AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Wed 06/17/20


Total Messages Posted: 18



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:29 AM - Re: Z101 with Rotax 915iS (Matthew S. Whiting)
     2. 06:31 AM - Re: Re: Z101 with Rotax 915iS (Matthew S. Whiting)
     3. 09:18 AM - Re: What is an RG battery? (BonniCase)
     4. 09:36 AM - Re: Z101 with Rotax 915iS (Ernest Christley)
     5. 10:44 AM - Re: digest distribution stopped? (farmrjohn)
     6. 11:27 AM - Re: With Flooded cells, at what discharge does damage start? (skywagon185guy .)
     7. 11:45 AM - Re: SDS CPI-2 internal crowbar (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     8. 01:30 PM - Re: Re: Z101 with Rotax 915iS (Ken Ryan)
     9. 01:31 PM - Re: Z101 with Rotax 915iS (Ernest Christley)
    10. 02:16 PM - Re: Surplus Wire (BMC_Dave)
    11. 02:50 PM - Re: Re: Surplus Wire (Charlie England)
    12. 03:26 PM - Re: With Flooded cells, at what discharge does damage start? (Ernest Christley)
    13. 03:32 PM - Re: Re: Z101 with Rotax 915iS (Ernest Christley)
    14. 03:52 PM - Re: Re: Z101 with Rotax 915iS (C&K)
    15. 05:00 PM - Z-11 ground avionics bus question (Ben Beaird)
    16. 05:07 PM - Re: Re: Surplus Wire (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    17. 05:08 PM - Re: Z-11 ground avionics bus question (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    18. 08:00 PM - Re: Surplus Wire (BMC_Dave)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:29:51 AM PST US
    From: "Matthew S. Whiting" <m.whiting@frontier.com>
    Subject: Re: Z101 with Rotax 915iS
    Yes, exactly what I was looking at. I would probably spring a few hundred m ore for a B&C unit, but I suspect a car one would do the job as a second alt ernator. I am attending the Lockwood installation course in August, assumin g covid doesn=99t return and kill it, so I will know more then and be a ble to ask some questions, but it looks very doable with the Rotax pulley an d mounting rings. Although those pieces alone are about $1,000 as I recall. Crazy expensive, but then I own a BMW motorcycle so I am used to parts tha t cost 3X what they should. Matt > On Jun 17, 2020, at 5:13 AM, Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Followup; if this is the right option, looks like you could buy all the Ro tax drive & mounting bits, and still save about $1000 on the alternator itse lf, by using an off the shelf automotive model. The image in that parts brea kout looks like a very common Nippon Denso internally regulated alternator t hat's available in output levels from around 35A to over 55A. They're all ba sically the same external dimensions. > > Charlie


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:31:13 AM PST US
    From: "Matthew S. Whiting" <m.whiting@frontier.com>
    Subject: Re: Z101 with Rotax 915iS
    I believe Joe is correct and this is the reason I desire an external alternator. Even though the 915 has two alternators, it effectively only has one from the perspective of ships power. From page 3 of the Appendix to the Rotax 915iS installation manual. Engagement of the backup power supply system Generator B is done by the Engine Control Unit (ECU) in the case of over voltage and under voltage. If the voltage of power supply system Generator A decreases signifi- cantly or at all, the control transition of the power supplies is additionally done per mechanical means (relays drop out). These mechanism allow engagement of backup power supply under every probable circumstance. If power supply system Generator B is used to supply the aircraft electrical system (possible in common opera- tion mode) it must be noted that in case of failure this power supply system B is disconnected from the aircraft to serve as the backup to the EMS. > On Jun 17, 2020, at 5:15 AM, Ken Ryan <keninalaska@gmail.com> wrote: > > > All accurate Joe. But I think there is a wrinkle. It is my understanding that if Gen A fails, AND the Emergency Power Switch is closed, THEN Gen B will operate both Engine and power the Bus. At least that's my understanding.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:18:05 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: What is an RG battery?
    From: "BonniCase" <BonniCase@protonmail.com>
    Hello....i didn't have good experience with RG battery. If you are having with your battery backup. If possible, try connecting it to a different outlet. If it is in a surge protector, remove it off the surge protector and connect it directly to the outlet. If there are still issues, it may be an issue with the unit itself. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=496883#496883


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:36:48 AM PST US
    From: Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net>
    Subject: Re: Z101 with Rotax 915iS
    $1,000?!=C2- For a pulley and some brackets?For those prices, you could have a machine shop design and custom build the pieces.=C2- Does no on in your EAA chapter own a lathe?=C2- No one around you does aluminum castin g? I mean, c'mon Rotax.=C2- I understand you've got to make a profit.=C2- But, you don't have to make it all off of one sale. On Wednesday, June 17, 2020, 8:30:21 AM EDT, Matthew S. Whiting <m.whit ing@frontier.com> wrote: Yes, exactly what I was looking at. =C2-I would probably spring a few hu ndred more for a B&C unit, but I suspect a car one would do the job as a se cond alternator. =C2-I am attending the Lockwood installation course in A ugust, assuming covid doesn=99t return and kill it, so I will know mo re then and be able to ask some questions, but it looks very doable with th e Rotax pulley and mounting rings. =C2-Although those pieces alone are ab out $1,000 as I recall. =C2-Crazy expensive, but then I own a BMW motorcy cle so I am used to parts that cost 3X what they should. =C2- Matt On Jun 17, 2020, at 5:13 AM, Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com> wrote: Followup; if this is the right option, looks like you could buy all the Rot ax drive & mounting bits, and still save about $1000 on the alternator itse lf, by using an off the shelf automotive model. The image in that parts bre akout looks like a very common Nippon Denso internally regulated alternator that's available in output levels from around 35A to over 55A. They're all basically the same external dimensions. Charlie


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:44:35 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: digest distribution stopped?
    From: "farmrjohn" <faithvineyard@yahoo.com>
    Well, still no digest even after supposedly re-subscribing with the Matronics Email Distribution Tool and completing the email confirmation link. The tool shows subscribed to the AeroElectric list but I haven't received any digests like I had been. Is anyone else experiencing this? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=496886#496886


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:27:08 AM PST US
    From: "skywagon185guy ." <skywagon185@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: With Flooded cells, at what discharge does damage
    start? Solar charger..... These are wonderful for certain applications, but, not for flooded 12v common batteries. A "12v panel", can raise to 18v on a sunny day. Even if it is only pumping out 0.1 amp, that will overcharge most lead acid batteries eventually, leading to "gassing". A cheap fix possible for using a low current panel is to trap the voltage output with a zener type diode or similar chosen to shunt current at some recommended voltage. On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 5:41 PM Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net> wrote: > Would a solar trickle charger help? I got one off Amazon for less than > $15 that is flexible and tops out at 14.4V. > > On Saturday, June 13, 2020, 10:25:34 AM EDT, Steve Stearns < > steve@tomasara.com> wrote: > > > Greetings, > > This isn't a relevant question for modern aircraft but I think the > membership of this list will likely know so I hope I don't bother anyone by > posting here. > > If you have a rarely used car with a traditional flooded cell lead-acid > battery and keep an eye on the battery voltage, at what voltage should it > be recharged to maintain a normal life? My old jeep has a small load while > parked so the battery slowly drains and it is neither convenient for me to > disconnect the battery nor keep a maintainer connected. If I charge it > back up with my smart charger before the (nominally 70deg f) battery > voltage drops to say, 12V will I still get full life out of the battery? > > Thanks in advance, > Steve Stearns > O235 Longeze > Boulder/Longmont CO >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:45:37 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: SDS CPI-2 internal crowbar
    At 04:44 PM 6/16/2020, you wrote: >This thread over on VAF is interesting. I have >the CPI-2 with their recommended small backup >battery in my single-alternator, single-battery >(for the main electrical system) VFR-only airplane.=C2 > >I'm planning an IFR upgrade with a full suite of >Garmin G3X goodies, and want to follow the Z101 architecture. =C2 > >It seems that their internal crowbar & fuse >leave me stuck with their backup battery. =C2 > ><http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?t=154648&page=34> http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?t=154648&page=34 This thread is a bit mystifying. OV conditions come from one and only one source(s) . . . alternators with failed regulators. An OV condition is not a transient event . . . it's a consistently rising voltage that will generally be limited by the battery(ies) as their chemistry gamely absorbs the excess energy condition. Hence the voltage does not rise quickly (i.e. volts per second) but rather sedately in electronic terms. For decades we have been designing, qualifying and integrating aviation electro-whizzies that are capable players in the wild and wooley world of vehicular DC power systems . . . matters not whether cars, trucks, earth movers . . . or airplanes. In 1935 some pretty smart cookies in the aviation industry got together in Washington DC and founded the Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (known today as RTCA). https://tinyurl.com/y78zvrt8 For 85 years these folk have been sifting the sands of physics in performance of electrical and electronics systems for aircraft. Their goal was to craft guidelines for the design and qualification of all manner of electrical accessory to (1) insure design performance under all anticipated conditions and (2) make sure that all accessories 'play nice' in the same sandbox such that arguments and spats do not put airframe or crew at risk. When it comes to ov definition, detection and response, the attached figures speak to 70+ years of design philosophy in aviation electrical systems. 14V devices are TESTED to withstand 20V perturbations for 1S and 30 (or 40) Volt perturbations for 100mS. Every device bolted to an airplane is expected to shrug off bus voltage perturbations between the high and low voltage plots for intervals of time laid out on the x-axis. When tasked with my first ov relay design about 1975, the rule of thumb was to design for a 50mS response to a step increase in bus voltage from 14.2 to 20 volts. While the electronics were solid-state, the 'timers' were pretty crude by contemporary standards. Today, micro-controllers allow us to start a timer when the voltage exceeds some lower discriminator, say 15 volts. If the voltage stays above that value for 500 milliseconds, we trip the ov protection system. If the voltage falls below 15v before time-out, the timer resets and the process starts over. This all but eliminates nuisance tripping of an ov protection system while offering robust but timely management of a recalcitrant regulator/alternator. Contemporary design recommendations are not difficult to accommodate . . . been doing it for decades. I've designed many products, some incorporating delicate silicon, wherein power was supplied directly from ship's bus . . . Often we were requested to qualify for indirect effects of lightning strike. Again, not difficult. I hope this lays foundation for consternation felt when I read about difficulties builders are having with the built-in ov protection on some product. It's even more difficult to understand how suppliers can offer what appears to be capable of producing really gee-whiz performance in some device but are unable to tailor electrical input-output ports to comfortably thrive in the aircraft environment. Adding any form of OV 'protection' to an accessory is completely redundant; i.e. unnecessary. Bob . . .


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:30:51 PM PST US
    From: Ken Ryan <keninalaska@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Z101 with Rotax 915iS
    If Gen A fails, the ECU will disconnect Gen B from the charging system (battery) and connect it to essential engine loads. Rotax does not want you to do it, but if you then close the Emergency Power switch, Gen B will also be re-connected to the charging system. In this condition, it would be possible to load the generator to the point where voltage drops to a level where the essential engine equipment fails. Because Rotax does not publish how much current the engine requires, it is difficult to determine what is safely available for running non-engine equipment. On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:37 AM Matthew S. Whiting <m.whiting@frontier.com> wrote: > m.whiting@frontier.com> > > I believe Joe is correct and this is the reason I desire an external > alternator. Even though the 915 has two alternators, it effectively only > has one from the perspective of ship=99s power. From page 3 of the Appendix > to the Rotax 915iS installation manual. > > =9CEngagement of the backup power supply system Generator B is done by the > Engine Control Unit (ECU) in the case of over voltage and under voltage. If > the voltage of power supply system Generator A decreases signifi- cantly or > at all, the control transition of the power supplies is additionally done > per mechanical means (relays drop out). These mechanism allow engagement of > backup power supply under every probable circumstance. > > If power supply system Generator B is used to supply the aircraft > electrical system (possible in common opera- tion mode) it must be noted > that in case of failure this power supply system B is disconnected from t he > aircraft to serve as the backup to the EMS.=9C > > > > On Jun 17, 2020, at 5:15 AM, Ken Ryan <keninalaska@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > =EF=BB > > All accurate Joe. But I think there is a wrinkle. It is my understandin g > that if Gen A fails, AND the Emergency Power Switch is closed, THEN Gen B > will operate both Engine and power the Bus. At least that's my > understanding. > > =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== > >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:31:49 PM PST US
    From: Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net>
    Subject: Re: Z101 with Rotax 915iS
    $1,000?!=C2- For a pulley and some brackets?For those prices, you could have a machine shop design and custom build the pieces.=C2- Does no on in your EAA chapter own a lathe?=C2- No one around you does aluminum castin g? I mean, c'mon Rotax.=C2- I understand you've got to make a profit.=C2- But, you don't have to make it all off of one sale. On Wednesday, June 17, 2020, 8:30:21 AM EDT, Matthew S. Whiting <m.whit ing@frontier.com> wrote: Yes, exactly what I was looking at. =C2-I would probably spring a few hu ndred more for a B&C unit, but I suspect a car one would do the job as a se cond alternator. =C2-I am attending the Lockwood installation course in A ugust, assuming covid doesn=99t return and kill it, so I will know mo re then and be able to ask some questions, but it looks very doable with th e Rotax pulley and mounting rings. =C2-Although those pieces alone are ab out $1,000 as I recall. =C2-Crazy expensive, but then I own a BMW motorcy cle so I am used to parts that cost 3X what they should. =C2- Matt On Jun 17, 2020, at 5:13 AM, Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com> wrote: Followup; if this is the right option, looks like you could buy all the Rot ax drive & mounting bits, and still save about $1000 on the alternator itse lf, by using an off the shelf automotive model. The image in that parts bre akout looks like a very common Nippon Denso internally regulated alternator that's available in output levels from around 35A to over 55A. They're all basically the same external dimensions. Charlie


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:16:45 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Surplus Wire
    From: "BMC_Dave" <bmcdave85@gmail.com>
    The shield is sized for the combined current of the wires right? I'd like to use it for the other current conductor if I can. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=496895#496895


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:50:41 PM PST US
    From: Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Surplus Wire
    On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:23 PM BMC_Dave <bmcdave85@gmail.com> wrote: > > The shield is sized for the combined current of the wires right? I'd like > to use it for the other current conductor if I can. > > > *In general*, that's not a bet I'd make, because shields are, well, shields. You don't normally see them carrying serious current, in the sense of actual power (RF transmission lines obviously excepted). Having said that, if we're still talking about 24 awg wire, it's extremely unlikely that the shield would be any smaller than that. If you're talking about using the shield for a single circuit's ground return, it sounds reasonable, but check for yourself by stripping a conductor, measuring approx. dia. with calipers, and then do the same with the shield 'drain' wire, assuming that it's a foil style shield. If it's braided copper strands, then the effective gauge might well be much larger than the combination of all 5 conductors combined. Just check it. Compute cross sectional area for a bare 24 awg wire, and do the same for the shield drain, using the basic pi * r^2 formula for the area of a circle.


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:26:18 PM PST US
    From: Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net>
    Subject: Re: With Flooded cells, at what discharge does damage
    start? I recently bought a solar panel that maxes out at 14.4V.=C2- It was adve rtised for that, but I tested it anyway.=C2- Given that it will output 0. 0V half the time, it's max output of 0.38A should be just right. It's flexible, and I attached to my canopy cover with velcro. On Wednesday, June 17, 2020, 2:28:06 PM EDT, skywagon185guy . <skywagon 185@gmail.com> wrote: Solar charger.....These are wonderful for certain applications, but, not f or flooded 12v common batteries.=C2- A "12v panel", can raise to 18v on a sunny day.Even if it is only pumping out 0.1 amp, that will overcharge mos t lead acid batteries eventually, leading to "gassing".A cheap fix possible for using=C2-a low current panel is to trap the voltage output with a ze ner type diode or similar chosen to shunt current at some recommended volta ge. On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 5:41 PM Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net> wrote : Would a solar trickle charger help?=C2- I got one off Amazon for less th an $15 that is flexible and tops out at 14.4V. On Saturday, June 13, 2020, 10:25:34 AM EDT, Steve Stearns <steve@tomas ara.com> wrote: Greetings, This isn't a relevant question for modern aircraft but I think the membersh ip of this list will likely know so I hope I don't bother anyone by posting here. If you have a rarely used car with a traditional flooded cell lead-acid bat tery and keep an eye on the battery voltage, at what voltage should it be r echarged to maintain a normal life?=C2- My old jeep has a small load whil e parked so the battery slowly drains and it is neither convenient for me t o disconnect the battery nor keep a maintainer connected.=C2- If I charge it back up with my smart charger=C2-before the (nominally 70deg f) batte ry voltage drops to say, 12V will I still get full life out of the battery? Thanks in advance,Steve StearnsO235=C2-LongezeBoulder/Longmont CO


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:32:55 PM PST US
    From: Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net>
    Subject: Re: Z101 with Rotax 915iS
    They don't publish how much the engine requires, but would it be difficult to insert a meter between the generator and the engine bus? On Wednesday, June 17, 2020, 4:31:44 PM EDT, Ken Ryan <keninalaska@gmai l.com> wrote: If Gen A fails, the ECU will disconnect Gen B from the charging system (ba ttery) and connect it to essential engine loads. Rotax does not want you to do it, but if you then close the Emergency Power switch, Gen B will also b e re-connected to the charging system. In this condition, it would be possi ble to load the generator to the point where voltage drops to a level where the essential engine equipment fails. Because Rotax does not publish how m uch current the engine requires, it is difficult to determine what is safel y available for running non-engine equipment. On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:37 AM Matthew S. Whiting <m.whiting@frontier.com> wrote: ontier.com> I believe Joe is correct and this is the reason I desire an external altern ator.=C2- Even though the 915 has two alternators, it effectively only ha s one from the perspective of ship=99s power.=C2- From page 3 of th e Appendix to the Rotax 915iS installation manual. =9CEngagement of the backup power supply system Generator B is done b y the Engine Control Unit (ECU) in the case of over voltage and under volta ge. If the voltage of power supply system Generator A decreases signifi- ca ntly or at all, the control transition of the power supplies is additionall y done per mechanical means (relays drop out). These mechanism allow engage ment of backup power supply under every probable circumstance. If power supply system Generator B is used to supply the aircraft electrica l system (possible in common opera- tion mode) it must be noted that in cas e of failure this power supply system B is disconnected from the aircraft t o serve as the backup to the EMS.=9C > On Jun 17, 2020, at 5:15 AM, Ken Ryan <keninalaska@gmail.com> wrote: > > =EF=BB > All accurate Joe. But I think there is a wrinkle. It is my understanding that if Gen A fails, AND the Emergency Power Switch is closed, THEN Gen B w ill operate both Engine and power the Bus. At least that's my understanding . - Electric-List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.co m/Navigator?AeroElectric-List FORUMS - eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com WIKI - errer" target="_blank">http://wiki.matronics.com b Site - =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- -Matt Dralle, List Admin. rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:52:21 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Z101 with Rotax 915iS
    From: C&K <yellowduckduo@gmail.com>
    Well on the 912is since gen A is rated at 16 amps and gen B at 30 amps that's a big hint. But then I read that having both fuel pumps on might trip off gen A which just seems like poor design if true. Don't know if this is the same on the 915. Ken L. On 17/06/2020 10:07 AM, Ken Ryan wrote: > If Gen A fails, the ECU will disconnect Gen B from the charging system > (battery) and connect it to essential engine loads. Rotax does not > want you to do it, but if you then close the Emergency Power switch, > Gen B will also be re-connected to the charging system. In this > condition, it would be possible to load the generator to the point > where voltage drops to a level where the essential engine equipment > fails. Because Rotax does not publish how much current the engine > requires, it is difficult to determine what is safely available for > running non-engine equipment. > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:37 AM Matthew S. Whiting > <m.whiting@frontier.com <mailto:m.whiting@frontier.com>> wrote: > > <m.whiting@frontier.com <mailto:m.whiting@frontier.com>> > > I believe Joe is correct and this is the reason I desire an > external alternator. Even though the 915 has two alternators, it > effectively only has one from the perspective of ships power. > From page 3 of the Appendix to the Rotax 915iS installation manual. > > Engagement of the backup power supply system Generator B is done > by the Engine Control Unit (ECU) in the case of over voltage and > under voltage. If the voltage of power supply system Generator A > decreases signifi- cantly or at all, the control transition of the > power supplies is additionally done per mechanical means (relays > drop out). These mechanism allow engagement of backup power supply > under every probable circumstance. > > If power supply system Generator B is used to supply the aircraft > electrical system (possible in common opera- tion mode) it must be > noted that in case of failure this power supply system B is > disconnected from the aircraft to serve as the backup to the EMS. > > > > On Jun 17, 2020, at 5:15 AM, Ken Ryan <keninalaska@gmail.com > <mailto:keninalaska@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > All accurate Joe. But I think there is a wrinkle. It is my > understanding that if Gen A fails, AND the Emergency Power Switch > is closed, THEN Gen B will operate both Engine and power the Bus. > At least that's my understanding. > > > ========== > - > Electric-List" rel="noreferrer" > target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List > ========== > FORUMS - > eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com > ========== > WIKI - > errer" target="_blank">http://wiki.matronics.com > ========== > b Site - > -Matt Dralle, List Admin. > rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > ========== > >


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:00:35 PM PST US
    From: Ben Beaird <n13en71@gmail.com>
    Subject: Z-11 ground avionics bus question
    I hope the answer to this question is not too obvious; On Z-11 (and others), the connection between the instrument panel ground bus and the avionics ground bus is designated 5X20AWG. What exactly does that mean? - Do I take up 5 tabs on my ground buses with 20 ga wires? Thanks, Ben Glastar


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:07:03 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Surplus Wire
    At 04:12 PM 6/17/2020, you wrote: > >The shield is sized for the combined current of the wires right? I'd >like to use it for the other current conductor if I can. NO . . . it's for conducting the products of electro-static coupling. Essentially zero current. Run AMPs through a known length of shield, measure voltage drop through that segment. Compute the AWG equivalent from the resistance values in a wire table. Bob . . .


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:08:44 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Z-11 ground avionics bus question
    At 06:57 PM 6/17/2020, you wrote: >I hope the answer to this question is not too obvious; > >On Z-11 (and others), the connection between the >instrument panel ground bus and the avionics >ground bus is designated 5X20AWG. What exactly does that mean?=C2 > * Do I take up 5 tabs on my ground buses with 20 ga wires? Yeah . . . 5 separate strands of 20AWG as long as you have the spares . . . otherwise . . . plan-B. The individual strands are easy. Bob . . .


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:00:54 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Surplus Wire
    From: "BMC_Dave" <bmcdave85@gmail.com>
    Looking at the BMS13-48 spec the flat shield is tin coated copper, 0.0015" +-.0004 thk and 0.020" wide. I counted 16 strands in the braid I disassembled. So 0.02"x.0011"x16 is 0.000352 sqin area, which is between 13-14ga (13.6, apparently). So that's what, 20ish Amps conservatively? So the 5x 24ga conductors, slightly de-rated to 10A, seems the shield would be more than up to it. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=496905#496905




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --