AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Sat 10/22/22


Total Messages Posted: 7



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 01:24 AM - Analogue Engine instruments near VHF radio. (Bob Verwey)
     2. 05:08 AM - Re: Clarify Z101 (johnbright)
     3. 05:23 AM - Re: Clarify Z101 (wsimpso1)
     4. 05:39 AM - Re: ****SPAM**** Analogue Engine instruments near VHF radio. (Peter Pengilly)
     5. 11:29 AM - Re: ****SPAM**** Analogue Engine instruments near VHF radio. (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     6. 03:04 PM - Re: Contactor Failure (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     7. 03:34 PM - Re: Clarify Z101 (bcone1381)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:24:33 AM PST US
    From: Bob Verwey <bob.verwey@gmail.com>
    Subject: Analogue Engine instruments near VHF radio.
    Is there any issue placing conventional electric VDO guages very close to the " round hole" Becker comm?


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:08:00 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Clarify Z101
    From: "johnbright" <john_s_bright@yahoo.com>
    bcone1381 wrote: > > . > . > . > 3) Does your Electronics International CGR-30P Engine Monitor stay on line during engine start, or will it reboot? The installation manual says it works between 7.5 and 30V. -------- John Bright, RV-6A, at FWF, O-360 Z-101 single batt dual alt SDS EM-5-F. john_s_bright@yahoo.com, Newport News, Va https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1u6GeZo6pmBWsKykLNVQMvu4o1VEVyP4K Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=508138#508138 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/erase_882.jpg


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:23:28 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Clarify Z101
    From: "wsimpso1" <wsimpso1@comcast.net>
    user9253 wrote: > If the battery contactor fails open during flight (unlikely), how will the pilot know it? When the pilot pulls the throttle to idle, voltage drop from 14 might be noticed. A further point is to review the failure modes and their effects. Looking at things that way may be enlightening. With the battery contactor failed open and wired per legacy designs, if the pilot (for whatever reason) attempts a reset of the alternator, the airplane goes dark and the alternator will not be re-energized. Why would a pilot do that? It is an instructional tool used by some instructors and some pilots check alternator function this way. Not saying it is right, but it is out there. Seems to be pretty low likelihood... With the designs we find dear to us from AeroElectric Connection, we have alternate methods of repowering the fields of our main and aux alternators. Z-12 has E-Bus Alternate Field switch, Z-14 has always hot buses, etc. Failure tolerant design changes the rare failed contactor from a full blown emergency into a ramp failure, and a simple repair. Billski Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=508139#508139


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:39:10 AM PST US
    From: Peter Pengilly <peter@sportingaero.com>
    Subject: Analogue Engine instruments near VHF
    radio. It depends Becker comms do not consume much current when not transmitting so are unlikely to cause a problem until the PTT is pressed, if at all. The Van=99s manifold pressure gauge I had was very susceptible to EMI and would read zero when the PTT was pressed, even with the antenna in the back of the aeroplane. Some of the other gauges were less sensitive but I suspected the were not well shielded. The only real way to find out is suck it and see. A good grounding scheme will always help along. Some manufacturers recommend twisting the power wires, but I=99m not convinced that helps and it always assumes the power and ground points are close together which is often not the case. Peter From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com <owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com> On Behalf Of Bob Verwey Sent: 22 October 2022 09:23 Subject: ****SPAM**** AeroElectric-List: Analogue Engine instruments near VHF radio. Is there any issue placing conventional electric VDO guages very close to the " round hole" Becker comm?


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:29:48 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Analogue Engine instruments near
    VHF radio. At 07:38 AM 10/22/2022, you wrote: >It depends=85 > >Becker comms do not consume much current when >not transmitting so are unlikely to cause a >problem until the PTT is pressed, if at all. 90% of time, Comm Tx interference to panel accessories is due to deficiency in accessory design . . . not the fault of the transceiver. I've tested a number of steam guages that were affected by expected RF energy sources. Some were affected by extra strong signals like hand held transceivers and bubble canopy a/c with an antenna laid up inside the canopy behind the pilot's head. I've seen a couple of instances where a comm system with satisfactory service history suddenly becomes a strong antagonist to panel accessories. Both cases involved the shield connection to coax connector at the back of the radio becoming disconnected. This turns the coax feedline into an antenna that illuminates wiring behind the panel with strong RF. >The Van=99s manifold pressure gauge I had was >very susceptible to EMI and would read zero when >the PTT was pressed, even with the antenna in the back of the aeroplane. > >Some of the other gauges were less sensitive but >I suspected the were not well shielded. Agreed. >The only real way to find out is suck it and see. > >A good grounding scheme will always help along. System ground have virtually no influence on RF interference issues. >Some manufacturers recommend twisting the power >wires, but I=99m not convinced that helps and it >always assumes the power and ground points are >close together which is often not the case. A mythical practice not supported in demonstrable physics. >Is there any issue placing conventional electric >VDO guages very close to the " round hole" Becker comm? Vulnerability of the panel accessory can be roughly evaluated on the bench. Hook it to a power supply and use a hand-held vhf ratio to check for effects. If there are no observable effects with the handheld a foot or so away, the instrument is probably well designed for such issues. I've seem some Van's gages go crazy with the radio 2 feet away. Bob . . . Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane out of that stuff?"


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:04:02 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Contactor Failure
    At 07:22 AM 10/22/2022, you wrote: > > >user9253 wrote: > > If the battery contactor fails open during flight (unlikely), how > will the pilot know it? > > >When the pilot pulls the throttle to idle, voltage drop from 14 >might be noticed. This may not even happen with belt driven alternators. They often support light loads at normal bus voltage at taxi idle rpm. >A further point is to review the failure modes and their effects. >Looking at things that way may be enlightening. With the battery >contactor failed open and wired per legacy designs, if the pilot >(for whatever reason) attempts a reset of the alternator, the >airplane goes dark and the alternator will not be re-energized. Why >would a pilot do that? It is an instructional tool used by some >instructors and some pilots check alternator function this way. Not >saying it is right, but it is out there. Seems to be pretty low likelihood... agreed. but some alternators, particularly belt driven, will self excite at cruise rpms or even less. The Bonanza and Baron alternators will do it . . . in fact, it's a requirement. >With the designs we find dear to us from AeroElectric Connection, we >have alternate methods of repowering the fields of our main and aux >alternators. Z-12 has E-Bus Alternate Field switch, Z-14 has always >hot buses, etc. Failure tolerant design changes the rare failed >contactor from a full blown emergency into a ramp failure, and a simple repair. Speaking of contactor failures: There are two primary causes for contactor failure (1) loss of coil current which produces the magnetic engagement force and (2) degradation of switched power conduction path (worn out or corroded contacts). Perhaps we could consider a sub-set of (2), stuck or welded contacts. Loss of contact integrity is the most common . . . the thing just wears out or succumbs to environmental stresses. One such example is seen here: https://tinyurl.com/226jcjnl We've seen examples of coil 'failures' . . . this one was a manufacturing defect . . . failure to solder the joints! https://tinyurl.com/me767pxn In general, failure to energize is rare . . . electro-magnets just don't 'wear'. Most failures are due to compromise of the current carrying contacts and those will start to get 'fussy' before they absolutely quit. Had a hangar renter on our airport that bragged about getting his airplane started by rapping the battery contactor with a screwdriver. Contactors are cheap. The cognizant owner/ operator will replace one the FIRST time it gets fussy. A teardown of the old one is always in order too. Worn contacts? Signs of corrosion? Perhaps evidence of moisture ingress? Was it mounted with proper orientation (cap down) and a drain hole added to the cap? A failure to energize in flight is more likely to be in the contactor's control path. Lose hardware, bad crimp, master switch going south? Again, age and environment are the biggest stresses on switchgear. The ONLY switch I ever replaced on a piece of heavy iron was in a Beechjet where a $high$ toggle switch that carried very low signal current went 'open'. The tech I was working with got out his pen to write up a requisition for the $100 switch (two hours away in a warehouse). I got a constant current bench supply out of the crib, set it for 10A and connected the offending switch to 'dead short' the power supply. I wiggled the switch a few dozen times against the corrosion burning power source and put the switch back in the panel where it would probably run another ten years. If your project's low cost toggle switches with fast-on tabs are getting long in the tooth . . . the cost of replacing all the power management switches is an hour's effort and fewer dollars than a family trip to MacD's. That's why I've favored them from day-one. In any case, loss of a contactor or switch in a well considered architecture (even while airborne) is rare and no big deal. Bob . . . Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane out of that stuff?"


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:34:23 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Clarify Z101
    From: "bcone1381" <bcone1964@gmail.com>
    johnbright wrote: > > bcone1381 wrote: > > > > . > > . > > . > > 3) Does your Electronics International CGR-30P Engine Monitor stay on line during engine start, or will it reboot? > > > The installation manual says it works between 7.5 and 30V. Awesome, Thanks for hunting that down John! Feedback I'm getting fro a supercub owner agrees that it stays on line during start. -------- Brooks Cone Bearhawk Patrol Kit Build Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=508143#508143




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --