AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Mon 07/13/20


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:18 PM - Static system tests (Kelly McMullen)
     2. 05:53 PM - Re: Static system tests (ornerycuss2001)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:18:24 PM PST US
    From: Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com>
    Subject: Static system tests
    I recently came upon a question that I don't find a clear answer in 91.411 or 91.413. Aircraft in question is either ELSA or E-AMB, built for VFR only. It is based under Mode C veil, and may have need to fly transitions through Class B, so it has to have ADS-B Out. The question is what level, if any, of certification the static system needs to assure that the ADS-B altitude reported is accurate? I am thinking a leak check at a minimum, but don't see any clear requirement. I would appreciate your thoughts on the subject.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:53:45 PM PST US
    From: ornerycuss2001 <ornerycuss2001@protonmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Static system tests
    91.217b requires that the pressure altitude for the transponder and ADSB come from the same source. Finding no other requirement for ADSB by itself it seems reasonable that a static system check for the transponder would be sufficient. I believe ADSB transmits both pressure altitude and GPS altitude. I'm guessing any large discrepancy would be flagged by the ADSB ground system and a (computer generated) letter of correction would be sent to the registered owner. FWIW, I just had my static system and transponder checked (transponder is also the ADSB box) and no separate check was performed for ADSB altitude information. Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. Original Message On Monday, July 13, 2020 4:12 PM, Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com> wrote: > > I recently came upon a question that I don't find a clear answer in > 91.411 or 91.413. Aircraft in question is either ELSA or E-AMB, built > for VFR only. It is based under Mode C veil, and may have need to fly > transitions through Class B, so it has to have ADS-B Out. > The question is what level, if any, of certification the static system > needs to assure that the ADS-B altitude reported is accurate? > I am thinking a leak check at a minimum, but don't see any clear > requirement. I would appreciate your thoughts on the subject.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --