AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Wed 07/26/23


Total Messages Posted: 1



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 11:27 AM - Re: Re: Excessive Amperage (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:27:49 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Excessive Amperage
    Sorry to bug out on you last week. Had a death in the family that needed our attention. Been 'off line' for a few days. >Upon starting my IO360 (only 12 hrs on engine) I noticed the "Low Voltage" warning light did not go out (typically I get a flashing lite when battery relay is activated and light goes out when alternator >kicks in after engine start). I checked voltage and it was about 12.5v and the amperage was 37 amps. Increasing RPM from 1k RPM idle the "Low Voltage" light went out at 1.5K but the amps went up to 40. >Turning off switches/loads made no difference in amperage. >Inactivating the alternator brought amps down to 0. >I have a B&C 40 A alternator with the B&C OV controller. I suggest that when questioning such behaviors of a B&C product, the FIRST, BEST source of technical assistance is with B&C. They are most willing and able to work with you by phone or email and will be best able to ask the right questions to sort through your concerns. Questions they might ask at the outset: What's the make/model of your battery? Was the battery in a state of full charge when you started the engine? What was your observed alternator current at engine idle? How fast was the engine turning at the highest observed readings? Over what period of time were these observations made? What is a 'new' experience with battery recharge currents and durations with this configuration. I.e. were pervious behaviors more benign? Analysis: The fact that you saw 12.5v system voltage at low rpm and low voltage light still on suggests the battery was seriously discharged and chemically primed to accept a high rate of recharge. The fact that your alternator current 'topped out' at 40 indicates that the alternator is functioning as expected (they inherently self limit their output current). The fact that your low volts warning went out at higher rpm reinforces the suggestion that the battery was significantly low in state of charge. With information currently in hand, I deduce no anomalies in your electrical system's behavior. ==== <correction for last post> ===== > It's NOT physically > possible to OVERLOAD an alternator at idle. ====================================== Further, a properly integrated alternator should be bullet-proof with respect to damaging overloads. So if there's anything to be concerned about with respect to battery recharge currents after engine start, damage to an alternator is not one of them. >There are gizmos made to take control of the charge rate such that >it stays under the alternators design limits. >The marine and RV folks use these controllers to safeguard their expensive stuff. >Check out the various YouTube videos that deal with RV travel with the solar market. >Many have converted to lithium batteries for their solar storage and great power capacity. >They have the same problem, namely stock alternators burning up trying to supply max amperage at idle speeds. >Resulting in too little air cooling. >Companies like Victron, Renegy, etc., etc., make "Charge controllers" to safeguard the alternators from overheating. Solar charge controllers? I agree that Youtube CAN be a valuable resource for tapping the experience of others before launching off on your own 'adventure'. I used it heavily but find that perhaps 1/4 of the information concerning physics is factually correct. In your particular case, I suggest YouTube will be of no value since virtually ALL presentations will focus on fixing a problem you don't have. Virtually no one publishes videos on things that are working okay. I presume we're talking about a lithium battery. There have been suggestions for limiting recharge current with connection of two diodes back-to-back in series with the battery. This is NOT a current limiting technique. It serves only to insert a VOLTAGE DROP in the battery connection of approximately 0.8 volts. One can achieve the same result by adjusting the regulator set point down by the same amount of voltage (see below). The notion that adding diodes is an appropriate prophylactic against alternator damage is in error. Experience demonstrating reduction in alternator failure by the addition of these diodes HIGHLIGHTS a deficiency in alternator design, fabrication or installation. If the lithium battery featured in this thread is promoted as a plug-n-play substitute for an SLVA or even a flooded battery, then under normal circumstances there are no concerns for damaging an alternator. We're not in possession of sufficient information to completely resolve the ORIGINAL query prompting this thread. At the same time, there are individuals experiencing alternator failures which in my opinion are improperly diagnosed as to root cause. These failures are popularly attributed to the quality or style of battery installed. Repeat: A judicious alternator design and installation can't care less about the type of battery installed. If changing a battery increases likelihood of alternator failure, it's NOT a fault of the battery. I.e. the alternator is crippled. Although a battery supplier's fondest wish is to assume plug-n-play compatibility of their lithium offering, I suggest that competent literature suggests that recharging stress can be lightened by simply turning down the regulator set point. See https://www.powerstream.com/lithium-phosphate-charge-voltage.htm I have repeated and confirm assertions offered in this article. Note that LiFePO4 cells will achieve essentially full charge at any voltage above 3.4 volts per cell (or 13.6 volts bus). When your system is fitted with a remote bus voltage sense feature (like the B&C products), TARGETING an operating setpoint of 13.8-14.0 volts is not a bad thing to do. Bob . . . //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o======== < Go ahead, make my day . . . > < show me where I'm wrong. > ================================ In the interest of creative evolution of the-best-we-know-how-to-do based on physics and good practice.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --