AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Tue 09/22/20


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:45 AM - Re: Official AeroElectric-List FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) (Ben Kaylian)
     2. 06:00 AM - Z13-8 modification and LSE ignition wiring (Tailwind1)
     3. 10:34 AM - Re: Z13-8 modification and LSE ignition wiring (user9253)
     4. 11:02 AM - Re: Re: Z13-8 modification and LSE ignition wiring (Tim Olson)
     5. 07:06 PM - Re: Z13-8 modification and LSE ignition wiring (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:45:55 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Official AeroElectric-List FAQ (Frequently Asked
    Questions)
    From: "Ben Kaylian" <Benkaylian@gmail.com>
    Nice information, but I want y'all to check this out Ever thought of ways to increase your wealth through some online gaming platforms? https://www.kingbillycasino.com/en-AU got you covered as it's the best online gaming platform that offers its users chances to increase their wealth within a short period of time. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=498491#498491


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:00:01 AM PST US
    Subject: Z13-8 modification and LSE ignition wiring
    From: "Tailwind1" <timmikus38@gmail.com>
    Hello all, I am new to the forum, I am building a Wittman Tailwind W10 powered by a Lyc O360 carbureted engine using two Light Speed Engineering electronic ignitions and a single PC680 battery. I am planning on using a Z13-8 based system with a B&C BC410 main alt and a SD8 stby alt. My proposed modification is to connect the SD8 to the E buss rather than the batttery bus or main buss (see attachment) My reasoning is that should the battery fail somehow, the battery can be isolated and the SD8 could run the E buss, it could also be used to charge the battery with the alternate feed relay closed and the main battery relay open/alt off. I plan on incorporating the self energizing circuit for the SD8 (is this required with the newer SD8 system?). Please understand that my attached diagram is conceptual and still lacks circuit protection illustration. Klause Savior of LSE recommends connecting the ignition power and ground (shielding) directly to the battery with no circuit protection until the 5 A breakers installed in the panel. I hope to incorporate a switch to allow one ignition to be run off of either the Battery buss or E buss in case of battery failure. I wonder if anyone can comment on the advisability/workability of connecting the SD8 in this manner, the advisability of not putting circuit protection at the battery connections for the ignitions, and the need or lack of need for the self energizing feature for the SD8 (it is kind of complicated). Thanks very much. Tim M -------- Flying Sonerai II with A80 Continental. Wittman W10 Tailwind under construction, O360, dual LSE electronic ignition, airframe complete and covered, engine hung, cowl built. Working on electrical, instrumentation, and other details. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=498496#498496 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/electrical_system_basic_layout_model_1_282.pdf


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:34:10 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Z13-8 modification and LSE ignition wiring
    From: "user9253" <fransew@gmail.com>
    Link to discussion of the SD8 self energizing circuit: http://www.matronics.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11971&view=previous&sid=8d09bfcf265444a653c4d15375aa3b74 If you think that both the main alternator and the battery will fail on the same flight, then yes, you need the self energizing feature for the SD8. It might seem complicated to you, but you can do it. Klause Savior thinks that the battery is one of the most reliable things in an airplane. It is more reliable than a pilot. Consider using diodes instead of a switch to choose between the battery bus or E-bus. Diodes are more reliable than switches and diodes eliminate pilot error and pilot workload in this application. Batteries supply the ignition source for fires following off airport landings. The pilot should have the ability to shut off all electrical power as close to the source as possible. -------- Joe Gores Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=498500#498500


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:02:17 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Z13-8 modification and LSE ignition wiring
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    I just did this while adding on a surefly ignition to my plane. I used 2 of the larger dual schottky diodes, with the ouput side of them all joined together to the EI power input. Each one is on it's own fuse or breaker, one being to the E-Bus and one to the Main Bus, with a 3rd to the main battery itself, but I did run it through a switch because I didn't want any always-hot circuits under the panel. The 4th diode is essentially a "spare" for the others. It is actually pretty simple to do. Tim On 9/22/2020 12:30 PM, user9253 wrote: > > Link to discussion of the SD8 self energizing circuit: > http://www.matronics.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11971&view=previous&sid=8d09bfcf265444a653c4d15375aa3b74 > If you think that both the main alternator and the battery will fail on the same flight, then yes, you need the self energizing feature for the SD8. > It might seem complicated to you, but you can do it. > Klause Savior thinks that the battery is one of the most reliable things in an airplane. It is more reliable than a pilot. > Consider using diodes instead of a switch to choose between the battery bus or E-bus. Diodes are more reliable than > switches and diodes eliminate pilot error and pilot workload in this application. > Batteries supply the ignition source for fires following off airport landings. > The pilot should have the ability to shut off all electrical power as close to the source as possible. > > -------- > Joe Gores > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=498500#498500 > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:06:19 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Z13-8 modification and LSE ignition wiring
    >My reasoning is that should the battery fail somehow, the battery >can be isolated and the SD8 could run the E buss, it could also be >used to charge the battery with the alternate feed relay closed and >the main battery relay open/alt off. I plan on incorporating the >self energizing circuit for the SD8 (is this required with the newer >SD8 system?). In 45 years of herding electrons on aircraft I cannot recall a single instance of an FMEA analysis that considered in flight 'battery failure'. Now there ARE airplanes fitted with battery over temperature warning systems that activate when a REGULATOR or some other system fault abuses an otherwise good battery. The battery is generally regarded as the most reliable source of energy on the airplane because it is sized and maintained to meet endurance design goals that far exceed it's ability to crank an engine. So, if (1) your engine started for this particular flight and (2) it recently demonstrated capacity conforming to design goals, then what is the likelihood of it suddenly going TU in the next 3 or 4 hours of flight? Further, if it's assumed to offer such risks, then what are the data supporting what failure mode? Field history? Observed limitations in fabrication? Limited manufacturer's warranty? Personal experience? The point being if there is a real, risk . . . then would it not be prudent to select another battery? Finally, suppose the battery does succumb to some failure while your cruising along. How would that failure manifest in the cockpit. What indication would you observe that points only to the battery causing you to initiate a plan developed to mitigate that condition? Bob . . .




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --