AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Sun 11/26/23


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 08:13 AM - Re: Re: Alternator Voltage Creeping Up (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     2. 05:55 PM - test (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:13:36 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Alternator Voltage Creeping Up
    At 09:52 AM 11/22/2023, you wrote: >Bob, if you had to buy a regulator for an OBAM=C2 >aircraft with EFIS and EMS, and conventional >lycoming engine, legacy alternator, what would it be? Good question. I'm not a diligent observer of the totality of offerings in the market. There are no 'bad' or even 'poor' regulators with respect to voltage. Building a perfectly adequate regulator is a trivial design task. The legacy, 4-terminal 'ford' regulator has been manufactured by the box-car load for many years and is perfectly fine. The risk for this and regulators of similar architecture is predicated on a shared pathway for the regulator's voltage sense line and alternator field current. When this pathway is polluted with too many manufactured joints, resistances due to age can add up to a point where the regulator will (1) artificially raise the bus voltage by a few hundred millivolts and (2) ultimately become unstable due to prime directives: (a) maintain xx.x volts on bus and (b) meet field current demands consistent with (a) If the resistance in the sense/supply path goes up, these requirements may begin to 'chase' each other generating the rare but irritating 'galloping ammeter' effect . . . combined with a constant flickering of panel lights. Early Cessna single engine ships had over a dozen manufactured joints in this pathway setting up a potential risk for this effect. I believe other aircraft have suffer similar effects. I've only designed one 3-terminal regulator per specs supplied by the customer . . . all subsequent designs featured at least a positive voltage sense; sometimes both positive and negative sense paths. This provided for much improved performance over the lifetime of the regulator. The only regulators I'm aware of that feature a separate sense path is the B&C LR/LS series devices. I designed the first LR series circa 1985 (Voyager carried two newly minted LR-1's). From the get-go, B&C decided that any such product offered would be an ALTERNATOR CONTROLLER consisting of a remote sense regulator, built in over voltage management and active notification of low voltage. I used to pitch the LR series regulators over the counter at OSH by stating the product was THREE devices at $75 each . . . making the $225 price a bargain. There are many examples of separate sense architecture out there. Ebay has many by Lamar, ElectroDelta and others. But these are all used, PMA devices with price tags to match. None will include active notification of low volts . . . only a few will have ov management. Therefore, burdened with ignorance of any similarly configured products, the B&C LR3 would be my first suggestion. If one were strongly motivated seek lower cost alternatives, I'd go with a 'ford' 4-terminal regulator teamed with a crowbar OVM and a low-volts annunciator of some sort. The 'ford' regulator will be just fine if you minimize joints in the field supply line and fabricate with PIDG quality terminations. Bob . . . //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o======= = < Go ahead, make my day . . . > < show me where I'm wrong. > ======================== ======== In the interest of creative evolution of the-best-we-know-how-to-do based on physics and good practice.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:55:09 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: test
    Bob . . . //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o======== < Go ahead, make my day . . . > < show me where I'm wrong. > ================================ In the interest of creative evolution of the-best-we-know-how-to-do based on physics and good practice.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --