AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Sun 05/23/21


Total Messages Posted: 4



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 10:16 AM - Re: was "Contactor Questions" now battery in the trunk (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     2. 10:46 AM - Thermocouples (Finn Lassen)
     3. 03:34 PM - Re: Try These Ideas to Help with Accounting Homework (OttilieMccall)
     4. 06:18 PM - Re: Thermocouples (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:16:06 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: was "Contactor Questions" now battery in the
    trunk At 11:57 PM 5/19/2021, you wrote: >This is kinda related to contactors... > >On the BD4 that I am rebuilding, the battery is >behind the baggage compartment, with a really >fat wire running up to the firewall.=C2 > >IO 470 engine so lots of amps required for start. > >Is there a recommended contactor >placement/battery disconnect=C2 protocol out there? >I'm thinking safety in the event of an incident >which might short out the fat wire to the fuselage. Battery contactor located as close as practical to battery; starter contactor as close as practical to starter. FAT wire connects battery contactor to starter contactor and main bus feeder. Bob . . . Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane out of that stuff?"


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:46:08 AM PST US
    From: Finn Lassen <finn.usa@gmail.com>
    Subject: Thermocouples
    Hi Bob, I re-read your chapter on thermocouples. The question I have is: what voltages are introduced at copper/thermocouple wire junctions? You show them in an ice bath. Does that mean that no voltages are generated at 0 degC at copper/chromel and copper/alumel junctions? I made a probe using K-type wire in a 5/32" brass tube, squeezed shut over the twisted wires and then silver-soldered to make it water tight. When I connected it to my engine monitor it read as much as 220 deg F in boiling water. In other words 8F too high. Now I'm wondering if it's contamination of the joint by brass or silver solder, or something in the engine monitor. The Data Acquisition Module for the engine monitor have 16 (x2) inputs going into MAX4558 8-to-1 multiplexers and from there to a MAX6675 (Type-K to 12 bit digital with cold-junction compensation). They are on the same PCB, so in theory the temperature should be the same at the screw connectors and the MAX6675 pins. Terminal block (ED555/DS) is CuZn with wireguard (the metal under the screw pressing down on wire) is CuSn. An issue is that the Data Acquisition Module is mounted where it gets hot (seen as much as 160F). The MAX6675's compensation should be good to 185F, but wondering about the other junctions on the PCB. Since each thermocouple wire has same path (terminal, PCB cu traces, solder, multiplexers) any junction voltages should balance out, or? I have been using LM35 (or similar) temp sensors but they appear to be failing. Finn --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:34:50 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Try These Ideas to Help with Accounting Homework
    From: "OttilieMccall" <MarkKramer655@gmail.com>
    Guys, we're always looking for an honest and reliable service and nobody likes wasting free time that could be spent on travel, friends and self-development. Isn't that right? If I'm right, there is a solution to all your problems! There is a very cool service, , which has been helping pupils and students with their homework for a very long time. They are professionals and know what they are doing, you can count on them! -------- In order to write a correct essay quickly, it is enough to use the free tools . You can also use them to check your finished essay for plagiarism. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=502036#502036


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:18:01 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Thermocouples
    At 12:45 PM 5/23/2021, you wrote: > >Hi Bob, > >I re-read your chapter on thermocouples. > >The question I have is: what voltages are >introduced at copper/thermocouple wire junctions? I don't have specific numbers but they are known. ANY two DISSIMILAR metals will demonstrate the Seebeck effect. >You show them in an ice bath. Does that mean >that no voltages are generated at 0 degC >at=C2 copper/chromel and copper/alumel junctions? No, it only means that the voltages generated are known and STABLE due to the inherent stability of an ice bath. >I made a probe using K-type wire in a 5/32" >brass tube, squeezed shut over the twisted wires >and then silver-soldered to make it water tight. The ideal way to bring two thermocouple wires together is by welding. We used to have a t/c welder that was nothing more than a 50vdc power supply fitted with a high resistance inductor to help stabilize the arc. I.e. a miniature, low power arc welder. Before we got the welder the techs would silver solder the junctions . . . I don't know if they had done any validation of the technique. >When I connected it to my engine monitor it read >as much as 220 deg F in boiling water. In other words 8F too high. Do you have other probes that are closer to 212? >Now I'm wondering if it's contamination of the >joint by brass or silver solder, or something in the engine monitor. You've got several variables there. Try building up some 'test' junctions with your stock wire. Make 2 or 3 junctions simply twisted and compare with your cited results. Then silver solder; repeat. Finally, add your housing and check for consistency. >The Data Acquisition Module for the engine >monitor have 16 (x2) inputs going into MAX4558 >8-to-1 multiplexers and from there to a MAX6675 >(Type-K to 12 bit digital with cold-junction >compensation). They are on the same PCB, so in >theory the temperature should be the same at the >screw connectors and the MAX6675 pins. Terminal >block (ED555/DS) is CuZn with wireguard (the >metal under the screw pressing down on wire) is CuSn. The nature of the various junctions in each t/c loop is not critical as long as they occur in thermally matched pairs. >An issue is that the Data Acquisition Module is >mounted where it gets hot (seen as much as >160F). The MAX6675's compensation should be good >to 185F, but wondering about the other junctions >on the PCB. Since each thermocouple wire has >same path (terminal, PCB cu traces, solder, >multiplexers) any junction voltages should balance out, or? If the DAS designer built the signal conditioning with T/C requirements in mind, you should be okay . . . but it's worth confirming. Sort out the probe issues first then perhaps test the same probes with the DAS multiplexer in an elevated temperature environment. (cardboard box with 100W bulb makes good po' boy's environmental oven). >I have been using LM35 (or similar) temp sensors >but they appear to be failing. What's the highest temperatures of interest to be explored? If this is a 'scratch built' DAS system, have you considered RTDs? Much larger delta-volts/degree and no parasitic junction issues. A 100 ohm RTD changes about 0.38ohms/C. Bias the critter up at 1mA gives you about 380uV per C. That's about 10x bigger signal than a K thermocouple. You can run 2 wires for short runs . . . but if you're really picky, a 3-wire connection will let you do a direct copper drop read on the lead wires or a 4-wire for separate excitation/sense paths. A down side of little RTDs is that they're a bit tricky to mount. I usually tack them onto the end of a shielded trio for a 4-wire connection then dip the assembly in JB Kwik for a rugged encapsulation. Perhaps the simplest thing to do first is to identify root cause for errors in your thermocouples. Bob . . . Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane out of that stuff?"




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --