Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 05:23 AM - Ensure Exceptional Growth In Business With Cash App Support (alicerose)
2. 05:23 AM - Do you know what happens if you want to unlock cash app acco (alicerose)
3. 08:33 AM - Magnetized Dynon D100 Display (cskelt)
4. 09:07 AM - Re: Re: Primary and B/U Alt Fields on Master Bus (ashleysc@broadstripe.net)
5. 09:23 AM - Re: opinions needed: Apollo/Garmin GNS480 vs Garmin 430 (Charlie England)
6. 09:44 AM - Re: opinions needed: Apollo/Garmin GNS480 vs Garmin 430 (David Carter)
7. 10:10 AM - Re: Magnetized Dynon D100 Display (Finn Lassen)
8. 01:23 PM - Re: Magnetized Dynon D100 Display (Kelly McMullen)
9. 01:35 PM - Re: Magnetized Dynon D100 Display (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
10. 01:40 PM - Re: Canopy antenna? (GTH)
11. 02:47 PM - Re: Magnetized Dynon D100 Display (cskelt)
12. 04:16 PM - Re: Canopy antenna? (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
13. 04:18 PM - Re: Re: Magnetized Dynon D100 Display (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
14. 06:02 PM - Re: Re: Magnetized Dynon D100 Display (n1dw)
15. 06:39 PM - Re: opinions needed: Apollo/Garmin GNS480 vs Garmin 430 (Earl Schroeder)
16. 06:43 PM - Re: opinions needed: Apollo/Garmin GNS480 vs Garmin 430 (Charlie England)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Ensure Exceptional Growth In Business With Cash App |
Support
To do the same without any kind of hassle, you can also have a word with the geeks who will teach you some optimal ways regarding the same. Moreover, you can also avail of Cash App Support service through which you will be able to ensure magnificent growth within the least time frame. cash app support (https://www.contact-customer-support.net/cash-app-customer-service-phone-number)
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=501921#501921
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Do you know what happens if you want to unlock cash |
app acco
If you want to know a solution for accounting for the use of unlock cash app account. You cannot withdraw money from a closed cash account, you must first open an account. Your money is safe; You have nothing to worry about because you can access it directly by logging into your account. If you still have problems, you should visit the website. unlock cash app account (https://www.supporttechhelp.com/blog/unlock-cash-app-account/)
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=501922#501922
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Magnetized Dynon D100 Display |
Here's a really weird one that occurred recently. Flying on a North-Easterly heading
the PAI-700 panel mount compass informed me I was heading West. This is
a new problem and the photo taken some years ago shows the relative positions
of the instruments with reasonable agreement between the panel mount compass and
the Dynon EFIS.
Taxiing around a circle without the Dynon EFIS D100 in the panel gives good compass
readings. With the EFIS in place the compass reading remains between South
and West. I took the compass and EFIS to the compass manufacturer, Precision
Aviation, where they confirmed that the compass is OK and the EFIS magnetization
too strong for a mu-metal shield to help.
The next photo below shows a compass correctly pointing North and the second shows
it after rotating to point to the EFIS display, folded out from the box of
electronics and sensors. The magnetization appears to be concentrated halfway
up the left side of the display.
Dynon Technical Support deny there is anything wrong and my eventual request to
buy a replacement display went unanswered. This led to a google search for a
demagnetizer that found many plausible devices for up to a few hundred dollars
that's no doubt less than a new display. Can anyone advise if it's feasible to
demagnetize a display screen and offer any tips, or ideas as to how the display
became magnetized?
I understand that a standalone magnetic compass isn't required if you have an remote
electronic magnetometer but I appreciate the redundancy and the units did
after all coexist harmoniously for some years.
Thanks in advance!!
Chris Skelt
LNC2 N1990L at KIWS.
--------
Chris Skelt
Lancair 320 N1990L at KIWS
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=501927#501927
Attachments:
http://forums.matronics.com//files/d100_magnetized_798.jpg
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Primary and B/U Alt Fields on Master Bus |
Hi Art;
Great electrical drawing and parts list. I haven't analyzed it, but very professionally
done.
Cheers! Stu.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Art Zemon" <art@zemon.name>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2021 2:43:52 PM
Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Re: Primary and B/U Alt Fields on Master Bus
Bud,
I put everything on one bus except a couple of tiny loads which are attached to
a small always-on bus. Here are all of my wiring diagrams . The file
engine.pdf
is the one that has the bus architecture and the alternators.
Cheers,
-- Art Z.
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 7:40 AM Bud K < budkeil@gmail.com > wrote:
Art,
Yes I could upgrade to a larger, pad mounted alternator but would rather use what
I have. I recognize the added expense and complexity of going the e-bus route.
And yes, that pitot heat power is over half of my e-bus load. I don't see
myself continuing to fly in IMC with a primary system failure and would head to
VMC ASAP.
Since your B/U alternator has the capacity, did you implement the e-bus architecture
or put everything on a main bus?
--
https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/
Friendship is like a stone. A stone has no value, but when you rub two stones together
properly, sparks of fire emerge.
Rabbi Mordechai of Lechovitz
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: opinions needed: Apollo/Garmin GNS480 vs Garmin |
430
Unimpeachable logic; which reduces me to doing nothing (if I'm honest, the
most sensible thing), or to investing much less money in a much
older/cheaper nav/ILS radio, & possibly something like a KLN94, which I'm
sure is also unsupported but the pain of entry (and exit) is much lower.
Spending 10 to 20 AMUs for what could end up being, for all practical
purposes in my flying world, 'art', just isn't going to happen.
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:42 AM Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com> wrote:
> kellym@aviating.com>
>
> Given the install costs, whether in time/effort, or in paying someone to
> install, seems to me a bad idea to consider the 480 that is no longer
> supported, the 430 if not upgraded to WAAS, which is barely supported,
> and even the WAAS unit that is likely to go unsupported within the next
> 5 years. I made the choice to go to a 650 about 7-8 years ago for that
> reason, and they are ever closer to becoming boat anchors.
> So, to me the discussion about ease of use between the Apollo designed
> units and the Garmin is greatly overshadowed by their expected useful
> life. Both original units are over 20 yrs old, using computer chips not
> made for 20 yrs, and even the upgraded WAAS units are already 13 yrs
> old. It seems like very few avionics with chips and displays that wear
> out are supported much past 20 yrs and some much less.
>
> On 5/13/2021 6:54 AM, Charlie England wrote:
> > Have any of you IFR flyers flown both the 430 & 480, and can give a
> > comparison of the two? I'm toying with the idea of adding an approach
> > certified GPS to the RV, but I'm 'not yet rated', so I truly don't know
> > what I don't know. I do know that the 430 is far more common, and the
> > 480 seems to sell for less money in the used market. I've heard only two
> > opinions comparing the two; diametrically opposed. Each said their
> > choice was far easier to use in an IFR environment. Not an adequate
> > sample size, so I'd like to get a bit more of a consensus.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Charlie
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: opinions needed: Apollo/Garmin GNS480 vs Garmin |
430
Have you considered an SL-30?
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:25 PM Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Unimpeachable logic; which reduces me to doing nothing (if I'm honest, the
> most sensible thing), or to investing much less money in a much
> older/cheaper nav/ILS radio, & possibly something like a KLN94, which I'm
> sure is also unsupported but the pain of entry (and exit) is much lower.
>
> Spending 10 to 20 AMUs for what could end up being, for all practical
> purposes in my flying world, 'art', just isn't going to happen.
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:42 AM Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com>
> wrote:
>
>> kellym@aviating.com>
>>
>> Given the install costs, whether in time/effort, or in paying someone to
>> install, seems to me a bad idea to consider the 480 that is no longer
>> supported, the 430 if not upgraded to WAAS, which is barely supported,
>> and even the WAAS unit that is likely to go unsupported within the next
>> 5 years. I made the choice to go to a 650 about 7-8 years ago for that
>> reason, and they are ever closer to becoming boat anchors.
>> So, to me the discussion about ease of use between the Apollo designed
>> units and the Garmin is greatly overshadowed by their expected useful
>> life. Both original units are over 20 yrs old, using computer chips not
>> made for 20 yrs, and even the upgraded WAAS units are already 13 yrs
>> old. It seems like very few avionics with chips and displays that wear
>> out are supported much past 20 yrs and some much less.
>>
>> On 5/13/2021 6:54 AM, Charlie England wrote:
>> > Have any of you IFR flyers flown both the 430 & 480, and can give a
>> > comparison of the two? I'm toying with the idea of adding an approach
>> > certified GPS to the RV, but I'm 'not yet rated', so I truly don't know
>> > what I don't know. I do know that the 430 is far more common, and the
>> > 480 seems to sell for less money in the used market. I've heard only
>> two
>> > opinions comparing the two; diametrically opposed. Each said their
>> > choice was far easier to use in an IFR environment. Not an adequate
>> > sample size, so I'd like to get a bit more of a consensus.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Charlie
>
>
--
---
David Carter
david@carter.net
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Magnetized Dynon D100 Display |
This is indeed very odd. The D-100 case is made of alum, I think.
Anything inside could possibly be a power-supply coil, but that should
not be a permanent magnet. Long shot -- try to remove the battery pack.
How old is the D-100? Still under warranty?
I would be tempted to carefully use a simple demagnetizer. Radio Shack
used to sell them for something like $20. Tapehead demagnetizer.
Finn
On 5/14/2021 11:32 AM, cskelt wrote:
>
> Here's a really weird one that occurred recently. Flying on a North-Easterly
heading the PAI-700 panel mount compass informed me I was heading West. This is
a new problem and the photo taken some years ago shows the relative positions
of the instruments with reasonable agreement between the panel mount compass
and the Dynon EFIS.
>
> Taxiing around a circle without the Dynon EFIS D100 in the panel gives good compass
readings. With the EFIS in place the compass reading remains between South
and West. I took the compass and EFIS to the compass manufacturer, Precision
Aviation, where they confirmed that the compass is OK and the EFIS magnetization
too strong for a mu-metal shield to help.
>
> The next photo below shows a compass correctly pointing North and the second
shows it after rotating to point to the EFIS display, folded out from the box
of electronics and sensors. The magnetization appears to be concentrated halfway
up the left side of the display.
>
> Dynon Technical Support deny there is anything wrong and my eventual request
to buy a replacement display went unanswered. This led to a google search for
a demagnetizer that found many plausible devices for up to a few hundred dollars
that's no doubt less than a new display. Can anyone advise if it's feasible
to demagnetize a display screen and offer any tips, or ideas as to how the display
became magnetized?
>
> I understand that a standalone magnetic compass isn't required if you have an
remote electronic magnetometer but I appreciate the redundancy and the units
did after all coexist harmoniously for some years.
>
> Thanks in advance!!
> Chris Skelt
>
> LNC2 N1990L at KIWS.
>
> --------
> Chris Skelt
> Lancair 320 N1990L at KIWS
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=501927#501927
>
>
> Attachments:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com//files/d100_magnetized_798.jpg
>
>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Magnetized Dynon D100 Display |
Best thing would be to email Dynon support. They are very good.
On 5/14/2021 10:09 AM, Finn Lassen wrote:
>
> This is indeed very odd. The D-100 case is made of alum, I think.
> Anything inside could possibly be a power-supply coil, but that should
> not be a permanent magnet. Long shot -- try to remove the battery pack.
>
> How old is the D-100? Still under warranty?
>
> I would be tempted to carefully use a simple demagnetizer. Radio Shack
> used to sell them for something like $20. Tapehead demagnetizer.
>
> Finn
>
> On 5/14/2021 11:32 AM, cskelt wrote:
>>
>> Here's a really weird one that occurred recently. Flying on a
>> North-Easterly heading the PAI-700 panel mount compass informed me I
>> was heading West. This is a new problem and the photo taken some years
>> ago shows the relative positions of the instruments with reasonable
>> agreement between the panel mount compass and the Dynon EFIS.
>>
>> Taxiing around a circle without the Dynon EFIS D100 in the panel gives
>> good compass readings. With the EFIS in place the compass reading
>> remains between South and West. I took the compass and EFIS to the
>> compass manufacturer, Precision Aviation, where they confirmed that
>> the compass is OK and the EFIS magnetization too strong for a mu-metal
>> shield to help.
>>
>> The next photo below shows a compass correctly pointing North and the
>> second shows it after rotating to point to the EFIS display, folded
>> out from the box of electronics and sensors. The magnetization appears
>> to be concentrated halfway up the left side of the display.
>>
>> Dynon Technical Support deny there is anything wrong and my eventual
>> request to buy a replacement display went unanswered. This led to a
>> google search for a demagnetizer that found many plausible devices for
>> up to a few hundred dollars that's no doubt less than a new display.
>> Can anyone advise if it's feasible to demagnetize a display screen and
>> offer any tips, or ideas as to how the display became magnetized?
>>
>> I understand that a standalone magnetic compass isn't required if you
>> have an remote electronic magnetometer but I appreciate the redundancy
>> and the units did after all coexist harmoniously for some years.
>>
>> Thanks in advance!!
>> Chris Skelt
>>
>> LNC2 N1990L at KIWS.
>>
>> --------
>> Chris Skelt
>> Lancair 320 N1990L at KIWS
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Read this topic online here:
>>
>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=501927#501927
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Attachments:
>>
>> http://forums.matronics.com//files/d100_magnetized_798.jpg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
>
>
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Magnetized Dynon D100 Display |
>
>Dynon Technical Support deny there is anything wrong and my eventual
>request to buy a replacement display went unanswered. This led to a
>google search for a demagnetizer that found many plausible devices
>for up to a few hundred dollars that's no doubt less than a new
>display. Can anyone advise if it's feasible to demagnetize a display
>screen and offer any tips, or ideas as to how the display became magnetized?
>
>I understand that a standalone magnetic compass isn't required if
>you have an remote electronic magnetometer but I appreciate the
>redundancy and the units did after all coexist harmoniously for some years.
>
>Thanks in advance!!
>Chris Skelt
Chris, this is a real puzzler! I'm sorry that
Dynon hasn't shown more interest in resolving
the issue.
I've dropped a note to John Torode at
Dynon (the head cheese). Let's see if he
is willing to be of assistance.
Bob . . .
Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes
survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane
out of that stuff?"
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Canopy antenna? |
Le 12/05/2021 22:21, Peter Pengilly a crit:
>
> Everything is a compromise. Copper tape can be used to create an antenna, the
more of the antenna that is vertical the better the performance. A BNC connector
can be soldered on to the foot, not sure how the ground plane would work,
perhaps it needs to be a dipole? I haven't been very close to anyone who has used
a tape antenna, but my impression was always that they required more maintenance,
and often have worse performance, than installed antennas. How important
is a reliable radio against saving weight?
Peter,
Thank you for your advice. Indeed the main point is having a reliable
radio, so the antenna (Bob Archer) will be in the glass fiber fin, as
originally intended.
I'll may be able to locate some quality smaller diameter coaxial with
acceptable performance as compared to our good old RG58.
Thanks for your help,
--
Best regards,
Gilles
http://contrails.free.fr
http://lapierre.skunkworks.free.fr
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Magnetized Dynon D100 Display |
Thanks to all for the quick replies. It's not the battery -- I removed it and
checked. Nor is it the aluminum carcass that I also removed before partially
disconnecting the display and folding it down so the face rests on the bench.
The photo shows the compass pointing at the display with the back side up.
I'm as certain as I can be that the magnetism is "something" at the edge of the
screen. The Dynon unit is over ten years old and had 300 hours of faultless
performance behind it before this happened.
I've had excellent service up until now from Dynon--several issues with the EMS
were dealt with promptly and effectively. And the 360 degree taxi test with
and without the EFIS in place was suggested by one of the Dynon guys on the stand
at Sun-n-Fun.
--------
Chris Skelt
Lancair 320 N1990L at KIWS
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=501940#501940
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Canopy antenna? |
>Thank you for your advice. Indeed the main point is having a
>reliable radio, so the antenna (Bob Archer) will be in the glass
>fiber fin, as originally intended.
good show
>I'll may be able to locate some quality smaller diameter coaxial
>with acceptable performance as compared to our good old RG58.
RG174 See if you can get a supplier that offers prefab
cables. Putting connectors on this coax is NOT for the
novice wire slinger.
here is one supplier . . . there are no doubt others
https://tinyurl.com/yfgmx3z2
Bob . . .
Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes
survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane
out of that stuff?"
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Magnetized Dynon D100 Display |
>
>I've had excellent service up until now from Dynon--several issues
>with the EMS were dealt with promptly and effectively. And the 360
>degree taxi test with and without the EFIS in place was suggested by
>one of the Dynon guys on the stand at Sun-n-Fun.
You've hit them with a ringer . . . I'm not
surprised at the reaction of the troops in
the trenches . . . but it's all just physics
and the answer will be simple.
Let's see if John T can help out . . .
Bob . . .
Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes
survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane
out of that stuff?"
Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Magnetized Dynon D100 Display |
Chris,
Just a thought here - have you tried to place the D100 near other compass
indicators to verify that the D100 is indeed magnetized? (The compass on
your iPhone (if that is what you have) is apparently not affected by a
nearby magnet!). Did you move it around and rotate it to see if the
apparent magnetism is localized at some point in the D100? Is it possible
that you had a steel screw or nut to secure the unit in place? What would
happen if you removed both units from the panel and positioned them in
various arrangements in magnetically benign area?
Just thinking out loud!
Doug Windhorn
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com
<owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com> On Behalf Of cskelt
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 2:47 PM
Subject: AeroElectric-List: Re: Magnetized Dynon D100 Display
Thanks to all for the quick replies. It's not the battery -- I removed it
and checked. Nor is it the aluminum carcass that I also removed before
partially disconnecting the display and folding it down so the face rests on
the bench. The photo shows the compass pointing at the display with the back
side up.
I'm as certain as I can be that the magnetism is "something" at the edge of
the screen. The Dynon unit is over ten years old and had 300 hours of
faultless performance behind it before this happened.
I've had excellent service up until now from Dynon--several issues with the
EMS were dealt with promptly and effectively. And the 360 degree taxi test
with and without the EFIS in place was suggested by one of the Dynon guys on
the stand at Sun-n-Fun.
--------
Chris Skelt
Lancair 320 N1990L at KIWS
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=501940#501940
Message 15
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: opinions needed: Apollo/Garmin GNS480 vs Garmin |
430
I am on your side Charlie England!
> On May 14, 2021, at 11:27 AM, Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com> wrote
:
>
> =EF=BB
> Unimpeachable logic; which reduces me to doing nothing (if I'm honest, the
most sensible thing), or to investing much less money in a much older/cheap
er nav/ILS radio, & possibly something like a KLN94, which I'm sure is also u
nsupported but the pain of entry (and exit) is much lower.
>
> Spending 10 to 20 AMUs for what could end up being, for all practical purp
oses in my flying world, 'art', just isn't going to happen.
>
>> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:42 AM Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com> wro
te:
com>
>>
>> Given the install costs, whether in time/effort, or in paying someone to
>> install, seems to me a bad idea to consider the 480 that is no longer
>> supported, the 430 if not upgraded to WAAS, which is barely supported,
>> and even the WAAS unit that is likely to go unsupported within the next
>> 5 years. I made the choice to go to a 650 about 7-8 years ago for that
>> reason, and they are ever closer to becoming boat anchors.
>> So, to me the discussion about ease of use between the Apollo designed
>> units and the Garmin is greatly overshadowed by their expected useful
>> life. Both original units are over 20 yrs old, using computer chips not
>> made for 20 yrs, and even the upgraded WAAS units are already 13 yrs
>> old. It seems like very few avionics with chips and displays that wear
>> out are supported much past 20 yrs and some much less.
>>
>> On 5/13/2021 6:54 AM, Charlie England wrote:
>> > Have any of you IFR flyers flown both the 430 & 480, and can give a
>> > comparison of the two? I'm toying with the idea of adding an approach
>> > certified GPS to the RV, but I'm 'not yet rated', so I truly don't know
>> > what I don't know. I do know that the 430 is far more common, and the
>> > 480 seems to sell for less money in the used market. I've heard only tw
o
>> > opinions comparing the two; diametrically opposed. Each said their
>> > choice was far easier to use in an IFR environment. Not an adequate
>> > sample size, so I'd like to get a bit more of a consensus.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Charlie
>
Message 16
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: opinions needed: Apollo/Garmin GNS480 vs Garmin |
430
Certainly. Used, the market prices I've monitored over the past few
years are within a few hundred dollars of non-WAAS 430s. I've got an
SL40 in the panel now; I've considered purchasing used a VAL 2000 (uses
the SL30 protocol), and a cheap non-WAAS gps to go with it.
I really can't make any purchase make financial sense, but I need to at
least be able to deceive myself on the value.
On 5/14/2021 11:42 AM, David Carter wrote:
> Have you considered an SL-30?
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:25 PM Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com
> <mailto:ceengland7@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Unimpeachablelogic; which reduces me to doing nothing (if I'm
> honest, the most sensible thing), or to investing much less money
> in a much older/cheaper nav/ILS radio, & possibly something like a
> KLN94, which I'm sure is also unsupported but the pain of entry
> (and exit) is much lower.
>
> Spending 10 to 20 AMUs for what could end up being, for all
> practical purposes in my flying world, 'art', just isn't going to
> happen.
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:42 AM Kelly McMullen
> <kellym@aviating.com <mailto:kellym@aviating.com>> wrote:
>
> <kellym@aviating.com <mailto:kellym@aviating.com>>
>
> Given the install costs, whether in time/effort, or in paying
> someone to
> install, seems to me a bad idea to consider the 480 that is no
> longer
> supported, the 430 if not upgraded to WAAS, which is barely
> supported,
> and even the WAAS unit that is likely to go unsupported within
> the next
> 5 years. I made the choice to go to a 650 about 7-8 years ago
> for that
> reason, and they are ever closer to becoming boat anchors.
> So, to me the discussion about ease of use between the Apollo
> designed
> units and the Garmin is greatly overshadowed by their expected
> useful
> life. Both original units are over 20 yrs old, using computer
> chips not
> made for 20 yrs, and even the upgraded WAAS units are already
> 13 yrs
> old. It seems like very few avionics with chips and displays
> that wear
> out are supported much past 20 yrs and some much less.
>
> On 5/13/2021 6:54 AM, Charlie England wrote:
> > Have any of you IFR flyers flown both the 430 & 480, and can
> give a
> > comparison of the two? I'm toying with the idea of adding an
> approach
> > certified GPS to the RV, but I'm 'not yet rated', so I truly
> don't know
> > what I don't know. I do know that the 430 is far more
> common,and the
> > 480 seems to sell for less money in the used market. I've
> heard only two
> > opinions comparing the two; diametrically opposed. Each said
> their
> > choice was far easier to use in an IFR environment. Not an
> adequate
> > sample size, so I'd like to get a bit more of a consensus.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Charlie
>
> --
> ---
> David Carter
> david@carter.net <mailto:david@carter.net>
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|