AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Fri 01/06/23


Total Messages Posted: 6



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 08:43 AM - Switch-Breakers (Neal George)
     2. 11:41 AM - Re: Switch-Breakers (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     3. 11:57 AM - Re: Switch-Breakers (Charlie England)
     4. 12:42 PM - Re: Switch-Breakers (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     5. 01:06 PM - Re: Switch-Breakers (Neal George)
     6. 03:54 PM - Re: Switch-Breakers (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:43:18 AM PST US
    From: Neal George <neal.george@gmail.com>
    Subject: Switch-Breakers
    Bob - What are your thoughts on using switch-breakers for items that are switched frequently, such as landing lights? Im under the impression that they should be reserved for occasional use items, such as Pitot Heat. Neal


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:41:04 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Switch-Breakers
    At 10:42 AM 1/6/2023, you wrote: Bob - What are your thoughts on using switch-breakers for items that are switched frequently, such as landing lights? I=99m under the impression that they should be reserved for occasional use items, such as Pitot Heat. There was a HUGE kerfuffle at Beech during my tenure there concerning failures of W31 series switch-breakers in Bonanzas and Barons. These ships used W31 switch breakers for ALL of pilot operated switches. It seems that SOMETIME during the Beech incorporation of these breakers, a change was made that removed a tiny bit of insulating material from under a spring. This was a new layer of 'swiss cheese' in the potential for generating a hazardous condition. Here are documents I've saved from the work product I generated for the failure investigation. https://tinyurl.com/2zttqpqt I thought I had a copy of the failure analysis narrative but that seems not to be in the library. Nonetheless, it seems that failure of all the jumper 'cable' strands preceded loading the spring with the current being carried in the switch. For light loads, this didn't seem to generate an alarming event. ONE of these switches in the Bonanza carried prop de-ice current. This switch would not be a high duty cycle device . . . none the less, one fielded aircraft suffered a failure of jumper strands followed by a catastrophic heating event in the spring that resulted in much smoke and bad smells in the cockpit. So . . . lots of slices of cheese had to line up to bring this difficulty to the forefront. But given that there were probably 80,000 switches out there in Beech products (Not to mention Cessnas too), This was not a trivial concern . . . ESPECIALLY since the existence of the insulator could not be verified by inspection. So, the short answer to your question is: "Probably no big deal. All new switches have the insulator." HOWEVER, keep in mind that when the pilot control device is combined with the fault protection for that branch, ship's BUS structure is extended to the hot side of each control . . . not unlike the special hat dance we do for the 5A crowbar breaker in fuseblock fitted airplanes. Bob . . . Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane out of that stuff?"


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:57:05 AM PST US
    From: Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Switch-Breakers
    On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:44 PM Robert L. Nuckolls, III < nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com> wrote: > At 10:42 AM 1/6/2023, you wrote: > neal.george@gmail.com> > > Bob - > What are your thoughts on using switch-breakers for items that are > switched frequently, such as landing lights? > > I=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2m under the impression that they should be reser ved for occasional use > items, such as Pitot Heat. > > > There was a HUGE kerfuffle at Beech during my tenure > there concerning failures of W31 series switch-breakers > in Bonanzas and Barons. These ships used W31 switch > breakers for ALL of pilot operated switches. > > It seems that SOMETIME during the Beech incorporation > of these breakers, a change was made that removed > a tiny bit of insulating material from under a > spring. > > This was a new layer of 'swiss cheese' in the > potential for generating a hazardous condition. > Here are documents I've saved from the work > product I generated for the failure investigation. > > https://tinyurl.com/2zttqpqt > > I thought I had a copy of the failure analysis > narrative but that seems not to be in the library. > Nonetheless, it seems that failure of all the jumper > 'cable' strands preceded loading the spring with > the current being carried in the switch. For light > loads, this didn't seem to generate an alarming > event. ONE of these switches in the Bonanza carried > prop de-ice current. This switch would not be a > high duty cycle device . . . none the less, one > fielded aircraft suffered a failure of jumper > strands followed by a catastrophic heating event > in the spring that resulted in much smoke and > bad smells in the cockpit. > > So . . . lots of slices of cheese had to line up > to bring this difficulty to the forefront. But given > that there were probably 80,000 switches out there > in Beech products (Not to mention Cessnas too), This > was not a trivial concern . . . ESPECIALLY since > the existence of the insulator could not be > verified by inspection. > > So, the short answer to your question is: "Probably > no big deal. All new switches have the insulator." > > HOWEVER, keep in mind that when the pilot control > device is combined with the fault protection for that > branch, ship's BUS structure is extended to the > hot side of each control . . . not unlike the special > hat dance we do for the 5A crowbar breaker in fuseblock > fitted airplanes. > > > Bob . . . > Not to mention the fact that two or three of them will pay for just about all the fuseblocks & fuses (and maybe some of the wire) we'd need to wire a decent panel... Charlie


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:42:49 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Switch-Breakers
    > >Not to mention the fact that two or three of >them will pay for just about all the fuseblocks=C2 >& fuses (and maybe some of the wire) we'd need to wire a decent panel... > >Charlie And there IS that! Bob . . . Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane out of that stuff?"


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:06:57 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Switch-Breakers
    From: Neal George <neal.george@gmail.com>
    Thanks Gentlemen =93 I don=99t disagree, but since I=99m refitting a Bonanza, I don=99t think I can go quite that far Neal George Not to mention the fact that two or three of them will pay for just about a ll the fuseblocks=C3=82 & fuses (and maybe some of the wire) we'd need to wire a decent panel... Charlie And there IS that! Bob . . . Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane out of that stuff?"


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:54:56 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Switch-Breakers
    At 03:06 PM 1/6/2023, you wrote: >Thanks Gentlemen ' > >I don't disagree, but since I'm refitting a Bonanza, I don't >think I can go quite that far=85 Hmmmm . . . yeah . . . that T/C parts list can be a real drag. Bob . . . Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane out of that stuff?"




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --