AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Sun 04/03/22


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 10:53 AM - Re: Re: Spark suppression diode on starter MOTOR (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     2. 10:55 AM - Re: Spark suppression diode on starter MOTOR (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:53:01 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Spark suppression diode on starter MOTOR
    At 12:48 PM 4/2/2022, you wrote: > >Batteries don't absorb the energy from inductive voltage spikes. Correct. A battery's ability to mitigate hazardous stimuli in the electrical system is limited to standing off a runaway power generation system for the very short period of time necessary for the o.v. protection system to operate (hundreds of milliseconds). This is a HIGH energy event (sometimes exceeding 10,000 watt-seconds). "Spikes" are short duration (less than 10mS) excursions generated by release of reactively stored energy (usually inductive, sometimes capacitive) and is a very low energy event measured in millijoules (1/1000th of a watt- seconds). These events are never a source of catastrophic system damage. They will sometimes manifest in transient mis-behavior of a system that has NOT been qualified to live in the legacy, aircraft electrical environment. >The controlling switch contacts do. As the switch contacts open, >an arc jumps across the opening contacts. The energy is dissipated as heat. Some years back, we had some deep-dives into physics and terminology of electrical transients here on the List. I produced a number of bench-top demonstrations illustrating the sources, effects and mitigation of low energy transients (true spikes). The attached plot was taken from one of those experiments. An S701 battery contactor coil collapse spike was plotted while being controlled by a toggle switch and NO coil suppression. Note that the maximum excursion was on the order of 250 volts impresses across the spreading contacts gap in the switch. An arc formed between those contacts which persisted for about 1.4 mS at which point the arc broke and remaining energy took the transient to its maximum excursion. Energy dissipated in this even was on the order of tens of millijoules. No single event being hazardous to the switch . . . but hundreds of events would eventually erode the switch's contacts. I couldn't quickly find examples of how much energy from such events propagates out onto the system during a de-energized non-suppressed coil event . . . but I have measured it. It's TINY . . . 99.9% of the energy is spent on the controlling device unless managed with appropriate suppression. Even if the battery WERE a valuable member of the spike suppression community, there wouldn't be anything for it to do! Two other images illustrate a study I did at Beech on another contact failure investigation. You can see the difference in burning and metal transfer of controlling contacts with no transient suppression on the loading device. >Starter motors have counter EMF that might limit inductive voltage spikes. True . . . but they are still quite stressful on their controlling device. This is why starter contactors are specially crafted for DOUBLE break contacts to increase contact spreading velocity for early break of the inevitable albeit CEMF mitigated arc. Perhaps one MIGHT improve service life of a starter contactor with some purposeful suppression of the arc but the contactor designers have pretty well slain that dragon. Bob . . . Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane out of that stuff?"


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:55:09 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Spark suppression diode on starter MOTOR
    At 08:06 AM 4/2/2022, you wrote: ><Tom.Costanza@gmail.com> P.S. Heres an article I posted about 22 years ago on the topic of spike suppression . . . https://tinyurl.com/y79ht8zm Bob . . . Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane out of that stuff?"




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --