)
     5. 08:17 AM - Re: Re: WIFI Repeater/Booster Options For My Remote Steel Hangar??? (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     6. 08:23 AM - Re: Limiting Current to a Battery (user9253)
     7. 09:53 AM - Re: Re: WIFI Repeater/Booster Options For My Remote Steel Hangar??? (Art Zemon)
     8. 11:30 AM - Headset Conversion (David and Elaine Lamphere)
     9. 02:36 PM - Re: WIFI Repeater/Booster Options For My Remote Steel Hangar??? (donjohnston)
    10. 02:50 PM - Re: Re: WIFI Repeater/Booster Options For My Remote Steel Hangar??? (Charlie England)
    11. 04:18 PM - Re: Limiting Current to a Battery (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    12. 06:34 PM - Re: Re: WIFI Repeater/Booster Options For My Remote Steel Hangar??? (Art Zemon)
    13. 10:45 PM - Re: Re: WIFI Repeater/Booster Options For My Remote Steel Hangar??? (William Hunter)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:30:35 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: WIFI Repeater/Booster Options For My Remote Steel
    Hangar???
    From: "LecrameMark" <lecramermark@yahoo.com>
    There is an easier way, I can suggest you to buy one more wifi router and to connect it with an UTP cable that is long enough to reach the other router. My house is big, and I bought one more router because one wasnt enough for the whole house. If you want more ideas () it may be useful for you, it is telling you how to configure router to work on larger distance oar gives ideas how to connect 2 routers with each other. It may be useful for you and for others. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=490152#490152


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:10:27 AM PST US
    From: Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net>
    Subject: Re: Limiting Current to a Battery
    What he said, Charlie.=C2- I had a part with threaded studs that was a 4 0amp fuse.=C2- I was under the impression that it acted as a current limi ter.=C2- It appears that I was wrong. On Monday, July 8, 2019, 10:26:14 PM EDT, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuck olls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote: At 02:23 PM 7/8/2019, you wrote: Don't polyfuses simplyopen/close? With no regulation, wouldn't you just get a series ofpulses? =C2- close . . . the polyfuse maintains a low =C2- resistance state BELOW some trip point =C2- whereupon it reverts to a high resistance =C2- state. Current flow never goes to zero and =C2- the 'fuse' is held in the high-resistance =C2- condition at some current value well below =C2- hazardous. =C2- To 'reset' a polyfuse, you have to remove =C2- the current and allow the device to cool =C2- whereupon the magic molecules re-arrange =C2- to form the low-resistance matrix. =C2- =C2- Bob . . .


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:14:06 AM PST US
    From: Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net>
    Subject: Re: Limiting Current to a Battery
    Before inserting a diode, I'd add a one ohm "sensing" resistor in the char ge line.=C2- You'd get the benefit of having a way to sense the health of the generator/alternator along with never being able to exceed the maximum charge current. On Monday, July 8, 2019, 8:15:11 PM EDT, user9253 <fransew@gmail.com> w rote: The battery manufacturer, EarthX, wrote: > Based on extensive testing, the maximum charge rating will never be excee ded using this simple and reliable diode isolation design. https://earthxbatteries.com/dual-bus-lithium-battery-design So why not try using diodes first before trying more complicated methods to reduce the voltage and current.=C2- An assortment of diodes with various forward voltage drops could be tried.=C2- Yes, it is trial and error.=C2 - But so is finding the ideal voltage output of a DC-DC converter. =C2- By the way, it is physically impossible to reduce the battery chargi ng current without lowering the charging voltage that is connected to the b attery. -------- Joe Gores Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=490144#490144 - S - WIKI - - =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- -Matt Dralle, List Admin.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:48:45 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Limiting Current to a Battery
    From: Dick Tasker <dick@thetaskerfamily.com>
    Adding a resistor with that high impedance would certainly limit the charging current! To only a couple amps or so... The idea would probably work, but the resistor would have to be much less than 1 ohm and would have to be a high wattage one. Dick Tasker Ernest Christley wrote: > Before inserting a diode, I'd add a one ohm "sensing" resistor in the charge line. You'd get the benefit of having a way to sense the health of the generator/alternator along with never being able > to exceed the maximum charge current. > > On Monday, July 8, 2019, 8:15:11 PM EDT, user9253 <fransew@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The battery manufacturer, EarthX, wrote: > > > Based on extensive testing, the maximum charge rating will never be exceeded using this simple and reliable diode isolation design. > > https://earthxbatteries.com/dual-bus-lithium-battery-design > So why not try using diodes first before trying more complicated methods to reduce the voltage and current. An assortment of diodes with various forward voltage drops could be tried. Yes, it is > trial and error. But so is finding the ideal voltage output of a DC-DC converter. > By the way, it is physically impossible to reduce the battery charging current without lowering the charging voltage that is connected to the battery. > > -------- > Joe Gores > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=490144#490144 > > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List > http://forums.matronics.com > http://wiki.sp; &= --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:17:48 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: WIFI Repeater/Booster Options For My Remote
    Steel Hangar??? At 07:29 AM 7/9/2019, you wrote: >"LecrameMark" <lecramermark@yahoo.com> > >There is an easier way, I can suggest you to buy >one more wifi router and to connect it with an >UTP cable that is long enough to reach the other >router. My house is big, and I bought one more >router because one wasn=99t enough for the whole >house. If you want more ideas () it may be >useful for you, it is telling you how to >configure router to work on larger distance oar >gives ideas how to connect 2 routers with each >other. It may be useful for you and for others. Just finished resolving a similar problem with my wifi system. A recent refurbishment of a deck at the back of my house offered an opportunity to move my main router to the highest possible point inside the house. Couldn't use the attic due to temperature variations but we added a power and cat5 cable conduit up through the walls to an upstairs bedroom. The router is now about 20' above terrain on the property. I can now remain 'connected' for up to 200 to 300 feet all around the house. Dr. Dee's system needed cat5 interconnect so I've been using an 'extender' at her desk. These don't have a WAN port, only 4 LAN ports. They listen-talk on 2.4 and 5.8G so you can set them up to become another wifi 'source' with their own SSID. I set up Dr. Dee's with a 5G SSID only because it let's me monitor her connectivity from my mobile phone. Other than convenience of maintenance, the extender could be radio-silent and only the cat5 ports active to connect up her office. I have another extender as wifi repeaters with independent SSIDs for the 'kids' wifi. It's powered through a programmable timer that limits their access. A third extender is kept on hand to supply a cat5 portal to the system for times that I'm working a computer that doesn't have wifi capability. There is a boat-load of extender products out there at really attractive prices. The key to good coverage is improving radio illumination of the property where (like in airplanes) ALTITUDE has a profound effect on range. Getting my main router elevated made a huge difference. Adding extenders in remote buildings (also as high and clear as practical) would offer both wifi SSID and Cat5 interconnection in the building. For your steel hangar situation, mounting a radio-silent extender in a plastic housing outside on a wall facing the house might do it. You could then bring cat5 into the hangar to another router that puts the hangar on the 'net with its own system. I've offered to try this for a friend out in the Gyp Hills with outbuildings a quarter mile away from the house. Will post the results as they become known. Bob . . .


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:23:15 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Limiting Current to a Battery
    From: "user9253" <fransew@gmail.com>
    Suppose the battery charging current is 10 amps. The voltage drop across a 1 ohm resistor with 10 amps flowing is 10 volts. That leaves 4 volts to charge the battery. It will not work. A resistor of 0.05 ohms times 10 amps equals 0.5 volts dropped across the resistor, which is about right. A 16 AWG wire that is 15 feet long has about 0.05 ohms. Maybe the towing vehicle and trailer wires already have enough resistance to limit battery charging current to a safe value. Maybe we are trying to solve a problem that does not exist. -------- Joe Gores Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=490156#490156


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:53:17 AM PST US
    From: Art Zemon <art@zemon.name>
    Subject: Re: WIFI Repeater/Booster Options For My Remote
    Steel Hangar??? Folks, I want to add a few things to what Bob wrote. 5.8 GHz attenuates rapidly as it passes through walls. You may find that just two or three walls are enough to make the signal unusable. Play with the location of your WiFi access point. Moving it a few feet side to side or up and down can make a huge difference. 2.4 GHz doesn't attenuate as badly as the signal passes through walls, ceilings, etc. but microwave ovens interfere with it badly. If you are out in the country, as opposed to in an apartment building with dozens of other WiFi access points, you may find that 2.4 GHz gives you broader, easier to manage coverage. 2.4 GHz looks like it has lots of channels but, in fact, only channels 1, 6, and 11 are useful here in the US. They are the only three which do not overlap. See https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/connectivity/wifi-ieee-802-11/ch annels-frequencies-bands-bandwidth.php When you configure your WiFi radio(s), make sure that you channels don't overlap, either your own equipment or your neighbors'. On Android, I use the Wifi Analyzer tool to display what is going on. There are similar ones on iOS, I'm sure. Many WiFi routers let you choose a maximum speed. In actuality, you are choosing the frequency bandwidth of the channel that you are using. Generally speaking, the transmitter power remains unchanged. If you choose a higher maximum speed, the transmitter spreads the power across a broader frequency range. You get more speed but less distance. By choosing a lower maximum speed, the transmitter focuses its power on a narrower frequency range and you get more distance. If all you do in the steel out-building is check your email, not watch Netflix and YouTube, you don't need much speed. Cheers, -- Art Z. On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 10:35 AM Robert L. Nuckolls, III < nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote: > At 07:29 AM 7/9/2019, you wrote: > > lecramermark@yahoo.com> > > There is an easier way, I can suggest you to buy one more wifi router and > to connect it with an UTP cable that is long enough to reach the other > router. My house is big, and I bought one more router because one wasn=C3 =A2=82=AC=84=A2t > enough for the whole house. If you want more ideas () it may be useful fo r > you, it is telling you how to configure router to work on larger distance > oar gives ideas how to connect 2 routers with each other. It may be usefu l > for you and for others. > > > Just finished resolving a similar > problem with my wifi system. A recent > refurbishment of a deck at the back of > my house offered an opportunity to > move my main router to the highest > possible point inside the house. Couldn't > use the attic due to temperature variations > but we added a power and cat5 cable conduit > up through the walls to an upstairs > bedroom. > > The router is now about 20' above > terrain on the property. I can > now remain 'connected' for up to > 200 to 300 feet all around the house. > > Dr. Dee's system needed cat5 interconnect > so I've been using an 'extender' at her > desk. These don't have a WAN port, only > 4 LAN ports. They listen-talk on 2.4 and > 5.8G so you can set them up to become > another wifi 'source' with their own > SSID. I set up Dr. Dee's with a 5G > SSID only because it let's me monitor > her connectivity from my mobile phone. > > Other than convenience of maintenance, > the extender could be radio-silent > and only the cat5 ports active to > connect up her office. > > I have another extender as wifi > repeaters with independent SSIDs > for the 'kids' wifi. It's powered > through a programmable timer that > limits their access. > > A third extender is kept on hand > to supply a cat5 portal to the system > for times that I'm working a computer > that doesn't have wifi capability. > > There is a boat-load of extender > products out there at really > attractive prices. The key to > good coverage is improving > radio illumination of the property > where (like in airplanes) ALTITUDE > has a profound effect on range. > > Getting my main router elevated made > a huge difference. Adding extenders > in remote buildings (also as > high and clear as practical) would > offer both wifi SSID and Cat5 > interconnection in the building. > > > For your steel hangar situation, > mounting a radio-silent extender > in a plastic housing outside on a > wall facing the house might do it. > You could then bring cat5 into > the hangar to another router that > puts the hangar on the 'net with > its own system. I've offered to > try this for a friend out in > the Gyp Hills with outbuildings > a quarter mile away from the house. > Will post the results as they become > known. > > > Bob . . . > -- https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ *Pray as if everything depends on God. Act as if everything depends on you. *


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:30:03 AM PST US
    From: David and Elaine Lamphere <dalamphere@comcast.net>
    Subject: Headset Conversion
    A few weeks back I purchased a Flightcom E-13 ANR Headset off of EBay. It was a really good price for a like new set. Found out later it was a Military (one-plug) headset. No problem, ordered an adapter (Pilot brand) to use it with a normal GA intercom. Well that turned out to be a problem - while you could talk and hear like usual, there was a great deal of static and loud white noise! I understand theres also a difference in impedance? Has anyone converted one of these military noise-cancelling headsets to a general aviation 2-plug set? Or is this just wishful thinking? David


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:36:47 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: WIFI Repeater/Booster Options For My Remote Steel
    Hangar???
    From: "donjohnston" <don@velocity-xl.com>
    I did something similar to this for a customer a few years back. They had a garage about 150' away from the office and wanted network access in the garage. Parking lot was paved so laying cable wasn't an option. We went with an outdoor wireless extender. Basically, two outdoor antennas (there were directional) that we connected to a wireless AP in the shop. Worked great. But costs about $500. Looks like prices have come down. Engenius was the brand. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=490167#490167


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:50:07 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: WIFI Repeater/Booster Options For My Remote
    Steel Hangar???
    From: Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com>
    On 7/9/2019 4:35 PM, donjohnston wrote: > > I did something similar to this for a customer a few years back. They had a garage about 150' away from the office and wanted network access in the garage. Parking lot was paved so laying cable wasn't an option. > > We went with an outdoor wireless extender. Basically, two outdoor antennas (there were directional) that we connected to a wireless AP in the shop. > > Worked great. But costs about $500. Looks like prices have come down. > > Engenius was the brand. > > Also, https://www.google.com/search?ei=ziIIW5XaA8zXzwKzr4dI&q=Ubiquiti+nano+station&oq=Ubiquiti+nano+station&gs_l=psy-ab.12..0i10k1l6.3555.99914.0.101253.3.3.0.0.0.0.230.649.0j1j2.3.0....0...1c.1j2.64.psy-ab..0.3.645...0j0i67k1j0i20i264k1.0.GvJK3J6l8As No 1st hand experience, but some linux guys who are network gurus recommended them. Apparently they can be quite long range. This one: https://www.balticnetworks.com/nsm5-ubiquiti-nanostation-m5-airmax-intl.html claims range to 15km. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:18:12 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Limiting Current to a Battery
    At 12:02 PM 7/7/2019, you wrote: >Would it be a DC-DC battery charger? > ><https://www.renogy.com/renogy-12v-dc-to-dc-on-board-battery-charger/?gclid =CjwKCAjwsIbpBRBNEiwAZF8-z-TrUeFYygbwZh7wrFUpKO_RhdCJkW-vJ-BFwYS_IZjlu9G8u AMNcxoCgBoQAvD_BwE>https://www.renogy.com/renogy-12v-dc-to-dc-on-board-batte ry-charger/?gclid=CjwKCAjwsIbpBRBNEiwAZF8-z-TrUeFYygbwZh7wrFUpKO_RhdCJkW-v J-BFwYS_IZjlu9G8uAMNcxoCgBoQAvD_BwE=C2 >=C2 > >On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 7:05 AM Jared Yates ><<mailto:email@jaredyates.com>email@jaredyates.com> wrote: >I have a question that's only somewhat >applicable to E/AB aviation, apologies in >advance. But I think it points out a hole in my electrical understanding. > >The characteristics of the lithium iron battery >I'm running allow it to draw lots of current >really fast after the engine starts. If it has >been a little while since the last flight, the >alternator is at max output for several minutes. >The alternator puts out all it can give, and >it's less than the battery wants to take. > >Stepping out of the hangar, my tow vehicle >circuitry includes a wire in the 7-pin connector >that provides alternator voltage to the trailer, >intending to charge a small battery for a >breakaway emergency brake. If I install a larger >battery for other purposes, perhaps one like >what is in the airplane, and connect it to that >line coming from the truck, it seems like it >would almost certainly open the fuse on that >circuit during that initial high-draw stage. Had to come back and review the headwaters of this thread. Seems this is a hypothetical not yet validated by the actual blowing of the cited fuse. The WIRE from the ending compartment back to the trailer has SIGNIFICANT resistance in the battery charging world. As Joe pointed out, a 50 milliohm resistance in a 10A charging path would drop 1/2 volt. This would cause a significant reduction in charge current to the second battery. Can you offer us a schematic of the trailer battery system? Does the battery feeder also supply power for electric brakes . . . or is that a separate path? What size fuse is protecting the current wire . . . and what size is the wire? 10AWG wire is 0.001 ohms per foot. So a 20' run would 'ballast' your charging path to the tune of .02 ohms. A 20A replenishment flow would drop 0.4 volts. Again, a marked reduction in battery recharge current. When dealing with batteries having sensitivity to 100 millivolt differences and charging current in the tens of amps, you're working with a rather un-predictable set of circumstances, difficult to predict without more data and perhaps easier to test with empirical experimentation. Bob . . .


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:34:37 PM PST US
    From: Art Zemon <art@zemon.name>
    Subject: Re: WIFI Repeater/Booster Options For My Remote
    Steel Hangar??? At that kind of distance, you might consider building a couple of directional antennas out of Pringles cans. It works really well, believe it or not -- Art Z. On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 4:52 PM donjohnston <don@velocity-xl.com> wrote: > don@velocity-xl.com> > > I did something similar to this for a customer a few years back. They had > a garage about 150' away from the office and wanted network access in the > garage. Parking lot was paved so laying cable wasn't an option. > > We went with an outdoor wireless extender. Basically, two outdoor > antennas (there were directional) that we connected to a wireless AP in the > shop. > > Worked great. But costs about $500. Looks like prices have come down. -- https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ *Pray as if everything depends on God. Act as if everything depends on you.*


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:45:04 PM PST US
    From: William Hunter <billhuntersemail@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: WIFI Repeater/Booster Options For My Remote
    Steel Hangar??? My hangar is 40 feet away from the house period I first tried a pair of these NETGEAR PowerLINE 1000 Mbps WiFi, 802.11ac, 1 Gigabit Port - Essentials Edition (PLW1010-100NAS and that was unsuccessful probably because the house has a solar system and SunPower uses a similar adapter and I think they were interfering with each other. I did end up buying the Ccrane directional internet extender antenna and I now have internet in my hangar! Inside my house at a window pointing toward the Hanger is by Wi-Fi transmitter so I had to buy only one directional antenna . In your case I would recommend buying two directional antennas because of the distance. CC Vector Extended Long Range WiFi Repeater System 2.4 GHz- Extends WiFi Coverage to a Distant Location https://www.amazon.com/dp/B076KRTXQ6/ref=cm_sw_r_em_apa_i_WJxjDbEA8HY1V Research this webpage to get some ideas but make sure you always buy these contraptions in a pair from the same manufacturer https://www.google.com/amp/s/rootsaid.com/best-wifi-antennas/amp/ Thanks, Bill Hunter On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 03:39 Art Zemon <art@zemon.name> wrote: > At that kind of distance, you might consider building a couple of > directional antennas out of Pringles cans. It works really well, believe it > or not > > -- Art Z. > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 4:52 PM donjohnston <don@velocity-xl.com> wrote: > >> don@velocity-xl.com> >> >> I did something similar to this for a customer a few years back. They >> had a garage about 150' away from the office and wanted network access in >> the garage. Parking lot was paved so laying cable wasn't an option. >> >> We went with an outdoor wireless extender. Basically, two outdoor >> antennas (there were directional) that we connected to a wireless AP in the >> shop. >> >> Worked great. But costs about $500. Looks like prices have come down. > > > -- > https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/ > > *Pray as if everything depends on God. Act as if everything depends on > you.* >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --