Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 08:19 AM - Re: Maintainer's for LiFePo batteries (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
2. 08:41 AM - Re: Maintainer's for LiFePo batteries (Charlie England)
3. 09:05 AM - Re: Maintainer's for LiFePo batteries (Ernest Christley)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Maintainer's for LiFePo batteries |
At 03:34 PM 10/15/2019, you wrote:
>My understanding is that the LiFePo batteries have incredibly slow
>self-discharge rate. That being the case, is a maintainer charger necessary?
Yeah, good question. Perhaps you've already
mentioned it but what, in your experience,
suggests that you need a maintainer on
this battery?
Bob . . .
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Maintainer's for LiFePo batteries |
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:24 AM Robert L. Nuckolls, III <
nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote:
> At 03:34 PM 10/15/2019, you wrote:
>
> My understanding is that the LiFePo batteries have incredibly slow
> self-discharge rate. That being the case, is a maintainer charger
> necessary?
>
>
> Yeah, good question. Perhaps you've already
> mentioned it but what, in your experience,
> suggests that you need a maintainer on
> this battery?
>
>
> Bob . . .
>
Same question applies to SLAs...
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Maintainer's for LiFePo batteries |
1) "Slow discharge" and "No discharge" are not the same thing.=C2- Espec
ially when weather extremities are taken into account.2) A topped off batte
ry is less of an issue for planes that will kick off within two blades at e
very start.=C2- It is more of a concern when you're trying to work throug
h carb issues or some other maintenance item the leave you tagged as a "sta
rter abuser".3) PM generators have the advantage of being light, simple, an
d reliable, but don't generally provide an overabundance of excess charge c
urrent.=C2- Have that PM generator driven inline (it spins at engine RPM)
, and you have more trouble.=C2- Combine these two with number 2, and you
have a frustrating pain in the rear that has you inventing new words on Su
nday mornings at the airport when you should've been in church anyhow.
On Wednesday, October 16, 2019, 11:19:54 AM EDT, Robert L. Nuckolls, II
I <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote:
At 03:34 PM 10/15/2019, you wrote:
Myunderstanding is that the LiFePo batteries have incredibly slowself-disch
arge rate. That being the case, is a maintainer chargernecessary?
=C2- Yeah, good question. Perhaps you've already
=C2- mentioned it but what, in your experience,
=C2- suggests that you need a maintainer on
=C2- this battery?
=C2- Bob . . .
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|