AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Sun 07/30/23


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:14 AM - Re: ADS-B issue (David and Elaine lamphere)
     2. 02:59 PM - Re: Re: Excessive Amperage (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:14:10 AM PST US
    From: David and Elaine lamphere <dalamphere@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: ADS-B issue
    Its been a while, but I remember that the key for my ADS-B report was using flight following. Getting ATC involved. Did you make sure your reg number was set (instead of anon) ? Which ADS-B unit do you have? Dave Wittman Buttercup N365ED On Jul 29, 2023, at 10:28 AM, merlewagner2 <wagnermerle@gmail.com> wrote: Not sure if this is relevant to this forum but... After going thru major fixes on my Tailwind I had a couple of test flights to check things out. I took a look at Flightaware.com to see the flights and they came up but the airspeeds were very erratic. Positioning/tracking looked great, just airspeed was crazy. I decided to pull an ADS-B report from the FAA to see what that stated. They came back with no report found on either flight. They suggested I send in the GPS/Transponder for repair. Any thoughts on what would cause the FAA to throw out a flight, ie: not create a report. I don't have the detail on what info is broadcast on ADS-B so maybe someone might know of a document that explains the process. Merle -------- KC1DNJ General Radiotelephone Commercial SEL A &amp; P Building scale P51, rebuilding Tailwind W10 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=511166#511166


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:59:33 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Excessive Amperage
    At 12:56 PM 7/29/2023, you wrote: > >Looks like nonsense to me, too. Of course, I've been less than >impressed with EX since they 1st started hyping their stuff on the >VAF forum; it was obvious that their spokesperson knew a whole lot >less than they pretended. > >1st question about the graphs in question: Why is the supply voltage >changing, if we're talking about an aircraft (or car, or motorcycle, >etc) charging system? If properly sized, the alternator output >voltage isn't going to vary in normal operation. > >Makes me wonder if they were really trying to show the relationship >between charge voltage and charge current, which should have been >plotted as x/y, without time on the graph at all. We'll probably never know . . . and the document raises more questions than answers. I have no doubt about that itty-bitty battery's ability to sink 30A . . . but that's a condition that would probably occur only if the battery were severely discharged and then hit with an energetic alternator of some loosely defined setpoint. The article suggests that dropping the charge potential to the standby battery by ~0.6V would prevent this deleterious inrush. The lithium battery's ability to draw such currents is based in part on its internal resistance. Hmmmm . . . if 0.6 volt reduction is a 'magic' endeavor what would happen if we put some small resistance in series with the battery . . . say something on the order of 50 milliohms. Okay, try to stuff 30A thru 50 milliohms would get you a drop of 30 x 0.05 = 1.5 volts! That suggests any potential for 30A inrush just evaporated. Now, after the battery approaches full charge and recharge load drops to say less than 1A, then the drop becomes 0.05 volts . . . okay, no big deal. Even with our resistor in place, the battery WILL become full charged. What would one expect for a voltage drop in an 'emergency' situation? 6AH battery . . . endurance load of what? 4A? That would give you approximately 90 minutes endurance when the battery is new . . . 70 minutes at end of life. Okay 4A draw through 0.05 ohms is 0.2 volts . . . again, no device wanting power from that battery would care. Where does one get a 0.05 ohm power resistor? How about 5 feet of 20AWG wire at 0.010 Ohms per foot? It's certainly 'beefy' enough to carry expected normal loads with negligible effect on system performance while ADDING series resistance to the battery thus corralling it's willing to self destruct when charged from a 'stiff' source. But let's further examine a fundamental premise of that article: TWO batteries? If we've learned anything over the past 30 or so years here on the List is that TWO engine driven power sources beat TWO batteries by a light year or so. A second, seldom-if-ever-used s/b battery has the same preventative maintenance burden as the main battery. You are sorta obligated to do periodic cap checks to confirm ability to meet design goals. Oh, yeah, that's not too hard on a long cross country, you could provide a means by which that battery and its precious loads are cut loose . . . then see how long it takes for the voltage to drop into the 'worrisome' range. But that also means that you're going to recharge the same TOTALLY dead device over the remainder of your trip . . . then is when that 50 milliohm resistor comes in real handy. Yeah, not every engine will support two power sources. So fine, have an separate ENDURANCE bus that can be drawn into service should the ONLY alternator fail. NOW . . . you've got a ROBUST s/b battery probably 3 or 4 times bigger than any itty-bitty, fussy-fragile lithium device and a much simpler system more like that described here on the List about 30 years ago with ancestors to Z-11. Short answer, the EarthX article cited is short on physics and practical realities of robust system design. I suggest it's safe to ignore it. Bob . . . //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o======== < Go ahead, make my day . . . > < show me where I'm wrong. > ================================ In the interest of creative evolution of the-best-we-know-how-to-do based on physics and good practice.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --