AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Tue 08/17/21


Total Messages Posted: 3



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 08:21 AM - Re: Blowing fuses on B&C BC433 alternator (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     2. 09:00 AM - Re: Blowing fuses on B&C BC433 alternator (Bob Verwey)
     3. 11:36 AM - Re: Conductor interface enhancements (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:21:44 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Blowing fuses on B&C BC433 alternator
    About 50 flight hours ago, one of the fuses blew. Really blew, it partially melted the plastic coating. I couldn't really find anything wrong, but I thought possibly there was a short from one of the butt connectors to the firewall, nothing definitive though. Last week, 50 flight hours later, another fuse blew. I don't know if it was on the same leg as I didn't record it the first time it happened. All the wiring from the alternator to the VR seems to be 100%. I put my VOM on the leads and they all checked out per the B&C service manual. https://bandc.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/pmr3a-trouble.pdf It would be interesting to see the carcasses of the blown fuses. A design goal for fuses is to provide a benign mitigation to an overloaded wire. They are electrical 'weak links' in the energy conduction chain. Fuse (and breaker) manufacturers design and test their products striving to bring a potentially catastrophic failure to a ho-hum conclusion. If a blown fuse presents with a compromised enclosure then it seems likely that some condition other than fault current is in operation. Especially when two such events are widely spaced in time. Electrical connections inside holders for these fuses are close cousins to the fast-on style terminals. They depend on very high pressure mating to achieve gas-tight integrity at the interface between blade and terminal. As we've seen and studied on switch failures, loss of gas-tightness, over TIME, can produce electrically induced heating at the joint that contributes to a slow but ever increasing degradation that ends in rather spectacular failure of the whole assembly. This may well be what we're seeing here. The fuse didn't simply open up in response to some over-current, rather it may have failed in response to a precipitous heating event at the blade-to-terminal interface. Suggest you replace all three fuse holders and see how it goes. Bob . . . Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane out of that stuff?"


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:00:11 AM PST US
    From: Bob Verwey <bob.verwey@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Blowing fuses on B&C BC433 alternator
    Bob N, you posted "The fuse didn't simply open up in response to some over-current, rather it may have failed in response to a precipitous heating event at the blade-to-terminal interface." Years ago, a sage at E.I. gave me a tip on said problem; this may be heresy in your eyes, but I am yet to suffer ill consequence as a result of this bit of advice... He suggested a drop of ACF 50 or equivalent on mating connections as a prophylactic to calendar driven corrosion events which lead to "hot" joints, even in crimped connections. Your thoughts? On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 17:26, Robert L. Nuckolls, III < nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote: > About 50 flight hours ago, one of the fuses blew. Really blew, it > partially melted > the plastic coating. I couldn't really find anything wrong, but I thought > possibly > there was a short from one of the butt connectors to the firewall, nothing > definitive though. Last week, 50 flight hours later, another fuse blew. > I don't know if it was on the same leg as I didn't record it the first time > it happened. All the wiring from the alternator to the VR seems to be 100%. > I put my VOM on the leads and they all checked out per the B&C service > manual. https://bandc.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/pmr3a-trouble.pdf > > It would be interesting to see the carcasses of > the blown fuses. A design goal for fuses is to > provide a benign mitigation to an overloaded > wire. They are electrical 'weak links' in the > energy conduction chain. Fuse (and breaker) > manufacturers design and test their products > striving to bring a potentially catastrophic > failure to a ho-hum conclusion. > > If a blown fuse presents with a compromised > enclosure then it seems likely that some condition > other than fault current is in operation. Especially > when two such events are widely spaced in time. > > Electrical connections inside holders for > these fuses are close cousins to the fast-on > style terminals. They depend on very high > pressure mating to achieve gas-tight integrity > at the interface between blade and terminal. > > As we've seen and studied on switch failures, > loss of gas-tightness, over TIME, can produce > electrically induced heating at the joint that > contributes to a slow but ever increasing > degradation that ends in rather spectacular > failure of the whole assembly. > > This may well be what we're seeing here. > The fuse didn't simply open up in response > to some over-current, rather it may have > failed in response to a precipitous heating > event at the blade-to-terminal interface. > > Suggest you replace all three fuse holders > and see how it goes. > > > Bob . . . > > Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes > survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane > out of that stuff?" > -- Best Regards, Bob Verwey 082 331 2727


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:36:35 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Conductor interface enhancements
    >Years ago, a sage at E.I. gave me a tip on said problem; this may >be heresy in your eyes, but I am yet to suffer ill consequence as >a result of this bit of advice... >He suggested a drop of ACF 50 or equivalent on mating >connections as a prophylactic to calendar driven >corrosion events which lead to "hot" joints, even in >crimped connections. > >Your thoughts? I can recall at least two times I was tasked with researching some form of contact enhancement/ preservative treatment for use on connectors while at Beech. Some of the products came with impressive presentations and credentials. Without a doubt, all of them performed as claimed . . . none of them were found to have deleterious effects. In each case, the products were found not to add value to our production processes. All of these products were tailored to enhancement of LOW PRESSURE interfaces where gas-tightness cannot be achieved. Connector pins/sockets are the most prolific examples of this condition. Our findings in no way suggest that one should not need/use these products given situations where benefits are inarguable. But at Beech, virtually all of our pin/socket connectors were specified and qualified to requirements that demonstrated resistance to the ravages of climate and time. All other connections strove to achieve gas-tightness in current carrying interface of a connection. By definition, gas-tightness prevents ingress and effects of moisture/ oxygen/contaminants. EVERY instance of joint failure analysis by this writer had root cause in failure to achieve enduring gas-tightness where materials, tools and processes were expected to achieve that goal. The fact-sheet for ACF-50 echoes risk factors like cracks, joints, seams, etc. It also claims effectiveness of up to 24 months. I cannot argue with anyone who has observed 'zero failures' for having used this product but I can argue for the gas-tight condition that renders the product unnecessary. Bob . . . Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane out of that stuff?"




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --